Colchicine monograph. Facts & Comparisons eAnswers. St. Louis, MO: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2010.

http://online.factsandcomparisons.com/MonoDisp.aspx?monoID=fandchcp12251&quick=275331%7c5&search=275331%7c5&isstemmed=True&NDCmapping=-

1&fromTop=true#firstMatch. Accessed June 2, 2015.

Cronstein BN, Terkeltaub R. The inflammatory process of gout and its treatment. Arthritis Res Ther.

2006;8(Suppl 1):S3.

Man CY et al. Comparison of oral prednisolone/paracetamol and oral indomethacin/paracetamol combination

therapy in the treatment of acute goutlike arthritis: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med.

2007;49:670.

Sivera F, et al. Interleukin-1 inhibitors for acute gout. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 9.

Art. No.: CD009993. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009993.pub2.

Schlesinger N, et al. Local ice therapy during bouts of acute gouty arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2002 Feb;29(2):331.

Zhang Y et al. Alcohol consumption as a trigger of recurrent gout attacks. Am J Med. 2006;119:800.e13.

Choi HK et al. Obesity, weight change, hypertension, diuretic use, and risk of gout in men: the health professionals

follow-up study. Arch Int Med. 2005;165:742.

Choi HK et al. Intake of purine-rich foods, protein, and dairy products and relationship to serum levels of uric

acid: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:283.

Johnson RJ, Rideout BA. Uric acid and diet—insights into the epidemic of cardiovascular disease. N EnglJ Med.

2004;350:1071.

Choi HK, et al. Coffee consumption and risk of incident gout in men: a prospective study. Arthritis Rheum.

2007;56:2049.

Sica DA. Diuretics should continue to be one of the preferred initial therapies in the management of hypertension:

the argument against. J Clin Hypertens. (Greenwich). 2005;7:117.

Hueskes BA, et al. Use of diuretics and the risk of gouty arthritis: a systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum.

2012;41(6):879.

Seth R, et al. Allopurinol for chronic gout. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 10. Art. No.:

CD006077. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006077.pub3.

Becker MA et al. The urate-lowering efficacy and safety of febuxostat in the treatment of the hyperuricemia of

gout: the CONFIRMS trial. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12: R63.

Reinders MK, et al. A randomised controlled trial on the efficacy and tolerability with dose escalation of

allopurinol 300-600 mg/day versus benzbromarone 100-200 mg/day in patients with gout. Ann Rheum Dis.

2009;68:829.

Arellano F, Sacristán JA. Allopurinol hypersensitivity syndrome: a review. Ann Pharmacother. 1993;27:337.

Fam AG. Difficult gout and new approaches for control of hyperuricemia in the allopurinol-allergic patient. Curr

Rheumatol Rep. 2001;3:29.

Hande KR et al. Severe allopurinol toxicity. Description and guidelines for prevention in patients with renal

insufficiency. Am J Med. 1984;76:47.

Dalbeth N et al. Dose adjustment of allopurinol according to creatinine clearance does not provide adequate

control of hyperuricemia in patients with gout. J Rheumatol. 2006;33:1646.

Uloric [package insert]. Deerfield, IL: Takeda Pharmaceuticals America; 2009.

Tayar JH, et al. Febuxostat for treating chronic gout. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 11.

Art. No.: CD008653. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008653.pub2.

Schumacher HR Jr et al. Effects of febuxostat versus allopurinol and placebo in reducing serum urate in subjects

with hyperuricemia and gout: a 28-week, phase III, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial. Arthritis

Rheum. 2008;59:1540.

Becker MA et al. Clinical efficacy and safety of successful longterm urate lowering with febuxostat or allopurinol

in subjects with gout. J Rheumatol. 2009;36:1273.

White WB et al. Cardiovascular safety of febuxostat and allopurinol in patients with gout and cardiovascular

comorbidities. Am Heart J. 2012;164(1):14.

MacDonald TM et al. Protocol of the Febuxostat versus Allopurinol Streamlined Trial (FAST): a large

prospective, randomised, open, blinded endpoint study comparing the cardiovascular safety of allopurinol and

febuxostat in the management of symptomatic hyperuricaemia. BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 10;4:e005354.

doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005354

Pranav K, et al. Cost-Effectiveness analysis of allopurinol versus febuxostat in chronic gout patients: a U.S. payer

perspective. J Manag Care Pharm. 2015;21(2):165.

National Health Service. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Febuxostat for the management of

hyperuricaemia in people with gout. 2008; http://www.nice.org.uk/Guidance/TA164. Accessed June 6,

2015.

Allopurinol monograph. Facts & Comparisons eAnswers. St. Louis, MO: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2010.

http://online.factsandcomparisons.com/MonoDisp.aspx?monoID=fandc-

hcp13090&quick=17622115&search=17622115&isstemmed=True. Accessed June 8, 2015.

Kydd ASR, et al. Uricosuric medications for chronic gout. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014,

Issue 11. Art. No.: CD010457. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010457.pub2.

