the dosage of clindamycin–primaquine was 600 mg clindamycin TID and

primaquine 30 mg/day. All patients with moderately severe PCP (A-a oxygen

gradient >45) were treated with prednisone (40 mg BID for 5 days, then once daily

for 3 weeks). Rash was the most frequent dose-limiting toxicity (TMP-SMX, 19%;

dapsone–TMP, 10%; clindamycin–primaquine, 21%). Hematologic toxicities were

observed more frequently in the clindamycin–primaquine arm. Elevated LFTs (5

times above baseline) were more frequent in the TMP-SMX arm. The clindamycin–

primaquine group demonstrated better quality of life scores at Day 7, but by Day 21,

these differences became less significant.

45 TMP-SMX, dapsone–TMP, and

clindamycin–primaquine demonstrated equal efficacy in patients with mild-tomoderate PCP.

J.R. should be hospitalized to better manage his severe adverse reaction and to

complete his treatment of PCP. Because of his severe reaction to TMP-SMX,

dapsone–TMP should not be administered because dapsone is a sulfone with a risk

of cross-reactivity in patients with severe sulfonamide allergies. IV pentamidine is

an option for J.R., but its toxicity suggests that it should be reserved for patients with

more severe PCP presentation. Atovaquone is a reasonable option for patients with

mild PCP who are intolerant of TMP-SMX and have no evidence of GI dysfunction,

but it is not as effective as TMP-SMX or IV pentamidine. Clindamycin–primaquine

is as efficacious as TMP-SMX for the treatment of mild-to-moderate PCP and can be

administered PO. Consequently, it is the drug of choice in this patient.

The decision was made to start J.R. on oral clindamycin–primaquine for his mildto-moderate PCP. J.R. tested negative for G6PD deficiency and was treated with

clindamycin–primaquine for 14 days, completing a 21-day course of PCP therapy

(Table 77-2).

Initiation of Corticosteroids

CASE 77-1, QUESTION 4: Should J.R. receive corticosteroid therapy with PCP treatment? If so, when

should corticosteroids be initiated, and what would be a reasonable regimen for patients with PCP?

Corticosteroids have an important role in the management of patients with acute

PCP who are clinically ill and have a low PO2

(<70 mm Hg) or an A-a oxygen

gradient greater than 35.

12 Many patients who are started on PCP therapy have an

acute period of clinical deterioration, which may be associated with an acute

inflammatory reaction to the rapid killing of Pneumocystis. Particularly among

patients with moderate-to-severe PCP (A-a oxygen gradient >35 mm Hg or Pao2 <70

mm Hg on room air), the use of prednisone during the first 72 hours of treatment may

prevent fatal acute deterioration.

51 Corticosteroids may also have some benefits in

patients exhibiting acute respiratory failure after 72 hours of conventional PCP

therapy.

52 The recommended dose of prednisone is 40 mg given PO BID for 5 days,

then 40 mg/day for 5 days, and then 20 mg/day for 11 days, for a total of 21 days.

53

Patients requiring IV corticosteroids may receive methylprednisolone at 75% of the

prednisone dose. The major concern using glucocorticoids is the activation of latent

infections (such as TB) or exacerbation of an active undiagnosed condition

(especially fungal infections). However, the beneficial role of corticosteroids as

adjunctive therapy outweighs the relative risk of short-term steroid use in this

population.

54 More common side effects of short-term corticosteroids include

ulcerative esophagitis, increased appetite, weight gain, sodium and fluid retention,

headache, and elevated LFTs. Corticosteroids should be used with caution in the

presence of uncontrolled diabetes, active GI bleeding, and uncontrolled hypertension.

Considering his mild hypoxemia (Pao2

, >70 mm Hg), J.R. is not a candidate for

corticosteroid therapy.

Prophylaxis

CASE 77-1, QUESTION 5: J.R. was hospitalized and responded well to treatment. He now is a candidate

for secondary prophylaxis. What secondary prophylaxis would be a good choice for J.R. when he is discharged

from the hospital?

The early recognized efficacy of TMP-SMX prophylaxis

49

led to the eventual

widespread application of prophylaxis and the development of guidelines for PCP

prophylaxis (Table 77-2).

