Search This Blog

468x60.

728x90

 


Hirayama A et al. Assessing the cardiovascular risk between celecoxib and nonselective nonsteroidal

antiinflammatory drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Circ J. 2014;78:194–205.

Danesh BJ et al. Comparison of the effect of aspirin and choline magnesium trisalicylate on thromboxane

biosynthesis in human platelets: role of the acetyl moiety. Haemostasis. 1989;19:169–173.

Antman EM et al. Cyclooxygenase inhibition and cardiovascular risk. Circulation. 2005;112:759–770.

Goldstein JL et al. Celecoxib plus aspirin versus naproxen and lansoprazole plus aspirin: a randomized, doubleblind, endoscopic trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:1167–1174.

Chan FK et al. Celecoxib versus omeprazole and diclofenac in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis

(CONDOR): a randomized trial. Lancet. 2010;376:173–179.

Masso Gonzalez EL et al. Variability among nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in risk of upper gastrointestinal

bleeding. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62:1592–1601.

Laine L et al. How common is diclofenac-associated liver injury? Analysis of 17,289 arthritis patients in a longterm prospective clinical trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:356–362.

Ultram. Full Prescribing Information. 2008.

http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2009/020281s032s033lbl.pdf. Accessed

November 24, 2015.

Park SH et al. Serotonin syndrome: is it a reason to avoid the use of tramadol with antidepressants? J Pharm

Pract. 2014;27:71–78.

Farquhar-Smith P, Gubbay A. Tramadol and acetaminophen combination for chronic non-cancer pain. Expert

Opin Pharmacother. 2013;14:2297–2304.

Chou R et al. Clinical guidelines for the use of chronic opioid therapy in chronic noncancer pain. J Pain.

2009;10:113–130.

Nuesch E et al. Oral or transdermal opioids for osteoarthritis of the knee or hip. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.

2009:CD003115.

Conaghan PG et al. Transdermal buprenorphine plus oral paracetamol vs an oral codeine-paracetamol

combination for osteoarthritis of hip and/or knee: a randomised trial. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011;19:930–938.

Munera C et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, parallel-group, 5-week study of buprenorphine

transdermalsystem in adults with osteoarthritis. J Opioid Manag. 2010;6:193–202.

Chappell AS et al. Duloxetine, a centrally acting analgesic, in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis knee

pain: a 13-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Pain. 2009;146:253–260.

Bellamy N et al. Intraarticular corticosteroid for treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. Cochrane Database Syst

Rev. 2006:CD005328.

Chevalier X et al. Single, intra-articular treatment with 6 mL hylan G-F 20 in patients with symptomatic primary

osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis.

2010;69:113–119.

Arrich J et al. Intra-articular hyaluronic acid for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee:systematic review and

meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2005;172:1039–1043.

Bellamy N et al. Viscosupplementation for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. Cochrane Database Syst

Rev. 2006:CD005321.

Richette P et al. Effect of hyaluronic acid in symptomatic hip osteoarthritis: a multicenter, randomized, placebocontrolled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60:824–830.

Bannuru RR et al. Therapeutic trajectory of hyaluronic acid versus corticosteroids in the treatment of knee

osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61:1704–1711.

Falck-Ytter Y et al. Prevention of VTE in orthopedic surgery patients: Antithrombotic therapy and prevention of

thrombosis, 9th Edition: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Chest 2012;141(2, suppl):e278s–e325s.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012369212601263?

via%3Dihubdoi:10.1378/chest.11-2404. Accessed July 25, 2017.

Barras MA et al. Individualized dosing of enoxaparin for subjects with renal impairment is superior to

conventional dosing at achieving therapeutic concentrations. Ther Drug Monit. 2010;32:482–488.

Davidson BL et al. Bleeding risk of patients with acute venous thromboembolism taking nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs or aspirin. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(6):947–953.

Clegg DO et al. Glucosamine, chondroitin sulfate, and the two in combination for painful knee osteoarthritis. N

EnglJ Med. 2006;354:795–808.

Rozendaal RM et al. Effect of glucosamine sulfate on hip osteoarthritis: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med.

2008;148:268–277.

Sawitzke AD et al. The effect of glucosamine and/or chondroitin sulfate on the progression of knee osteoarthritis:

a report from the glucosamine/chondroitin arthritis intervention trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:3183–3191.