Yue TF et al. Mutualsuppression of the uricosuric effects of sulfinpyrazone and salicylate: a study in interactions

between drugs. J Clin Invest. 1963;42:1330.

Reyes AJ. Cardiovascular drugs and serum uric acid. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2003;17:397.

Sundy JS et al. Efficacy and tolerability of pegloticase for the treatment of chronic gout in patients refractory to

conventional treatment: two randomized controlled trials JAMA. 2011;306(7):711.

Elitek [prescribing information]. Bridgewater, NJ: Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC; 2010. http://products.sanofiaventis.us/elitek/elitek.pdf. Accessed June 8, 2015.

De Angelis S et al. Is rasburicase an effective alternative to allopurinol for management of hyperuricemia in renal

failure patients? A double blind-randomized study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2007;11:179.

Sundy JS et al. Reduction of plasma urate levels following treatment with multiple doses of pegloticase

(polyethylene glycol-conjugated uricase) in patients with treatment-failure gout: results ofa phase II randomized

study. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:2882.

Krystexxa [prescribing information]. East Brunswick, NJ: Savient Pharmaceuticals; 2010.

http://www.crealtapharma.info/pdfs/krystexxa/KRYSTEXXA_Prescribing_Information.pdf. Accessed

June 8, 2015.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA Approves New Drug for Gout. 2014.

http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm225810.htm. Accessed June 10,

2015.

Daskalopoulou SS et al. Effect on serum uric acid levels of drugs prescribed for indications other than treating

hyperuricaemia. Curr Pharm Des. 2005;11:4161.

Andrés M, et al. Dietary supplements for chronic gout. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue

10. Art. No.: CD010156. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010156.pub2.

Stamp LK et al. Clinically insignificant effect of supplemental vitamin C on serum urate in patients with gout: a

pilot randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65(6):1636.

Choi HK, Soriano LC, Zhang Y, Rodríguez LA. Antihypertensive drugs and risk of incident gout among patients

with hypertension: population based case-controlstudy. BMJ. 2012;344.

Würzner G, et al. Comparative effects of losartan and irbesartan on serum uric acid in hypertensive patients with

hyperuricaemia and gout. J Hypertens. 2001;19(10):1855.

Feher MD et al. Fenofibrate enhances urate reduction in men treated with allopurinol for hyperuricaemia and

gout. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003;42:321.

Ka T et al. Effects of a fenofibrate/losartan combination on the plasma concentration and urinary excretion of

purine bases. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006;44:22.

Gast LF. Withdrawal of longterm antihyperuricemic therapy in tophaceous gout. Clin Rheumatol. 1987;6(1):70.

Reif MC et al. Chronic gouty nephropathy: a vanishing syndrome? [editorial]. N EnglJ Med. 1981;304:535.

Yu TF, Berger L. Impaired renal function in gout: its association with hypertensive vascular disease and intrinsic

renal disease. Am J Med. 1982;72:95.

Yu TF et al. Renal function in gout. V. Factors influencing the renal hemodynamics. Am J Med. 1979;67:766.

Harrold LR, et al. Adherence with urate-lowering therapies for the treatment of gout. Arthritis Res Therapy.

2009;11:R46.

p. 920

Ninety percent of patients who are affected by systemic sclerosis also

have signs and symptoms consistent with Raynaud phenomenon.

Case 46-1 (Questions 1, 2),

Table 46-1

Nifedipine, prazosin, and losartan may decrease severity and frequency

of symptoms of Raynaud syndrome.

Case 46-1 (Question 3),

Table 46-3

Many authorities believe polymyalgia rheumatica and temporal arteritis

are manifestations of the same underlying process occurring at different

times during the clinical course. However, they each have characteristic

symptoms and are treated differently.

Case 46-2 (Questions 1–3),

Table 46-4

Reactive arthritis is secondary to certain genitourinary, gastrointestinal,

or respiratory infections. Patients with the HLA-B27 gene are more

susceptible to spondyloarthritis.

Case 46-3 (Question 1),

Table 46-5

Patients with documented active infections, and their partners when

caused by a sexually transmitted disease, should be offered antibiotics.

However, efficacy of prolonged antibiotics as a treatment of reactive

arthritis is conflicting.

Case 46-3 (Question 2)

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories are appropriate initial therapy for

reactive arthritis to control pain and inflammation.

Case 46-3 (Question 2)

In severe or prolonged cases of reactive arthritis, steroids, DMARDs,

and biologicals may be considered.

Case 46-3 (Question 3)

Polymyositis and dermatomyositis should initially be treated with highdose corticosteroids. Immunosuppressive agents are recommended if

the disease is not controlled with corticosteroids alone, if the response is

positive but steroid sparing effects are desired, or if the condition

presents initially with extramuscular complications.

Case 46-4 (Questions 1, 2)

INTRODUCTION

Despite new knowledge in the immunology and the pathogenesis of the different

connective tissue diseases (CTDs), the etiology of these conditions remains unclear.

