Hyperuricemia is noted to be an independent risk factor for CHD, although it is
unlikely to be a primary cause of disease. Several observational studies have shown
a link between hyperuricemia and an increase in CHD (e.g., HTN, stroke, heart
failure, and ischemic heart disease).
18-21 Researchers continue to study the causality
and note that despite the apparent strong relationship, the subject remains
controversial. Impaired glucose utilization also has a relationship with
hyperuricemia. Because of these close linkages, patients who present with gout
and/or hyperuricemia should be monitored closely for the development of CHD and
Uric acid excretion is decreased in patients with renal dysfunction owing to
decreased glomerular filtration, and as a consequence, hyperuricemia is a common
finding. The use of xanthine oxidase (XO) in patients with hyperuricemia and chronic
kidney disease has been examined in low-quality studies with mixed results.
Currently, treating hyperuricemia in patients with renal dysfunction is not
recommended unless patients manifest gouty arthritis.
19,22 Appropriate monitoring of
renal function in M.D. by obtaining blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum creatinine
(SCr), and electrolytes is important for evaluating her risk factors as well as
determining drug doses for treating gout.
CASE 45-1, QUESTION 3: During the medication management clinic visit, M.D. mentions that her doctor
Overindulgence of alcohol has been linked to acute gout attacks. Alcohol intake was
examined in a prospective cohort of men with new diagnoses of gout from the Health
Professionals Follow-Up Study and found that the risk of gout is 2.5-fold in patients
who drink two or more beers/day.
23 Ethanol-induced gout or hyperuricemia has been
attributed to several mechanisms. M.D.’s episode of overindulgence of beer,
possible dehydration from vigorous exercise, and lactic acidemia from muscle
energy expenditure made the diagnosis of an acute gout attack the most likely cause of
her toe pain and inflammation.
QUESTION 1: E.J., a 52-year-old male school bus driver, reports to the emergency department with the
A definitive diagnosis of gout can be established by finding MSU crystals in the
aspirated synovial fluid of the affected joint. The absence of MSU crystals in the
synovial fluid, however, does not rule out the diagnosis of gout. Although joint fluid
aspiration is considered the gold standard for diagnosis of acute gout, it is rarely
done in clinical practice. If synovial fluid is aspirated from an inflamed joint, it
should also be analyzed for bacteria and a WBC count should be obtained. In gouty
arthritis, the WBC count is likely to range from 5,000 to 50,000/L.
the WBC count of the synovial fluid is usually greater than 50,000/L. E.J.’s physician
may consider fluid joint aspiration as a diagnostic measure if E.J. is agreeable and
the physician is equipped to conduct the procedure.
Because uric acid primarily is excreted renally and renal impairment is a risk factor
for gout, the serum concentrations of E.J.’s BUN and SCr should be measured along
with an SUA concentration, especially in light of his history of HTN and
hydrochlorothiazide therapy. Although infection, in particular septic arthritis, could
also present as sudden onset of joint pain and inflammation, it is not likely in this
case. An elevated systemic white blood cell (WBC) count may be consistent with
infection or gout. If joint infection is of genuine concern, synovial fluid aspiration
could differentiate between infection and gout.
Radiographic findings of the affected joint are nonspecific and generally
characterized by asymmetric soft tissue swelling overlying the involved joint. When
gout has been long-standing, bony changes can be noticed on a radiograph, along with
calcium deposition and increased density in the areas of soft tissue swelling.
Ultrasound and computed tomography are also used for diagnosis with the latter
showing early changes compared to a traditional radiography. (See
http://www.healthinplainenglish.com/health/musculoskeletal/gout/forexamples.)
A radiograph of E.J.’s elbow should be obtained if other musculoskeletal disorders
(e.g., bone fracture) are being considered.