Wilkens P et al. Effect of glucosamine on pain-related disability in patients with chronic low back pain and

degenerative lumbar osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010;304:45–52.

Hochberg MC et al. Combined chondroitin sulfate and glucosamine for painful knee osteoarthritis: a multicentre,

randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial versus celecoxib. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75:37–44.

Warner TD et al. Nonsteroid drug selectivities for cyclo-oxygenase-1 rather than cyclo-oxygenase-2 are

associated with human gastrointestinal toxicity: a full in vitro analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.

1999;96(13):7563–7568.

p. 874

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic systemic inflammatory disorder

characterized by potentially deforming polyarthritis and a wide spectrum

of extra-articular manifestations. Diagnosis of RA is based on joint

involvement, serology, acute-phase reactants, and symptom duration.

Case 44-1 (Questions 1, 2)

Treatments for RA include nonpharmacologic (heat or cold therapy,

range-of-motion [ROM] exercises, physical therapy, and occupational

therapy) and pharmacologic options (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory

drugs [NSAIDs], synthetic [conventional and targeted] and biologic

disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs [DMARDs], and

corticosteroids). NSAIDs are for symptom management only and must

be used cautiously, if at all, because of serious health risks, including

gastrointestinal complications and thromboembolic cardiovascular

events.

Case 44-1 (Questions 3–5)

Case 44-2 (Question 1)

Case 44-3 (Questions 1, 2)

Case 44-4 (Question 1)

Case 44-5 (Questions 1–3)

Owing to the destructive nature of the disease, DMARDs should be

initiated as soon as possible once diagnosis has been established.

Methotrexate is the most common selection because of efficacy, safety,

rapid onset, and cost-effectiveness. Other traditional DMARDs and

combinations of traditional DMARDs are selected based on disease

severity, disease duration, and the presence of poor prognostic

indicators. Regardless of the DMARD chosen, all require diligent

monitoring.

Case 44-5 (Questions 4–7)

Case 44-6 (Questions 1–7)

Case 44-7 (Questions 1–5)

Patients with RA, who experience an inadequate response to traditional

DMARD monotherapy or intolerable adverse effects, should consider

the addition of or switching to a biologic DMARD. Diligent monitoring is

also critical with biologic agents owing to the risk of serious adverse

effects such as infections and lymphoma.

Case 44-7 (Questions 6–8)

Case 44-8 (Question 1)

Case 44-9 (Question 1)

Corticosteroids when used judiciously at the lowest effective doses and

for limited duration, are very effective at quickly controlling

inflammation while awaiting onset of DMARD therapy. Although

systemic corticosteroids can be prescribed for short-term flares of RA

disease activity, intra-articular corticosteroid injections are very

effective at managing flares that are limited to a few joints and are not

associated with the adverse effects of systemic therapy.

Case 44-10 (Questions 1, 2)

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) describes an assortment of arthritis Case 44-11 (Questions 1, 2)

conditions affecting children and adolescents. Symptoms of JIA, such as

joint inflammation and ROM limitation, are present before 16 years of

age. As in RA, the diagnosis of JIA is based on clinical manifestations,

and all infectious, traumatic, and other etiologies must be ruled out.

Many nonpharmacologic treatment options are also available to

supplement JIA pharmacologic therapy, including exercise, massage,

and physical and occupational therapies.

Case 44-11 (Question 3)

Pharmacologic treatment options for JIA include NSAIDs, traditional

and biologic DMARDs, and corticosteroids.

Case 44-11 (Questions 4–9)

Case 44-12 (Question 1)

Case 44-13 (Questions 1, 2)

p. 875

p. 876

EPIDEMIOLOGY

Arthritis refers to more than 100 different joint diseases causing swelling, pain and

damage to joints and connective tissue.

1 Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most

common chronic inflammatory arthritis and is characterized by potentially deforming

polyarthritis and a wide spectrum of extra-articular manifestations resulting from

abnormal systemic immune response. It has an estimated worldwide prevalence of

0.5 to 1%, although rates vary between geographic regions.

2,3

In the United States

alone, RA afflicts 1.3 million adults, occurring 2 to 3 times more often in women than

in men.

3,4 RA prevalence increases with age, with the average age increasing from

63.3 years in 1965 to 66.8 years in 1995. These patterns predict that RA-associated

morbidity, mortality, and disability will rise in future years, especially as the United

States’ baby boomer generation ages.

