Oo C et al. Pharmacokinetics of anti-influenza prodrug oseltamivir in children aged 1–5 years. Eur J Clin

Pharmacol. 2003;59:411.

Soul-Lawton J et al. Absolute bioavailability and metabolic disposition of valaciclovir, the L-valyl ester of

acyclovir, following oral administration to humans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:2759.

Dunn CJ, Goa KL. Zanamivir: a review of its use in influenza. Drugs. 1999;58:761.

Cass LMR et al. Pharmacokinetics of zanamivir after intravenous, oral, inhaled, or intranasal administration to

healthy volunteers. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1999;36(Suppl 1):1.

Whitley RJ et al. Management of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia now and in the future. J Clin Virol.

2010;48(Suppl 1):S20.

Levin MJ et al. Prevention strategies for herpes zoster and post-herpetic neuralgia. J Clin Virol. 2010;48(Suppl

1):S14.

Ernst ME et al. Oral corticosteroids for herpes zoster pain. Ann Pharmacother. 1998;32:1099.

Harpaz R et al. Prevention of herpes zoster. Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization

Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2008;57(RR-5):1.

Chen N et al. Corticosteroids for preventing postherpetic neuralgia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;

(12):CD005582.

Wood MJ et al. A randomized trial of acyclovir for 7 days or 21 days with and without prednisolone for treatment

of acute herpes zoster. N EnglJ Med. 1994;330:896.

Santee JA. Corticosteroids for herpes zoster: what do they accomplish? Am J Clin Dermatol. 2002;3:517.

Watson CP et al. A randomized vehicle-controlled trial of topical capsaicin in the treatment of postherpetic

neuralgia. Clin Ther. 1993;15:510.

Lidoderm [product information]. Chadds Ford, PA: Endo Pharmaceuticals; 2010.

Lyrica [product information]. Vega Baja, PR: Pfizer Pharmaceuitcals LLC; 2006.

Volpi A et al. Current management of herpes zoster. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2005;6:317.

Balfour HH, Jr et al. Acyclovir halts progression of herpes zoster in immunocompromised patients. N Engl J

Med. 1983;308:1448.

Dworkin RH et al. Recommendations for the management of herpes zoster. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44(Suppl

1):S1.

Tyring S et al. A randomized, double-blind trial of famciclovir versus acyclovir for the treatment of localized

dermatomal herpes zoster in immunocompromised patients. Cancer Invest. 2001;19:13.

Arora A et al. Double-blind study comparing 2 dosages of valacyclovir hydrochloride for the treatment of

uncomplicated herpes zoster in immunocompromised patients 18 years of age and older. J Infect Dis.

2008;197:1289.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Influenza. In: Hamborsky J et al, eds. Epidemiology and Prevention

of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases. 13th ed. Washington, D.C.: Public Health Foundation; 2015.

Grohskopf LA et al. Prevention and control of seasonal influenza with vaccines: recommendations of the

advisory committee on immunization practices (ACIP) – United States, 2015–16 influenza season. MMWR

Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64:818.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

119.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Diaz-Granados CA et al. Efficacy of high-dose versus standard dose influenza vaccine in older adults. N Engl J

Med. 2014;371:635–645.

Fluzone Intradermal [product information]. Swiftwater, PA: Sanofi Pasteur; 2014.

Nichol KL et al. Side effects associated with influenza vaccination in healthy working adults. A randomized,

placebo controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:1546.

Margolis KL et al. Frequency of adverse reactions after influenza vaccination. Am J Med. 1990;88:27.

Scolaro KL. Colds and allergy. In: Krinsky DL et al, eds. Handbook of Nonprescription Drugs: An Interactive

Approach to Self-Care. 18th ed. Washington, DC: American Pharmacists Association; 2015.

Harper SA et al. Seasonal influenza in adults and children—diagnosis, treatment, chemoprophylaxis, and

institutional outbreak management: clinical practice guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48:1003.

Rapivab [product information]. Durham NC: BioCryst Pharmaceuticals; 2014.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Oseltamivir-resistant 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1)

virus infection in two summer campers receiving prophylaxis—North Carolina, 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal

Wkly Rep. 2009;58:969.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Children and flu antiviral drugs. Updated January 25, 2017.

http://www.cdc.gov/flu/children/antiviral.htm. Accessed August 1, 2017.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Antiviral agents for the Treatment and Chemoprophylaxis of

influenza. Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Morb

Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60:1–26.