Deposition of microcrystals (i.e., calcium pyrophosphate, calcium oxalate, calcium
hydroxyapatite) into joints can cause
acute or chronic arthritis in a manner similar to that caused by MSU deposition.
role of these microcrystals in causing acute synovitis has been greater than
previously expected because improved crystallographic technology (e.g., electron
microscopy, radiograph diffraction) can differentiate these diagnoses from that of
acute gout. Crystal-induced diseases tend to occur in older patients as a result of
prior joint disease, especially osteoarthritis (which is generally a disease of the
elderly), predisposing them to crystal deposition and acute episodes of joint
inflammation. Older adults are also more prone to microcrystal-induced arthritis
because these crystals generally accumulate for a long period and must attain a
sufficient concentration and size before they precipitate into the synovial fluid and
The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) first suggested classification criteria
for gout in 1977, which until recently have been commonly used for diagnosis.
2015, new criteria for the classification of gout were published via a collaboration
between ACR and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR).
criteria represent the best available evidence and incorporate a multifaceted,
objective approach to making a diagnosis. The ACR/EULAR criteria are streamlined
into 3 steps. The updated criteria now separate individuals with symptoms of gout
undergoing evaluation of joint fluid aspiration from those not undergoing this
In order for gout to be considered, a patient must meet the entry criterion (Step 1),
which is described as one or more episodes of pain, swelling, or tenderness in a
peripheral joint or bursa. If the entry criterion is met, the clinician moves to Step 2.
The sufficient criterion described in Step 2 evaluates the presence of MSU crystals
from fluid aspiration of the symptomatic joint, bursa, or tophus. If the patient meets
the criteria described in Steps 1 and 2, a diagnosis of gout is made. If fluid aspiration
is not performed or the results are negative, the clinician moves to the next step. Step
3 examines three different areas consistent with gout: clinical characteristics (i.e.,
symptoms, timing, clinical evidence of disease), laboratory findings (i.e., SU
synovial fluid analysis), and imaging findings (i.e., results consistent with urate
disposition, evidence of joint damage). Step 3 utilizes a scoring method for the
different characteristics associated with gout, and a diagnosis is made with a score of
8 or greater. A classification calculator can be found at:
http://goutclassificationcalculator.auckland.ac.nz/
CASE 45-2, QUESTION 2: Laboratory tests were ordered for E.J., and the results are as follows:
A radiograph of his elbow shows soft tissue swelling with no evidence of tophi. Does E.J. have gout?
Additionally, Table 45-2 discusses the EULAR propositions for the diagnosis of
E.J.’s objective and clinical presentation fulfills the ACR/EULAR criteria for
diagnosis, highlighted in Table 45-1. He presents with symptoms meeting the entry
criterion, however, and does not meet the sufficient criterion because he did not
undergo joint aspiration. When using the classification calculator, the final criteria
score is 8 [e.g., pattern of joint involvement (1), characteristics of symptoms (3), and
serum urate (4)]. A score of 8 is consistent with a gout classification.
Gout is one of few rheumatologic diseases that can be treated successfully and even
29 However, despite the availability of adequate
pharmacologic interventions, a survey of rheumatologists and internists in the United
States (US) found that drug therapy is often not used based on scientific evidence for
30 Another survey of US primary-care physicians found
that evidence-based treatment recommendations were made in only 52.8% of cases
of acute gout and 16.7% of cases of chronic gout.
31 Because these common practices
are contrary to current scientific data, the ACR Guidelines for Management of Gout
were developed to provide evidence-based recommendations for treatment.
European guidelines include EULAR and British Society of Rheumatology and
British Health Professionals in Rheumatology (BSR/BHPR) Guidelines for the
33,34 A comparison of recommendations from these guidelines is
CASE 45-2, QUESTION 3: What is the primary goal in the treatment of E.J.’s acute gout attack?
The primary goal in the treatment of an acute attack of gout for E.J. is to relieve his
pain and inflammation. Treatment within 24 hours of symptom onset is recommended
to rapidly improve patient symptoms. The immediate goal of therapy should not be
aimed at decreasing the SUA concentration with urate-lowering therapy (ULT). Gout
sufferers are most likely to have been hyperuricemic for several months or years, and
it is not necessary to treat the hyperuricemia immediately. Furthermore, a decrease in
the SUA concentration at this time might mobilize urate stores and precipitate yet
another acute gout attack. However, if the patient is already receiving ULT, it is not
necessary to discontinue therapy during an acute attack.
