Prompt diagnosis and immediate initiation of therapy are essential for the
management of acute infections. Most common OIs can be classified into one of two
groups. The first group consists of infections that can be treated by conventional or
investigational agents. These include PCP, TB, cryptococcosis, CMV, MAC, and
histoplasmosis. Treatment may result in either effective or moderately effective
resolution. These infections may recur if chronic suppressive or secondary
prophylaxis is discontinued without an accompanying elevation in the CD4 count and
viral load suppression. The second group includes pathogens for which no
therapeutic regimen is currently effective. These include cryptosporidiosis,
SECONDARY PROPHYLAXIS OR CHRONIC SUPPRESSIVE THERAPY
Secondary prophylaxis is used to prevent recurrence of an OI once the patient has
developed signs and symptoms of active infection. In some cases, secondary
prophylaxis regimens can be discontinued after patients achieve a certain CD4 level.
The USPHS and IDSA strongly recommend secondary prophylaxis for PCP,
toxoplasmosis (reduced dosage), MAC, CMV, Salmonella species, and infections
caused by endemic fungi and C. neoformans.
Discontinuation of Secondary Prophylaxis or Chronic Suppressive Therapy
The USPHS/IDSA guidelines recommend discontinuing primary or secondary
prophylaxis for certain pathogens with HAART-related increases in CD4 count to
12 Criteria for discontinuing chemoprophylaxis are based
on specific clinical studies and vary by duration of CD4 count increase and duration
of treatment of the initial episode of disease (in the case of secondary prophylaxis).
Secondary PCP prophylaxis may be discontinued among patients whose CD4
counts have increased to greater than 200 for more than 3 months while on HAART.
Secondary prophylaxis for disseminated MAC may be discontinued among patients
who have completed 12 months of MAC therapy, have no signs or symptoms of
MAC, and have had a CD4 count of greater than 100 for more than or equal to 3
months in response to HAART. Similarly, secondary prophylaxis for toxoplasmosis
may be discontinued in patients who have completed initial therapy, have no signs or
symptoms of infection, and have had CD4 counts of greater than 200 for more than 3
months. Using the same criteria, patients with cryptococcosis can discontinue
secondary prophylaxis if they have had CD4 counts of greater than or equal to 200
for more than 6 months. Maintenance therapy for CMV can be discontinued safely in
patients who have maintained a CD4 count of greater than 100 for greater than 6
16 The decision to stop CMV prophylaxis should be made in
consultation with an ophthalmologist and is influenced by factors such as the
magnitude and duration of CD4 increases and viral load suppression, anatomic
location of retinal lesions, and vision in the contralateral eye.
Although there are considerable data concerning the discontinuation of primary
and secondary prophylaxis, there are no data regarding restarting prophylaxis if the
CD4 count decreases again to levels at which the patient is likely to again be at risk
for OIs. For primary prophylaxis, the same CD4 count threshold for stopping or
restarting therapy is recommended. For PCP prophylaxis, the current guidelines use a
CD4 count of 200 as the threshold for restarting both primary and secondary
prophylaxis. For toxoplasmosis, the CD4 threshold is 100 to 200, and for MAC, it is
PNEUMOCYSTIS JIROVECI PNEUMONIA
As an indication of the relative obscurity of this organism, no comprehensive text on
35 Since that time, this organism has been reclassified
from a protozoan to a fungus on the basis of ribosomal RNA sequence comparisons.
The morphologic resemblance of P. carinii to a protozoan has led to its life cycle
being described as a cyst form, with up to eight sporozoites per cyst. The trophozoite
or extracystic form has different staining characteristics (i.e., it does not stain with
Toluidine Blue O or Grocott-Gomori stains) compared with the cyst or sporozoites.
In addition, current literature refers to PCP as P. jiroveci as opposed to the original
terminology of Pneumocystis carinii. The former species is the one responsible for
infectivity in humans. P. jiroveci pneumonia is the second leading opportunistic
infection affecting HIV-infected patients in the United States.
hospital mortality for AIDS-associated PCP have decreased significantly in the last
20 years; however, there has been a shift in the overall population at risk for PCP
over time with a greater proportion of patients with PCP who are black, female, or
from the southern region of the United States.
