CASE 87-1, QUESTION 7: What are the potential side effects of VPA therapy? How should T.R. be
monitored for these possible effects?
T.R. should be monitored for potential dose-related adverse reactions of VPA
including various gastrointestinal complaints (nausea, diarrhea, dyspepsia, anorexia),
sedation, ataxia, tremor, transaminase elevations, and thrombocytopenia. Reducing
the dosage, changing to an extended-release preparation,
antacid or histamine H2-antagonist may mitigate gastrointestinal complaints. Central
nervous system effects such as ataxia and sedation may respond to dosage reduction,
although sedation may resolve with continued treatment. If a tremor is bothersome or
interferes with the patient’s functioning, a dosage reduction or change to the
extended-release preparation may provide relief.
86 Small elevations in transaminases
are considered benign; however, VPA should be discontinued if elevations are more
than 2 to 3 times the upper limit of normal.
Weight gain occurs in up to 20% of patients receiving VPA.
weight is particularly distressing to some patients and may contribute to medication
non-adherence. Weight gain has been associated with VPA at different
concentrations, so a dosage reduction may not be helpful.
has been associated with the development of polycystic ovary syndrome.
features of polycystic ovary syndrome include oligomenorrhea and
hyperandrogenism, which develop in about 10% of women with BD taking VPA.
Alopecia occurs in 0.5% to 12% of patients and may improve with dose reduction.
There are several reports of VPA-induced hyperammonemic encephalopathy in
95,96 Patients presenting with coma or mental status changes
should have serum ammonia and liver functions tests ordered. If VPA-induced
hyperammonemic encephalopathy is suspected, then VPA should be discontinued.
Other serious adverse events with VPA include fulminant hepatic failure,
agranulocytosis, and pancreatitis. All of these adverse events require immediate
In January 2008, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a warning
to healthcare professionals about the potential for an increased risk of suicidality
associated with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), including VPA. For its analysis, FDA
used data from 199 randomized clinical trials of 11 AEDs involving 43,892 study
participants with either psychiatric or neurologic disorders. In the “Warnings and
Precautions” section of AED product labels, it is stated that the risk of suicidality for
those treated with AEDs during clinical trials was approximately twice that of
placebo treatment (0.43% vs. 0.24%; adjusted relative risk = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.2, 2.7;
number needed to harm = 530). In these clinical trials, there were a total of four
suicides in AED-treated patients, and zero suicides in placebo-treated patients. As a
result, practitioners are advised to inform patients and caregivers to be vigilant about
the emergence or worsening of signs and symptoms of depression or mood/behavior
changes, especially if they involve thoughts or behaviors centered on self-harm when
patients receive AED treatment.
Once VPA therapy is initiated, liver function tests, VPA serum levels, and CBCs
with differential and platelets should be monitored at least monthly for the first 3
months and every 3 to 6 months thereafter.
11 Body weight should also be determined
at baseline and monitored monthly during therapy.
have a steady-state plasma concentration of 95 mcg/mL after 1 month of treatment. A routine CBC with
differential and platelet count was ordered at this time, and the following data were reported:
White blood cell count, 8.5 × 103/μL
How should T.R.’s VPA-induced thrombocytopenia be managed?
VPA-induced thrombocytopenia occurs in 18% of patients and is associated with
female gender and higher VPA levels (>100 mcg/mL in women and >130 mcg/mL in
98 Clinicians should educate patients to look for signs such as easy bruising or
bleeding. In most patients, thrombocytopenia is asymptomatic and responds to a
lowering of the VPA dosage; complete discontinuation of the drug is usually
99 T.R.’s dosage should be reduced, and his platelet count should be
monitored closely. In addition, he should be observed for reemerging symptoms of
QUESTION 1: C.N., a 21-year-old woman, was diagnosed with her first episode of mania 3 weeks ago. At
Because lithium can affect many organ systems, baseline laboratory values must be
evaluated before therapy is initiated. Baseline laboratory tests are useful in
determining contraindications to the use of lithium or conditions that may require an
adjustment in dosage. As a young, healthy female, C.N.’s prescreening laboratory
battery should include electrolytes, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, urine specific
gravity, thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), thyroxine (T4
Also, a pregnancy test should be obtained before starting therapy since lithium is a
Routine Monitoring During Lithium Therapy
Baseline Every 1–3 Months Yearly
aMonitor more often in patients with history of kidney disease.
bPatients ≥45 years or those with history of cardiac disease.
cWeekly monitoring during the first month of treatment is often recommended.
dWomen of childbearing potential.
