2) Tetrahydroisoquinolines and tetrahydro-[J-carbolines and alcohol dependence.

3) Similarities between opiate alkaloid and alcohol dependence.

ALCOHOL: THE OLO RASCAL IN NEW CLOTHES 365

Myers & Veale (1968) found that the 5HT depletor, p-chlorophenylalanine (PCPA) produced, in an imals, an aversion to alcohol. Since then this

tendency has been confirmed in several studies. However pCPA also induces

aversion to saccharine fluid (Parker & Radow, 1976) and therefore it is not clear ifthe

drug itself may be more important than 5HT depletion in alcohol aversion. Liver

acetaldehyde formation is increased by pCPA, if alcohol is administered concurrently. Therefore, alcohol aversion could be a safety reaction in the animal towards

toxic levels ofacetaldehyde (Myers, 1978).

Injection of 5HT-lesioning compounds, such as 5,6-d ihydroxytryptamine and

5,7-dihydroxytryptamine, directly into the cerebral ventricles, enhances alcohol

drinking in rats (Ho, Tsai, Chen, Begleiter & Kissin, 1974). In other studies, depletion

of 5HT by 30% or even 69% did not alter the amount of alcohol drinking

(Kiianmaa, 1976), in rats .

The role of 5HT depletion, or 5HT metabolism, in alcoholism is not clear from

these experimental studies. Ahtee & Eriksson (1972) reported increased 5HT and

5HIAA contents in the brains of alcohol preferring rats and chronic use of alcohol

enhanced this action. The highest 5HT elevations were detected in the hypothalamus, thalamus and midbrain ofthe alcohol drinking rats .

Isoquinoline alkaloids are widely distributed in nature. Some ofthese alkaloids are

known hallucinogens. During the last ten years , several studies have claimed that

catecholamine derived tetrahydroisoquinolines (TIQ) may be involved in the

aetiology ofalcoholism.

In 1970 Davis & Wafsh reported tetrahydroisoquinoline formation, in biological

preparations, from acetaldehyde and ethanol in vitro. The compound formed,

salsolinol, has also been found in the brain of rats after ethanol administration.

Highly sensitive and specific assay methods are needed to detect TIQ compounds and

their metabolism in brain tissue . Recently Collins, Nijm, Borge, Teas & Goldfars

(1979) detected from five to six times higher concentrations of dopamine-related

tetrahydroisoquinolines (salsolinols) in the dail y urine sampies of alcoholics than in

the daily urinesampies ofnonalcoholic control subjects.

TIQ compounds, harman, or ß-carbolines can be formed in condensation

reactions of tryptamines with carbonyl compounds, that is, aldehydes. McIsaac

(1961) gave ethanol, 5HT and monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) to rats and

found a ß-carboline in the urine. p-carbolines are hallucinogenic compounds and

they also induce tremor (Ho , Fritchie, Idänpään-Heikkilä, Tansey & McIsaac, 1970).

They have been detected in brain tissue after treatment ofrats with acetaldehyde but

also in the untreated rat brain. Recently Airaksinen, Peura, Kari & Mikkonen (1980)

reported that a moderate alcohol intake (50-100 g in 4 h) induced detectable amounts

of a ß-carboline (tetrahydroharman) in the plasma and platelets of normal healthy

volunteers.

Myers & Melchior (1977) showed, in rats, that tetrahydro- ß-carboline (tetrahydroharman) increased voluntary alcohol consumption, resernbling tetrahydroisoquinolines , but being at least 100 times more potent. It remains to be studied if tetrahydroharmans have any role in the symptoms ofalcohol intoxication, hang-over or alcohol

dependence. While ß -carbolines have now been shown to exist in the animal brain,

and to appear in human plasma and platelets, after alcohol intake, it would be

interesting to know if there are any dose response efTects in regard to the amount of

alcohol consumed.

Both tetrahydroisoquinolines and p-carbolines seem to be important compounds

in trying to explore the biochemical mechanism of alcoholism and alcohol

dependence. The speculation that TIQ and /or ß-carbolines are involved in physical

dependence, requires a demonstration that they are formed in significant amounts to

cause the symptoms ofdependence.