4

ETIOLOGY

The exact etiology of RA is unknown, but like many autoimmune diseases it involves

interplay among multiple factors including genetic susceptibility, environmental

influences, and effects of advancing age on somatic changes in the musculoskeletal

and immune system.

3 The onset of RA likely starts years before clinical symptoms

develop with activation of specific genes, resulting in innate immunity activity

leading the cascade of events.

3

It is suspected that genetics contribute 50% to 60% of

the risk of developing RA. The genes with the strongest implication include the HLADRB1 gene of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and chromosome 1’s

PTPN22 gene. Cigarette smoking increases the production of rheumatoid factor (RF)

and anti–cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (anti-CCP), clinical markers

associated with RA, and has been shown to double the risk of developing RA.

5,6

Female sex hormones may also play a role in RA development. In women, peak

incidence occurs at the fifth decade, a time when many enter menopause or

perimenopause. Estrogen is known to stimulate the immune system; pregnant patients

often experience a remission of RA symptoms, and women who take oral

contraceptives appear to be somewhat protected against the development of RA.

2,5

Diets rich in fish, olive oil, and other omega-3 fatty acid sources are associated with

a lower risk of developing RA.

5

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

Pharmacologic therapy for RA targets components of the inflammatory cascade

which lead to persistent inflammation of the synovial lining and ultimately cause joint

destruction.

7 This normally thin membrane proliferates and transforms into the

synovial pannus. The pannus, a highly erosive enzyme-laden inflammatory exudate,

invades articular cartilage (leading to narrowing of joint spaces), erodes bone

(resulting in osteoporosis), and destroys periarticular structures (ligaments, tendons),

resulting in joint deformities (Fig. 44-1).

7,8

Under normal circumstances, the body can distinguish between self (i.e., proteins

found within the body) and nonself (i.e., foreign substances such as bacteria and

viruses). On occasion, immune cells (T or B lymphocytes) can react to a self-protein

while developing in the thymus or bone marrow. These developing cells are usually

killed or inactivated before release from their place of formation; sometimes,

however, a self-targeted immune cell can escape destruction and become activated

years later to initiate an autoimmune response. Some experts believe the activation of

RA is initiated by bacteria (possibly Streptococcus) or a virus containing a protein

with an amino acid sequence similar to tissue protein, but this assertion remains

disputable.

5 When the activation source (i.e., the self-targeted immune cell) reaches

the joint, complex cell–cell interactions take place, leading to the pathology

associated with RA.

The initiating interaction for an autoimmune response takes place between antigenpresenting cells (APC), which display complexes of class II MHC molecules, and

CD4-lineage T cell lymphocytes (Fig. 44-2). In addition, B cells (previously thought

to have little to do with the inflammatory response) can become activated, leading to

antibody formation (including RF and anti-CCP), proinflammatory cytokine

production, and accumulation of polymorphonuclear leukocytes that release

cytotoxins and other substances destructive to the synovium and joint structures. B

cells also act as APCs, leading to T cell activation and acceleration of the

inflammatory process.

7,8 T cell activation requires two signals: (1) an antigenspecific signal occurring when a class II MHC antigen molecule on an APC binds to

a T cell receptor and (2) binding of CD39 on the T cell to either CD80 or CD86 on

the APC. T cell activation leads to activation of macrophages and secretion of

cytokines, polypeptides that serve as important mediators of inflammation, and

cytotoxins, which can directly destroy cells and tissues. Proinflammatory cytokines,

such as interleukin (IL) 1 and TNF-α, stimulate both synovial fibroblasts and

chondrocytes in neighboring articular cartilage to secrete enzymes that cause

degradation of proteoglycan and collagen tissues. In healthy individuals, the

inflammatory process is regulated by balancing the ratios of proinflammatory

cytokines (e.g., IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α) with anti-inflammatory cytokines––for

example, IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra), IL-4, IL-10, and IL-11. In the synovium

of patients with RA, however, this balance is heavily weighted toward the

proinflammatory cytokines, which results in sustained inflammation and tissue

destruction.