BMI, body mass index; CBC, complete blood count; ECG, electrocardiogram.
CASE 87-2, QUESTION 2: C.N.’s baseline laboratory parameters were normal, and her pregnancy test was
negative. How should lithium treatment for C.N. be initiated?
Although there are many strategies for calculating lithium dosage requirements, it
is simplest to begin C.N. at a dosage of 300 mg twice daily. This is a common
starting dose for a healthy adult patient.
Patients experiencing an acute manic episode require higher lithium levels
compared with maintenance therapy. The goal for the acute management of C.N. is a
serum level between 0.8 and 1.2 mEq/L.
11 Because lithium is not immediately
effective, C.N.’s lithium dosage can be adjusted based on the results of lithium serum
levels checked weekly until the manic episode resolves. As she recovers and enters
the maintenance phase of treatment, both C.N.’s lithium dosage and her lithium levels
will require re-evaluation (see Case 87-8, Question 1).
CASE 87-2, QUESTION 3: How long will it take for C.N. to get the full effect of lithium?
The half-life of lithium in a young patient with normal renal function is
approximately 24 hours; therefore, steady-state concentrations are typically achieved
in approximately 5 days. The onset of action is slow, taking as long as 1 to 2 weeks
to fully exert its therapeutic effects.
11 Because of the delay in onset, it is appropriate
to use an adjunctive medication to help reduce C.N.’s acute symptoms. Both
benzodiazepines and antipsychotics have been used in this manner.
preferred over typical antipsychotics (see also Chapter 85, Schizophrenia) and have
been demonstrated to enhance efficacy and accelerate time to response when used in
combination with lithium in acute mania.
48 Benzodiazepines work rapidly to reduce
agitation, anxiety, and decreased need for sleep.
the bathroom. How might C.N.’s presentation be related to her medication?
When considering adverse effect management early in lithium therapy, it becomes
important to monitor lithium levels closely. When patients start to recover from acute
mania, the rate of lithium clearance may decrease and patients may demonstrate an
increase in lithium levels and worsening side effects (Table 87-4). This does not
seem to be the case with C.N. because her lithium level is within the accepted range
for the management of acute mania.
C.N. is complaining of a hand tremor. She should be interviewed and examined to
determine its origin. Lithium-induced tremor occurs in 10% to 65% of treated
patients and is characteristically rapid, regular, and fine in amplitude.
tremor occurs early in therapy and improves with time. Caffeine, personal or family
history of tremor, alcoholism, anxiety, antidepressants, antipsychotics, and possibly
older age enhance the risk of lithium-induced tremor.
in patients with higher serum concentrations and may be worse at times of peak
If C.N. is not bothered by the tremor and suffers no impairment,
treatment is not necessary. If the tremor becomes problematic, her lithium dosage
may be reduced or a β-adrenergic blocking agent can be added. Propranolol is the
most commonly used. Additionally, switching to a sustained-release lithium
preparation may reduce peak serum levels and ameliorate tremors if associated with
11 Because it is early in treatment and C.N. has only a moderate
lithium level, it is reasonable to add propranolol 10 mg 3 times a day rather than to
reduce the lithium dosage (if an intervention is required). Propranolol usually is
effective at dosages less than 160 mg/day.
101 C.N. should be educated about her
tremor, the adverse effects of propranolol (see Chapter 9, Essential Hypertension)
and instructed to minimize her caffeine consumption.
ECG changes T-wave suppression, delayed or irregular rhythm, increase in
Edema Primarily ankles and feet; transient or intermittent; secondary to
effects on sodium and carbohydrate metabolism; caution about
diuretics and sodium restriction to avoid lithium toxicity
Psoriasis Treatment-refractory worsening
Rashes Maculopapular and follicular
Hypothyroidism About 5% goiter; about 30% clinically significant hypothyroidism;
Hyperparathyroidism Clinically not significant
Teratogenicity Ebstein anomaly (tricuspid valve malformation, atrialseptal
defect); educate female patients, encourage advanced planning
Anorexia, nausea (10%–30%) Usually early in treatment and usually transient; may be early sign
Diarrhea (5%–20%) Slow-release preparations may help
Leukocytosis May be useful in disorders such as Felty syndrome, iatrogenic
Tremor (10%–65%) Dose-related; men > women; worse with antidepressants and
antipsychotics; reduce dose or use β-blocker
Cognitive disruption (10%) Worsens compliance; perceived as “mental dulling”
Fatigue or weakness May be early toxicity; may mimic depression
Polyuria-polydipsia (nephrogenic diabetes
May be an indication of morphological changes; requires adequate
In addition, C.N. should be asked about her trip to the bathroom during this clinic
visit because lithium may cause both diarrhea and polyuria. Polyuria and polydipsia
are common, occurring in up to 60% of patients.