1

Diagnosing CTDs can be difficult because of the complexity of the diseases and the

varying presentation of symptoms. The patient’s reported history of symptoms, results

of the physical examination, and laboratory testing help guide the diagnosis of a

CTD.

1

It has been reported that as many as half of patients who have a diagnosed

CTD had been identified as having undifferentiated connective tissue disease.

2

It can

take years for a patient to be diagnosed and meet classification criteria. Diffuse

CTDs include systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), scleroderma, polymyositis,

dermatomyositis, rheumatoid arthritis, and Sjögren syndrome. Patients may present

with findings consistent with more than one CTD, and symptoms generally do not all

appear simultaneously. Mixed CTD is an overlap of autoimmune disease features that

can include myositis, scleroderma, and lupus.

1,2

GENERAL SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS

Many patients such as those with SLE can have arthralgias and arthritis as part of the

inflammatory disease associated with their CTD. Inflammatory disease is suggested

by morning stiffness of greater than 1 hour (a similar problem occurs with sitting or

resting), swelling, fever, weakness, and systemic fatigue. In some patients, activities

of daily living and function may be excellent despite pain and deformity; in others,

because of psychologic and systemic disease, there may be poor function with

minimal articular involvement. Other psychosocial aspects of their life, including

sexuality, may be affected by many of the inflammatory disorders.

p. 921

p. 922

Dermatologic changes are often associated with a particular rheumatic disease.

Examples include alopecia with SLE, onycholysis and keratoderma blennorrhagica

with reactive arthritis, buccal or genital ulcers with SLE or Reiter syndrome,

Raynaud phenomenon with SLE or systemic sclerosis, calcinosis and rash over the

knuckles (Gottron papule) with dermatomyositis, and sun sensitivity malar rash with

SLE. The presence of nodules, tophi, telangiectasia, or vasculitic changes also may

be detected, helping the clinician differentiate which inflammatory disease is present

and what management is necessary.

The CTDs are commonly associated with musculoskeletal changes. Joints may

display warmth, redness and effusion, synovial thickening, deformities, decreased

range of motion, pain on motion, tenderness on palpation, and decreased function.

Often, a patient’s hand and arm function, as well as gait, may be altered. In addition

to the signs and symptoms used to differentiate various rheumatic diseases,

laboratory evaluation of patients with rheumatic complaints can often define the

extent of disease or detect other organ systems that may be involved.

SELECTED CONNECTIVE TISSUE DISEASES

CTDs and rheumatic diseases encompass a wide range of disorders that are

inflammatory in nature and related to the immune system. The following are some of

the conditions that are encountered in clinical practice and will be discussed in this

chapter: scleroderma, polymyalgia rheumatica, temporal arteritis, reactive arthritis,

polymyositis, and dermatomyositis. The reader is also referred to Chapter 33, which

covers SLE.

Systemic Sclerosis (Scleroderma)

Systemic sclerosis, or systemic scleroderma, is a CTD associated with autoimmunity

characterized by excessive extracellular matrix deposition and vascular injury to the

skin and other visceral organs.

3 Systemic sclerosis can be classified into distinct

clinical subsets based on the patterns of skin and internal organ involvement,

autoantibody production, and patient survival.

3 The most common subsets include

limited cutaneous (approximately 60% of patients) and diffuse cutaneous

(approximately 35% of patients).

3 The term overlap syndrome may be applied to

patients when features common in one or more of the other CTDs are present and

affect approximately 11% of patients diagnosed with systemic sclerosis. The limited

cutaneous subset is diagnosed when skin thickening is limited to the areas distal to

the elbows and knees. A constellation of dysfunctions known as CREST (calcinosis

cutis, Raynaud phenomenon, esophageal dysfunction, sclerodactyly, telangiectasia)

syndrome is a variant of limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis.

3

More women than men suffer from systemic sclerosis (female- to-male ratio,

4.6:1), although the mean age at diagnosis does not differ between men and women.

4

Onset of systemic sclerosis generally begins in adults between 30 and 50 years of

age and is rare in children and seniors older than 80 years of age.

5 The prevalence is

estimated at 276 cases/million adults in the United States.

5 African-American

patients are twice as likely as non–African-American patients to have diffuse

disease, with the annual incidence in African-American women being twice that of

Caucasian women.

4,6 Likely and possible risk factors for the disease include

environmental exposure to silica dust (e.g., coal miners) and the presence of a

connective tissue growth factor polymorphism, respectively.

7 At this time, there is no

conclusive evidence to support an association between silicone breast implants and

systemic sclerosis, or any other CTD.

7 Cigarette smoking is not associated with an

increased risk of systemic sclerosis.