12 HIV-infected patients not receiving HAART or

Pneumocystis prophylaxis were associated with a PCP prevalence of 8.4%, 18.4%,

and 33.3% at 6, 12, and 36 months, respectively, in patients with a CD4 count of less

than 200.

55 These data have formed the basis on which patients receive PCP

prophylaxis. In addition to patients with CD4 counts of less than 200, other patients

at a risk for PCP include those with a CD4 count of less than 14%, a history of an

AIDS-defining illness, a history of oropharyngeal candidiasis, and possibly those

with CD4 counts of 200 to 250.

12 J.R. refused primary prophylaxis and developed

PCP. Secondary prophylaxis is necessary for J.R. to prevent recurrence and should

be continued for life or until immune reconstitution occurs as a result of antiretroviral

therapy.

The same agents and dosing schedules are recommended for primary (before an

acute event) and secondary (after an acute event) prophylaxis of PCP.

12 TMP-SMX,

one double-strength tablet daily, is the most efficacious prophylactic regimen; a

single-strength tablet given daily is less toxic and nearly as efficacious. Patients with

a history of non–life-threatening rash or fever caused by TMP-SMX may benefit from

rechallenge with the original (or half) dose, or a dose escalation technique

(desensitization regimen). Desensitization is preferred to switching to an alternative

agent and is more successful than the direct rechallenge method.

56 Desensitization

involves initiating very low doses of TMP-SMX and gradually increasing to the

maximum dose over the course of days to weeks. In addition, patients who develop

PCP while receiving prophylactic doses of TMP-SMX usually respond to full

therapeutic doses for acute therapy. However, J.R. had a life-threatening reaction to

TMP-SMX and should not be rechallenged or desensitized, and another agent should

be chosen for prophylaxis.

The alternative agents used for prophylaxis include dapsone, dapsone plus

pyrimethamine (with leucovorin), atovaquone suspension, and aerosolized

pentamidine administered by the Respirgard II nebulizer (Table 77-2). TMP-SMX

confers additional protection against toxoplasmosis and certain bacterial infections.

Regimens containing dapsone plus pyrimethamine or atovaquone with or without

pyrimethamine also protect against toxoplasmosis.

12 Although yet to be confirmed in

clinical trials, other options include oral clindamycin–primaquine, intermittently

administered IV pentamidine, oral pyrimethamine–sulfadiazine, and aerosolized

pentamidine administered by other nebulizing devices.

12 TMP-SMX is more

efficacious than dapsone or aerosolized pentamidine in the prevention of PCP.

57

Extrapulmonary (e.g., lymph nodes, spleen, liver, bone marrow, adrenal gland, and

GI tract) P. carinii has been noted in patients receiving inhaled pentamidine

prophylaxis,

58 a finding rarely observed with IV administration. In addition,

aerosolized pentamidine alters the usual chest radiograph findings associated with

PCP, potentially complicating the diagnosis of this disease. Upper lobe infiltrates,

cystic lesions, pneumothoraces, cavitary lesions with nodular infiltrates, and pleural

effusions have been associated with aerosolized pentamidine prophylaxis.

The guidelines for primary prophylaxis suggest that prophylactic antimicrobial

therapy can be discontinued when CD4 counts rise above the threshold associated

with a risk for infection (i.e., <200 for PCP).

12 Many studies support the practice of

discontinuing

p. 1604

p. 1605

secondary PCP prophylaxis in patients whose CD4 counts have increased to

greater than 200 for at least 3 months.

12 A European cohort study found that primary

PCP rates were very low in patients with CD4 counts of 101 to 200 cells/μL and a

viral load of less than 400 copies/mL regardless of prophylaxis, indicating that

discontinuation of prophylaxis may be safe in patients with a CD4 count greater than

100 cells/μL who are on effective antiretrovirals.

59 The guidelines recommend that

prophylaxis be reintroduced if the CD4 count decreases to less than 200 or if PCP

recurs at a CD4 count of greater than 200.

12 J.R. responded well to his PCP treatment

with clindamycin–primaquine in the hospital. However, because this regimen is

unproven for secondary prophylaxis, it cannot be recommended. Considering his

intolerance to TMP-SMX, the best selections would be dapsone (with or without

pyrimethamine) or atovaquone suspension.

