22 Section I ■ Preparation and Support
3. Belcher v. Charleston Area Med. Ctr., 422 S.E.2d 827 (W. Va. 1992).
4. American Academy of Pediatrics. Clinical report—consent by
proxy for nonurgent pediatric care. Pediatrics. 2010;126:1022.
5. Bourgeois v. McDonald, 622 So. 2d 684, 688 (La. Ct. App. 1993).
6. K.A.C. v. Benson, 527 N.W.2d 553 (Minn. 1995).
7. Canterbury v. Spence, 464 F.2d 772 (D.C. Cir. 1972), cert. denied,
8. Berkey v. Anderson, 82 Cal. Rptr. 67 (Cal. 1969).
9. Dow v. Permanente Med. Group, 90 Cal. Rptr 747 (Cal. 1970).
10. Backlund v. Univ. of Wash., 975 P.2d 950 (Wash. 1999).
11. Miller v. HCA, Inc., 118 S.W.3d 758 (Tex. 2003).
12. Newmark v. Williams, 588 A.2d 1108 (Del. 1991).
Health Law Policy. 2000;17:84.
14. Wash. Rev. Code § 7.70.050 (2011).
15. Alaska Stat. §09.55.556 (Michie 1976).
16. N.Y. Pub. Health Law §Sec. 2805-d (McKinney 2007).
17. McQuitty v. Spangler, 976 A.2d 1020 (Md. 2009).
18. Solomon D. Informed consent for routine infant circumcision: a
proposal. NY Law Sch Law Rev. 2007/08;52:215.
19. Arato v. Avedon, 858 P.2d 598 (Cal. 1993).
20. MacDonald v. U.S., 767 F. Supp. 1295, 1310 (M.D. Pa. 1991).
21. Canterbury v. Spence, 464 F.2d 772,791–92 (D.C. Cir. 1972).
22. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Bioethics.
Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric
practice [reaffirmed October 2006]. Pediatrics. 1995;95(2):314.
23. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights.
Guidance to Federal Financial Assistance Recipients Regarding
Title VI Prohibition Against National Origin Discrimination
Affecting Limited English Proficient Persons. Available at:
http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/civilrights/resources/specialtopics/lep/
policyguidancedocument.html. Accessed August 3, 2011.
24. Novak v. Cobb County-Kennestone Hosp. Auth., 849 F. Supp.
25. Bendiburg v. Dempsey, 707 F.Supp. 1318, 1324 (N.D. Ga 1989).
26. Prince v. Mass., 321 U.S. 158 (1944).
27. M.N. v. Southern Baptist Hosp. of Florida, Inc., 648 So. 2d 769,
28. Superintendent of Belchertown State Sch. v. Saikewicz, 370 N.E.2d
No comments:
Post a Comment
اكتب تعليق حول الموضوع