8

The underlying pathophysiologic changes that lead to systemic scleroderma remain

unknown, but many believe that it results from a lymphocyte-mediated autoimmune

reaction with endothelial cells, activated immune cells, and fibroblasts playing a key

role in the process. It is hypothesized that the process is initiated by an immune attack

on the endothelium leading to endothelial cell activation or injury. This is followed

by activation of the fibroblasts, resulting in subendothelial connective tissue

proliferation, narrowing of the vascular lumen, and Raynaud phenomenon. T cells are

then selectively activated and populate the affected areas such as the dermis and lung

tissue. These cells produce cytokines that stimulate resident fibroblasts to produce

excessive amounts of procollagen, which is then converted extracellularly to mature

collagen. Later, when the inflammatory process subsides, the fibroblasts revert back

to normal. The most common, and serious, complications of systemic scleroderma

involve the pulmonary system and may include fibrosis or interstitial lung disease as

well as pulmonary vascular disease leading to pulmonary arterial hypertension. It is

estimated that pulmonary involvement occurs in 40% of individuals and contributes

from 13% to 17% of deaths from systemic scleroderma.

7 Other complications

include, but are not limited to, poor wound healing, arrhythmia, heart failure, renal

failure, and esophageal strictures.

7

CASE 46-1

QUESTION 1: T.P., a 58-year-old African-American woman with known limited cutaneous scleroderma,

presents to your outpatient clinic complaining of pain and discoloration of the fingers on both hands. She

describes discoloration as an intermittent loss of color from normal to a pale appearance, and the pain as

intermittent numbness and tingling accompanying the loss of color. T.P. states the symptoms only appear when

she is exposed to a cold environment. These symptoms are interfering with her quality of life and activities of

daily living. In terms of other symptoms, T.P. also experiences intermittent development of thickened, pitted,

rough skin patches located distal to her elbows bilaterally. She has no other significant past medical history, nor

takes any medications on a regular basis. The physical examination findings revealed patches of skin thickening

and nonpitting induration on upper torso. Telangiectasias are also noted in this area. Laboratory samples drawn

last week show her ANA is negative and the basic metabolic panel, complete blood count, and liver function

tests are all normal. What subjective and objective data present in T.P.’s case are consistent with limited

cutaneous scleroderma?

T.P. is complaining of classic symptoms of Raynaud syndrome, which is a

common clinical feature of limited cutaneous scleroderma, present in over 95% of

cases. In addition, skin fibrosis that is present distal to the elbow or knees, and

telangiectasias are suggestive of limited cutaneous scleroderma as opposed to diffuse

cutaneous scleroderma. Because ANAs may be present in unaffected patients and

absent in afflicted patients, ANA test results must be interpreted within the clinical

context and should not be relied on as a sole diagnostic marker.

9

CASE 46-1, QUESTION 2: Based on these signs and symptoms, which variant(s) of limited cutaneous

scleroderma is likely present?

Over 95% of patients who are affected by systemic sclerosis also have signs and

symptoms consistent with Raynaud phenomenon, as it is seen with T.P. Patients will

typically complain of recurrent, intermittent vasospastic episodes resulting in a color

change in the fingers or toes after being exposed to cold temperatures.

Vasoconstriction may lead to local cyanosis and accompanying pain and numbness,

with flushing noted on rewarming. Other parts of the body may also be affected, such

as the nose, ears, tongue, and nipples.

p. 922

p. 923

Table 46-1

Common Clinical Features of Systemic Sclerosis

Subset Skin Fibrosis Lung Involvement

Visceral Organ

Involvement

Physical

Examination

Findings

Limited cutaneous Areas distal to the

elbows and knees

a

Pulmonary arterial

hypertension

Severe GERD and

Raynaud

phenomenon

Telangiectasia,

calcinosis cutis,

sclerodactyly, digital

ischemic

complications

Diffuse cutaneous Areas proximal or

distal to the elbows

and knees

a

Interstitial lung

disease

Scleroderma renal

crisis

Tendon friction rubs,

pigment changes

aMay affect the face.

GERD, gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Adapted with permission from Hinchcliff M, Varga J. Systemic sclerosis/scleroderma: a treatable multisystem

disease. Am Fam Physician. 2008;78:961.

Common clinical features can be used to distinguish between limited and diffuse

cutaneous systemic sclerosis subsets (Table 46-1).

3

In addition, variants of the

condition may exist within each subset based on the presence of other symptoms.

Manifestations of systemic sclerosis differ based on the organ system(s) involved

(Table 46-2).

3 Other disorders that may have similar clinical characteristics, such as

amyloidosis and mixed CTD, should be considered and ruled out before the

diagnosis of systemic sclerosis. The ACR/EULAR criteria for the diagnosis of

systemic sclerosis require the presence of one lone major criterion (skin thickening

of fingers of both hands extending proximal to metacarpophalangeal joints) or two

minor criteria (skin thickening of fingers, fingertip lesions, telangiectasia, abnormal

nailfold capillaries, pulmonary arterial hypertension and/or interstitial lung disease,

Raynaud phenomenon, or presence of any of systemic sclerosis-related

autoantibodies).

10 Skin biopsy is recommended to confirm scleroderma if the clinical

picture is unclear. Separate criteria exist for the diagnosis of juvenile systemic

sclerosis.

10 The overall course of systemic sclerosis is highly variable and

unpredictable. However, after a remission occurs, relapse is uncommon.