Hayden FG et al. Use of oral neuraminidase inhibitor oseltamivir in experimental influenza: randomized controlled

trials for prevention and treatment. JAMA. 1999;282:1240.

[No authors listed]. Randomised trial of efficacy and safety of inhaled zanamivir in treatment of influenza A and

B virus infections. The MIST (Management of Influenza in the Southern Hemisphere Trialists) Study Group

[published corrections appear in Lancet. 1999;353:504; Lancet. 1999;353:1104]. Lancet. 1998;352:1877.

Jefferson T et al. Neuraminidase inhibitors for preventing and treating influenza in healthy adults. Cochrane

Database Syst Rev. 2010;(2):CD001265.

Allison MA et al. Influenza vaccine effectiveness in healthy 6- to 21-month-old children during the 2003–2004

season. J Pediatr. 2006;149:755.

FluMist [product information]. Gaithersburg, MD: Med Immune LLC; 2012.

Hayden FG et al. Use of selective oral neuraminidase inhibitor oseltamivir to prevent influenza. N Engl J Med.

1999;341:1336.

Hayden FG et al. Inhaled zanamivir for the prevention of influenza in families. Zanamivir Family Study Group. N

EnglJ Med. 2000;343:1282.

Monto AS et al. Zanamivir in the prevention of influenza in healthy adults: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA.

1999;282:31.

Lugo RA, Nahata MC. Pathogenesis and treatment of bronchiolitis. Clin Pharm. 1993;12:95.

Shay DK et al. Bronchiolitis-associated mortality and estimates of respiratory syncytial virus-associated deaths

among US children 1979–1997. J Infect Dis. 2001;183:16.

Perez-Yarza EG et al. The association between respiratory syncytial virus infection and the development of

childhood asthma: a systematic review of the literature. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2007;26:733.

Panitch HB. Respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis:supportive care and therapies designed to overcome airway

obstruction. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2003;22(2 Suppl):S83.

Ralston SL et al. Clinical Practice Guideline: the diagnosis, management, and prevention of bronchiolitis.

Pediatrics. 2014;134;e1474.

Gadomski AM et al. Bronchodilators for bronchiolitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(12):CD001266.

[No authors listed]. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Infectious Diseases: use of ribavirin in the

treatment of respiratory syncytial virus infection. Pediatrics. 1993;92:501.

Englund JA et al. High-dose, short-duration ribavirin aerosol therapy compared with standard ribavirin therapy in

children with suspected respiratory syncytial virus infection. J Pediatr. 1994;125:635.

Wheeler JG et al. Historical cohort evaluation of ribavirin efficacy in respiratory syncytial virus infection. Pediatr

Infect Dis J. 1993;12:209.

Ventre K, Randolph AG. Ribavirin for respiratory syncytial virus infection of the lower respiratory tract in

infants and young children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(1):CD000181.

Meert KL et al. Aerosolized ribavirin in mechanically ventilated children with respiratory syncytial virus lower

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

157.

.

.

.

.

.

.

respiratory tract disease: a prospective, double-blind, randomized trial. Crit Care Med. 1994;22:566.

Smith DW et al. A controlled trial of aerosolized ribavirin in infants receiving mechanical ventilation for severe

respiratory syncytial virus infection. N EnglJ Med. 1991;325:24.

Janai HK et al. Ribavirin: adverse drug reactions, 1986 to 1988. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1990;9:209.

Edell D et al. Early ribavirin treatment of bronchiolitis: effect on long-term respiratory morbidity. Chest.

2002;122:935.

Krilov LR. Safety issues related to the administration of ribavirin. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2002;21:479.

[No authors listed]. Palivizumab, a humanized respiratory syncytial virus monoclonal antibody, reduces

hospitalizations from respiratory syncytial virus infection in high-risk infants. The IMpact-RSV Study Group.

Pediatrics. 1998;102(3, pt 1):531.

[No authors listed]. Prevention of respiratory syncytial virus infections: indications for the use of palivizumab and

update on the use of RSV-IGIV American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Infectious Diseases and

Committee of Fetus and Newborn. Pediatrics. 1998;102:1211.