CASE 45-2, QUESTION 4: What are the pharmacologic options for the treatment of E.J.’s acute pain?
Acute gouty arthritis can be effectively treated in most instances by using
monotherapy with one of the following: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug
(NSAID), colchicine, or corticosteroids.
32–34 Each therapy has been proven
previous response or experience with an agent, and patient-specific factors (e.g.,
comorbidities, current medications, renal or hepatic impairment). Switching to an
alternative agent or add-on therapy may be considered in refractory cases.
Combination therapy is recommended in severe cases especially those involving
multiple joints. Treatment should be continued until patient is asymptomatic (usually
Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs
NSAIDs are the preferred first-line therapy for the treatment of acute gout according
to the ACR, EULAR, and BSR/BHPR guidelines because of their effectiveness and
32–34 Although only a few NSAIDs (i.e., naproxen, indomethacin,
sulindac) are US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for the treatment of
pain associated with acute gout attacks, most have been studied and experts consider
32,34 The choice of NSAID should be determined based on
patient-specific factors, and dosing should be consistent with the FDA-approved
recommendations for the treatment of acute pain and/or acute gout. GI bleeding or
ulceration and inhibition of platelet aggregation are two of the most common serious
adverse effects of nonselective NSAIDs. Both compound the risk of bleeding when
given concomitantly with anticoagulants (e.g., warfarin). Among the nonselective
NSAIDs, ibuprofen is the least likely to cause GI adverse effects and is perhaps the
safest nonselective NSAID for use in patients at risk for GI bleeding, whereas
piroxicam and indomethacin are among the worst offenders.
cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor NSAIDs are another option in patients at risk
for GI bleeding or when taking chronic anticoagulants because they do not inhibit
platelets at normal doses. Published data to support efficacy in acute gouty arthritis
exist for etoricoxib and lumiracoxib (withdrawn in most countries due to
hepatotoxicity), but these drugs are not available in the United States. Despite limited
evidence for use, celecoxib and meloxicam are available in the United States with
FDA-approved indications for the treatment of acute gout. A Cochrane systematic
review compared nonselective NSAIDs to COX-2 inhibitors for the treatment of
acute gout pain and found no significant differences in efficacy. However, the review
demonstrated increased cardiovascular risk and GI adverse effects with nonselective
The ACR/EULAR Gout Classification Criteria
Step 1: Entry criterion (only apply criteria below
to those meeting this entry criterion)
At least 1 episode of swelling, pain, or tenderness
in a peripheral joint or bursa
Step 2: Sufficient criterion (if met, can classify
as gout without applying criteria below)
Presence of MSU crystals in a symptomatic joint
or bursa (i.e., in synovial fluid) or tophus
Step 3: Criteria (to be used if sufficient criterion
Pattern of joint/bursa involvement during
Ankle or mid-foot (as part of monoarticular or
oligoarticular episode without involvement of the
first metatarsophalangeal joint)
Involvement of the first metatarsophalangeal joint
(as part of monoarticular or oligoarticular
Characteristics of symptomatic episode(s) ever
Erythema overlying affected joint (patientreported or physician-observed)
Can’t bear touch or pressure to affected joint Two characteristics 2
Great difficulty with walking or inability to use
Time course of episode(s) ever
Presence (ever) of ≥2, irrespective of antiinflammatory treatment:
Time to maximal pain <24 hours One typical episode 1
Resolution of symptoms in ≤14 days Recurrent typical episodes 2
Complete resolution (to baseline level) between
Draining or chalklike subcutaneous nodule under
transparent skin, often with overlying vascularity,
located in typical locations: joints, ears, olecranon
bursae, finger pads, tendons (e.g., Achilles)
Serum urate: measured by uricase method
Ideally should be scored at a time when the
patient was not receiving urate-lowering
treatment, and it was >4 weeks from the start of
an episode (i.e., during intercritical period); if
practicable, retest under those conditions
6−8 mg/dL (0.36−<0.48 mmol/L) 2
8−<10 mg/dL (0.48−<0.60 mmol/L) 3
The highest value irrespective of timing should be
Synovial fluid analysis of a symptomatic (ever)
joint or bursa (should be assessed by a trained
Imaging evidence of urate deposition in
symptomatic (ever) joint or bursa: ultrasound
evidence of double-contour sign
demonstrating urate deposition
Imaging evidence of gout-related joint damage:
conventional radiography of the hands and/or feet
demonstrates at least 1 erosion
American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) websites.