366 J.IDÄNPÄÄN -HEIKKILÄ

Sinclair, Adkins & Walker (1973) found that morphine markedly decreased, in

rats, the daily intake 'of fluid containing alcohol. In hamsters, morphine, and

levorphanol to a lesser degree, reduced alcohol intake, whereas the narcotic

antagonist, naltrexone, had an opposite etTect. In rats, an injection of methadone or

levorphanol decreased voluntary alcohol inta ke. It seems that morphine exacerbates

the degree of physical dependence on alcohol in rats . A conflicting factor was the

fmding that in rats, wh ich prefer and drink solutions of morphine, alcohol does not

decrease the inta ke ofmorphine.

In general, narcotics see m to interact with ethanol in animals. There are also so me

clinical experiences as to the fact that many narcotic addicts use alcohol when heroin

or morphine are not available. In methadone maintenance programmes, addicts are

frequently also heavy users of alcohol. However, there is no evidence that similar

behavioural mechanisms are involved in alcohol and narcotic abuse. The evidence is

also very weak if one considers the neurochemical mechanisms of alcohol or opiate

intoxication and withdrawal symptoms. The controversies may in part be explained

by the fact that there is a lack of agreement concerning the methods for inducing

dependence and what are the withdrawal signs .

Conclusions

Although alcohol may have some beneficial etTects, its list of sins is long and

voluminous. Taken together, the medical, psychiatric and social cost of drinking and

alcoholism is a heavy economic burden in an increasingly large number of countries.

There is no reason to believe that alcohol could be used rationally as a preventive

agent, for example, against ischaemic heart disease.

However, it has been interesting to note that the recent studies have shown many

new aspects, which make us re-evaluate the old and well-known views about alcohol.

References

Ahtee, L. & Eriksson, K. (1972). 5-hydroxytryptamine and 5-hydroxyindolylacetic acid content

in brain ofrat strains selected for their alcohol intake. Physiol. Behav.. 8, 123-126.

Airaksinen, M. M., Peura, P., Kari, J. & Mikkonen, E. (1980). Tetrahydro- ß-carbolines in man

after alcohol drinking. Abstract in Annual Nordic Meeting on Biological Alcohol Research

XI. Helsinki.

British Medical Journal (1979). Alcohol heart muscle disease. Leading article, Brit. med. J.. 2,

1457-1458.

Castelli, W. P., Douyle, J. T., Gordon, T., Harnes, C. G., Hjortland, M. c.,Hulley, S. B., Kagan,

A. & Zukel, W. J. (1977). Alcohol and blood lipids. Lancet, 1, 153-155.

Clarren, S. K. & Smith, D. W. (1978). The fetal alcohol syndrome. New Eng. 1. Med.. 298,

1063-1067.

Collins, M. A., Nijm, W. P., Borge, G. F., Teas, G. & Goldfars, C. (1979). Dopamine-related

tetrahydroisoquinolines: Significant urinary excretion by alcoholics after alcohol

consumption. Science, 205, 1184-1185.

Davis, V. E. & Walsh, M. J. (1970). Alcohol, amines, alkaloids: A possible biochemical basis for

alcohol addiction. Science, 167, 1005-1007.

Hennekens, C. H., Rosner, B. & Cole, D. S. (1978). Daily alcohol consumption and fatal

coronary heart disease.Am. J. Epidem., 107,196-200.

Hennekens, C. H., Willett, W., Rosner, B., Cole, D. S. & Mayrent, S. H. (1979). EfTects ofbeer,

wine and liquor in coronary deaths. J. Am. med. Ass.. 242, 1973-1974.

Ho, A. K. S., Tsai, c.s., Chen, R. C. A., Begleiter, H. & Kissin, B. (1974). Experimental

studieson alcoholism. Psychopharmac.. 40, 101-107.

Ho, B. T., Fritchie, G. E., Idänpään-Heikkilä , J. E., Tansey, L. W. & Mclsaac, W. M. (1970).

(lH)-Harmal ine distribution in monkey brain, pharmacological and autoradiographie

study. Brain Res.. 22,397-400.

ALCOHOL: THE OLD RASCAL IN NEW CLOTHES 367

Idänpään-Heikkilä, J. E., Fritchie, G . E., Ho , B. T. & McIsaac, W. M. (1971). Placental transfer

of 14C-ethanol. Am. J. Obst. Gynec.,110,426-428.