Table 46-2

Manifestations of Systemic Sclerosis

Organ System Manifestations

Cardiovascular Abnormal cardiac conduction, congestive heart failure, pericardial effusion,

digital ischemic changes, Raynaud phenomenon

Gastrointestinal Barrett esophagitis or strictures, gastroesophageal reflux disease, dysphagia,

halitosis, chronic cough, dental erosions

Genitourinary Sexual dysfunction, dyspareunia, impotence

Musculoskeletal Flexion contractures, muscle atrophy, puffy hands, inability to make a tight fist,

weakness

Pulmonary Interstitial lung disease, pulmonary arterial hypertension, basilar and course

crackles, dyspnea on exertion

Renal Renal crisis

Skin Calcinosis, pruritus, thickened skin, tight skin, excoriations, scabbing, loss of

pigmentation

Adapted with permission from Hinchcliff M, Varga J. Systemic sclerosis/scleroderma: a treatable multisystem

disease. Am Fam Physician. 2008;78:961.

CASE 46-1, QUESTION 3: At this time, which therapeutic agent(s) is recommended to treat T.P.’s

manifestations and symptoms of systemic sclerosis?

Clinical practice guidelines exist, which may assist the clinician when determining

treatment for systemic sclerosis.

12 However, there is not a specific therapy for

systemic sclerosis. Rather, treatment is mainly supportive and symptomatic in nature,

targeting the specific organ(s) affected (Table 46-3).

13 Therefore, the primary goals

of therapy are to improve the quality of life and minimize the risk of complications.

Based on T.P.’s current symptoms, initiating therapy with the dihydropyridine

calcium-channel blocker nifedipine is an appropriate option to achieve symptom

control. Compared with placebo, nifedipine and prazosin modestly reduced the

severity and frequency of Raynaud ischemic attacks.

14,15 However, when losartan was

compared with low-dose nifedipine in a nonblinded, randomized, controlled trial

(RCT), losartan users experienced a decrease in severity and frequency of Raynaud

symptoms in a 12-week period.

16 This should not be considered as definitive

evidence that losartan is superior as the lack of blinding may have resulted in an

overestimation of losartan’s benefit. Although tadalafil monotherapy does not appear

effective for Raynaud phenomenon due to systemic sclerosis, when added to a

calcium-channel blocker the combination appears to improve symptoms and reduce

digital ulcers compared to calcium-channel blocker alone.

17,18 Bosentan (which is

restricted in the United States and approved for the treatment of symptomatic

pulmonary hypertension) has been shown to decrease the occurrence of digital ulcers

caused by Raynaud phenomenon.

19 Compared to placebo, atorvastatin 40 mg daily

reduced the number of new digital ulcers in patients with Raynaud phenomenon and

systemic sclerosis during a four-month randomized trial: mean number of new digital

ulcers per patient 1.6 versus 2.5 comparing atorvastatin versus placebo,

respectively.

20 Patients who develop pulmonary artery hypertension early the

treatment with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor may improve prognosis in

scleroderma renal crisis.

12,21 For patients who develop pulmonary hypertension,

treatment with bosentan, ambrisentan, sildenafil, epoprostenol infusion, or other

prostanoids (treprostinil, iloprost) may be considered because they have all been

shown to improve functional capacity.

7 The effects of cyclophosphamide, an

antineoplastic agent, demonstrated in clinical trials are conflicting. In an RCT

comparing cyclophosphamide with placebo in patients with scleroderma lung

disease, use of this agent modestly reduced dyspnea and disability while improving

lung function.

22 However, a meta-analysis of three RCTs and six cohort studies

concluded that cyclophosphamide does not result in significant clinical improvement

of pulmonary function.

23 Because this is a potentially toxic drug, patients who take it

require close monitoring.

Table 46-3

Treatment Options for Manifestations of Systemic Sclerosis

Manifestation Treatment Options

Raynaud phenomenon Nifedipine, verapamil, losartan, prazosin, iloprost, calcium-channel blocker +

tadalafil

Pulmonary hypertension Bosentan, sildenafil, enalapril, iloprost

Interstitial lung disease Cyclophosphamide, prednisone

Renal crisis Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, dialysis, or kidney transplant

Skin fibrosis Methotrexate, cyclosporine, D-penicillamine

Arthralgias Acetaminophen and NSAIDs

GERD Proton pump inhibitors, H2 antagonists, prokinetic agents

Pruritus Antihistamines, low-dose topicalsteroids

GERD, gastroesophageal reflux disease; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; H2, type 2 histamine

receptor.

Adapted with permission from Usatine RP, Diaz L. Scleroderma (progressive systemic sclerosis). In: Ebell MH et

al. Database Online. October 15, 2009. Hoboken, NJ:John Wiley & Sons. Accessed March 18, 2011.

p. 923

p. 924

Polymyalgia Rheumatica and Temporal Arteritis (Giant

Cell Arteritis)

Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and temporal arteritis, also known as giant cell

arteritis (GCA), are closely related clinical syndromes that usually affect the elderly

and frequently occur together. Many authorities believe them to be different phases of

the same underlying disease process. Polymyalgia rheumatica is 2 to 3 times more

common than GCA. However, about 27% to 53% of persons with GCA also have

PMR, and 18% to 26% of those with PMR also have GCA.

