Table 50-4

Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonists

GnRH Agonist (Brand

Name) Strength Dosage Form Dosage Regimen

Nafarelin (Synarel) 2 mg/mL delivers 200

mcg/spray

Intranasal 200–800 mcg BID

Leuprolide (Lupron) 3.75 mg, 11.25 mg IM depot 3.75 mg/month or 11.25

mg every 3 months

Goserelin (Zoladex) 3.6 mg, 10.8 mg SC implant 3.6 mg implant every

month or 10. 8 mg implant

every 3 months

BID, 2 times daily; GnRH, gonadotropin-releasing hormone; IM, intramuscular; SC, subcutaneous.

Aromatase Inhibitors

The most recently studied therapy for endometriosis, aromatase inhibitors (AIs), was

originally developed for use in patients with breast cancer. Aromatase, the enzyme

responsible for the synthesis of estrogens, is required for the conversion of

androstenedione and testosterone to estrone and estradiol.

130 Although AIs, OCs,

progestins, and GnRH agonists all decrease serum levels of estrogen, only AIs

decrease secretion and production of estrogen by endometrial tissue itself.

Anastrozole and letrozole are type II AIs, binding reversibly to the enzyme to

produce a beneficial effect on endometriosis symptoms.

130 Although AIs effectively

decrease estrogen conversion in the periphery, addition of an agent to reduce ovarian

estrogen levels is also necessary in premenopausal women; hence, most of the

studies in this population have included double therapy with AIs and oral

contraceptives or GnRH analog. AIs may be used alone in postmenopausal women.

130

Although the end result of GnRH agonists and AIs is similar, the adverse effects of

the AIs are decreased, with fewer hot flashes, and primarily mild headache, nausea,

and diarrhea. Although few long-term trials have been conducted, decreased bone

density is suspected with the use of AIs and estrogen add-back therapy is appropriate

(described later in this section and Case 50-4, Question 1). All AI studies, although

small, have demonstrated reduction in pain and reduced lesion size. The largest study

to date used a combination of anastrozole with GnRH agonists compared with GnRH

agonists alone in patients after surgery.

131 Although effective at controlling pain, the

combination resulted in significantly more bone loss than either regimen alone at 6

months, but no difference was seen at the 2-year follow-up.

131 Further research is

needed to determine the role of AIs in the treatment of endometriosis, because

currently they do not have an FDA indication for the treatment of endometriosis.

Their use should be reserved at this time for those patients with severe endometriosis

who have failed other therapies.

Danazol

Danazol, an androgenic drug derived from 17-ethinyl testosterone, also induces a

pseudomenopausal state by increasing androgen levels and decreasing estrogen

levels. It inhibits the enzymes involved in ovarian steroidogenesis and increases the

metabolic clearance of estradiol. By creating a hypoestrogenic, hypoprogestogenic

state, danazol causes anovulation, amenorrhea, and atrophy of endometrial implants.

Although effective at decreasing pelvic pain, danazol is poorly tolerated because of

its significant side effects, which include weight gain, voice changes, edema, acne,

hot flashes, vaginal dryness, hirsutism, liver disease, and increased cholesterol; these

occur in up to 85% of treated patients.

106 Because of safety concerns, use should be

limited to 6 months at a time and should only be initiated in women after all other

therapy options have failed.

Emerging Agents

Two new medication classes hold promise for the treatment of endometriosis, with

the hope of decreased side effects when compared with current therapy. HMG-CoA

reductase inhibitors (Statins) have been studied in one small clinical trial in

comparison with a GnRH analog and were found to have similar efficacy in

providing pain relief.

132 Further investigation needs to be done with these agents

particularly in women who wish to retain the option of fertility.

An additional emerging group of therapeutic agents is the GnRH antagonists,

thought to maintain the beneficial effects on pain control in endometriosis, but with

decreased side effects. When compared to depot medroxyprogesterone, the first agent

in this class studied for endometriosis, elagolix, (a once-daily oral medication)

demonstrated noninferiority in its effects on pain control, with little effect on bone

density.

133

PAIN MANAGEMENT: NONPHARMACOLOGIC THERAPY

Definitive Surgery

Definitive surgery, referring to total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingooophorectomy, and removal of all visible endometriosis, theoretically should

eliminate the risk of recurrence of the disease. These procedures are not an option for

many women with endometriosis who desire pregnancy in the future. It is invasive

surgery, reserved for those patients whose pain is unresponsive to other therapies or

to conservative surgery. Furthermore, removal of all endometriosis is difficult, and

recurring pain is not uncommon. Sinaii et al. surveyed patients with endometriosis

regarding treatments and benefits, and found that, of the 1,160 women surveyed, 12%

had had definitive surgery, with 40% reporting the surgery was successful, 33%

reporting partial benefit, 5.6% reporting no benefit, and 6% of patients actually

reported increased pain and symptoms after surgery.