Idänpään-Heikkilä, J. , Jouppila, P., Äkerblom, H. K., Isoaho, R., Kauppila, E. & Koivisto, M.

(1972). Elimination and metablie etTeets of ethanol in mother, fetus and newbom infant.

Am. J. Obst. Gynec.. 112, 387-393.

Johansson, B. G. & Medhus, A. (1974). Increase of plasma rr-lipoprotein in chronic a lco holics

after acute abuse. Acta med. Scand., 195,273-278.

Jones, K. L., Smith, D. W., Ulleiand, C. N. & Streissguth, A. P. (1973). Pattern ofmalformation

in otTspring ofchronic alcoholie mothers. Lancet, 1, 1267-1271.

Kaminski, M., Rumeau-Rouquette, C. & Schwartz, D. (1976). Consommation d'alcohol chez

les femmes enceintes et issue de la grossesse. Rev. Epidem. Sante Publ., 24,27-40.

Kiianrnaa, K. (1975). Evidenee for involvement of noradrenaline and against

5-hydroxytryptamine neurons in alcohol consumption by rats . Finn. Found. AlcoholStud.,

24,73-84.

Klatsky , A., Friedman, G . & Siegelaub. A. (1977). Alcohol consumption before myocardial

infarction: result s from the Kaiser-Permanente epidemiologie study of myocardial

infarction. Ann. intern. Med.. 81, 294-301.

La Porte, R., Kuller, L. & Cresanta, J. (1979). Geographie and secular relationship of alcohol

intake to ASHD death rate s. Abstract in Conference on cardiovascular epidemiology, New

Orleans.

Lemoine, P., Harousseau, H., Bortegru, J. P. & Menuet, J. C. (1967). Les enfants de parents

alcoholiques: Anomalies observees apropos de 127 cas. Arch. Fr. Pediat., 25,830-832.

Mclsaac, W. M. (1961). Formation ofl-methyl-6-methoxy-I,2,3,4-tetrahydro-2-carboline under

physiological conditions. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 52,607-609.

Myers, R. D. (1978). Psychopharmacology ofalcohol. Ann. Rev. Pharmac. Toxicol.. 18,125-44.

Myers, R. D. & Melehior, C. L. (1977). Alcohol drinking: Abnormal intake caused by

tetrahydropapaveroline in brain. Science. 196,554-556.

Myers, R. D. & Veale, W, L. (1968). Alcohol preference in the rat: Reduction following

depletion ofbrain serotonin. Science. 160, 1469-1471.

Nicloux, M. (1899). Sur le pass äge de I'alcohol ingere de la mere an foetus, en particulier chez la

fernrne . Cr. R. Soc. Bio!.. 51,980-982.

Nikkilä, E. (1979). Alcohol and heart. Duodecim, 95,389-398.

Parker, L. F. & Radow, B. L. (1976). EtTects of parachlorophenylalanine on ethanol

self-selection in the rat. Pharmac. Biochem. Behav.,4, 535-540.

Pikkarainen, P. H. & Raiha, N. C. R. (1967). Development ofalcohol dehydrogenase aetivity in

the human liver. Pediat. Res., 1, 165-169 .

Ross , D. H., Hartmann, R. J. & Geiler, J. (1976). EtTects of morphine sulfate and naloxone, a

long active morphine antagonist. Proc. West. Pharmac. Soc., 19,326-330.

Sinclair, J. D., Adkins, J. & Walker, S. (1973). Morphine-indueed suppression of voluntary

alcohol drinking in rats. Nature, 246,425-427.

Stasen, W. B., NetT, R. K., Miettinen, O. S. & Jiek, H. (1976). Alcohol consumption and

nonfatal myocardial infaraction. Am. J. Epidem., 104,603-608.

St. Leger, A., Cochrane, A. & Moore, F. (1979). Factors assoeiated with cardiae mortality in

developed countries with particular reference to the con sumption of wine. Lancet, 1,

1017-1020.

Taskinen, M. R. & Nikki1ä, E. A. (1977). Nocturnal hypertriglyceridemia and hyperinsulinemia

following moderate evening intake ofalcohol. Acta med. Scand., 202, 173-176.

Ulleland, C. N. (1972). The otTspring ofalcoholie mothers. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 187,167-169.