Khan AS et al. Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome: the first 100 US cases. J Infect Dis. 1996;173:1297.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Hantavirus. Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome (HPS) Case

De finition. http://www.cdc.gov/hantavirus/health-care-workers/hps-case-definition.html. Accessed

August 3, 2015.

Mertz GJ et al. Hantavirus infection. Dis Mon. 1998;44:85.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Hantavirus. Annual U.S. HPS Cases and Case-fatality,

1993–2013. www.cdc.gov/hantavirus/surveillance/annual-cases.html. Accessed August 3, 2015.

Mertz GJ, Chapman L. Hantavirus infections in the United States: diagnosis and treatment. Adv Exp Med Biol.

1996;394:153.

Huggins JW et al. Prospective, double-blind, concurrent, placebo-controlled clinical trial of intravenous ribavirin

therapy of hemorrhagic fever with renalsyndrome. J Infect Dis. 1991;164:1119.

Mertz GJ et al. Placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of intravenous ribavirin for the treatment of hantavirus

cardiopulmonary syndrome in North America. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:1307.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). West Nile virus. West Nile virus disease cases reported to

CDC by state and year, 1999–2014. http://www.cdc.gov/westnile/resources/pdfs/data/2-west-nile-virusdisease-cases-reported-to-cdc-by-state_1999-2014_06042015.pdf. Accessed August 1, 2015.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. AllAbout Hantaviruses. Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome (HPS).

http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/diseases/hanta/hps/. Accessed January 21, 2011.

Diamond MS. Progress on the development of therapeutics against West Nile virus. Antiviral Res. 2009;83:214.

Nash D et al. The outbreak of West Nile virus infection in the New York City area in 1999. N Engl J Med.

2001;344:1807.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Neuroinvasive and Non-Neuroinvasive Domestic Arboviral

Diseases. 2004 Case Definition. CSTE Position Statement Number 09-ID-28.

http://www.cdc.gov/osels/ph_surveillance/nndss/casedef/arboviral-2004.htm. Accessed November 24,

2010.

Petersen LR, Marfin AA. West Nile virus: a primer for the clinician. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:173.

Lewis M, Amsden JR. Successful treatment of West Nile virus infection after approximately 3 weeks into the

disease course. Pharmacotherapy. 2007;27:455.

Anderson JF, Rahal JJ. Efficacy of interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin against West Nile Virus in vitro. Emerg

Infect Dis. 2002;8:107.

Kalil AC et al. Use of interferon-alpha in patients with West Nile encephalitis: report of 2 cases. Clin Infect Dis.

2005;40:764.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). SARS basic fact sheet. Updated July 2, 2012.

http://www.cdc.gov/sars/about/fs-sars.html. Accessed August 1, 2017.

World Health Organization. Global Alert and Response (GAR). Summary of probable SARS cases with onset of

illness from 1 November 2002 to 31 July 2003.

http://www.who.int/csr/sars/country/table2004_04_21/en/index.html. Accessed December 17, 2010.

Donnelly CA et al. Epidemiological determinants of spread of causal agent of severe acute respiratory syndrome

in Hong Kong [published correction appears in Lancet. 2003;361:1832]. Lancet. 2003;361:1761.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Update: outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome—

worldwide, 2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52:269.

Ksiazek TG et al. A novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N Engl J Med.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

182.

.

.

185.

.

.

.

.

.

2003;348:1953.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Revised U.S. surveillance case definition for severe acute

respiratory syndrome (SARS) and update on SARS cases—United States and worldwide, December 2003.

MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52:1202.

Christian MD et al. Severe acute respiratory syndrome. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38:1420.

Stockman LJ et al. SARS:systematic review of treatment effects. PLoS Med. 2006;3:e343.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and

coronavirus testing—United States 2003 [published correction appears in MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep.

2003;52:345]. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52:297.

Mazulli T et al. Severe acute respiratory syndrome associated coronavirus in lung tissue. Emerg Infect Dis.

2004;10:20.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Update on the Epidemiology of Middle East Respiratory

Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) Infection, and Guidance for the Public, Clinicians, and Public Health

Authorities—January 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64:61

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). MERS in the Republic of Korea. Available at:

http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/travel/notices/watch/mers-republic-of-korea. Accessed August 6, 2015.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). MERS in the US.

http://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/mers/us.html. Accessed August 6, 2015.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Zika Virus. http://www.cdc.gov/zika/geo/index.html.