TOXOPLASMA GONDII ENCEPHALITIS

Clinical Presentation

CASE 77-2

QUESTION 1: W.O. is a 40-year-old man discovered to be HIV-positive during admission to a detoxification

program for alcohol and heroin dependency. W.O. presented to the AIDS clinic with esophageal candidiasis, a

CD4 count of 60 cells/μL (normal, approximately 1,000 cells/μL), a viral load of 150,000 copies/mL, and a

Toxoplasma IgG titer of 1:256. W.O. was started on HAART. He remained well until 2 years later, when he

presented to the emergency department reporting two seizures in the past 24 hours. His medications at that time

included daily emtricitabine, tenofovir, darunavir/ritonavir, and inhaled pentamidine 300 mg monthly. His

temperature was 100.1°F, and he was observed to have difficulty walking. His CD4 count is 90 cells/μL

(previously 230 cells/μL), viral load is 70,000 copies/mL (previously 4,000), and white blood cell (WBC) count is

4,200 cells/L (normal, 3,800–9,800). A magnetic resonance image (MRI) of the head reveals several ringshaped lesions in the brain stem. Toxoplasma encephalitis is presumptively diagnosed. Should W.O. be isolated

from other patients and health-care workers to prevent the spread of this organism?

T. gondii is a parasitic protozoan that can infect people and is spread by

environmental factors, such as the consumption of raw or undercooked meats and

contact with cat feces. Immunocompetent persons infected with T. gondii may

develop mild symptoms resembling infectious mononucleosis. However, these

symptoms are generally transient and not associated with significant sequelae in

immunocompetent patients (except in pregnant women). Recrudescent disease from

T. gondii is problematic in patients with a suppressed cellular immune system,

including those infected with HIV. Any HIV-positive patient infected with T. gondii

is at a risk for developing clinical disease, particularly at CD4 counts less than 100,

as illustrated by W.O.

12 W.O. presents with encephalitis (an inflammation of the

brain or brainstem), the most frequent manifestation of T. gondii in HIV-positive

patients.

All HIV-infected patients should be tested for IgG antibody to T. gondii after HIV

diagnosis to detect latent infection. In the United States, as many as 70% of healthy

adults are seropositive to Toxoplasma. The prevalence of Toxoplasma encephalitis

among HIV-positive patients varies depending on the geographic region. In the

United States, only 3% to 10% of AIDS patients actually develop encephalitis. In

countries such as France, El Salvador, and Tahiti, where uncooked meat commonly is

ingested, seropositivity is greater than 90% by the fourth decade of life. Toxoplasma

encephalitis may develop in as many as 25% to 50% of AIDS patients in these

countries.

60

The two major routes of transmission of Toxoplasma to humans are oral and

congenital. W.O. need not be isolated from other patients and health-care workers.

HIV-infected patients should be advised not to eat raw and undercooked meat

(internal temperature of meat should be at least 165°F–170°F), especially patients

who are IgG-negative for T. gondii. Patients should wash their hands after touching

uncooked meats and soil, and fruits and vegetables must be washed before eating.

HIV-infected patients should avoid stray cats, keep their cats inside, and change the

litter box daily. If no one else is available to change the litter box, patients should

wash their hands thoroughly afterward.

12

Diagnosis

CASE 77-2, QUESTION 2: Is there sufficient clinical evidence to establish a presumptive diagnosis of

Toxoplasma encephalitis in W.O.?

The diagnosis of Toxoplasma encephalitis usually is presumptive because

demonstration of cysts or trophozoites in brain tissue is required for a definitive

diagnosis. The clinical signs and symptoms of Toxoplasma encephalitis can be either

focal (indicating a specific region of the brain that is infected or inflamed) or

generalized (indicating diffuse inflammation of the brain). Toxoplasma encephalitis

usually occurs in patients with CD4 counts of less than 100. Serum titers of

antibodies against T. gondii typically reflect past infection with the organism and

unfortunately do not help delineate whether acute infection is present. In addition,

cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) polymerase chain reaction for Toxoplasma is not always a

reliable diagnostic tool. Most patients with encephalitis have single or multiple ringenhancing lesions demonstrated on computed tomography scan or MRI of the head.

Brain biopsy is reserved for patients with symptoms of encephalitis who are

seronegative and for those who do not respond to presumptive antitoxoplasmosis

therapy.