QUESTION 1: J.R. is a 38-year-old, HIV-seropositive man who was diagnosed 5 years ago when he had an
symmetric, interstitial infiltrate. Arterial oxygen partial pressure (Pao2
) is 80 mm Hg. His last CD4 count
extracystic trophozoites. How is the clinical presentation of J.R. consistent with PCP?
The clinical features of PCP in AIDS patients differ from those of non-AIDS
patients in that a more subtle onset, with mild fever, a cough, tachypnea, and dyspnea,
is typically seen in HIV-infected patients.
12 J.R.’s low-grade fever and mild,
nonproductive cough of 4 weeks’ duration are consistent with this description of
PCP. His history of HIV infection and the finding of trophozoites on Giemsa stain
further support a diagnosis of PCP. The characteristic diffuse interstitial pulmonary
infiltrates on J.R.’s chest radiograph are consistent with PCP. Limited data exist with
regard to the latent state of P. jiroveci after host infection. Some investigators
hypothesize that most persons are asymptomatic unless the host immune system
becomes impaired. Others believe that the infection is caused by reinfection as
might his course of PCP be monitored?
The treatment of acute PCP is determined by the degree of clinical severity on
presentation. The arterial oxygen status on presentation is an important indicator of
overall outcome. Key factors to consider when initiating therapy for PCP include
arterial blood gas findings, whether it is an initial or repeat episode of PCP, the need
for parenteral therapy, and a prior history of adverse drug reactions or
hypersensitivity. Concomitant therapy must also be considered.
Patients with PCP often can be classified as having mild, moderate, or severe
disease, based on their oxygenation. Patients with mild PCP often have a room air
alveolar-arterial (A-a) oxygen gradient of less than 35 or Pao2 greater than 70 mm
Hg, and patients with moderate or severe disease have an A-a greater than 35 mm Hg
. The A-a gradient (normal range, 5–15 mm Hg) can be calculated as PIO2 −
is the partial pressure of inspired oxygen (150 mm
Hg in room air), and Paco2 and Pao2 are arterial levels of CO2 and O2
Several other clinical tests have been used to identify and monitor PCP. The
lactate dehydrogenase concentration in serum or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid has
been used to aid in diagnosis, monitor therapy, and to predict the outcome of PCP.
However, it is a nonspecific value and should not be used alone. Chest radiographs
also vary with PCP. The most common picture is one of bilateral diffuse interstitial
pneumonitis, but atypical patterns, such as pleural effusion, cavities, pneumatoceles,
and nodules, may also occur. A normal chest radiograph is associated with improved
The natural course of PCP among untreated HIV-infected patients is progressive
dyspnea and hypoxemia. Increasing patient age, subsequent episode of PCP, low
hemoglobin, low partial pressure of oxygen breathing room air, the presence of
medical comorbidity, and pulmonary KS are all early predictors of mortality from
38 The treatment of PCP in AIDS patients (compared with
non–HIV-infected patients) indicates that a longer duration of therapy is needed.
Some patients may experience worsening hypoxemia during the first 3 to 5 days after
the treatment is initiated. This period of clinical worsening is least tolerated by those
patients with moderate-to-severe PCP (Pao2 <70 mm Hg). In sicker patients, this
period may lead to respiratory failure and the need for intubation. Although many
would associate the need for intensive care unit admission as a poor prognostic
factor, many patients do well despite the need for mechanical ventilation and IV
antibiotics. In light of the role of corticosteroids, patients with PCP and respiratory
failure may be viewed as manageable if treated aggressively (Table 77-2).
The decision to hospitalize a patient is based on the severity of his or her illness.
Patients who present with mild PCP with reasonable oxygenation and without
evidence of clinical deterioration can be managed as outpatients. Patients with
reasonably good gas exchange (i.e., Pao2 >70 mm Hg) but with signs of clinical
deterioration most often are admitted to the hospital and given oxygen by nasal
cannula and are usually started on IV TMP-SMX (15–20 mg/kg/day TMP and 75–
100 mg/kg/day SMX) for 21 days.
39 The dosing of IV TMP-SMX must be modified
in patients with renal dysfunction. TMP reversibly inhibits dihydrofolate reductase,
and sulfamethoxazole competes with para-aminobenzoic acid in the production of
dihydrofolate, synergistically blocking thymidine biosynthesis.