Accessed May 18, 2016.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Recognizing, Managing, and Reporting Zika Virus

Infections in Travelers Returning from Central America, South America, the Caribbean, and Mexico.

http://emergency.cdc.gov/han/han00385.asp. Accessed May 18, 2016.

Oster AM et al. Update: Interim Guidance for Prevention of Sexual Transmission of Zika Virus—United States,

2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65:323.

Atkinson B et al. Detection of Zika virus in semen [letter]. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:940.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Zika Virus, Prevention.

http://www.cdc.gov/zika/prevention/. Accessed May 18, 2016.

Chen LH et al. Zika virus: rapid spread in the western hemisphere. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164:613.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Health Statistics. Vital and Health

Statistics: Current Estimates From the National Health Interview Survey, 1996. October 1999.

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_10/sr10_200.pdf. Accessed December 17, 2010.

Heikkinen T, Järvinen A. The common cold. Lancet. 2003;361:51.

Monto AS. Epidemiology of viral respiratory infections. Am J Med. 2002;112(Suppl 6A):4S.

Eccles R. Efficacy and safety of over-the-counter analgesics in the treatment of common cold and flu. J Clin

Pharm Ther. 2006;31:309.

Arroll B. Non-antibiotic treatments for upper-respiratory tract infections (common cold). Respir Med.

2005;99:1477.

Kim SY et al. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the common cold. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009:

(3):CD006362.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Revised product labels for pediatric over-the-counter cough

and cold medicines. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008;57:1180.

Vassilev ZP et al. Safety and efficacy of over-the-counter cough and cold medicines for use in children. Expert

Opin Drug Saf. 2010;9:233.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Infant deaths associated with cough and cold medications

—two states, 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007;56:1.

Singh M et al. Zinc for the common cold. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;6:CD001364.

Karsch-Volk M et al. Echinacea for preventing and treating the common cold. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.

104;2:DC000530.

Taylor JA et al. Efficacy and safety of echinacea in treating upper respiratory tract infections in children: a

randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;290:2824.

Caruso TJ, Gwaltney JM, Jr. Treatment of the common cold with echinacea: a structured review. Clin Infect

Dis. 2005;40:807.

p. 1661

Hepatitis A virus (HAV) is a worldwide, acute self-limiting disease

transmitted via the fecal–oral route. Hepatocyte injury is caused by a

cytopathic and immunologic response, which can result in jaundice and

increased liver function tests. Treatment measures are usually

supportive and aimed toward prevention (pre-exposure and postexposure) through vaccination.

Case 80-1 (Questions 1–3),

Case 80-2 (Question 1),

Case 80-3 (Question 1)

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a bloodborne pathogen that is transmitted

through percutaneous or perinatal exposure, blood products, or sexual

contact. HBV has an acute phase with resolution and a chronic phase.

Over the course of decades, the chronic phase can lead to hepatic

cirrhosis and death. Patients with chronic infection require treatment

with peginterferon, nucleoside and nucleotide reverse transcriptase (RT)

inhibitors. Several effective prophylactic strategies (immunizations and

nucleoside or nucleotide RT inhibitors) are used to prevent HBV

infection.

Case 80-4 (Questions 1–4),

Case 80-5 (Questions 1, 2),

Case 80-6 (Questions 1–3),

Case 80-7 (Question 1),

Case 80-8 (Question 1),

Case 80-9 (Question 1),

Case 80-10 (Questions 1, 2),

Case 80-11 (Question 1),

Case 80-12 (Questions 1–14)

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a bloodborne pathogen that is transmitted

primarily through percutaneous exposure, blood products, or sexual

contact. HCV has an acute and a chronic phase. The chronic phase can

lead to cirrhosis, decompensated liver disease, hepatocellular carcinoma,

and death. Acute clinical manifestations are similar to those for HAV

and HBV. Treatment of chronic HCV infection (genotypes 1 to 6) is

with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs).

Case 80-13 (Question 1),

Case 80-14 (Questions 1–3),

Case 80-15 (Questions 1–3)

Hepatitis Dvirus (HDV) is a small RNA virus that requires coinfection

with HBV for replication. HDV transmission is most likely associated

with percutaneous exposure. HDV, in combination with HBV, leads to

a much higher risk of acute liver failure. Prevention strategies rely on

successful immunization of HBV.