Witti, F. P. (1978). Alcohol and birth defects . FDA Consumer, 12,20-23.

Yano, K., Rhoads, G . & Kagan, A. (1977). Coffee, alcohol and risks ofcoronary heart disease

amongJapanese men living in Hawaii. New Eng. J. Med., 297,406-409.

CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY OF

BENZODIAZEPINE DEPENDENCE

P. TYRER

Mapp erley Hospital.

Porchester Road, Mapp erley, Nottingham NG3 6AA. England

Introduction

Benzodiazepines are the mo st commonly prescribed drug s in the world. They are

etTective in reducing anxiety and promoting sleep , safe in overdosage and greatly

superior to the main class of drugs that preceded them, the barbiturate s. Benzodiazepines are taken by about one person in fifteen ofthe population during the course ofa

year (Skegg, Doll & Perry, 1977) and similar ftgures are found in most other countries

(Balter, Levine & Manheimer , 1974). The rate of increase in prescriptions of benzodiazepines during the 1960s and early 1970s has been a dramatic on e and aroused

concern in many quarters (Lancet , 1973; Trethowan, 1975), although it mu st be

added that th is increase was accompanied by a fall in barbiturate pres criptions and

often represents substitution rather than new pre scribing . In recent years the increase

has been less dramatic, of the order of three to five per cent per year (Department of

Health & Social Security, 1972-1978) but the concern over benzodiazepine

dependence continues (Greenblatt & Shader, 1978; Cornmittee . on the Review of

Mcdicines, 1980). What is disturbing is that repeat pre script ion s make up such a large

proportion of total pre scribing and that in man y cases such prescriptions are

inappropriate (Tyrer , 1978). One of the possible reasons for repe at prescribing is

dependence, leading to pati ent s demanding more drug s even ifthey are not clinically

indicated. Thi s can either be because the drug induces pleasure or at least avoids

discomfort (psych ic dependence) or leads to intense physical disturbance on withdrawal (ph ysical dependence) (World Health Organisation , 1974). Whether or not the

regular consumption of benzodiazepines leads to dependence is an important

question and has generated a great deal of debate. The results of animal and human

pharmacological studies hav e both been relevant in assessing the que stion, but for

reasons that will become clear later in this review a distinction is made between

dependence occurring in high (non-therapeutic) dosage , and the lower range of

therapeutic dosage.

Animalstudies

High dosage

There are good animal models of drug dependence (Kumar, 1974). Opiate and

barbiturate dependence has been amply demonstrated by drug-seeking behaviour in

dependent an ima ls, who regularly choose food or drink containing their drug.

CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY OF BENZODIAZEPINE DEPENDENCE 369

Benzodiazepines have much less potential to induce dependence, significantly less so

than barbiturates (Findlay, Robinson & Peregrino, 1972) but physical withdrawal

symptoms can occur. The reasons for the pharmacological dependence are not yet

clear, The recent discovery ofbenzodiazepine receptors in the central nervous system

(Möhler & Okada, 1977) has been a powerful impetus, particularly as there is a close

relationship between the pharmacological potency of the benzodiazepines and their

affmity for the receptors. However, one possible explanation for dependence in high

dosage, an increase in the number of benzodiazepine receptors after long term

administration, has been disproved (Braestrup, Nielsen & Squires, 1979).

Lowdosage

There are no animal studies suggesting that benzodiazepines at dosages equivalent to

those used in human therapy lead to pharmacological dependence.

Studies in man

High dosage

It has been known for many years that prolonged, high dosage ofbenzodiazepines can

sometimes lead to pharmacological dependence, with the development of tolerance

and withdrawal symptoms when the drug is stopped abruptly. This was Irrst

described by Hollister, Motzenbecker & Oegan (1961) with chlordiazepoxide and has

been reported with other benzodiazepines since (Fruensgaard, 1976; Oysken & Chan,

1977; Preskorn & Oenner, 1977; Oe Bard, 1979). The dosage taken at the time of

withdrawal is usually five to ten times the normal therapeutic dose (for example,

chlordiazepoxide 300 mg daily; diazepam 100-150 mg daily) , and the withdrawal

symptoms include epileptic seizures, acute 'psychotic' reactions with agitation,

confusion, paranoid symptoms and perceptual distortion. Most of these symptoms

are re1ieved by retaking the drug, confirrning that they are part of a withdrawal

syndrome. Interpretation of these reactions is complicated by the frequency with

which other drugs, particularly alcohol, had been taken at the same time as the

benzodiazepines, and is common with individuals prone to drug abuse. Marks (1978)

has recentl y reviewed all the literature on benzodiazepine dependence and concludes

from a number of cases of dependence published (which are almost certainly an

underestimate of the true incidence) that only one case of dependence occurs in five

million patient months 'at risk' , and in comparison with dependence on other

psychotropic drugs this figure is very small.