Figure 44-1 Overview of joint changes in rheumatoid arthritis.

p. 876

p. 877


Figure 44-2 Schematic representation of events occurring in rheumatoid arthritis. T cells invading the

synovial membrane are primarily CD4+ memory cells, which produce interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interferon-γ (IFN-γ)

to a similar extent as antigen-triggered T cells, and which are either already preactivated or become (further)

activated by antigen-presenting cells (APCs) in conjunction with arthrogenic (auto)antigen(s) and appropriate major

histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecules, costimulation (mainly through CD80, CD81, and CD28) and

certain cytokines (IL-1, IL-15, IL-18). Through cell–cell contact (e.g., through CD11- and CD69-mediation) and

through different cytokines, such as IFN-γ, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and IL-17, these T cells activate

monocytes, macrophages, and synovial fibroblasts. The latter then overproduce proinflammatory cytokines, mainly

TNF-α, IL-1, and IL-6, which seems to constitute the pivotal event leading to chronic inflammation. Through

complex signal transduction cascades, these cytokines activate a variety of genes characteristic of inflammatory

responses, including genes coding for various cytokines and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) involved in tissue

degradation. Tumor necrosis factor-α and IL-1 also induce RANK expression on macrophages, which when

interfering with RANKL on stromal cells or T cells, differentiate into osteoclasts that resorb and destroy bone. In

addition, chondrocytes also become activated, leading to the release of MMPs. Initial events might also involve

activation of APCs through Toll-like receptors (TLRs) before T cell engagement. RANK, receptor activator of

nuclear factor-κB; RANKL, RANK ligand; RF, rheumatoid factor; TCR, T cell receptor. Reprinted with

permission from Smolen JS, Steiner G. Therapeutic strategies for rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Rev Drug Discov.

2003;2:473.

p. 877

p. 878

Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis, and Disease Course

CASE 44-1

QUESTION 1: T.W., a previously healthy 42-year-old, 60-kg woman, has been suffering from morning

stiffness that persists for several hours, fatigue, and generalized muscle and joint pain for the past 4 months. In

addition, she reports that her eyes seem red most of the time and are unusually dry. Her symptoms have been

much worse during the past month and a half, causing her to limit her physical activities somewhat. She also

can no longer wear her wedding ring because of swelling of her hand. Physical examination reveals bilaterally

symmetrical swelling, tenderness, and warmth of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal

(PIP) joints of the hands and the metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints of the feet.

Pertinent laboratory findings include the following:

ESR, 52 mm/hour (reference range: males 0 to 15 mm/hour, females 0 to 20 mm/hour)

9

CRP, 2.1 mg/dL (reference range: 0 to 0.5 mg/dL)

Hemoglobin, 10.6 g/dL

Hematocrit, 33%

Platelets, 480,000/μL

Albumin, 3.8 g/dL

Serum iron, 40 mcg/dL

Total iron-binding capacity, 275 mg/dL

Positive anti-CCP at 82 units (reference range: <20 units/mL)

Positive RF performed by latex fixation method in a dilution of 1:320 (reference range: <1:80)

Tests for antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and tuberculin sensitivity are negative. Her uric acid level is normal.

Radiographic films of the hands and feet show soft tissue swelling, narrowing of joint spaces, and marginal

erosions of the second and third MCP and PIP joints bilaterally with no evidence of calcification. Other routine

laboratory data and physical findings are normal. What signs and symptoms of RA are manifested by T.W.?

More than 50% of RA cases, like that seen in T.W., will have slow onset of

symptoms over weeks to months, although up to 15% of patients experience acuteonset RA, with rapid development of symptoms over several days. Onset of

symptoms may be either articular or systemic, including nonspecific complaints such

as fatigue, weakness, muscle pains, weight loss, and low-grade fever. Joint

involvement is characterized by soft tissue swelling and warmth, decreased range-ofmotion (ROM), and sometimes muscle atrophy around affected joints. Most common

complaints include pain and stiffness in multiple joints. Classically, as illustrated by

T.W., presentation is symmetrical involving wrists, proximal interphalangeal joints,

and metacarpophalangeal joints, although asymmetrical joint involvement also occurs

with symmetry developing later in the disease course. The peripheral joints of the

hands, wrists, and feet are usually involved first. Reflective of joint inflammation,

patients usually experience prolonged morning stiffness on awakening lasting at least

30 to 45 minutes, but it can be present all day with decreasing intensity after

arising.

10,11 Morning stiffness lasting for more than 1 hour rarely occurs in other

diseases outside of RA.