24 PMR can occur before,

with, or after the development of GCA. Inflammation is the hallmark of both

conditions. PMR is characterized by aching and morning stiffness in the cervical

region and shoulder and pelvic girdles, and may result in disability.

25

Inflammation

as a result of GCA most commonly involves the temporal artery, but arteries in other

parts of the body can also be affected.

26 Despite certain similarities, PMR and GCA

have distinct symptoms, corticosteroid requirements for treatment, and prognoses.

The incidence of PMR and GCA increases in patients after the age of 50 and peaks

in those 70 to 80 years of age.

25 GCA is the most common vasculitis among the

elderly and can lead to blindness if not diagnosed and treated in a timely manner.

Likewise, without treatment, PMR can lead to significant morbidity and disability.

Patients with PMR are also at an increased risk of peripheral arterial disease. The

primary risk factor for both conditions is age, and both occur more frequently in

women than in men. PMR is seen mainly in people of north European ancestry and

generally affects whites more commonly than African-Americans, Hispanics, Asians,

and Native Americans.

26 The incidence of PMR is 5.9/10,000 patients/year in the

United States, with an overall prevalence in the United States of about 740/100,000:

532 for men and 925 for women.

27 The incidence of GCA is 0.17 new cases annually

per 1,000 persons older than 50 years of age with a prevalence of 2/1,000 persons.

28

Although the exact pathogeneses of PMR and GCA are yet to be determined, they

are both thought to arise from an autoimmune or inflammatory dysfunction involving

similar cellular immune responses from T cells, antigen-presenting cells,

macrophage-derived inflammatory cytokines, genetic human leukocyte antigen

molecules, and macrophages. A viral cause has been suspected but not confirmed for

both PMR and GCA, and some studies demonstrate a cyclic pattern in PMR

incidence pointing to environmental infectious triggers (e.g., parvovirus B19,

Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and Chlamydia pneumoniae) as potential causes.

25,29

Branches of the internal and external carotid arteries are most commonly affected in

those with GCA, and biopsies often reveal inflammatory changes that lead to a

narrowing or occlusion of the vessel and ischemia distal to the lesion.

26 Systemic

inflammation is the most prominent feature in PMR, but inflammation of the blood

vessels is often clinically undetectable.

26

CASE 46-2

QUESTION 1: D.C. is an 85-year-old white man presenting to the emergency department complaining of

new-onset morning aching pain and stiffness in his shoulders and upper arms. He states his symptoms

developed 3 weeks ago and have progressed to the point where his pain and limited range of motion are keeping

him from performing activities of daily living. D.C. denies headaches or vision disturbances, but is complaining

of overall malaise, fatigue, and anorexia. He has a past medical history significant for hyperlipidemia, type 2

diabetes mellitus, and hypertension. He has been taking his current medications for the past 2 years, which are

adequately controlling his hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and hypertension. His current medications include

simvastatin 40 mg daily, metformin 1,000 mg twice daily, lisinopril/hydrochlorothiazide 40/25 mg daily, and

aspirin 81 mg daily. His physical examination was negative for decreased muscle strength. Limited range of

shoulder and upper arm motion is noted along with tenderness of these areas on palpation. Routine baseline

laboratory values are within normal limits, with an ESR of 75 mm/hour. D.C. was admitted to a general medical

ward with a diagnosis of PMR and was started on prednisone. What signs and symptoms present in this case

differentiate PMR from GCA?

No conclusive laboratory test for PMR or GCA exists, and nonspecific clinical

features and the absence of physical signs often complicate diagnosis. Appropriate

diagnosis requires a thorough history and physical examination. Distinguishing

between the two disorders is of importance, as GCA can lead to blindness and

requires higher doses of treatment medications. The typical onset of PMR is acute in

nature. However, as is the case with D.C., most who present for a medical evaluation

describe their symptoms as occurring for 1 month or longer.

26 D.C. is also exhibiting

common complaints associated with PMR, which include aching pain and morning

stiffness in the shoulders and upper arms, hips and thighs, or neck and torso. The

shoulders are affected in 95% of cases. New-onset GCA often manifests as a new

headache or a headache that is described as different from previous headaches and

has been occurring for 2 to 3 months. Constitutional symptoms such as fatigue,

anorexia, and weight loss in an older patient often accompany headaches seen in

GCA.

24 The absence of headache in D.C. further supports the diagnosis of PMR.

Common findings associated with both conditions are presented in Table 46-4.

26 The

most useful laboratory test for diagnosing PMR is the ESR. Patients with GCA

usually have an ESR greater than 40 to 50 mm/hour; rates of greater than 100

mm/hour are common. A normal ESR is very helpful in ruling out GCA in

corticosteroid-naïve patients; however, an elevated ESR (>100 mm/hour) is only

minimally helpful in ruling out GCA.

