BACKGROUND: A paucity of randomized trials have compared prophylactic dose of unfractionated heparin (UFH) versus low-molecular

 

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A paucity of randomized trials have compared prophylactic dose of unfractionated heparin (UFH) versus low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for the prevention of venous thromboembolic events in spinal surgery. Our objective was to determine the most prevalent chemoprophylactic techniques in spine surgery.

METHODS: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education was queried for all neurosurgical residency programs, which were subsequently sent an electronic survey about prophylactic UFH versus LMWH in spine surgery for (1) degenerative/deformity, (2) traumatic, and (3) neoplastic pathologies.

RESULTS: Of 69 unique responding residencies, the first dose of chemoprophylaxis for degenerative/deformity spinal disease started most commonly on postoperative day (POD) 1 in 75.3% of neurosurgery programs, followed by POD 2 in 10.1% of programs, POD 0 (same day of surgery) in 8.7% of programs, POD 3 in 1.4% of programs, and morning of surgery in 1.4% of programs. Choice of postoperative chemoprophylaxis did not differ statistically significantly between UFH versus LMWH: 56.5% versus 36.2% in degenerative/deformity pathologies (P = 0.080) and 50.7% versus 43.4% in traumatic pathologies (P = 0.535). Three programs (4.3%) in both the degenerative/deformity and trauma groups documented no chemoprophylaxis. Neoplastic pathologies saw a statistically significantly higher proportion of prophylactic UFH (60.8%) compared with prophylactic LMWH (36.2%) (P = 0.037). One program (1.4%) in the neoplastic group did not utilize chemoprophylaxis. Two institutions (2.8%) in the degenerative/deformity cohort and 1 institution (1.4%) in the trauma and cancer cohorts reported "other".

CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic UFH was statistically more common than LMWH in neoplastic spinal surgery, but not in the degenerative/deformity and trauma groups (cohorts). Further trials are warranted.

PMID: 31525483 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

22:14

In reply to this message

pubmed: caandvteortroorpul

The impact of surgical duration on complications after transurethral resection of the prostate: an analysis of NSQIP data.

//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/corehtml/query/egifs/http:--www.nature.com-images-lo_npg.gif Related Articles

The impact of surgical duration on complications after transurethral resection of the prostate: an analysis of NSQIP data.

Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2019 05;22(2):303-308

Authors: Riedinger CB, Fantus RJ, Matulewicz RS, Werntz RP, Rodriguez JF, Smith ND