61 Because of the nonspecific diagnosis of Toxoplasma encephalitis, a high

index of suspicion for other causes of encephalitis (e.g., central nervous system

[CNS] lymphoma or TB) should be maintained throughout the treatment period for

presumed Toxoplasma encephalitis. W.O. has overwhelming clinical evidence

suggestive of Toxoplasma encephalitis. He is HIV-positive, has a CD4 count of less

than 100, a positive Toxoplasma titer of 1:256 IgG, and a ring-shaped lesion in the

brainstem on MRI. The development of this infection, in addition to the decline in

CD4 T cells and the increase in plasma HIV RNA concentrations, may signal

antiretroviral failure. W.O.’s current antiretroviral therapy should be reassessed,

including his adherence to the regimen.

Prophylaxis

CASE 77-2, QUESTION 3: Should W.O. have been receiving prophylactic therapy for T. gondii?

Similar to many other OIs associated with HIV, therapy for toxoplasmosis can be

categorized into primary prophylaxis, treatment of acute disease, and secondary

prophylaxis. Primary prophylaxis is currently recommended for HIV-infected

patients with CD4 counts of less than 100 who are also IgG-positive for T. gondii

(Table 77-2). Many of the agents used to prevent PCP have activity against T. gondii:

TMP-SMX, dapsone–pyrimethamine–leucovorin, and atovaquone with or without

pyrimethamine/leucovorin are effective as primary prophylaxis for T. gondii.

12 The

increased use of prophylaxis with these agents has significantly decreased the

incidence of Toxoplasma encephalitis.

2

,

12 The double-strength TMP-SMX tablet once

daily is recommended as the first-line prophylaxis. Data do not support the use of

macrolides

p. 1605

p. 1606

or aerosolized pentamidine for Toxoplasma prophylaxis. Similarly, data are

conflicting regarding the efficacy of pyrimethamine as monotherapy for primary

prophylaxis.

62

,

63

Primary prophylaxis may be discontinued in patients who have responded to

HAART with an increase in the CD4 counts to greater than 200 for more than 3

months. In addition, data support reinstituting primary prophylaxis when CD4 counts

drop below 200.

W.O. is currently receiving inhaled pentamidine for PCP prophylaxis. Considering

his CD4 count and IgG seropositivity, he should have received primary prophylaxis

for T. gondii.

Treatment

ACUTE THERAPY

CASE 77-2, QUESTION 4: How should W.O.’s presumptive Toxoplasma encephalitis be treated?

The first-line treatment of acute Toxoplasma encephalitis consists of a

combination of sulfadiazine 4 g/day in three or four daily divided doses and

pyrimethamine as a single 200-mg loading dose, followed by 50 to 75 mg/day as a

single daily dose plus leucovorin 10 to 25 mg PO every day.

12

Induction therapy

should be continued for 6 weeks after resolution of symptoms (a treatment course of

approximately 8 weeks) followed by maintenance therapy (secondary prophylaxis).

Sulfadiazine toxicity may limit the completion of a full course of therapy in as many

as 40% of patients.

64 However, successful desensitization has been documented.

65

W.O.’s clinical and radiologic response should be monitored closely, and other

diagnoses should be considered if there is no improvement.

Alternative therapy includes pyrimethamine plus leucovorin with clindamycin 600

to 900 mg IV every 6 hours or 600 mg PO every 6 hours for at least 6 weeks. One

controlled trial compared the efficacy and tolerability of pyrimethamine plus

sulfadiazine versus pyrimethamine plus clindamycin. Although both regimens were

effective, pyrimethamine–sulfadiazine was superior to pyrimethamine–clindamycin.

The rate of adverse events was similar with both regimens; however,

pyrimethamine–clindamycin led to fewer discontinuations than pyrimethamine–

sulfadiazine (11% vs. 30%, respectively).

66 TMP-SMX may be considered a

treatment option, particularly in patients who cannot take an oral regimen because the

only widely available parenteral sulfonamide is the sulfamethoxazole component of

TMP-SMX. However, there is less in vitro activity and less clinical data to support

the use of TMP-SMX as monotherapy for toxoplasmosis.

67 Additionally,

anticonvulsants should be given to patients with Toxoplasma encephalitis and a

history of seizures, and corticosteroids may be warranted for focal lesions or edema

but should be used cautiously.

