Search This Blog

468x60.

728x90

 knitted cord,

braided cord and twisted cord.

• Selection of the type of retraction cord depends on the clinician’s

preference.

• Largest cord which can adequately physically displace the gingiva

should be selected.

• There are a number of chemicals which are used to impregnate the

retraction cord to produce effective haemostasis.

Criteria for selecting appropriate retraction material

• It should effectively displace gingiva and produce haemostasis.

• It should not irreversibly damage the gingiva.

• It should not produce any systemic side effect.

• Chemicals which are commonly used with the retraction cord to

provide adequate displacement of the gingiva are aluminium,

potassium sulphate, aluminium sulphate, aluminium chloride and

epinephrine.

Epinephrine

• Although epinephrine is commonly used, its potential to produce

systemic side effect has been questioned recently.

• It produces haemostasis and causes local vasoconstriction, resulting

in transitory gingival shrinkage.

• It causes increase in blood pressure and heart rate.

• The amount of epinephrine absorbed depends on the area and time

of exposure to the tissues.

Contraindications

• Hyperthyroid patient

• Patients on monoamine oxidase inhibitors or tricyclic

antidepressants

• Patients on beta-blockers or cocaine

• Diabetic or cardiovascular patient

• Patients hypersensitive to epinephrine

Technique of using retraction cord

• The operating field is kept dry by using high-vacuum suction and

cotton rolls.

• Around 5 cm of retraction cord is drawn from the dispenser bottle.

• It is moistened by dipping in 25% of aluminium chloride solution.

• The retraction cord should not be touched with gloves, as latex

inhibits polymerization of elastomeric impression material.

• Cord is looped around the prepared tooth.

• Gently the cord is slipped into the sulcus using a cord-packing

instrument.

• Cord is first tucked in the mesial side and then moved buccally,

distally and lingually.

• Cord packer should be inclined towards the area where the cord has

already been placed.

• Cord is left in the mouth for 10 min and then removed slowly (Fig.

26-2).

• The impression material is injected in dry and clean sulcus area.

• An impression is made of the prepared tooth with a material of

choice.

FIGURE 26-2 Position of retraction cord in the sulcus.

Surgical method of gingival retraction

Surgical method of gingival retraction is of two types:

(i) Rotary curettage

(ii) Electrosurgery

Rotary curettage

• The aim of this method is limited removal of the epithelial tissue in

the sulcus while creating the chamfer finish line.

• This method is also called gingettage.

• It should always be done on healthy gingival tissues.

• The method was first described by M. Amsterdam in 1954.

• It was developed by F.J. Hansing and R. Ingraham.

Criteria for gingettage

• There should be no bleeding on probing.

• Sulcus depth should be less than 3 mm.

• The patient should have adequate keratinized gingiva.

Technique

• It is usually done along with cervical margin preparation.

• Torpedo diamond bur is extended into the sulcus up to half of its

depth to remove the epithelium.

• Chamfer finish line is formed along with the removal of the sulcular

epithelium.

• Abundant water spray is used during preparation.

• Cord impregnated with aluminium chloride is placed in the sulcus

for 4–8 min to control haemorrhage.

Disadvantages

• It has poor tactile sensation.

• There are chances of injuring the periodontium.

Electrosurgery

• It is used to enlarge the gingival sulcus by controlled tissue

destruction to facilitate impression making (Fig. 26-3).

• It consists of a high-frequency oscillator or radio transmitter that

uses either vacuum tube or a transistor to deliver a high-frequency

electric current of at least 1 MHz.

• It is also called surgical diathermy.

FIGURE 26-3 Electrosurgical electrode used to enlarge

gingival sulcus.

Indications

• Removal of inflamed or irritated tissues proliferating over the

cervical margin to be prepared.

• In situations, where retraction cord use is not feasible.

Contraindications

• Patients with cardiac pacemaker

• Use of topical anaesthetics (e.g. ethyl chloride or other flammable

aerosol should be avoided)

Advantages

• It can be done in irritated or inflamed tissues.

• It results in less or no bleeding.

• It is less time-consuming.

Disadvantages

• It is a sensitive technique.

• It is difficult to control lateral heat dissipation in this technique.

