the assay system will operate accurately for the
said analyte and a concentration value of the sample can
The interval between the signal generated by the lowest
calibrator to the signal generated by the highest calibrator,
which gives proportionate and measurable and a linear
signal, is referred to as the measuring range of the assay
The critical point (Cx in Fig. 23.13), in the antigen excess
zone of the dose-response curve corresponds to the
maximum concentration value of analyte, which gives a
signal value higher than the signal value of the calibrator
of highest concentration, and just before the value (B1 in
FIG. 23.10: Signal development as a function of time. Figure
illustrating ‘immediate mixed blanking’ using IgA as an example
FIG. 23.11: Signal development as a function of time. Figure
illustrating ‘immediate mixed blanking’ using IgG as an example
FIG. 23.12A: Standard curves for IgA obtained with ‘real sample
blanking’ and ‘immediate mixed blanking’
Fig. 23.13) at which erroneous interpolation begins. The
interval between the signal of highest standard and the
signal of the critical concentration can be referred to as the
security range of the assay system for the analyte.
The risk of obtaining signals in the antigen excess zone
are more relevant in analytes like C-reactive protein or
immunoglobulins such as IgG where the concentration
between normal and pathological sample can differ
by manifolds. It is necessary to make sure that the
concentration values lying in the antigen excess zone
(critical point) are beyond the concentrations which can
The relation between the security range and measuring
range is very important in optimizing assay systems.
As mentioned earlier the shape of the dose-response
curve depends on the ratio between the antigen and
the antibody. At a constant antibody concentration, an
increase in the measuring range will result in a narrower
security range, leading to antigen excess at a lower antigen
The implications of increasing the antibody reagent
concentrations can be practically demonstrated using IgG as
an analyte and antihuman IgG as a reagent. The measuring
range and the security range can be expanded by increasing
the antibody concentration. However, this expansion can
only be done to a point where it is still possible to have the
desired sensitivity for lower analyte concentration.
Figure 23.15, shows the effect of increasing the antibody
concentration on the security ranges while keeping
constant, the measuring range of the dose-response curve.
When the volume of an antibody solution of concentration
‘X’ used is 50 µL, the security range obtained is around 5000
mg/dL. As the volume of the same antibody concentration is
increased to 75 µL, the security range increases to >10,000 mg/
dL. With a further increase in volume of the same antibody
concentration to 100 µL, the security range shifts to >15,000
mg/dL. But this increase in measuring range is possible till a
certain limit of increasing volume of antibody solution. If the
volume of antibody solution is increased further, there will
be a decrease in the absorbance at the lowest concentration
of the measuring range due to antibody excess, resulting in
compromising with assay sensitivity.
By adjusting the sample dose and the antibody
concentration, a measuring range 20 to 25 times the lowest
calibrator value can be possibly optimized, with a security
range still giving a warning up to the pathophysiological
concentration. A wide measuring range combined with a
wide security range offer the advantage of a few reruns and
maximum security against antigen excess problems.
Once the dose-response curve for a reagent has been
optimized, a standard curve can be obtained by using
a number of dilutions of the calibrator (preferably 5–6)
covering the optimal measuring range. The lowest
calibrator should be chosen to give a signal significantly
higher than the background noise. The highest calibrator
space for a fair security range (Fig. 23.16).
A curve is fitted to the signals obtained for calibrator
dilutions and can be stored in the memory of the
instrument. Different curve fitting programs can be made
available in instrument software.
Many of the instruments are equipped with a facility
to give a ‘warning’ that indicate reruns of the test with
FIG. 23.12B: Standard curves for IgG obtained with ‘real sample
blanking’ and ‘immediate mixed blanking’
FIG. 23.13: Dose-response curve Figure illustrating measuring range
(X-Y), critical concentration (Z), standard curve (A1-A6), erroneous
interpolation (where Abs. val.1.0 corresponds to A6 and B1, Abs. val.
0.8 corresponds to A5 and B2 and Abs val. 0.6 corresponds to A4 and
dilution of the sample with high concentration values of
analyte. This warning is given as long as the sample signal
is higher than the signal of the highest calibrator.
The validity of the stored standard curve should be
checked with known controls at regular time intervals.
Instrumentation for Turbidimetry
The development of automated instruments for the
clinical laboratory began in the 1950s at the same time
as the demand for test such as IgA, CRP, HBsAg escalated
dramatically. One of the benefits of automation is a
reduction in the variability of results and errors of analysis
by eliminating tasks that are repetitive and monotonous
for a human and that can lead to boredom or inattention.
The significant improvement in quality of laboratory tests
The photometric requirements of turbidimetric analysis
are no different from those of photometric biochemistry
analysis. However, the photometer used must be provided
with means to maintain the contents of the cuvette at
a constant temperature during the reaction along with
compatible software to run the various steps of the reagent
and reagent kinetics appropriately.
The chemistry analyzers (spectrophotometers)
available utilize either or both of the two modes of
In this mode, the chemical reaction is carried out in a
test tube/cuvette. The instrument aspirates the reaction
mixture from the test tube/cuvette, which enters into the
flow cell (internally built reading chamber), where the
absorbance is measured. After the absorbance is measured,
the reaction mixture is passed through a different outlet
and is collected in a waste collecting bottle. As all the
measurements are done in a single flow cell, the flow cell
has to be washed after each test. Improper washing may
affect the test results of the subsequent tests. Especially, if
latex enhanced tests are used, the latex has a tendency to
stick and form a permanent coating on the internal walls of
the flow cell resulting in variation in the wavelength of the
FIG. 23.14: Effect of increasing measuring range on security range.
M-M1 = measuring range for curve 1, C1 = critical concentration
for curve 1 M-M2 = Measuring range of curve 2, C2 = critical
FIG. 23.16: Illustrating standard curve
FIG. 23.15: Effect of increasing antibody concentration on security
range. Where 50, 75 and 100 µL are volumes of antibody and 6,000,
11,000 and 16,500 are their respective critical concentrations
non-enhanced antibody reagents are proteinacious and
cleaning of the flow cell would remain a critical issue.
When Ag-Ab complexes are aspirated, because of the
force of aspiration, the formed immune complexes would
be structurally disturbed and may break down into smaller
complexes, which would result in lower absorbance
values. Moreover, the immune precipitates formed may
block the aspiration tube or the flow cell itself.
For turbidimetric assays designed with real sample
blanking reading principle, it would be inconvenient to run
the test in the aspiration mode. Initially, the sample mixed
with the activation buffer would have to be aspirated first
and absorbance A1 measured. Then again the activation
buffer and the sample will have to be taken in another test
tube and the principle reagent added and the reaction
read after a fixed time interval. Hence, for running one
assay twice, double the amount of activation buffer and
In this mode, the reaction of the reagent and sample takes
place in a measuring cuvette, and absorbance is read in
the same measuring cuvette itself. Hence, assays using
any of the reading principles can be conveniently read in
cuvette mode without wastage of reagents.
Instruments applying this mode of measuring have an
advantage. As the reactions are run in external cuvettes,
the instruments are safe from the effects of reagents.
Moreover, availability of standardized optically clean
No comments:
Post a Comment
اكتب تعليق حول الموضوع