Abstract
Background: The risk of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) during adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer (CRC) is unknown. We aim to evaluate if the Khorana score (KS) can predict this risk, and if it represents a prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) through a post hoc analysis of the phase III TOSCA trial of different durations (3- versus 6-months) of adjuvant chemotherapy.
Methods: A logistic regression model was used to test the associations between the risk of VTE and the KS. The results are expressed as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). To assess the effect of the KS on OS, multivariable analyses using Cox regression models were performed. The results are expressed as hazard ratios (HR) with 95% CI.
Results: Among 1380 CRC patients with available data, the VTE risk (n = 72 events: 5.2%) was similar in the two duration arms (5.5% versus 4.9%), with 0.2% of patients belonging to the high-risk KS group. Rates of VTE were similar in the low- and intermediate-risk groups (4.8% versus 6.4%). KS did not represent an independent predictive factor for VTE occurrence. Chemotherapy duration was not associated with VTE risk. In addition, KS was not prognostic for OS in multivariate analysis (HR: 0.92, 95% CI, 0.63-1.36; p = 0.6835).
Conclusions: The use of the KS did not predict VTEs in a low-moderate thromboembolic risk population as CRC. These data did not support the use of KS to predict VTE during adjuvant chemotherapy, and suggest that other risk assessment models should be researched.
PMID: 32010236 [PubMed]
22:13
Photo
Not included, change data exporting settings to download.
256×256, 6.0 KB
22:13
In reply to this message
pubmed: caandvteortroorpul
Factors in the feasibility and safety of outpatient robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial or cervical carcinoma.
Related Articles
Factors in the feasibility and safety of outpatient robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial or cervical carcinoma.
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Jan 30;:
Authors: Matern T, Kang E, Lim PC
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Identify factors influencing the feasibility and safety of outpatient robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial or cervical carcinoma.
METHODS: A single-institution retrospective chart review of patients who underwent robotic hysterectomy for cervical or endometrial cancer between 2012 and 2016 was performed. Outcomes were measured by length of stay (LOS), which was categorized as an admit-to-discharge time of >12 h or <12 h.12 h. These factors were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression. Readmission rates were compared between the two groups using an independent-samples t-test.
RESULTS: Of the 254 patients, 150 (59.1%) had a LOS >12 h and 104 (40.9%) had a LOS < 12 h.12 h (p < 0.05)180 min, uterine mass > 150 g, start time after 15:00, history of venous thromboembolism (VTE), age > 75 years, body mass index (BMI) 35-40, and post-operative VTE formation. Patients discharged in <12-hours12-hours to be re-admitted (p = 0.92).
CONCLUSIONS: Robotic hysterectomy for the treatment of endometrial and cervical carcinoma is both feasible and safe in the outpatient setting, as >40% of patients were successfully discharged within 12 h with no increase in readmission. Multiple risk factors were identified for extended hospitalization, offering potential for the development of a risk stratification model to improve the efficacy of outpatient robotic hysterectomy.
PMID: 32008793 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
22:14
Photo
Not included, change data exporting settings to download.
256×256, 6.0 KB
22:14
Photo
Not included, change data exporting settings to download.
256×256, 6.0 KB
22:14
In reply to this message
pubmed: caandvteortroorpul
A Survey of Chemoprophylaxis Techniques in Spine Surgery Among American Neurosurgery Training Programs.
//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/corehtml/query/egifs/https:--linkinghub.elsevier.com-ihub-images-PubMedLink.gif Related Articles
A Survey of Chemoprophylaxis Techniques in Spine Surgery Among American Neurosurgery Training Programs.
World Neurosurg. 2020 Jan;133:e428-e433
Authors: Macki M, Haider SA, Anand SK, Fakih M, Elmenini J, Suryadevara R, Chang V
No comments:
Post a Comment
اكتب تعليق حول الموضوع