• It cannot be done in dry field.

• Foul smell during the procedure may be unpleasant for the patient.

• It is costly.

Commonly used electrosurgical electrodes:

• Coagulating probe

• Diamond loop

• Round loop

• Small straight probe

• Small loop

Technique

• Profound anaesthesia is given before beginning the procedure.

• All the connections are checked and the cutting tip should be

completely seated into the handpiece.

• Cutting electrode is applied onto the tissues with a quick stroke by

applying light pressure.

• Speed of the electrode should not be more than 7 mm/s in order to

avoid lateral heat build-up.

• The tissues should always be kept moist for best results.

• High-volume suction is kept adjacent to the cutting electrode to

ward off any unpleasant odour.

• A plastic-handled mouth mirror and wooden tongue depressor

should be used.

• The tip of the electrode should be frequently cleaned with alcoholsoaked sponge.

Electrosurgery is commonly employed for gingival sulcus

enlargement, removal of edentulous cuff and crown lengthening

procedure.

Techniques used for gingival retraction

There are different techniques which are used for gingival retraction.

Retraction cord impregnated with a medicament is common to all

these techniques. Operator’s choice and clinical situation are

important in deciding the type of technique to be used.

Common techniques for gingival retraction are:

(i) Single cord technique

(ii) Double cord technique

(iii) Infusion technique

Single cord technique

• This is the most commonly used method of gingival retraction.

• It is indicated when impression is made of one to three prepared

teeth.

• Approximate length of the retraction cord is selected depending on

the anatomy of the prepared tooth.

• The retraction cord is moistened with medicament of choice and is

placed on the prepared tooth with the help of cord packer.

• Cord is allowed into the sulcus for around 8–10 min before it is

removed (Fig. 26-4).

• Usually, the cord is soaked with water before it is removed.

• Tooth preparation is dried and impression is made with material of

choice.

FIGURE 26-4 Single cord technique.

Double cord technique

• It is used during impression making of multiple prepared teeth or

when tissue health is compromised.

• Small diameter cord is placed in the sulcus such that the cut ends

meet each other. This cord is left in the sulcus during impression

making.

• Second cord of largest diameter is soaked in haemostatic agent of

choice and placed over the small cord into the sulcus (Fig. 26-5).

• After 8–10 min, the larger cord is removed.

• Prepared tooth is dried and the impression is made with small cord

in place.

• After impression making, the small cord is soaked in water and

removed from the sulcus.

FIGURE 26-5 Double cord technique.

Infusion technique

• Dento-infusor with 20% of ferric sulphate chemical is commonly

used to control the haemorrhage during cervical margin

preparation.

• The dento-infusor or syringe is effective in extruding the chemical

into the gingival sulcus.

• When haemorrhage is controlled a knitted retraction cord is soaked

in ferric sulphate solution and placed into the sulcus.

• The cord is left in place for only 1–3 min.

• After this, the cord is removed, sulcus is rinsed with water, the

prepared tooth is dried and the impression is made.

• The time provided for the cord to stay in sulcus may not be

sufficient to allow adequate lateral displacement of the sulcus.

• Also, ferric sulphate may temporarily darken the gingival sulcus for

a few days.

Recently introduced materials in the form of synthetic polymers are

injected into the undisplaced sulcus. The material expands and

provides displacement and haemostasis. The efficacy of such

materials is not established.

Importance of impression making in fixed partial

denture

An accurate impression is of utmost importance for fabricating a

precisely fitting restoration. Most of the restorations in fixed partial

denture are made by indirect method on the cast in the laboratory.

This saves a lot of chairside time and is comfortable for both the

clinician and the patient. As the restoration is fabricated on the

working model, handling of impression material till the time it is

poured with gypsum product is important. Also, use of proper

technique is essential for achieving an accurate impression. There are

a number of impression materials available from which the clinician

has to choose an appropriate material.