CASE 77-2, QUESTION 5: W.O. is treated with sulfadiazine–pyrimethamine. What are the limitations to the

use of the sulfadiazine component for the treatment of Toxoplasma encephalitis?

As with other sulfonamides in HIV-infected patients, rashes commonly occur with

sulfadiazine therapy.

64 Similar to TMP-SMX, various desensitization regimens have

been recommended

40

,

65

; however, it may be simpler to use alternative regimens.

Renal function should be monitored throughout therapy. Elevated serum creatinine

(SCr) levels, hematuria, or decreased urine output may occur secondary to

sulfadiazine-induced crystalluria. The water solubility of sulfadiazine is less than

that of other sulfonamides; therefore, hydration (2–3 L/day) is needed to prevent

crystalline nephropathy, and aggressive hydration and alkalinization can be used in

cases of crystal formation.

CASE 77-2, QUESTION 6: What toxicities are associated with the pyrimethamine component?

Pyrimethamine can suppress bone marrow function; thus, concomitant therapy with

other medications that suppress marrow function (e.g., zidovudine [AZT] or

ganciclovir) may not be tolerated. Leucovorin (10–25 mg/day) is always given in

conjunction with pyrimethamine to maintain bone marrow function, although it may

not always be successful. Leucovorin doses can be increased to 50 to 100 mg/day in

divided doses if needed to reverse bone marrow suppression.

12 Folic acid (not

folinic acid) should be avoided because it can be used for growth by protozoal

organisms, potentially antagonizing pyrimethamine–sulfadiazine activity.

68 Vitamin

preparations containing large quantities of folic acid should be discontinued during

therapy for T. gondii.

W.O. is not taking any medications that would make him particularly susceptible to

the myelosuppressive effects of pyrimethamine, and he is not neutropenic.

Consequently, he should be given sulfadiazine and pyrimethamine.

SUPPRESSIVE THERAPY (SECONDARY PROPHYLAXIS)

CASE 77-2, QUESTION 7: Once W.O. has completed acute therapy for his Toxoplasma encephalitis, should

he receive suppressive therapy?

Most antiprotozoal agents do not eradicate the cyst form of T. gondii. Therefore,

patients should be administered lifelong suppressive therapy unless immune

reconstitution occurs as a consequence of HAART.

12 A commonly used regimen for

patients who cannot tolerate sulfonamides is pyrimethamine plus clindamycin.

However, only the combination of pyrimethamine plus sulfadiazine provides

protection against PCP as well. Additionally, two small studies of patients receiving

maintenance therapy for Toxoplasma encephalitis have suggested that sulfadiazine–

pyrimethamine is more effective than clindamycin–pyrimethamine or pyrimethamine

alone.

66 The use of atovaquone with or without pyrimethamine is also effective as

prophylaxis for both Toxoplasma and PCP, but it is significantly more expensive and

is only available as a less palatable liquid formulation.

Patients receiving secondary prophylaxis are at a low risk for recurrence of

Toxoplasma encephalitis when they have completed their initial therapy, remain

asymptomatic, and have a sustained increase in their CD4 count to greater than 200

after more than 6 months of HAART. Clinicians may obtain a brain MRI as part of

the evaluation to determine the end point of therapy. Discontinuation of primary and

secondary toxoplasmosis prophylaxis is safe if patients are receiving HAART and

their CD4 count has increased to greater than 200 for at least 3 months. Secondary

prophylaxis should be reintroduced if the CD4 count decreases to less than 200.

12

W.O. will be continued on sulfadiazine–pyrimethamine for suppressive therapy for

his Toxoplasma encephalitis because his CD4 count has decreased to less than 100.

W.O. is currently receiving aerosolized pentamidine for PCP prophylaxis, but

because sulfadiazine–pyrimethamine is also protective against PCP, the aerosolized

pentamidine can be discontinued. Clindamycin–pyrimethamine is an inferior option

because it does not protect against PCP.

12

ALTERNATIVE THERAPIES

CASE 77-2, QUESTION 8: What treatment options exist for patients who cannot tolerate sulfadiazine and do

not wish to undergo desensitization?

p. 1606

p. 1607

Clindamycin 1,200 mg IV or PO every 6 hours or 600 mg PO every 6 hours plus

pyrimethamine and leucovorin at standard doses.

