Significant controversy surrounds the comparative efficacy of
HCTZ and chlorthalidone. Most clinicians, including the AHA,
assume a class effect for these two drugs.15 However, class effects
can be legitimized only after assurance of equipotent dosing;
for antihypertensives, when they are not directly compared in
a CV event trial, it assumes that if two agents achieve similar
BP lowering then both achieve similar reduction in CV events.
With regard to HCTZ and chlorthalidone, this assumption is
unproven. Chlorthalidone is more potent on a milligram per
milligram basis and has a longer half-life than HCTZ (50–60
hours versus 9–10 hours).128 Based on a comparative study using
is unpopular because of increased side effects. Consequently, it is
Complicating this issue is evidence demonstrating that office BP
tends to overestimate the response to HCTZ, and the 24-hour
BP lowering with HCTZ is only comparable to other common
agents (ACEI, ARB, CCB, and even β-blocker) when 50 mg daily
than HCTZ.131 Although chlorthalidone is the most optimal
and evidence-based thiazide diuretic for B.A., HCTZ remains
currently accepted in the clinical environment as a reasonable
thiazide diuretic for hypertension assuming her BP goal can be
readily achieved with its use.
Loop diuretics produce a more potent diuresis, but a smaller
decrease in PVR, and less vasodilation than thiazide diuretics.
They are subject to a significant postdose antinatriuretic period,
which offsets their antihypertensive effect. Therefore, a thiazide is
more effective at lowering BP than loop diuretics in most patients.
Loop diuretics are usually considered only for patients with severe
CKD (estimated GFR <30 mL/minute/1.73 m2), left ventricular
dysfunction, or severe edema. In these patients potent diuresis
is often needed. Furosemide has a short duration of effect and
should be given twice daily when used in hypertension, whereas
torsemide can be given once daily.
Potassium-sparing diuretics (triamterene and amiloride) should
be reserved for patients who experience hypokalemia while on
a thiazide diuretic. With low-dose thiazide diuretics, less than
25% of patients develop hypokalemia, and most cases are not
Several fixed-dose products are available that include HCTZ with
triamterene or amiloride. Empirically starting all patients with
hypertension treated with a thiazide diuretic on triamterene or
amiloride to avoid hypokalemia is not rational unless baseline
serum potassium is in the low-normal range.
CASE 14-4, QUESTION 2: How should a thiazide diuretic be
risks for orthostatic hypotension, so starting at the higher 25-mg
daily dose is safe, and will have a better chance of lowering her
314 Section 2 Cardiac and Vascular Disorders
Hg reduction in DBP with a standard starting dose.81
CASE 14-4, QUESTION 3: B.A. is prescribed HCTZ 25 mg
daily. How should she be counseled regarding this therapy?
Several counseling points are summarized in Table 14-7. Some
lifestyle modification to maximize her response to drug therapy.
B.A. should be informed that diuretics lower both BP and risk of
CV events and that taking her dose at about the same time each
morning to minimize nocturia and provide consistent effects is
diminishes with time. Inform B.A. that missed doses should be
taken as soon as possible within the same day, but doubling doses
the next day is not recommended. The potential for hypokalemia,
which is easily identified and managed, and the need for routine
monitoring of serum potassium should be reviewed. She should
report these to her health care provider if they occur. Increasing
dietary intake of potassium-rich foods to minimize electrolyte
depletion is an option to minimize potassium loss. This should
be encouraged only with thiazide and loop diuretics, but not with
CASE 14-4, QUESTION 4: After 4 weeks of HCTZ 25 mg
daily, B.A. has no complaints and has not missed a dose.
She is exercising and is following the DASH diet. Her BP
values are 142/86 mm Hg (140/84 mm Hg when repeated).
Her fasting laboratory values are as follows:
All other values are unchanged. Last month, potassium
efficacy and toxicity of B.A.’s antihypertensive therapy?
Despite improvements with lifestyle modifications and
reported adherence with HCTZ, B.A.’s goal BP of less than 140/90
mm Hg has not been met (her BP average is 141/83 mm Hg).
No new signs of hypertension-associated complications are seen.
She should be encouraged to continue with her current efforts,
but other interventions are warranted.
Adverse reactions with low-dose thiazide diuretics (e.g., HCTZ
seen with placebo.41,43,44,57 Regardless, signs and symptoms of
in all patients treated with thiazide diuretics. B.A. has experienced
small changes in serum potassium and uric acid, which are typical
thiazide-induced abnormalities. B.A. should be questioned about
muscle cramps or weakness, which can be caused by decreased
CASE 14-4, QUESTION 5: Is B.A.’s potassium decrease concerning? If so, how should this be managed?
Most total body potassium is intracellular (∼98%). Thiazide
diuretics can cause potassium loss and can result in potassium
serum concentrations in the low end of the normal range.
serum potassium by an average of 0.21, 0.34, and 0.5 mEq/L,
respectively.41,132,133 This is usually considered mild, with serum
potassium concentrations reaching a nadir within the first month
of therapy and remaining stable thereafter. Restriction of dietary
sodium in patients receiving diuretic therapy has been shown
to reduce the loss of potassium, and should be encouraged in
SUBCLINICAL POTASSIUM DECREASES
The clinical significance of small potassium decreases when
serum potassium concentrations are still in the normal range
is controversial. B.A.’s potassium has dropped slightly, and her
current serum concentration is in the low end of the normal
the greatest decreases in potassium also experience the greatest
increases in glucose values,136 although this is not consistently
demonstrated in other analyses.137
Large outcome trials have demonstrated that thiazide
therapies.34,138,139 Because of the possible association between
the middle to high end of the normal range (e.g., between 4.0
and 5.0 mEq/L) in patients treated with thiazide diuretics.140 This
may minimize the risk, albeit small, of increasing fasting glucose
concentrations, and possibly development of type 2 diabetes.
combining the thiazide diuretic with a potassium-sparing diuretic
(including an aldosterone antagonist), or an ACEI, ARB. These
No comments:
Post a Comment
اكتب تعليق حول الموضوع