134

Conservative Surgery

In contrast to definitive surgery, conservative surgery (involving ablation and

removal of implants, and lysis of adhesions) preserves fertility and is commonly

conducted during the initial diagnostic laparoscopy. In the Sinaii et al. survey, 70%

of patients had undergone laparoscopy with removal of lesions, with 30%

considering the procedure a success, 50% reporting partial benefit, 15% with no

difference in symptoms, and 10% reporting increased symptoms.

134 On average,

women reported having three surgical procedures.

134 Drug treatment is used after

conservative surgery, because it is not possible to remove all lesions, many of which

are difficult to visualize.

p. 1020

p. 1021

Clinical trials in endometriosis have not singled out one treatment as the treatment

of choice for all women, with most investigations demonstrating equivalence of the

studied therapies. An NSAID and combined hormonal contraception (e.g., N.H.’s

contraceptive vaginal ring) are the drugs of choice for initial management, owing to

their safety profile and, in this case, the contraceptive agent’s dual utility in

preventing conception. As a next step, progestins, GnRH agonists, and AIs are

options. Because of adverse effects and poor tolerability, danazol should be reserved

as an agent of last choice. If N.H. were uninterested in having children in the future,

surgical sterilization would be an option. Conservative surgery, including removal of

endometriomas and adhesions and ablation of visible lesions, is not curative, but may

provide pain relief in 50% to 95% of patients at 1 year.

129 A combination of

conservative surgery, followed by postoperative progestin, combined hormonal

contraceptive, GnRH agonists, or danazol, has been shown to prolong the duration of

pain relief and decrease recurrence after surgery.

129

CASE 50-3, QUESTION 3: N.H. has not had a problem in the past tolerating a variety of contraceptive

products, but does have some problems with daily medication adherence, and would like to avoid giving herself

injections if possible. How does this information assist in the selection of therapy for her endometriosis?

N.H. is a smoker, with poor calcium intake and some cardiovascular risk factors

(family history, high cholesterol), who would rather avoid injectable medication and

has trouble with daily medication taking. Danazol, with its ability to increase

cardiovascular risk factors and extensive side effects, is not a good option. Although

some GnRH analogs are available as nasal sprays or injectable implants, the

significant risk of decreased bone density and menopause-like adverse effects place

them as a second-line option. Progestins, particularly the long-acting progestins,

either in the form of the medroxyprogesterone acetate 3-month depot or subcutaneous

injection, or the levonorgestrel IUS, make these appropriate first-line options for

N.H., although the risk of diminished bone density with depot formulations remains

an issue.

CASE 50-3, QUESTION 4: N.H. would like to start the levonorgestrel IUS, but her insurance company will

not pay for it to be used in the treatment of endometriosis because of its lack of FDA indication. She decides to

start depot medroxyprogesterone acetate. What information can you provide her regarding use, and the benefits

and risks of treatment?

Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) is available in two dosage forms:

150 mg to be given intramuscularly (IM) every 3 months and a 104-mg formulation

given subcutaneously (SC) every 3 months. Product choice may be based on

insurance coverage or potential for the patient to self-administer (the SC product may

be more patient-friendly). Because N.H. does not want to self-inject, either choice,

administered by her provider’s office, or a pharmacist if law allows, would be an

appropriate option. Although the DMPA does provide the contraception N.H.

desires, she should be informed that it may take longer than usual (up to 1 year) to

become pregnant after its use. More than 80% of patients treated with progestins will

experience partial or complete pain relief.

123 Although devoid of the menopause-like

adverse effects of other medications used to treat endometriosis, DMPA is

associated with weight gain (which may be significant in some patients), bloating,

and irregular periods or bleeding for several months, with most users eventually

experiencing amenorrhea. To reduce bone density loss, which is significant but less

than with GnRH agonists, N.H. should be advised to ensure her daily intake by diet

or supplementation of calcium is at least 1,000 mg/day and at least 400 to 600 IU of

vitamin D/day, receive smoking cessation counseling and pharmacotherapy as

appropriate, and start a regular weight-bearing exercise regimen.

135 She should be

monitored for pain relief, weight gain, amenorrhea or bleeding changes, and

adherence to the quarterly injections. When N.H. desires conception, significant

planning is required and she may require a different therapy for her endometriosis

because she regains fertility.

GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING HORMONE AGONISTS AND ADD-BACK

THERAPY

CASE 50-4

QUESTION 1: M.F., a 24-year-old single woman with a history of moderate-to-severe endometriosis, has

been treated with some benefit with NSAIDs (three different NSAIDs at appropriate doses), combined oral

contraceptives, and the levonorgestrel IUS. She has no desire for conception and is looking for pain relief. She

has also had two conservative laparoscopic surgical procedures, each of which was successful, with pain relief

lasting 6 months to 1 year. She recently had her “last ever” (by her description) surgical procedure and is

looking to extend the improvement she has seen previously after surgery. She does not mind injections, but has

had trouble with adherence in the past. What options are available for the treatment of M.F.’s pain?