(≥0.24−<0.36 mmol/L), score this item as 0.
If imaging is not available, score these items as 0.
but should disappear with a change in the insonation angle of the probe).
joints and gull wing appearance.
EULAR Propositions for Diagnosis of Gout 2006
1 In acute attacks, the rapid development of acute pain, swelling, and tenderness
that reaches peak intensity within 6–12 hours, especially with overlying
erythema, highly suggests crystal inflammation (although not specific for gout).
2 For typical presentations of gout (e.g., recurrent podagra with hyperuricemia),
a clinical diagnosis alone is reasonably accurate, but not definitive without
3 Demonstration of MSU crystals in synovial fluid or a tophus permits a
4 A routine search for MSU crystals is recommended in allsynovial fluid
samples obtained from undiagnosed joints.
5 Identification of MSU crystals from asymptomatic joints may allow for definite
diagnosis in intercritical gout.
6 Gout and sepsis can coexist. When septic arthritis is suspected, synovial fluid
should be Gram stained and cultured for bacteria even if MSU crystals are
7 Serum uric acid concentrations, although the most important risk factor for
gout, do not confirm or exclude gout. Many with hyperuricemia do not develop
gout, and SUA concentrations during acute attacks can be normal.
8 Renal uric acid excretion should be assessed in selected gout patients,
especially those with a family history of young-onset gout, onset of gout at
younger than 25 years, or those with renal calculi.
9 Although radiographs can be useful for differential diagnosis and can show
typical features of chronic gout, they are not useful in confirming the diagnosis
10 Risk factors for gout and comorbidity should be assessed, including features of
the metabolic syndrome (obesity, hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia,
aA + B (%) is the percentage of fully (A) and strongly (B) recommended, based on EULAR ordinalscale.
EULAR, European League Against Rheumatism; MSU, monosodium urate; SUA, serum uric acid.
Adapted with permission from Zhang W et al. EULAR evidence-based recommendations for gout. Part I:
Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65:1301.
Comparison of ACR, EULAR, and BSR/BHPR Guidelines for Gout
Treat an acute attack within 24
hours of attack with any of the
following: oral NSAIDs, colchicine
Treat as soon as possible with oral
absence of contraindications, an
NSAID is a convenient and wellaccepted treatment
Treat acute gout with an NSAID,
colchicine, or corticosteroid and
continue until attack is terminated
NSAIDs or COX-2 is effective at
NSAIDs are drug of choice provided
Use colchicine 1.2 mg, then 0.6 mg
1 hour later. The 0.6 mg once to
twice daily until attack subsides
High doses of colchicine cause side
effects, and low doses (e.g., 0.5 mg
Use colchicine in doses of 0.5 mg 2–
Recommend prednisone 0.5 mg/kg
per day for 5–10 days. Intraarticular recommended for acute
Intra-articular aspiration and
injection of a long-acting steroid are
effective and safe treatments for an
Corticosteroids are effective for
acute gout in patients who cannot
tolerate NSAIDs or are refractory to
intramuscularly, intravenously, or
intra-articularly; the latter is highly
effective in monoarticular gout
Treatment of Hyperuricemia to Prevent Recurrent Gout
ULT is indicated in patients with
established gouty arthritis and >2
acute attacks per year, tophi, a
history of urolithiasis, and CKD
ULT is indicated in patients with
arthropathy, tophi, or radiographic
uncomplicated gout only if two or
Treat to a minimum SUA of <6 The therapeutic goal of ULT (i.e., Plasma urate goal is <300 mmol/L
mg/dL, may consider a goal of <5
symptomatic relief at <6 mg/dL.
dissolution and prevent crystal
(<5 mg/dL). Start ULT 1–2 weeks
after inflammation has resolved
inhibitor (allopurinol or febuxostat).