12


Figure 44-3 Frequency of involvement of different joint sites in established rheumatoid arthritis. MCPs,

metacarpophalangeal joints; MTPs, metatarsophalangeal joints; PIPs, proximal interphalangeal joints.

Ultimately, any or all of the diarthrodial joints (elbows, knees, shoulders, ankles,

hips, temporomandibular joints, sternoclavicular joints, and glenohumeral joints) can

be involved (Fig. 44-3). Progressive disease is characterized by irreversible joint

deformities, such as ulnar deviation of the fingers (Fig. 44-4), boutonniere

deformities (hyperextension of the DIP joint and flexion of the PIP joint), or swan

neck deformities (hyperextension of the PIP joint and flexion of the DIP joint) (Fig.

44-5). Similar irreversible deformities can also involve the feet. Patients with more

aggressive disease (multiple joint involvement, positive RF) have a greater than 70%

probability of developing joint damage or erosions within 2 years of disease onset.

13

Figure 44-4 Ulnar deviation and metacarpophalangealsynovitis (left). This may progress to more marked lateral

deviation with subluxation of the extensor tendons (right finger; right).

p. 878

p. 879

Figure 44-5 Characteristic finger deformities in rheumatoid arthritis. DIP, distal interphalangeal joint; MCP,

metacarpophalangeal joint; PIP, proximal interphalangeal joint.

CASE 44-1, QUESTION 2: Which laboratory values in T.W. could be used to monitor her RA disease

progression?

Physical assessment of an RA patient is fundamental to monitoring and evaluating

patient course. For instructions on how to perform a basic musculoskeletal

examination, go to http://meded.ucsd.edu/clinicalmed/joints.htm and scroll to

select either knee, shoulder, hand, hip, or lower back examinations.

In 2010, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and European League

Against Rheumatism (EULAR) developed new classification criteria for RA. In

comparison to criteria previously outlined in 1987, the intent of the new

classification was to identify patients early in disease development so that

therapeutic intervention can be initiated as soon as possible, ultimately decreasing

disease progression and improving clinical outcomes.

14

Because no single chemical or laboratory finding is specific for the disease, the

diagnosis of RA is based on multiple clinical criteria (Table 44-1). Individuals

presenting with clinical synovitis (swelling) not explained by other differential

diagnoses such as systemic lupus erythematosus, psoriatic arthritis, or gout, among

others, should be tested for RA. RA criteria in the new classification system include

quantifying joint involvement and symptom duration as well as detecting presence of

autoantibodies and acute-phase reactants.

11,14–16 Using a score-based algorithm based

on these four categories, a summative score of 6 or more out of a total possible score

of 10, as seen in T.W., suggests RA.

14

Individually, each of the laboratory findings is characteristic for chronic systemic

inflammatory disease with no test being specific for RA, although rheumatoid factor

(RF) and anti–citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) are more definitive than erythrocyte

sedimentation rate (ESR) or C-reactive protein (CRP).

9 Specifically, autoimmune

diseases are frequently characterized by autoantibodies, with 50% to 80% of RA

individuals having RF, anti-CCP, or both.

11,15,16

RF, an IgM or IgG autoantibody, abnormally reacts with the Fc portion of IgG to

form an immune complex. It is found in 75% to 80% of patients with RA. It may also

present in up to 5% of healthy individuals and in patients with diseases other than

RA, including almost any condition associated with either immune complex

formation or with hypergammaglobulinemia (e.g., chronic infections,

lymphoproliferative and hepatic diseases, systemic lupus erythmatosus, and

Sjogren’s syndrome). An RF titer of at least 1:160 is considered a positive test and

most patients with RA, such as T.W., typically have titers of at least 1:320.

9,17

Overall, RF is neither sensitive nor specific enough to independently diagnose RA,

but it is found in the majority of patients and a higher titer early in disease generally

correlates with increased disease severity and progression.

18

Table 44-1

Criteria for Diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis

Criteria Score

a

Joint Involvement

1 large joint

b 0

2–10 large joints 1

1–3 small joints

c 2

4–10 small joints 3

>10 small joints 5

Serology

d

(≥1 result needed)

Negative RF and negative anti-CCP 0

Low-positive RF or low-positive anti-CCP 2

High-positive RF or high-positive anti-CCP 3

Acute-Phase Reactants

Normal CRP and normal ESR 0

Abnormal CRP or abnormal ESR 1

Duration of symptoms

<6 weeks 0

≥6 weeks 1

aScore-based algorithm: add score of all categories; score of ≥6/10 needed to classify patient as having definite

RA.

bShoulders, elbows, hips, knees, and ankles.

cmetacarpophalangeal, proximal interphalangeal, second through fifth metatarsophalangeal, thumb interphalangeal

joints and wrists.

dnegative, IU ≤ upper limit of normal (ULN); low-positive, IU higher than ULN but ≤3 times ULN; high-positive,

>3 times ULN; if RF assay only available as positive or negative, positive RF interpreted as low-positive.