Treatment of Pneumocystis jiroveci Pneumonia
Regimen Dose Route Adverse Effects/Comments
TMP-SMX 15–20 mg/kg TMP (75–100 mg/kg
SMX) daily administered IV or PO
every 6–8 hours or two DS tablets
IV, PO Hypersensitivity, hyperkalemia, rash, fever,
neutropenia ↑LFTs, and nephrotoxicity (15
mg/kg/day preferred to 20 mg/kg/day
4 mg/kg IV daily for 60–90 minutes ×
IV Pancreatitis, hypotension, hypoglycemia,
hyperglycemia, and nephrotoxicity
a 750 mg BID with meals × 21 days
PO Headache, nausea, diarrhea, rash, fever,
15 mg/kg/day PO Pruritus, GI intolerance, and bone marrow
100 mg/day × 21 days PO Methemoglobinemia and hemolytic anemia
(contraindicated in G6PD deficiency)
600 mg IV every 8 hours or 300–450
15–30 mg (base) daily × 21 days PO Methemoglobinemia and hemolytic anemia
(contraindicated in G6PD deficiency)
Prednisone Within 72 hours of anti-Pneumocystis
therapy 40 mg every 12 hours × 5
days, then 40 mg daily × 5 days, then
PO Initiation in patients with moderately severe
Pao2 <70 mm Hg or A-a gradient >35 mm
dehydrogenase; IV, intravenous; PO, oral; Pao2
, arterial partial pressure of oxygen; LFTs, liver function tests;
TMP-SMX, trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole.
or superior to all alternative agents. A good response may be expected in more than
70% of patients receiving TMP-SMX. TMP-SMX is often prescribed orally (PO)
because of its high bioavailability. The usual dose is 15 mg/kg (dosed by the TMP
component) divided every 8 hours for 21 days. Because one double-strength tablet of
TMP-SMX contains 160 mg TMP plus 800 mg SMX, a standard regimen is two
double-strength tablets 3 times per day (or every 8 hours).
Although the TMP-SMX regimen is very efficacious, 25% to 50% of patients may
be intolerant. Adverse effects include an erythematous, maculopapular, morbilliform
rash, and, less commonly, severe urticaria, exfoliative dermatitis, and Stevens–
Johnson syndrome. GI intolerance (nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain) is
12 Hematologic side effects may include leukopenia, anemia, and
thrombocytopenia. Neurologic toxicities, hyperkalemia, and hepatitis may also occur.
Most patients who exhibit a mild hypersensitivity (skin rash) reaction can be
managed with antipruritics or antihistamines without discontinuation of TMP-SMX.
In some patients with mild hypersensitivity reactions, the agent can be restarted after
the rash has resolved, using gradual dosage escalation or rapid oral desensitization to
40 Patients with severe adverse reactions should be switched
to another agent rather than being rechallenged with this drug (See also Chapter 32,
Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions).
Because J.R. seems to have a mild-to-moderate case of PCP (Pao2
has not previously experienced an episode of PCP, and has no history of adverse
effects to TMP-SMX, an outpatient course of TMP-SMX would be reasonable.
ALTERNATIVES TO TRIMETHOPRIM– SULFAMETHOXAZOLE
CASE 77-1, QUESTION 3: J.R. experienced exfoliative dermatitis on Day 7 of TMP-SMX treatment. What
other drugs could be prescribed to treat his PCP?
Because J.R. presents with a serious adverse effect to TMP-SMX, it should be
discontinued and he should not be rechallenged or desensitized. Instead, he should be
treated with an alternative regimen (Table 77-2).
IV pentamidine isethionate can be used to treat acute PCP. The mechanism of
action is unknown, but it may be related to interference with oxidative
phosphorylation, inhibition of nucleic acid biosynthesis, or interference with
dihydrofolate reductase. Pentamidine is generally more toxic than TMP-SMX.
5-year review of 106 courses of IV pentamidine, 76 (72%) patients had adverse
reactions (nephrotoxicity, dysglycemia, hepatotoxicity, hyperkalemia, and
hyperamylasemia). Drug discontinuation occurred in 31 (18%) of the severe cases.