102 Nephrogenic diabetes insipidus is
less common, affecting about 10% of patients on long-term treatment.
diabetes insipidus (see Chapter 53, Diabetes Mellitus) is dose dependent, so C.N.
can be told that a lower lithium dose may minimize the symptoms. Although the
advantages of once-daily administration of lithium are not universally accepted,
switching a stabilized patient to this schedule with its lower trough levels may help
If C.N. were to fail to respond to either of these
interventions, amiloride could be administered, which minimizes lithium’s effect on
If C.N.’s trip to the bathroom was because of diarrhea, lithium should be evaluated
as a possible cause; up to 20% of patients started on lithium experience diarrhea,
epigastric bloating, and sometimes stomach pain early in therapy.
lithium is associated with high serum levels, once-daily dosing, and rapidly absorbed
preparations; therefore, divided doses may help to alleviate the problem. Use of
lower doses and switching to sustained-release preparations are alternative
strategies that could be used if C.N. is experiencing diarrhea or polyuria. Her fluid
status and lithium level also should be monitored closely. Dehydration leads to
increased lithium reabsorption in the proximal tubule and could result in
accumulation and lithium toxicity.
CASE 87-2, QUESTION 5: What should C.N. be told regarding potential renal damage from lithium?
C.N. should be informed that lithium could adversely affect her kidneys. Long-term
treatment has been associated with reduced kidney function and, rarely, end-stage
106 Routine monitoring of renal function (Table 87-3) allows for the
identification of patients with precipitous declines in glomerular filtration. In such
patients, lithium should be discontinued to prevent progression to end-stage renal
disease. Risk factors for renal insufficiency include episodes of lithium intoxication,
medical conditions that impair glomerular filtration (e.g., hypertension, diabetes
mellitus), and concurrent medications that are damaging to the kidney.
Communication with her physician about situations that increase the risk of lithium
toxicity (see Case 87-2, Question 7) and cooperation with regular lithium and renal
function monitoring can vastly reduce the risk of renal disease. Finally, C.N. must be
informed that polyuria is not related to any of the more serious renal side effects.
As with all medications, C.N. should be instructed to disclose all medications she
is taking to each of her healthcare providers. She should be informed that
dehydration, fever, vomiting, or sodium-restricted diets could lead to increases in her
lithium level. Therefore, she needs to drink plenty of fluids and should avoid
C.N. should be instructed to contact her physician if she starts to experience any
symptoms of lithium toxicity, including worsening tremor, slurred speech, muscle
weakness or twitches, or difficulty walking. C.N. should be told to use caution in
selecting over-the-counter medications. Specifically, she should be warned to avoid
the use of preparations containing nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, which can
108 C.N. should know that caffeine can sometimes be
troublesome in patients taking lithium, worsening tremor on a short-term basis and
lowering lithium levels during the long term.
108 With regard to serum lithium level
monitoring, C.N. needs to know that lithium levels usually are drawn approximately
12 hours after a dose of lithium. If she is taking lithium in the evening and the
morning, she should take her evening dose and then report for a blood sample to be
drawn in the morning before taking her morning dose.
CASE 87-2, QUESTION 7: About 6 months after discharge, C.N.’s mother calls, concerned that C.N. has
There is a strong possibility that C.N. is suffering from lithium toxicity, which can
occur acutely from an overdose or insidiously from reduced lithium clearance. Mild
toxicity at levels less than 1.5 mEq/L causes feelings of apathy, lethargy, and muscle
weakness accompanied by nausea and irritability. Moderate toxicity occurs between
1.5 and 2.5 mEq/L with symptoms progressing to coarse tremor, slurred speech,
unsteady gait, drowsiness, confusion, muscle twitches, and blurred vision. Severe
toxicity at levels greater than 2.5 mEq/L can result in seizures, stupor, coma, renal
failure, and cardiovascular collapse. C.N. seems to be experiencing moderate lithium
toxicity. She should stop any medications that can decrease lithium clearance and the
lithium itself until instructed to resume it. She should be taken to the emergency
department immediately, where stat laboratory tests, including a lithium level,
electrolytes, and renal function tests, should be ordered. There is no antidote for
lithium intoxication. Intravenous solutions should be started to ensure that C.N. is
hydrated adequately, and electrolyte abnormalities should be corrected promptly.
Depending on the results of physical examination and laboratory tests, cardiac
monitoring should be instituted and hemodialysis should be considered.