Allopurinolshould be initiated at 100
mg/d and titrated every 2–5 weeks
May use doses of >300 mg in renal
impairment if it is proper education
Allopurinol, an appropriate longterm urate-lowering agent, should
weeks, if required. The dose must
be adjusted in patients with renal
impairment. If toxicity occurs,
options include other xanthine
oxidase (XO) inhibitors, a uricosuric
agent, or allopurinol desensitization
Initial ULT should be allopurinol
increasing by 50–100 mg every few
weeks until therapeutic goal of SUA
<300 mmol/L to a maximum of 900
mg/d allopurinol (adjust as necessary
Probenecid may be used as a firstline alternative in patients unable to
use or intolerant to at least 1 XO
inhibitor. Avoid use in patients with
Probenecid can be an alternative to
allopurinol in patients with normal
renal function, but is relatively
contraindicated in patients with
Uricosuric agents should be used
only as a second-line drug in those
underexcreting urate and in those
resistant to or intolerant of allopurinol
first-line agent for prophylaxis
against acute gout is colchicine or
corticosteroids are recommended as
Prophylaxis against acute attacks
for up to 6 months of initiation of
ULT with colchicine (0.5–1 mg/d)
or NSAID (with gastroprotection, if
Prevent gout attacks by giving
colchicine 0.5 mg twice daily for up
to 6 months; if patient cannot
tolerate colchicine, NSAIDs or
COX-2 inhibitors can be substituted
Adjunctive Therapy to Prevent Recurrent Gout
Patient education on general health,
diet, and lifestyle modifications
includes limiting daily alcoholic
beverages, purine-rich meats, and
beverages/foods. Specifically, beer
and, to a smaller extent, spirits are
associated with increased gout
attacks; wine is less likely to be a
risk factor. Increasing low-fat dairy
protein has a favorable effect on
Optimal treatment of gout requires
pharmacologic modalities tailored to
specific risk factors (SUA levels,
prior attacks); clinical phase of
gout; and general risk factors (age,
comorbidity, drug interactions)
Dietary management: includes skim
milk and yogurt; favors soybeans
and vegetable proteins; restricts
intake of high-purine food (<200
mg/d); avoids liver, kidneys, shellfish,
and yeast extracts; reduces intake of
red meat; favors cherries, fresh or
Patient education and lifestyle
modifications (e.g., weight loss if
obese, reduced beer, and other
alcohol consumption) are important
units/wk (men) and <14 units/week
(women); two 125-mL glasses of
wine per day are usually safe; two
25-mL glasses of spirits per day are
safer than 1/2 pint of many beers
BSR/BHPR, British Society for Rheumatology/British Health Professionals in Rheumatology; COX-2,
cyclooxygenase-2; CrCl, creatinine clearance; EULAR, European League Against Rheumatism; GI,
serum uric acid; TID, three times daily; ULT, urate-lowering therapy.
The potential adverse cardiovascular effects of NSAIDs are of concern.
Cardiovascular risk associated with NSAID therapy has been known for some
time (e.g., myocardial infarction, stroke); however, newer literature highlights the
significance of this risk. Two separate cohort trials indicate increased risk of
cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients using NSAIDs after an acute
myocardial infarction. This risk was increased in patients receiving antithrombotic
therapy and was observed even with short-term use (0–3 days).
history of myocardial infarction, proceed with caution when considering NSAID use.
NSAIDs can also aggravate HTN, cause renal failure, inhibit diuretic-induced
increases in renal sodium excretion,
38–41 and decrease the hypotensive effect of
diuretics and other antihypertensive drugs.