Nephrotoxicity and hypoglycemia were the most common causes of drug
discontinuation. Nephrotoxicity occurred in 25% to 50% of the patients with
dehydration and concurrent nephrotoxic drugs among the risk factors. Hypoglycemia
was noted in 5% to 10% of patients after 5 to 7 days of treatment or several days
adverse effects and toxicities include thrombocytopenia, orthostatic hypotension,
ventricular tachycardia, leukopenia, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and
Patients receiving IV pentamidine should be monitored closely, and serum
concentrations of glucose, potassium, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and creatinine
should be obtained daily or every other day during treatment. Other tests for periodic
monitoring include a complete blood count (CBC), liver function tests (LFTs),
41 Renal toxicity often responds to a reduction in the
dosage of pentamidine to 3 mg/kg/day or 4 mg/kg every 48 hours (creatinine
clearance <10 mL/minute); however, the drug should be discontinued in patients who
exhibit signs and symptoms of pancreatitis. Risk factors for pentamidine-induced
pancreatitis include prior episodes of pancreatitis and concurrent therapy with other
drugs known to cause pancreatitis. Nebulized pentamidine should not be considered
as an alternative to IV pentamidine for the treatment of PCP.
Atovaquone suspension, 750 mg twice a day (BID), is available for the treatment
of mild-to-moderate PCP. Atovaquone interrupts protozoan pyrimidine synthesis and
demonstrates activity against P. jiroveci and Toxoplasma gondii in animal models.
Atovaquone is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the
treatment of mild-to-moderate PCP in patients intolerant of TMP-SMX. Atovaquone
is also an alternative for primary and secondary prophylaxis for both PCP and
12 Atovaquone is well tolerated compared with other PCP therapies.
Adverse effects include rash, fever, elevated LFTs, and emesis. Atovaquone is safer,
but less effective, than TMP-SMX in patients with mild-to-moderate PCP.
compared with IV pentamidine in the treatment of mild-to-moderate PCP, atovaquone
and pentamidine were equally efficacious; however, pentamidine was significantly
44 Most atovaquone studies were performed using the moderately
absorbed oral tablets; reformulation of this drug as a suspension has improved
bioavailability by at least 30%. Concomitant administration of fatty foods with
atovaquone doubles the absorption.
An oral regimen of dapsone plus TMP is another alternative to TMP-SMX.
Dapsone–TMP can be used to treat mild-to-moderate PCP in patients intolerant of
TMP-SMX. Dapsone is a sulfone antimicrobial that is used for leprosy. Although
monotherapy (200 mg/day) with dapsone is ineffective for the treatment (not
prophylaxis) of PCP, the addition of TMP (20 mg/kg/day) to dapsone (100 mg/day)
is an effective alternative regimen.
In a small comparative trial of TMP–dapsone
versus TMP-SMX, the response rates of 93% and 90% were observed,
46 When dapsone is coadministered with TMP, the resulting plasma
concentrations for both drugs are higher than when either drug is taken alone. In
combination with TMP, a pyrimidine, synergistic inhibition of folic acid synthesis
47 Dapsone–TMP should not be used in sulfonamide-allergic patients with a
history of type I hypersensitivity reaction, toxic epidermal necrolysis, or Stevens–
Johnson syndrome. Dapsone is associated with hematologic toxicities, including
hemolytic anemia, methemoglobinemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia. Patients
with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency cannot detoxify
hydrogen peroxide and are at an increased risk for hematologic toxicity from
Success rates of 70% to 100% have been reported with clindamycin (600 mg IV
every 6 hours or 600 mg PO 3 times a day [TID]) given in conjunction with 30
mg/day of primaquine base. Although skin rashes are common with this combination,
these often subside with continued therapy. Some patients experience toxicities
(fever, rash, granulocytopenia, and methemoglobinemia) requiring
48–50 As with dapsone, before starting primaquine, patients should be
screened for G6PD deficiency. Patients who test positive for G6PD deficiency are at
a risk for developing hemolytic anemia.
A double-blind efficacy and toxicity study of 181 patients with mild-to-moderate
PCP compared three oral drug regimens: TMP-SMX versus dapsone–TMP versus
clindamycin–primaquine. The doses of TMP-SMX and dapsone–TMP were weightbased, and
No comments:
Post a Comment
اكتب تعليق حول الموضوع