12 Combination therapy with

pyrimethamine and leucovorin plus azithromycin (1.2–1.5 g/day), clarithromycin (1 g

BID), or atovaquone (750 mg PO 4 times a day) has shown promise in a limited

numbers of patients.

12

CYTOMEGALOVIRUS DISEASE

Diagnosis

CASE 77-3

QUESTION 1: P.Z., a 39-year-old man with AIDS, complains of floating spots, light flashes, and difficulty

reading road signs when he drives. His most recent laboratory results were as follows:

BUN, 17 mg/dL

SCr, 0.8 mg/dL

CD4 count, 40 cells/μL

Viral load, 80,000 copies/mL (3 months ago)

WBC count, 1,200 cells/L, with 63% polymorphonuclear neutrophil leukocytes

His current weight is 63 kg. P.Z.’s medications include tenofovir, emtricitabine, atazanavir, ritonavir, dapsone

(PCP prophylaxis), and azithromycin (MAC prophylaxis). He has a history of hematologic intolerance to AZT

and TMP-SMX. P.Z. is known to have a positive CMV IgG antibody titer. Funduscopic examination reveals

alternating areas of hemorrhage and scar tissue (a “cottage cheese and ketchup” appearance) in the proximity

of the retina in his left eye.

What is the likely cause of P.Z.’s visual problems?

P.Z. has an inflammation of the retina (retinitis), most likely because of CMV.

Many HIV-infected patients have been previously infected with CMV, and

reactivation typically occurs when CD4 counts are less than 50. Before HAART, the

prevalence of CMV disease in patients with AIDS was 30%; however, the incidence

of new cases of CMV end-organ disease has declined by 75% to 80% since the

advent of HAART and is estimated to be less than 6 cases per 100 person-years.

12

,

69

Although CMV can cause colitis, pneumonitis, esophagitis, hepatitis, and neurologic

disease, retinitis is the most common manifestation of active infection in AIDS

patients, accounting for 75% to 85% of CMV end-organ disease. One investigation

describing patients with CMV retinitis in the post-HAART era found a diverse

demographic group with infection; most of them had received HAART, and as

expected, they had very low CD4 counts.

70

Comments

Search This Blog

Archive

Show more

Popular posts from this blog

TRIPASS XR تري باس

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

ZENOXIA 15 MG, Comprimé

VOXCIB 200 MG, Gélule

Kana Brax Laberax

فومي كايند

بعض الادويه نجد رموز عليها مثل IR ، MR, XR, CR, SR , DS ماذا تعني هذه الرموز

NIFLURIL 700 MG, Suppositoire adulte

Antifongiques مضادات الفطريات

Popular posts from this blog

علاقة البيبي بالفراولة بالالفا فيتو بروتين

التغيرات الخمس التي تحدث للجسم عند المشي

إحصائيات سنة 2020 | تعداد سكَان دول إفريقيا تنازليا :

ما هو الليمونير للأسنان ؟

ACUPAN 20 MG, Solution injectable

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

الام الظهر

VOXCIB 200 MG, Gélule

ميبستان

Popular posts from this blog

TRIPASS XR تري باس

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

Popular posts from this blog

TRIPASS XR تري باس

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

ZENOXIA 15 MG, Comprimé

VOXCIB 200 MG, Gélule

Kana Brax Laberax

فومي كايند

بعض الادويه نجد رموز عليها مثل IR ، MR, XR, CR, SR , DS ماذا تعني هذه الرموز

NIFLURIL 700 MG, Suppositoire adulte

Antifongiques مضادات الفطريات

Popular posts from this blog

TRIPASS XR تري باس

Kana Brax Laberax

PARANTAL 100 MG, Suppositoire بارانتال 100 مجم تحاميل

الكبد الدهني Fatty Liver

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

الم اسفل الظهر (الحاد) الذي يظهر بشكل مفاجئ bal-agrisi

SEDALGIC 37.5 MG / 325 MG, Comprimé pelliculé [P] سيدالجيك 37.5 مجم / 325 مجم ، قرص مغلف [P]

نمـو الدمـاغ والتطـور العقـلي لـدى الطفـل

أخطر أنواع المخدرات فى العالم و الشرق الاوسط

Archive

Show more