42,43 Patients with CHD and renal
insufficiency can be treated for a short duration with nonselective NSAIDs, albeit
with much caution. The nonselective NSAIDs are safe for patients with stable,
controlled HTN when given for only a few days and with close monitoring of blood
Colchicine has been successfully used to treat acute gout for more than 2,000 years
despite little published research supporting its efficacy.
polymerization, it decreases the action of inflammatory mediators such as cytokines
and chemokines. Traditionally, colchicine has been dosed as one or two 0.5- to 0.6-
mg tablets initially followed by 0.5 to 0.6 mg hourly or every other hour, until joint
pain was relieved or GI effects (i.e., diarrhea, nausea, vomiting) intervened. To
minimize these significant adverse effects, the EULAR and BSR/BHPR guidelines
recommend lower doses of 0.5 mg twice to four times daily. However, the AGREE
45 compared a lower-dose regimen (1.2 mg to start followed by 0.6 mg in 1 hour)
with the traditional dosing and found significantly fewer adverse effects with the
lower-dose regimen and similar efficacy. A 2014 systematic review, combining the
AGREE trial with a separate randomized trial, found similar results.
colchicine has been marketed in the United States since 1961, it was never approved
by the FDA as safe and effective. The AGREE trial was the basis of the FDA
approval of a new registered colchicine product in the United States. The FDA
granted brand exclusivity to this product. Consequently, there are no approved
generic alternatives available in the United States.
47,48 The approved dosage is 1.2
mg to start followed by 0.6 mg in 1 hour for the treatment of acute gout and 0.6 mg
once to twice daily for gout prophylaxis with a maximal dose of 1.2 mg per day for
chronic dosing, which is also consistent with the ACR recommendations. Colchicine
should be used cautiously in patients with creatinine clearance (CrCl) less than 30
mL/minute and with hepatic impairment.
32 Colchicine has a number of significant
drug interactions that inhibit either cytochrome P-450 (CYP) 3A4 or P-
49 A thorough medication history is essential to assure safe prescribing.
Some common medications that interact with colchicine include digoxin, fibric acids,
statins, nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, erythromycin, and antifungals.
A table detailing significant colchicine drug interactions can be found online in Table
45-4. Common adverse effects include nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea.
Historically, corticosteroids have been considered second-line therapy due to the
potential for serious adverse effects and adrenal suppression when used long-term as
well as the risk of rebound pain when abruptly discontinued.
systematic review found prednisolone to be as effective as NSAIDs for reducing pain
from acute gout, and no differences in serious adverse events were observed.
Corticosteroids may be particularly useful for elderly patients or those with renal
disease or CHD who cannot tolerate NSAIDs.
3,34,50,51 Corticosteroid adverse effects
(e.g., osteoporosis, myopathy, peptic ulcer disease, central nervous system effects,
HTN, predisposition to infections) are not likely with short courses of treatment for
gout attacks. Glucose intolerance, however, can occur with short-term therapy. If the
acute gout episode involves only one or two large joints, intra-articular
corticosteroid administration is recommended by the ACR
34 guidelines, despite limited evidence. There is also evidence to support
the use of intramuscular corticosteroids especially for patients unable to take oral
When an occasional patient requires more pain control, a dose or two of nonopioid
or opioid analgesics can be a reasonable adjunctive therapy to blunt the pain of acute
gouty arthritis while awaiting the apparent benefits of NSAIDs, colchicine, or
6 Most patients, however, generally experience benefits from
NSAIDs, colchicine, and corticosteroids soon after a dose is administered.
Alternative regimens include the use of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and
interleukin-1 inhibitors (IL-1). The ACR guidelines recommend the use of ACTH
drugs, such as corticotropin, as an alternative to IM/IV corticosteroids in patients
unable to take oral medications; however, the significant expense may outweigh the
Interlukin-1 agents (e.g., anakinra, rilonacept,
canakinumab) have not been approved by the FDA for the treatment of acute gout. A
systematic review comparing canakinumab to intramuscular triamcinolone indicated
that canakinumab was more effective in pain reduction during an acute flare;
however, it had significantly higher serious and nonserious adverse effects.
ACR guidelines recommend reserving these agents for situations where traditional
medications are contraindicated to ineffective until there is a clearer idea of the risk
32 As with the ACTH medications, the cost of IL-agents may
Cobicistat May increase the return concentration of colchicine. Management: Colchicine
is contraindicated in patients with impaired renal or hepatic function who are
also receiving a strong CYP3A4 inhibiter like cobicistat. In those with normal
renal and hepatic function, reduce colchicine dose as directed. Consider
Conivaptan May increase the serum concentration of CYP3A4 substrates. Avoid
Cyanocobalamin Colchicine may decrease the serum concentration of cyanocobalamin. Monitor
CYP3A4 inhibitors (moderate) May increase the serum concentration of colchicine. Management: Reduce
colchicine dose as directed when using with a moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor,
and increase monitoring for colchicine-related iconicity. Use extra caution in
patients with impaired renal and/or hepatic function.