No cases

Hepatitis E virus is similar to HAV and is transmitted via the fecal–oral

route, especially through contaminated water, which is found more

common in developing countries. Recovery from acute illness usually

occurs.

No cases

There are five distinctly separate hepatitis viruses that cause liver disease. A sixth

virus also has been identified, but has yet to be implicated in liver disease. Four of

these viruses are RNA viruses, and one is a DNA virus.

1 The individual virus types

can be distinguished by serologic assays and, in some instances, by genotyping.

Although progress in the area of disease prevention has improved, advances in

treatment of certain viral infections have been limited because of the large amount of

viruses produced and their rapid mutation. For instance, the hepatitis C virus (HCV)

replicates approximately 1 trillion virus particles (virions) daily, compared with 100

billion HBV virions daily and 10 billion HIV virions daily.

1,2 This chapter reviews

the virology, epidemiology, pathogenesis, natural history, diagnosis, clinical

manifestations, prevention, and treatment strategies for viral hepatitis A through E.

CAUSATIVE AGENTS AND CHARACTERISTICS

Viral hepatitis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States.

1–3 At

least five distinct pathogens are responsible for viral hepatitis. These hepatotrophic

viruses are identified by the letters A through E as follows: (a) type A hepatitis

caused by hepatitis A virus (HAV), (b) type B hepatitis caused by hepatitis B virus

(HBV), (c) type C hepatitis caused by HCV, (d) type D or delta hepatitis caused by

the HBV-associated hepatitis D virus (HDV), and (e) type E hepatitis caused by the

hepatitis E virus (HEV). Hepatitis A through E viruses differ in their immunologic

characteristics and epidemiologic patterns (Table 80-1).

4,5 Fecal–oral transmission

is the primary mode of infection for HAV and HEV, whereas parenteral and sexual

transmission is characteristic of HBV, HCV, and HDV infections.

1–3 Several other

viruses primarily affect nonhepatic organ systems and may secondarily induce a

hepatitis-like syndrome. These include the Epstein–Barr virus (infectious

mononucleosis), cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex viruses, varicella-zoster virus, and

rubella, rubeola, and mumps viruses.

p. 1662

p. 1663

Table 80-1

Characteristics of Hepatitis Viruses

4,5

Virus Nucleic Acid

Routes of

Transmission

Risk of Chronic

Illness Mortality

HAV Nonenveloped SS RNA Fecal–oral None Low

HBV Enveloped DS DNA Parenteral

(sex, perinatal)

High Moderate–High

HCV Enveloped SS RNA Parenteral

(sex, perinatal)

High Moderate–High

HDV Enveloped SS RNA Parenteral

(sex, perinatal)

High High

HEV Nonenveloped SS RNA Fecal–oral None Low–Moderate

HAV, hepatitis A virus; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; HDV, hepatitis D virus; HEV, hepatitis E

virus; SS, single-stranded; RNA, ribonucleic acid; DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid.

Definitions of Acute and Chronic Hepatitis

Viral hepatitis can present as either an acute or chronic illness. Acute hepatitis is

defined as an illness with a discrete date of onset with jaundice or increased serum

aminotransferase concentrations greater than 10 times the upper limit of normal

1–3,5

and does not exceed 6 months. Chronic hepatitis is a prolonged inflammatory

condition of the liver that involves ongoing hepatocellular necrosis for ≥6 months

beyond the onset of acute illness.

4,5 The most common causes of chronic viral

hepatitis are HBV and HCV.

3 Drug-induced and autoimmune chronic hepatitis occur

less frequently; metabolic disorders and HDV chronic hepatitis are relatively rare.

6,7

HAV and HEV are self-limiting infections that rarely progress to chronic hepatitis.

Serologic Evaluation in Presumed Chronic Hepatitis

Serologies are useful in diagnosing viral hepatitis. Antibodies against hepatitis A

virus (anti-HAV), hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), and hepatitis C virus (antiHCV) are useful diagnostic markers. A diagnosis of acute HAV infection includes the

presence of immunoglobulin M (IgM) anti-HAV. If HBsAg is present, further testing

for hepatitis B envelope antigen (HBeAg) and HBV DNA confirms the presence of

active viral replication and viral load, respectively. Testing for hepatitis D antibody

(anti-HDV) should also be performed in patients with HBV infection to evaluate the

possibility of coinfection. If serology is negative, rare but treatable causes of chronic

active hepatitis should be further ruled out. These include alcoholic liver disease,

disease, alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency, and drug-induced chronic active hepatitis.