Properties of ideal impression

• Should be dimensionally stable

• Should reproduce accurate detail

• Should adequately wet the oral tissues

• Should have sufficient elasticity after cure so as to facilitate multiple

pouring of impression

Ideal requirements of impression material

• Should be biocompatible

• Should have an excellent shelf life

• Should have pleasant taste, odour and colour

• Should be economical

• Should be easy to manipulate requiring less equipment

• Should have sufficient tear strength

• Should permit multiple pour without distortion

• Should have sufficient working, mixing and setting time

• Should be easily removed from the mouth after setting

• Should have adequate flow to record minute details

Various impression techniques used in fixed

prosthodontics

There are a number of impression techniques which can be used by

the clinician to make impression for fixed restorations. Selection of a

particular technique depends on factors such as time, accuracy, cost

and clinical acumen of the clinician.

Impression techniques can be classified on the basis of type of

impression trays used:

(i) Stock trays/putty wash impression technique

(ii) Custom tray

(iii) Dual arch or closed bite or triple tray impression technique

(iv) Segmental impression technique

(v) Post-space impression technique

Stock tray/putty wash impression technique

There are three methods of making a putty wash impression with

elastomers.

Advantages

• Metal stock trays are rigid and do not distort easily.

• Stock trays are readily available.

• It saves extra cost of fabricating custom trays.

Disadvantages

• There is a need for sterilization of trays.

• More impression material is required.

Method 1

• In this technique, a putty material is used to make a custom tray.

• First, one layer of wax is placed over the primary cast as a spacer,

removing wax from the nonfunctional cusp region which acts as

occlusal stop.

• Putty impression material is loaded on the stock tray and placed

over the wax spacer on the primary cast.

• This results in a putty custom tray.

• Wax spacer is then removed and the prepared teeth are injected

with light body elastomer and putty custom tray.

• This loaded tray is then used to make complete arch impression.

• This technique is considered to be most acceptable (Fig. 26-6).

FIGURE 26-6 Impression technique in which putty material is

used as custom tray.

Method 2

• This is a two-step technique.

• In the first step, preoperative putty impression is made intraorally.

• A plastic sheet is placed over the teeth to be prepared to act as

spacer.

• After the complete polymerization of putty material, the plastic

sheet is removed and putty material is removed over the teeth to be

prepared.

• The second step is done after the completion of tooth preparation;

the putty impression is then washed or relined with low-viscosity

elastomer (Fig. 26-7).

FIGURE 26-7 Two-step impression technique.

Disadvantages

• It is difficult to control wash impression material in the relieved

region.

• As the impression material flows into the unrelieved areas, it creates

a problem of hydraulic distortion of the putty material as it is seated

intraorally.

Method 3

• This is a single-step technique, also called squash or simultaneous

technique.

• Here, stock tray is loaded with putty material and the low-viscosity

elastomer is injected around the prepared tooth or teeth

simultaneously.

• Tray with putty material is placed over the prepared teeth.

• Impression is made once, both the putty and syringed materials

polymerize simultaneously.

• This approach should not be used, as it is not possible to control the

thickness and bulk of the impression material used.

• It is impossible to control the flow of either material onto the

prepared tooth surface.

• Usually, putty material displaces the low-viscosity material and

captures the prepared margin.

• Putty material lacks ability to accurately record details of the margin

(Fig. 26-8).

FIGURE 26-8 Single-step impression technique.

Custom trays

Advantages

• Impression material used is less in comparison to stock trays.

• Hygienic, as it is custom-made for particular patient.

• Uniformity of thickness of impression material decreases the

chances of distortion.

Disadvantages

• It is time-consuming during fabrication.

• It cannot be used in patients sensitive to monomer.

Indications

• When impression is made of distal most tooth in the arch.

• Where arch does not conform to the dimensions of a stock tray.

• Multiple prepared teeth.

Technique

• This is a single-step technique.

• On the diagnostic cast, two sheets of baseplate wax are adapted over

the cast.

• After applying tin foil substitute over the cast, acrylic resin special

tray is fabricated with acrylic resin on the diagnostic cast.

• Vents may be given on the tray to allow easy escape of excess

material.

• Tray adhesive is applied over the internal surface of the special tray.

• Medium body elastomer is loaded onto the tray.

• Low-viscosity elastomer is syringed over the prepared teeth.

• Loaded tray is then seated over the teeth to make complete arch

impression.

• The impression is removed after it is polymerized and evaluated.