M.F. has tried numerous pharmacologic and surgical treatments (NSAIDs,

combined oral contraception, and progestin-only contraception) for endometriosis

with limited benefit. Given that she does not desire pregnancy at this time, GnRH

analogs, aromatase inhibitors, and danazol are other options. Leuprolide, nafarelin,

and goserelin are GnRH analogs (agonists) typically used for the treatment of

endometriosis (Table 50-4). Although GnRH analogs have not been shown to

produce better results than the therapies M.F. has already used, they may provide her

with pain relief. Choice of GnRH agonist is driven by patient choice of

administration method (nasal twice daily [BID] with nafarelin, monthly SC implant

with goserelin, or IM injection either once monthly or once every 3 months with

leuprolide). In M.F.’s case, the once every 3 months dosing with leuprolide would be

most desirable for her, eliminating the need for daily administration. Efficacy is

similar for all the GnRH agonists. Before use of these agents, pregnancy,

undiagnosed vaginal bleeding, and breastfeeding should be ruled out. Because M.F.

does not desire conception, and use of the GnRH agonists is contraindicated in

pregnancy, she should be counseled regarding choices of nonhormonal contraceptive

agents.

Onset of response to GnRH therapy depends on the phase in the menstrual cycle

during which the agent is initiated. Administration beginning in the luteal phase

causes decreased estrogen levels within 2 to 3 weeks, and amenorrhea within 4 to 5

weeks versus the 6 to 8 weeks if started in the follicular phase.

99

Usual therapy duration is 6 months, although a small pilot study suggested longterm treatment (up to 10 years) with estrogen add-back therapy is without major

adverse effects, with continued efficacy.

136 Add-back therapy is based on the concept

of an estrogen threshold hypothesis, formulated by Barbieri,

112 which states that there

is a critical amount of estrogen that exacerbates endometriosis, and below that level

the presence of estrogen serves to decrease adverse effects but does not have an

adverse effect on the disease itself. Add-back therapy should be initiated at the

beginning of GnRH agonist therapy to try to reduce the occurrence of all

hypoestrogenic adverse effects.

136

Estrogen-containing OCs contain a dose of estrogen that is above the threshold,

and they should not be used for add-back therapy. Doses

p. 1021

p. 1022

of estrogen equivalent to 0.625 mg of conjugated equine estrogen have been

studied in combination with either medroxyprogesterone 2.5 mg daily, or

norethindrone 5 mg daily. This dose of norethindrone alone, or a dose of 20 mg of

medroxyprogesterone alone, has also demonstrated benefit.

106 To prevent bone loss, a

regimen of a progestin plus a bisphosphonate has been studied with positive results.

No studies have demonstrated superior efficacy or safety of one regimen over

another. Women using add-back therapy should consume in diet or supplement a total

of 1,000 mg of calcium daily, and have vitamin D levels in the normal range.

111

Therapy beyond 3 to 6 months requires the use of add-back therapy to reduce the

risk of hypoestrogenic complications. Monitoring for efficacy includes monitoring for

amenorrhea, decreases in pain and dyspareunia, and quality of life. After

discontinuation of GnRH agonists, menses and ovarian function return to normal in 6

to 12 weeks, although benefits may be maintained for another 6 to 12 months.

99

Comments

Search This Blog

Archive

Show more

Popular posts from this blog

TRIPASS XR تري باس

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

ZENOXIA 15 MG, Comprimé

VOXCIB 200 MG, Gélule

Kana Brax Laberax

فومي كايند

بعض الادويه نجد رموز عليها مثل IR ، MR, XR, CR, SR , DS ماذا تعني هذه الرموز

NIFLURIL 700 MG, Suppositoire adulte

Antifongiques مضادات الفطريات

Popular posts from this blog

علاقة البيبي بالفراولة بالالفا فيتو بروتين

التغيرات الخمس التي تحدث للجسم عند المشي

إحصائيات سنة 2020 | تعداد سكَان دول إفريقيا تنازليا :

ما هو الليمونير للأسنان ؟

ACUPAN 20 MG, Solution injectable

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

الام الظهر

VOXCIB 200 MG, Gélule

ميبستان

Popular posts from this blog

TRIPASS XR تري باس

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

Popular posts from this blog

TRIPASS XR تري باس

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

ZENOXIA 15 MG, Comprimé

VOXCIB 200 MG, Gélule

Kana Brax Laberax

فومي كايند

بعض الادويه نجد رموز عليها مثل IR ، MR, XR, CR, SR , DS ماذا تعني هذه الرموز

NIFLURIL 700 MG, Suppositoire adulte

Antifongiques مضادات الفطريات

Popular posts from this blog

TRIPASS XR تري باس

Kana Brax Laberax

PARANTAL 100 MG, Suppositoire بارانتال 100 مجم تحاميل

الكبد الدهني Fatty Liver

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

الم اسفل الظهر (الحاد) الذي يظهر بشكل مفاجئ bal-agrisi

SEDALGIC 37.5 MG / 325 MG, Comprimé pelliculé [P] سيدالجيك 37.5 مجم / 325 مجم ، قرص مغلف [P]

نمـو الدمـاغ والتطـور العقـلي لـدى الطفـل

أخطر أنواع المخدرات فى العالم و الشرق الاوسط

Archive

Show more