Source: Aletaha D et al. 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of

Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative [published correction appears in Ann

Rheum Dis. 2010;69:1892]. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:1580.

anti-CCP, anti–cyclic citrullinated peptide; CRP, C-reactive protein; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; RA,

rheumatoid arthritis; RF, rheumatoid factor.

Citrulline, a nonstandard amino acid, is also established as a key component of RA

antigenicity and is more specific for RA than RF. Citrullinated proteins and anti-CCP

antibodies are abundant in inflamed RA synovium. Anti-CCP antibodies can be

detected in 50% to 60% of early RA patients, and the specificity of anti-CCP is very

high at 90% to 95%.

9 Anti-CCP is present as early as 1.5 to 9 years before symptom

presentation, suggesting a pathogenic role for these antibodies in RA.

19,20 A positive

anti-CCP also correlates with an increased likelihood of a more erosive course of

RA than either a negative anti-CCP or a positive RF. In summary, a positive antiCCP antibody test is highly specific for RA, predictive of the development of RA, is

a marker for an erosive disease course, and in combination with positive RF also

correlates with 99.5% specificity for RA, making the likelihood of T.W. not having

RA very minimal.

9,21

The nonspecific markers for inflammation include ESR and CRP, but unfortunately

these acute-phase responses are also not

p. 879

p. 880

disease-specific. T.W.’s hematologic findings are consistent with a mild anemia of

chronic inflammation. Although her serum iron concentration is decreased, her

normal iron-binding capacity makes a diagnosis of iron-deficiency anemia unlikely.

Her anemia probably results from a failure of iron release from the

reticuloendothelial tissues and would not be expected to respond to iron therapy. The

mild thrombocytosis is additional evidence of a systemic inflammatory response. The

laboratory manifestations of inflammation should improve with effective drug therapy

and, along with many of the clinical features of RA, are useful parameters for

monitoring disease activity and response to therapy.

Finally, the test for ANA rules out systemic lupus erythematosus in T.W. The

ANA, however, can be positive in 10% to 70% patients with RA.

14

EXTRA-ARTICULAR MANIFESTATIONS AND

COMPLICATIONS

The classic RA presentation involves joint findings; however, RA is a systemic

disease reflected by accompanying extra-articular and organ system manifestations

that, chronically, can occur in up to 46% of patients. These manifestations are also

associated with higher disease activity,

22 and those with systemic involvement have

higher mortality rates than those without, suggesting that early treatment may lower

both the risk and severity of RA complications.

22,23

Rheumatoid nodules occur in 15% to 20% of patients and are typically found on

extensor surfaces, pressure points, and tendons. Pleuropulmonary manifestations

include pulmonary nodules, fibrosis, and pleuritis; interstitial pneumonitis and

arteritis of the pulmonary vasculature, although rare, can be potentially lifethreatening. Vasculitis occurs infrequently, is more common in patients with longstanding and often severe disease. Complications include skin ulceration, peripheral

neuropathy, and arteritis of organs.

10

Some extra-articular manifestations occur as syndromes. Sjögren syndrome

includes dry eyes (keratoconjunctivitis sicca), dry mouth (xerostomia), and

connective tissue disease. T.W.’s eye complaints may be an extra-articular

manifestation of her RA. Felty syndrome is characterized by chronic arthritis,

splenomegaly, and neutropenia; thrombocytopenia, anemia, and lymphadenopathy

may also be present.

10

Individuals with RA have a median life expectancy that is 3 to 10 years shorter

than non-RA populations, with lower life expectancy associated with more severe

disease.