Lowdosage

Whilst the existence of true dependence on high dosage of benzodiazepines is

undisputed there are disagreements over the nature of the syndrome that often

follows withdrawal of benzodiazepines prescribed in therapeutic dosage. This

syndrome comprises anxiety, insomnia, dizziness, headache and perceptual

disturbance (Lancet, 1979). All these symptoms can be found with anxiety states

(Roth, Gurney, Garside & Kerr, 1972) and when they occur after benzodiazepine

withdrawal they may represent areturn ofpre-existing anxiety previously relieved by

the drug (Covi, Lipman, Pattison, Oerogatis & Uhlenluth, 1973; Rickels , Oowning &

Winokur, 1978). If, however, the symptoms increase after benzodiazepine withdrawal and then improve without further drug intervention it is much more likely

that they are part of a withdrawal syndrome. The most convincing evidence of true

withdrawal symptoms has come from Kaies and his colleagues who have described

'rebound insornnia' following cessation of benzodiazepine hypnotic drugs (Kaies,

370 P. TYRER

Scharf & Kaies, 1978; Scharf, Kaies & Soldatof, 1979), although several single case

reports are also difficult to interpret except by postulating a withdrawal syndrome

(Mendelson, 1978; Pevnick, Jasinski & Haertzen, 1978; Winokur, Rickels,

Greenblatt, Snyder & Schatz, 1980). There are also a few case reports of physical

withdrawal syrnptoms, including fits, after chronic benzodiazepine consumption in

low dosage (Rifkin, Quitkin & Klein, 1976; Einarson, 1980), supporting the case that

a true withdrawal syndrome can occur after therapeutic dosage. The presence of

dysphoric symptoms during the withdrawal phase, described by Lader (1980, in

preparation) as 'an amalgam of anxiety, depression, nausea, malaise and

depersonalisation' is also a little difficult to interpret as areturn of pre-existing

anxiety.

Pharmacokinetics ofbenzodiazepines in relation to withdrawal symptoms

One explanation of benzodiazepine withdrawal symptoms occurring after stopping

the drug is that it is a 'reverse placebo' effect. According to this argument the drug is

providing no real pharmacological benefit but when it is stopped the subject feels

worse because he lacks the placebo support ofthe tablet. 1fthis were so the apparent

withdrawal syndrome would show itselfimmediately after stopping the drug. In fact,

in almost all reported cases of withdrawal symptoms there has been aperiod of

between three and thirteen days (with a peak of frve days) before the withdrawal

reaction has become manifest, so the 'reverse placebo' argument loses much of its

credibility.

The delayed onset of the withdrawal symptoms is consistent with the pharmacokinetics of many of the benzodiazepines, Diazepam, medazepam, chlorazepate and

chlordiazepoxide all have a common metabolite, desmethyldiazepam,

(nordiazepam) which has a half life of 50-120 h (Hillestad, Hansen & Melson,

1974). Desmethyldiazepam accumulates after chronic administration and takes

many days to be cleared from the body. In the one case where plasma levels were

recorded during the withdrawal syndrome the symptoms were temporally related to a

delayed fall in plasma desmethyldiazepam (Winokur et al., 1980). Benzodiazepines

with no active metabolites, or short acting ones, such as lorazeparn, oxazeparn,

triazolam, nitrazepam and flunitrazepam, might be expected to show withdrawal

symptoms earlier and this is supported to some extent by the work of Kaies and his

colleagues (Kaies et al., 1979).