30 Three or more of the following criteria that

are present are 93% sensitive and 91% specific for GCA: age of onset of disease

greater than or equal to 50 years, new headache, temporal artery abnormality, ESR

greater than or equal to 50 mm/hour, or abnormal findings on biopsy of the temporal

artery.

31 The BSR/BHPR guidelines recommend biopsy of the temporal artery for the

diagnosis of GCA.

32 An abnormal biopsy in the context of positive clinical findings

described in Table 46-4 as well as an elevated ESR is strongly predictive of neuroophthalmic complications. However, a negative biopsy result does not preclude the

diagnosis of GCA if there is strong clinical suspicion.

p. 924

p. 925

Table 46-4

Common Findings Associated with Polymyalgia Rheumatica and Giant Cell

Arteritis (GCA)

Polymyalgia Rheumatica Giant Cell Arteritis

Age ≥50 years Age ≥50 years

ESR >50 mm/hour ESR >50 mm/hour

Anemia (mild, normochromic, normocytic) Anemia

Aching, pain, and morning stiffness in the shoulders and

upper arms, hips and thighs, or neck and torso

Headache: temporal with temporal artery involvement,

or occipital with occipital artery involvement

Symptoms of systemic inflammation Visualsymptoms or jaw claudication

Fever, weight loss, depression, fatigue

Arthralgias

ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate.

Adapted with permission from Unwin B et al. Polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis. Am Fam Physician.

2006;74:1547.

CASE 46-2, QUESTION 2: What other inflammatory conditions should be considered and excluded before

making the diagnosis of PMR or GCA in D.C.?

Other inflammatory or autoimmune disorders, such as fibromyalgia, myalgias from

statin therapy, osteoarthritis, polymyositis, and rheumatoid arthritis, should be

considered and excluded before the diagnosis of PMR or GCA.

26 Specific

alternatives that should be included in the differential diagnosis of PMR include

hyperparathyroidism, Parkinson disease, thyroid disorders, adhesive capsulitis,

pseudogout, cervical spondylosis, SLE, or multiple myeloma.

24 Other vasculitides

(Wegener granulomatosis, polyarteritis nodosa, microscopic polyangiitis), Takayasu

arteritis, malignancies, herpes zoster, and migraines (or other causes of headaches)

should be included in the differential diagnosis of GCA.

33

CASE 46-2, QUESTION 3: What is the preferred initial treatment approach for PMR in D.C.? Explain the

difference(s) in this approach as compared with those for GCA.

Owing to its anti-inflammatory properties, corticosteroids are considered first-line

therapy for either PMR or GCA. Early visual loss may occur in up to 20% of patients

and rarely improves once present. Therefore, initiation of corticosteroid treatment

should not be delayed pending temporal artery biopsy results.

24 When PMR and GCA

occur simultaneously, higher corticosteroid doses (indicated for the treatment of

CGA) are required to prevent significant complications. For the treatment of PMR,

the British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) and the British Health Professionals in

Rheumatology (BHPR) recommend standard initial treatment with oral prednisone 15

mg/day for 3 weeks, 12.5 mg/day for 3 weeks, and 10 mg/day for 4 to 6 weeks, then

decrease by 1 mg every 4 to 8 weeks.

29 An alternative treatment regimen includes

intramuscular methylprednisolone 120 mg every 3 to 4 weeks, decreased by 20 mg

every 2 to 3 months. Beginning low-dose prednisone may improve D.C.’s PMR

symptoms within days, but some optimal results could take several weeks to achieve

and most patients can expect to receive therapy for 1 to 2 years. Treatment should be

tailored to patient symptoms, and inflammatory markers should be followed.

Attempts to taper the dose to avoid long-term adverse drug events (e.g., osteoporosis,

hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal axis suppression) should be made once acute relief

has been achieved. Tapering the dose (e.g., 1 mg/day/week) should be individualized

and based on symptom response because it may take years owing to symptom flares.

The Polymyalgia Rheumatica Activity Scale, a disease activity assessment, may be

used to monitor and adjust therapy and patient response.

26

As opposed to PMR, treatment for uncomplicated (no jaw or tongue claudication

or visual changes) GCA should begin with high-dose prednisolone (40–60 mg/day).

29

Complicated GCA (evolving visual loss or history of amaurosis fugax) should be

treated with IV, methylprednisolone 500 mg to 1 g/day for 3 days, followed by oral

prednisolone 60 mg/day.

29 A corticosteroid taper can be initiated after 4 weeks of

treatment and resolution of symptoms and normalization of ESR/CRP. It is

recommended to decrease the prednisolone dose by 10 mg every 2 weeks until 20 mg

is reached, then decrease by 2.5 mg every 2 to 4 weeks until 10 mg is reached, and

then decrease by 1 mg every 1 to 2 months.

29 Most will achieve a dose of 7.5 to 10

mg/day after 6 months of therapy, but relapses are common and are managed by

restarting steroid therapy or increasing the dose to previous beneficial amounts.

25 The

use of low-dose aspirin may reduce the incidence of cranial ischemic complications.