Dual arch or triple tray or closed bite impression

tray technique

Advantages

• Less impression material is needed as only one section of the arch is

recorded.

• Both the arches are recorded simultaneously.

• Teeth are recorded in maximum intercuspation position.

• There may be less chance of gagging.

• It eliminates any mandibular flexure that may occur during

opening.

Disadvantages

• As the trays are not rigid, distortion of impression may occur.

• Sometimes buccolingual width of the arch is wider than the tray.

Indications

• It should be used in patients with existing anterior guidance.

• It should be used in patients who can completely close in maximum

intercuspation.

• It should be used for a maximum of two prepared teeth.

• There should be unprepared teeth (vertical stops), both anterior and

posterior to the prepared teeth.

Contraindications

• Patients with rapidly ascending ramus

• Presence of third molar

• Excessive soft tissues posterior to the last molar

Technique

• Fit of the tray is evaluated and the patient is instructed to bite the

tray. The occlusion on the opposing arch is checked using Mylar

strips.

• Mix a low-viscosity elastomer and load it in a syringe.

• Then high-viscosity elastomer is mixed and loaded onto the tray.

• The syringe material is injected onto the prepared tooth.

• The patient is asked to bite in maximum intercuspation position.

• Once the material is set, the patient is asked to open the mouth

slowly.

• Impression is then evaluated.

Segmental impression technique

• It is indicated in cases where simultaneous impression is made of

multiple teeth.

• It is indicated in patients where moisture control is difficult.

Technique

• Impression of the arch with multiple prepared teeth is made in

segments.

• Individualized custom trays are fabricated for each segment with

acrylic resin over the diagnostic cast.

• All the segmented trays should be able to seat on the cast

simultaneously.

• Tray adhesive is applied on each segmented tray on the internal

surface.

• Automix polyvinyl siloxane is loaded onto the tray and seated on

the segment of the arch.

• Once the material is set, the tray is not removed and another

segment is loaded and seated over that segment.

• Procedure is repeated till impression of all the segment is made.

• Then an oversized stock tray is used to make a pick up impression

with appropriate material.

• The completed impression is evaluated and poured.

Post-space impression technique

See Chapter 24.

Key Facts

• Electrosurgical procedure for impression making is contraindicated

in patients with pacemakers.

• Epinephrine should be avoided in patients suffering from

hypertension or cardiovascular disease, as it increases the heart rate

and blood pressure.

• Rubber dam should not be used when impression is made with

polyvinyl siloxane, as it inhibits the polymerization of the

impression material.

• Svedopter is usually used in mandibular arch when the patient is

seated in nearly upright position.

CHAPTER

27

Provisional restoration

CHAPTER OUTLINE

Introduction, 386

Definition, 386

Biological Requirements, 386

Mechanical Requirements, 387

Aesthetic Requirements, 387

Provisional Restoration—an Excellent

Diagnostic Tool, 387

Commonly Used Resin-Based Materials in

Fabricating Provisional Restorations, 387

Techniques Used for Fabrication of Provisional

Restorations, 389

Commonly Available Prefabricated

Crowns, 390

Limitations of Provisional Restoration, 392

Introduction

Provisional restoration refers to a type of restoration that is provided

to maintain the health of the prepared tooth until definitive or

permanent restoration is given. It is fabricated after the tooth

preparation and is cemented in the same appointment.

Definition

Provisional restoration is defined as ‘a fixed or removable dental

prosthesis, or maxillofacial prosthesis, designed to enhance aesthetics,

stabilization and/or function for a limited period of time, after which it is to

be replaced by a definitive dental or maxillofacial prosthesis. Such prosthesis

is used to assist in determination of the therapeutic ef ectiveness of a specific

treatment plan or the form and function of the planned definitive prosthesis’.

(GPT 8th Ed)

An ideal restoration should meet certain requirements necessary for

successful treatment. These requirements can be grouped into three

categories, namely, biological, mechanical and aesthetic.

Biological requirements

• It should seal and provide insulation to the prepared tooth to avoid

postoperative sensitivity.

• It should have a good marginal fit to prevent plaque accumulation

or food lodgement.

• It should have a smooth surface and proper contour to permit easy

cleaning.