It has been suggested that, like the barbiturates, benzodiazepines may induce their

own metabolism in chronic dosage (Kanto, Iisalo, Lehtinen & Salminen, 1974) but

this has not been confirmed (Rutherford, Okoko & Tyrer, 1978). Kaies et al. (1979)

have proposed that the 'rebound insomnia' is caused by a delay or lag in the replacement of endogenous benzodiazepine-like molecules in the central nervous system

after abrupt withdrawal of the exogenous drug; this could also explain other withdrawal symptoms.

Since 1976, a double-blind study of the ß-adrenoceptor blocking drug,

propranolol, and placebo in the treatment of bensodiazepine withdrawal symptoms,

in psychiatrie out-patients and general practice patients, has been in progress in

collaboration with colleagues at the Poisons Unit at Guy's Hospital. As propranolol

reduces the somatic aspects of anxiety (Tyrer & Lader, 1974), it was feit to have

potential in treating withdrawal symptoms, although it is only minimally effective in

treating the symptoms of opiate withdrawal (Hollister & Prusmack, 1974). All

patients taking diazepam or lorazepam only in regular dosage for at least four months

seen by the author in general practice and psychiatrie out-patient clinics have been

considered for the trial, if their drug therapy was considered to be no longer

appropriate. Most such patients were feit to be taking their drugs unnecessarily and

this is in keeping with the recent report ofthe Committee on the Review ofMedicines

CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY OF BENZODIAZEPINE DEPENDENCE 371

who recommend that patients receiving benzodiazepines should be 'carefully selected

and monitored and prescribing limited to short term use', (Committee on the Review

ofMedicines, 1980).

Patients entering the tr ial , stop their lorazepam or diazepam and take between 60

and 120 mg of propranolol (or placebo) for two weeks, according to a flexible dose

regime. Drug levels of desmethyldiazepam and diazepam are taken before stopping

the benzodiazepines and seven and fourteen days after withdrawal. Patients record

their symptoms daily on selfrating scales during the fourteen days after withdrawal.

Unfortunately the study has taken longer than expected because over fifty per cent

of the patients have refused to consider stopping their benzodiazepines. This itself

suggests some degree of dependence. The study is planned to end when forty patients

have entered the trial, after which the code will be broken. To date thirty eight

patients have entered the study and the results should be available soon. It is hoped

that they will give a better idea of the incidence of withdrawal symptoms in

therapeutic dosage and also determine whether pharmacokinetic factors are

important in determining the onset ofwithdrawal symptoms.

Conclusions

It is weil established from animaI and human studies that regular high dosage of

benzodiazepines may lead to psychic and physical dependence, with severe withdrawal symptoms after abrupt cessation ofthe drug.

Most benzodiazepines are taken in low dosage and there is growing evidence that a

proportion of patients may become dependent on these drugs after chronic therapy.

The dependence shows itselfprimarily by the onset ofa withdrawal syndrome several

days after stopping the drug and tolerance and habituation are rare. The incidence of

such withdrawal symptoms is at present unknown.

Pharmacokinetic factors and studies on benzodiazepine receptors have not as yet

explained the nature ofbenzodiazepine dependence.

References

Balter, M. B., Levine,J. & Manheimer, B. I. (1974). Cross-national study ofthe extent ofantianxiety/sedative drug use. New Eng. J. Med. , 290,769-774.

Braestrup, c., Nielsen, M. & Squires, R. F. (1979). No changes in rat benzodiazepine receptors

after withdrawal from continuous treatment with lorazepam and diazepam. Life Sei., 24,

347-350. Committee on the Review ofMedicines (1980). Systematic reviewofthe benzodiazepines. Brit.

med. J., 1,910-912.

Covi, L., Lipman, R. S., Pattison, J. H., Derogatis, L. R. & Uhlenluth, E. H. (1973). Length of

treatment with anxiolytic sedatives and response to their sudden withdrawal. Acta

psychiat. Scand.,49, 51-64.

Oe Bard, M. L. (1979). Oiazepam withdrawal syndrome: a case with psychosis, seizure and

coma. Am. J. Psychiat.,136, 104-5.

Oepartment of Health and Social Security. Health and Personal Social Services Statistics for

England.1972-1978. London: H.M.S.O.

Oysken, M. W. & Chan, C. H. (1977). Oiazepam withdrawal psychosis; a case report. Am. J.

Psychiat., 134,573.

Einarson, T. R. (1980). Lorazepam withdrawal seizures. Lancet, 1, l51.