Consider therapy modification.
is contraindicated in patients with impaired renal or hepatic function who are
also receiving a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor. In those with normal renal and
hepatic function, reduce colchicine dose as directed.
Consider therapy modification.
Dasatinib May increase the serum concentration of CYP3A4 substrates. Monitor
Digoxin May increase the serum concentration of colchicine. Monitor therapy.
Fibric acid derivatives May enhance the myopathic (rhabdomyolysis) effect of colchicine. Monitor
Fosamprenavir May increase the serum concentration of colchicine. Management: Colchicine
is contraindicated in patients with impaired renal or hepatic function who are
receiving ritonavir-boosted fosamprenavir. In those with normal renal and
hepatic function, reduce colchicine dose as directed.
Consider therapy modification.
Fusidic acid (systemic) May increase the serum concentration of CYP3A4 substrates. Avoid
HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors Colchicine may enhance the myopathic (rhabdomyolysis) effect of HMG-CoA
reductase inhibitors. Colchicine may increase the serum concentration of
HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Consider therapy modification.
Idelalisib May increase the serum concentration of CYP3A4 substrates. Avoid
Luliconazole May increase the serum concentration of CYP3A4 substrates. Monitor
Mifepristone May increase the serum concentration of CYP3A4 substrates. Management:
Minimize doses of CYP3A4 substrates, and monitor for increased
concentrations/toxicity during and 2 weeks following treatment with
mifepristone. Avoid cyclosporine, dihydroergotamine, ergotamine, fentanyl,
pinacide, quinidine, sirolimus, and tacrolimus. Consider therapy modification.
Colchicine may decrease the serum concentration of multivitamins/fluoride
(with ADE). Specifically, colchicine may decrease absorption of
cyanocobalamin (vitamin B12). Monitor therapy.
Colchicine may decrease the serum concentration of multivitamins/minerals
(with ADEK, folate, iron). Specifically, colchicine may decrease the serum
concentration of cyanocobalamin. Monitor therapy.
Colchicine may decrease the serum concentration of multivitamins/minerals
(with AE, no iron). Specifically, colchicine may decrease absorption of
cyanocobalamin (vitamin B12). Monitor therapy.
P-glycoprotein inducers may also further limit the distribution of P-glycoprotein
substrates to specific cells/issues/organs where P-glycoprotein is present in
large amounts (e.g., brain, T-lymphocytes, testes).
into certain issues (e.g., brain) may also be increased. Management:
Colchicine is contraindicated in patients with impaired renal or hepatic function
who are also receiving a P-glycoprotein inhibitor. In those with normal renal
and hepatic function, reduce colchicine dose as directed. Consider therapy
Stiripentol May increase the serum concentration of CYP3A4 substrates. Management:
Use of stiripentol with CYP3A4 substrates that are considered to have a
narrow therapeutic index should be avoided because of the increased risk for
adverse effects and toxicity. Any CYP3A4 substrate used with stiripentol
requires closer monitoring. Consider therapy modification.
Telaprevir May increase the serum concentration of colchicine. Management: Colchicine
should not be used with telaprevir in patients with impaired renal or hepatic
function. In those with normal renal and hepatic function, reduced colchicine
doses (as directed) are required if used with telaprevir.
Consider therapy modification.
Tipranavir May increase the serum concentration of colchicine. Management: Colchicine
should not be used with tipranavir in patients with impaired renal or hepatic
function. In those with normal renal and hepatic function, reduced colchicine
doses (as directed) are required if used with tipranavir.
Consider therapy modification.
Source: Facts & Comparisons eAnswers; http://online.factsandcomparisons.com/MonoDisp.aspx?
No comments:
Post a Comment
اكتب تعليق حول الموضوع