Hemodialysis is used to shorten the exposure of different tissues of the body to the
elevated lithium concentration and to lower the lithium level to 1.0 mEq/L.
Mohandas and Ramjmohan suggest that candidates for hemodialysis include those
with: compromised renal function, severe (irreversible) neurological symptoms,
acute lithium ingestions where symptoms are clear and serum levels are greater than
4.0 mEq/L, or a chronic toxicity where lithium levels exceed the therapeutic values
with a clearly manifested clinical picture.
likely cause of C.N.’s complaints? What treatment should be instituted?
C.N.’s symptoms are consistent with those of hypothyroidism.
Lithium affects the incorporation of iodine into thyroid hormone, interferes with
secretion of thyroid hormones, and may interfere with the peripheral conversion of T4
110 According to laboratory indices, the incidence of
hypothyroidism in lithium-treated patients with BD ranges from 28% to 32%
compared with 6% to 11% in patients not taking lithium.
thyroid illness in first-degree relatives, weight gain, elevated baseline TSH,
preexisting autoantibodies, an iodine-deficient diet, rapid cycling, and elevated
112 For women, the first 2 years of treatment is a period of heightened
risk as well as for any middle-aged patient starting lithium.
Thyroid function tests should be ordered to evaluate C.N.’s current symptoms. If
she is found to be hypothyroid, discontinuation of lithium is not necessary. She should
receive levothyroxine in doses that normalize her thyroid function tests. Even if she
has an elevated TSH with normal levels of T3 and T4
supplementation may help to resolve her symptoms, and prevent breakthrough
the cafeteria. What factors could contribute to a decrease in T.J.’s lithium levels?
Drug interactions are a common cause of changes in lithium levels, but there have
been no changes in T.J.’s regimen (Table 87-5 provides a list of clinically significant
drug interactions). Changes in formulation or brand may sometimes have an impact
on lithium levels. Nevertheless, lithium is relatively well absorbed and has a long
elimination half-life, so this usually does not result in large changes in the 12-hour
postdose lithium level. Occasionally, patients switched from lithium citrate to solid
dosage forms experience small changes in lithium levels.
T.J. should be questioned about his visits to the cafeteria because diet can have a
major influence on lithium excretion. If T.J. is consuming large amounts of
caffeinated beverages or salty snacks, a reduction in lithium levels could occur.
Increases in dietary sodium intake and the ingestion of methylxanthines (e.g., caffeine,
theophylline) can increase lithium clearance.
Finally, acute mania can increase lithium clearance.
If T.J. was showing signs of a
relapse, his decrease in lithium levels might be attributable to his return to a manic
While there is considerable disagreement about the importance of lithium as a
teratogen, it has been associated with a variety of congenital malformations,
including the rare cardiac malformation, Ebstein anomaly.
thought to increase the risk of Ebstein anomaly 400 times; however, the risk is more
likely 20 to 40 times higher than in the general population.
overall risk for congenital malformations related to lithium treatment is
approximately 4% to 12% (compared with 2%–4% in controls).
malformations are most likely to occur in the first trimester of pregnancy, it is
advisable for patients to avoid lithium, when possible, during this high-risk period.
Lithium Drug Interactions of Clinical Significance
Drugs That Increase Lithium Levels
Many NSAIDs have been reported to increase lithium levels as much as 50%–60%. This probably is owing
whereas loop diuretics and potassium-sparing diuretics seem to be somewhat safer.
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) inhibitors
results in reduced lithium excretion.
Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers (ARBs)
ARBs decrease in sodium and reabsorption via AT1
blockade results in reduced lithium excretion.
Drugs That Decrease Lithium Levels
Acetazolamide may impair proximal tubular reabsorption of lithium ions.
High dietary sodium intake promotes the renal clearance of lithium.
Drugs That Increase Lithium Toxicity
Cases of neurotoxicity involving the combined use of lithium and carbamazepine have been reported in
patients with normal lithium levels.
diltiazem have been reported. Lithium interferes with calcium transport across cells.
Cases of neurotoxicity (encephalopathic syndrome, extrapyramidal effects, cerebellar effect, EEG
Serotonin-selective reuptake inhibitors
reported to cause nausea and tremor in lithium recipients.
In addition to cardiac malformations, infants exposed to lithium have been
reported to have hypotonia, nephrogenic diabetes insipidus, and thyroid
113 Lithium administration during pregnancy increases the risk of
premature delivery by a factor of two to three.
No comments:
Post a Comment
اكتب تعليق حول الموضوع