The use of methotrexate as adjuvant therapy for PMR and GCA is not routinely

recommended, and its evidence of symptom relief benefit is conflicting.

26 However, a

single RCT demonstrated that the use of methotrexate 10 mg once weekly in addition

to prednisone in those with GCA resulted in an overall decrease in the amount of

prednisone required and in relapse rates.

35 Relapses are common in both PMR and

GCA and may be managed by restarting steroid therapy or increasing the dose to

previous levels that controlled symptoms, if already receiving steroids. All patients

on long-term corticosteroids should be offered calcium (1,200 mg/day) and vitamin

D (800 international units/day) for prevention of osteoporosis and be monitored for

other complications of steroid therapy. Patients at risk for gastritis should receive

prophylactic protection with a proton pump inhibitor.

Patients being treated for PMR or GCA should be monitored closely in response to

treatment and disease progression. It is recommended that the first follow-up visit

should take place 1 to 3 weeks after the start of corticosteroids.

29 Subsequent visits

should occur at 6 weeks as well as 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, or on an as-needed basis

if relapses or adverse events occur. At each visit, patients should be assessed for

specific symptom improvement and routine blood work should include ESR, CRP,

CBC, and CMP. Bone mineral density testing every 2 years may be considered in

patients receiving long-term corticosteroids. Professional guidelines recommend a

chest X-ray every 2 years to assess for aortic aneurysm in patients diagnosed with

GCA.

29 However, a systematic review of imaging studies found limited evidence to

guide screening recommendations for thoracic aortic aneurysm/dilation because a

chest X-ray may not be sensitive enough to detect thoracic aortic aneurysms.

34

p. 925

p. 926

Reactive Arthritis

Reactive arthritis is defined as peripheral arthritis often accompanied by one or more

extra-articular manifestations that appear after certain infections of the genitourinary,

gastrointestinal, or respiratory infection. Table 46-5 lists bacterial pathogens

associated with the development of reactive arthritis.

36–39

In addition, it shares

features with other forms of spondyloarthropathies, which is the grouping it falls

under. Reiter syndrome was previously used to describe this condition, but the term

reactive arthritis has become the preferred term. The term classic “Reiter triad”

associated with this condition was used to describe the specific combination of

arthritis, urethritis, and conjunctivitis.

37 The presentation of arthritis is usually a large

joint monoarthritis or oligoarthritis usually in the lower extremities, and/or enthesitis

which is the inflammation of the entheses. This is the site where the tendon or

ligament enters the bone.

36 Typically, the inflammatory disorder would occur 1 to 6

weeks after the infection.

37 The clinical course of reactive arthritis is variable and

usually runs a self-limited course of 3 to 12 months.

36 Mortality from reactive

arthritis is not common and results from cardiac complications such as aortitis.

Approximately 10% to 20% of patients may continue to have chronic, destructive,

and disabling arthritis or enthesitis within 2 years after the onset of symptoms. Ten to

fifteen percent may progress to ankylosing spondylitis.

39

Comments

Search This Blog

Archive

Show more

Popular posts from this blog

TRIPASS XR تري باس

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

ZENOXIA 15 MG, Comprimé

VOXCIB 200 MG, Gélule

Kana Brax Laberax

فومي كايند

بعض الادويه نجد رموز عليها مثل IR ، MR, XR, CR, SR , DS ماذا تعني هذه الرموز

NIFLURIL 700 MG, Suppositoire adulte

Antifongiques مضادات الفطريات

Popular posts from this blog

علاقة البيبي بالفراولة بالالفا فيتو بروتين

التغيرات الخمس التي تحدث للجسم عند المشي

إحصائيات سنة 2020 | تعداد سكَان دول إفريقيا تنازليا :

ما هو الليمونير للأسنان ؟

ACUPAN 20 MG, Solution injectable

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

الام الظهر

VOXCIB 200 MG, Gélule

ميبستان

Popular posts from this blog

TRIPASS XR تري باس

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

Popular posts from this blog

TRIPASS XR تري باس

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

ZENOXIA 15 MG, Comprimé

VOXCIB 200 MG, Gélule

Kana Brax Laberax

فومي كايند

بعض الادويه نجد رموز عليها مثل IR ، MR, XR, CR, SR , DS ماذا تعني هذه الرموز

NIFLURIL 700 MG, Suppositoire adulte

Antifongiques مضادات الفطريات

Popular posts from this blog

Kana Brax Laberax

TRIPASS XR تري باس

PARANTAL 100 MG, Suppositoire بارانتال 100 مجم تحاميل

الكبد الدهني Fatty Liver

الم اسفل الظهر (الحاد) الذي يظهر بشكل مفاجئ bal-agrisi

SEDALGIC 37.5 MG / 325 MG, Comprimé pelliculé [P] سيدالجيك 37.5 مجم / 325 مجم ، قرص مغلف [P]

نمـو الدمـاغ والتطـور العقـلي لـدى الطفـل

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

أخطر أنواع المخدرات فى العالم و الشرق الاوسط

Archive

Show more