• It should not impinge on the gingival tissues and should be

biocompatible.

• It should have proper contact with the opposing tooth so as to avoid

its supraeruption.

• It should have adequate proximal contact with the adjacent teeth so

as to avoid drifting or horizontal movement.

• It should protect the prepared margins of the tooth to prevent

microleakage.

• It should not have overextended or underextended contours to

prevent plaque accumulation.

• It should have appropriate pontic, in order to maintain proper

gingival health and aesthetic contours.

Mechanical requirements

• It should have adequate strength to withstand the functional forces

of chewing without fracturing.

• It should adapt well to the prepared tooth to avoid movement or

drifting of adjacent teeth.

• It should remain intact on its removal so that it may be reused.

• It should establish proper occlusal and proximal contacts.

• Anterior provisional restoration should have proper lateral and

protrusive guidance.

Aesthetic requirements

• It should satisfy the aesthetic need of the patient, especially in the

anterior region.

• It should be colour stable.

• It should be made of biocompatible material which is easily

contourable.

• It should be translucent and colour compatible with adjacent

teeth/tooth.

Provisional restoration—an excellent diagnostic

tool

Provisional restoration or interim restorations are an excellent

diagnostic tool used in fixed prosthodontics. Provisional restoration

serves as guide to determine whether the planned restoration satisfies

the functional, physiological or aesthetic requirement or not. Once the

diagnostic wax-up is done after completing the mock preparation on

the cast, the provisional restorations are fabricated with appropriate

material. This restoration helps in determining whether the proposed

treatment will satisfy the functional and aesthetic need of the patient

or not. The importance of provisional restoration in diagnosis is

magnified with the increase in complexity of the fixed treatment.

It is useful in:

• Determining the changes in centric occlusion and incisal guidance.

• Determining the changes in vertical dimension.

• Determining the changes in occlusal or incisal plane, tooth length or

contour.

• Aiding the diagnosis and treatment planning of periodontally

compromised teeth.

• Aiding the preprosthetic, endodontic and orthodontic procedures.

• Serving as an excellent guide in procedures such as crown

lengthening, ridge augmentation and pontic site preparation.

• Serving as a guide for the laboratory technician to fabricate the

definitive prosthesis.

Provisional restoration, therefore, proves to be a valuable diagnostic

tool which provides a blueprint for a predictable, functional and

durable definitive prosthesis.

Commonly used resin-based materials in

fabricating provisional restorations

The most common materials used for fabricating single or multiple

unit provisional restorations are resin-based materials. There are a

number of resin-based materials which are available in the market.

The basic properties of these resins are similar to each other but only

differ in filler composition, type of monomer and method of

polymerization.

The commonly used resin materials for fabricating provisional

restorations are:

• Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)

• Poly(ethyl methacrylate)

• Polyvinylethylmethacrylate

• Bis-acryl composite

• Visible light-cured (VLC) dimethacrylate

Type of Resin Material Advantages Disadvantages

PMMA (poly[methyl methacrylate])Most

commonly used resin for provisional

restoration

• High fracture toughness

• High flexural strength

• Good marginal fit and

durability

• Can be highly polished

• High temperature

increase during

polymerization

• Chemical irritant to

pulp due to free

monomer

• High volumetric

shrinkage

• Poor colour stability

Polyethyl methacrylate • Can be highly polished

• Colour stable and minimal

heat increase during

polymerization

• Low polymerization

shrinkage

• Decreased transverse

strength

• Less fracture toughness

and less durability

• Decreased surface

hardness

Bis-acryl composite • High modulus of rupture

• Good marginal fit

• Low exothermic heat increase

• High transverse strength

• Low polymerization

shrinkage

• Brittle cannot be used

for long-span bridges

• Limited shade selection

• Limited polishability

• Less colour stable

• Decreased surface

hardness

VLC urethane dimethacrylate • Less polymerization

temperature increase

• High surface hardness

• Working time under the

control of operator

• High transverse strength and

abrasion resistance

• Good colour stability

• Brittle, should be

avoided in long-span

bridges

No comments:

Post a Comment

اكتب تعليق حول الموضوع

mcq general

 

Search This Blog