ABSTRACT

AIMS: To examine the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) versus low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in patients with cancer-related venous thrombo-embolism (VTE).

METHODS AND RESULTS: An electronic search of MEDLINE, SCOPUS and COCHRANE without language restrictions was performed through April 2020 for randomized controlled trials that compared the effects of DOACs versus LMWH on patients with cancer-related VTE. Summary estimates were reported using random effects model. The main efficacy outcome was VTE recurrence while the main safety outcome was major bleeding events. The final analysis included 4 randomized trials with a total of 2,907 patients. The weighted mean follow-up was 6.1 months. Compared with LMWH, DOACs were associated with lower risk of VTE recurrence (5.7% vs. 9.1%, risk ratio [RR] 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44 to 0.87; P = 0.01), driven by lower deep venous thrombosis (P = 0.02). There was no difference between DOACs and LMWH in major bleeding events (4.8% vs. 3.6%, RR 1.33; 95% CI 0.84 to 2.11; P = 0.23). The incidence of all-cause mortality was similar (RR 0.99; 95% CI 0.84 to 1.16; P = 0.91). Subgroup analysis suggested no differences according to the type of DOAC in recurrent VTE or major bleeding (Pinteraction= 0.53 and Pinteraction= 0.11, respectively).

CONCLUSION: Among patients with cancer-related VTE, DOACs were associated with lower risk of VTE recurrence and similar risk of major bleeding compared with LMWH. Future studies examining the subset of cancer patients who drive the most benefit are encouraged.

PMID:32556105 | DOI:10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaa067

05:04

In reply to this message

PubMed articles on: Cancer & VTE/PE

Thrombotic Risk in Cancer Patients: Diagnosis and Management of Venous Thromboembolism

Citro R, et al. J Cardiovasc Echogr 2020 - Review.