5,24 The excess mortality has been attributed primarily to accelerated

cardiovascular disease, responsible for one-third to one-half of deaths among adults

compared with one-fourth to one-fifth of deaths among adults without RA. RA is

associated with a twofold to threefold increased rate of myocardial infarction (MI),

as well as lower MI survival. Management of cardiovascular risk include annual

cardiovascular risk evaluations for all patients, multiplying risk scores by 1.5 for

patients with more than one marker of severe disease activity, use of statins and

cardiovascular medications known to reduce cardiovascular risk, caution when

prescribing nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) owing to associated

cardiovascular risk, and smoking cessation (Table 44-2).

25 Finally, pericarditis and

myocarditis, while rare, may also occur.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

Table 44-2

Recommendations for Reducing Cardiovascular Risk

a

in Patients with

Rheumatoid Arthritis (Evidence/Strength Rating)

b

Rheumatoid arthritis should be considered as a disease in which cardiovascular risk is elevated, because of

both an increased prevalence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors and the inflammatory burden.

Although the evidence base is less, this may also apply to ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis (2b–

3/B).

To lower cardiovascular risk, adequate control of arthritis disease activity is necessary (2b–3/B).

All patients with rheumatoid arthritis should undergo annual cardiovascular risk evaluation with use of

national guidelines. This should also be considered for all patients with ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic

arthritis. When antirheumatic treatment has been changed, risk assessments should be repeated (3–4/C).

For patients with rheumatoid arthritis, risk score models should be adapted by introducing a 1.5

multiplication factor when the patient meets two of the following three criteria: disease duration of more

than 10 years, rheumatoid factor or anti–cyclic citrullinated peptide positivity, and the presence of certain

extra-articular manifestations (3–4/C).

When using the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation model for determination of cardiovascular risk,

triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio should be used (3/C).

Intervention for cardiovascular risk factor management should be performed according to national

guidelines (3/C).

Preferred treatment options are statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, or angiotensin II blockers

(2a–3/C–D).

The effect of cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors and most nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on cardiovascular

risk is not completely determined and should be studied further. Clinicians should therefore be very

cautious in prescribing these drugs, especially to patients with cardiovascular risk factors or with

documented cardiovascular disease (2a–3/C).

When corticosteroids are prescribed, this should be at the lowest possible dose (3/C).

Patients should be actively encouraged to stop smoking (3/C).

aCardioprotective treatment is recommended when 10-year cardiovascular risk is above the threshold of

“moderate” that is established for each country (i.e., either 10% or 20%).

bLevel of Evidence: Category 1A, from meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials; 1B, from at least one

randomized, controlled trial; 2A, from at least one controlled study without randomization; 2B, from at least one

type of quasi-experimental study; 3, from descriptive studies, such as comparative studies, correlation studies, or

case-control studies; 4, from expert committee reports or opinions or from clinical experience of respected

authorities; Strength of recommendation directly based on A, category 1 evidence; B, category 2 evidence or

extrapolated recommendations from category 1 evidence; C, category 3 evidence or extrapolated

recommendations from category 1 or 2 evidence; D, category 4 evidence or extrapolated recommendations from

category 2 or 3 evidence.

Source: Peters MJ et al. EULAR evidence-based recommendations for cardiovascular risk management in

patients with rheumatoid arthritis and other forms of inflammatory arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:325.

p. 880

p. 881

Treatment

The treatment goals of RA are to maximize functional status through maintenance or

improvement of symptoms (e.g., joint pain and swelling), preserve joint function, and

prevent deformity to ultimately improve quality of life and delay disability.

Treatment to achieve remission or lowest possible disease activity involves a

combination of interventions. Early initiation of pharmacologic therapy starting at the

point of diagnosis is critical to quality RA care.

26–28 Other supportive interventions

include rest, exercise and physical therapy, occupational therapy, and emotional

support.

CASE 44-1, QUESTION 3: What nonpharmacologic therapy should be included in the management of

T.W.’s RA?

Systemic and articular rest (achieved by splinting the affected joints) can reduce

inflammation significantly. Restful and adequate sleep are particularly important in

chronic, fatigue-inducing diseases such as RA. Therefore, T.W. should rest often

especially when experiencing acute inflammation, but daytime rest periods should be

limited to 30 to 60 minutes each as prolonged rest can also induce rapid losses in

strength and endurance. Splinting of joints is typically prescribed throughout the day

and night during periods of active inflammation, then only at night for several weeks

after cessation of inflammation.

29

No comments:

Post a Comment

اكتب تعليق حول الموضوع

mcq general

 

Search This Blog