Findlay, J. 0 ., Robinson, W. W. & Peregrino, L. (1972). Addiction to secobarbital and

chlordiazepoxide in the Rhesus monkey by means of a self-infusion preference procedure.

Psychopharmac., 26,93-114.

Fruensgaard, K. (1976). Withdrawal psychosis: A study of30 consecutive cases. Acta psychiat.

Scand., 53, 105-118.

372 P. TYRER

Greenblatt, D. J. & Shader, R. 1. (1978). Dependence, tolerance and addiction to benzodiazepines: c1inical and pharmacokinetic considerations. DrugMet. Rev., 8, 13-28.

Hillestad, L., Hansen, T. & Melson, H. (1974). Diazepam metabolism in normal man . ii. Serum

concentration and clinical effect after oral administration and accumulation. Clin.

Pharmac. Ther.. 16, 485-489 .

Hollister, L. E., Motzenbecker, F. P. & Degan, R. O. (1961). Withdrawal reaction from

chlordiazepoxide ("Librium"). Psychopharmac., 2,63-8.

Hollister, L. E. & Prusmack, J. J. (1974). Propranalol in withdrawal from opiates. Arch. gen.

Psychiat., 31, 695-8 .

KaIes, A., Scharf, M. B. & KaIes, J. D. (1978). Rebound insomnia; a new c1inical syndrome.

Science, 201,1039-41.

Kaies, A., Scharf, M. B., KaIes, J. D. & Soldatof, C. R. (1979). Rebound insomnia. A potential

hazard following withdrawal ofcertain benzodiazepines. J. Am. med. Ass., 241, 1692-95.

Kanto, J., Iisalo, E., Lehtinen, V. & Salminen, J. (1974). The concentrations of diazepam and its

metabolites in the plasma after an acute and chronic administration. Psychopharmac., 36,

123-131. Kumar, R. (1974). Animal model forevaluating psychotropic drugs. Psychol. Med., 4, 353-9 .

Lancet (1973). Leading article - Benzodiazepines; use, over-use, misuse, abuse? Lancet, I, 1101.

Lancet (1979). Leading article - Benzodiazepine withdrawal. Lancet, I, 196.

Comments

Search This Blog

Archive

Show more

Popular posts from this blog

TRIPASS XR تري باس

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

ZENOXIA 15 MG, Comprimé

VOXCIB 200 MG, Gélule

Kana Brax Laberax

فومي كايند

بعض الادويه نجد رموز عليها مثل IR ، MR, XR, CR, SR , DS ماذا تعني هذه الرموز

NIFLURIL 700 MG, Suppositoire adulte

Antifongiques مضادات الفطريات

Popular posts from this blog

علاقة البيبي بالفراولة بالالفا فيتو بروتين

التغيرات الخمس التي تحدث للجسم عند المشي

إحصائيات سنة 2020 | تعداد سكَان دول إفريقيا تنازليا :

ما هو الليمونير للأسنان ؟

ACUPAN 20 MG, Solution injectable

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

الام الظهر

VOXCIB 200 MG, Gélule

ميبستان

Popular posts from this blog

TRIPASS XR تري باس

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

Popular posts from this blog

TRIPASS XR تري باس

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

ZENOXIA 15 MG, Comprimé

VOXCIB 200 MG, Gélule

Kana Brax Laberax

فومي كايند

بعض الادويه نجد رموز عليها مثل IR ، MR, XR, CR, SR , DS ماذا تعني هذه الرموز

NIFLURIL 700 MG, Suppositoire adulte

Antifongiques مضادات الفطريات

Popular posts from this blog

Kana Brax Laberax

TRIPASS XR تري باس

PARANTAL 100 MG, Suppositoire بارانتال 100 مجم تحاميل

الكبد الدهني Fatty Liver

الم اسفل الظهر (الحاد) الذي يظهر بشكل مفاجئ bal-agrisi

SEDALGIC 37.5 MG / 325 MG, Comprimé pelliculé [P] سيدالجيك 37.5 مجم / 325 مجم ، قرص مغلف [P]

نمـو الدمـاغ والتطـور العقـلي لـدى الطفـل

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

أخطر أنواع المخدرات فى العالم و الشرق الاوسط

Archive

Show more