Drugs associated with reversible chronic active hepatitis syndrome include

methyldopa,

8 nitrofurantoin,

9

isoniazid,

10 and, rarely, sulfonamides

11 and

propylthiouracil.

12

HEPATITIS A VIRUS

Virology and Epidemiology

Hepatitis A virus is an icosahedral, nonenveloped virus measuring 28 nm diameter. It

is a single-stranded, positive-sense, linear RNA enterovirus of the Picornaviridae

family (see Table 80-1).

2,4,5

HAV has a worldwide distribution.

13,14 The prevalence of infection is related to

the quality of the water supply, level of sanitation, and age.

14,15

Incidence data are

unreliable because the disease is frequently mild and often unrecognized, resulting in

under-reporting. The primary mode of transmission is from person to person via the

fecal–oral route.

15,16 The virus is sturdy and resists degradation by drying,

environmental conditions (temperatures as high as 56°C and as low as −20°C),

gastric acid (pH 3.0), and digestive enzymes in the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract.

Therefore, HAV is easily spread within a population. Fecally contaminated water or

food is a significant mode of transmission.

16,17 Children are considered a relatively

common reservoir, but rarely exhibit clinical symptoms.

17,18

In 2014, the overall incidence rate of HAV infection was 0.4 cases per 100,000

population in the United States.

19 HAV infection could occur from common-source

outbreaks of fecally contaminated food or water, as well as uncooked HAVcontaminated foods. In developed countries with well-maintained sanitation and

water supplies, waterborne outbreaks of HAV are uncommon.

19 Originally, HAV

vaccination was recommended for persons at high risk of infection and children

living in communities at high risk. However, due to the significant number of cases of

HAV disease still occurring in the United States, HAV vaccination recommendations

have expanded. In 2006, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)

recommended routine vaccination for all children aged 12 to 23 months in the United

States.

20

Exceedingly rare causes of HAV include transfusion of blood or blood products

collected from donors during the viremic phase of their infection and from contact

with experimentally infected nonhuman primates.

16,21 Percutaneous transmission is

rare because no asymptomatic carrier state for HAV exists and the incubation period

is brief.

16 Occupations at risk for HAV infection include sewage workers, hospital

cleaning personnel, day-care staff, and pediatric nurses.

18,19 HAV is the most common

preventable (e.g., vaccination) infection in travelers visiting locations with poor

hygienic conditions.

22

p. 1663

p. 1664

Pathogenesis

Although the exact mechanism of injury is unknown,

17,23,24 viral replication occurs

within the liver, or hepatocytes. Subsequent hepatocyte death results in viral

elimination and eventual resolution of the clinical illness.

18

Natural History

After exposure to HAV, usually via ingestion of HAV from material contaminated

with feces, the virus resides and replicates in the hepatocytes within hours or days

after infection. Following the translational and replication processes, HAV is

released into the bile canaliculi and is transported to the intestine, where it is

excreted in the feces at concentrations ranging up to 10

9

infectious virions per gram

of feces.

17 This occurs during the subclinical stage (incubation period) or anicteric

prodromal period (14–21 days) of the infection before alanine aminotransferase

(ALT) levels become elevated and clinical symptoms or jaundice occurs.

18 The

contagiousness of the infection is highest during this period and is significantly

reduced following the onset of symptoms or jaundice. HAV infection could occur in

two clinical courses varying from subclinical hepatitis (asymptomatic), usually

observed in children, to anicteric hepatitis (symptoms without jaundice) or icteric

hepatitis that occurs in adults and could result in fulminant hepatitis and death,

especially among adults older than 50 years.

18 Chronic HAV infection usually does

not manifest because of the robust humoral and cellular immune responses,

particularly natural killer cells, CD4

+ and CD8

+ cytotoxic T cells.

18 Most important,

humoral immunity plays a pivotal role in viral clearance leading to viremia declines

after the presence of neutralizing antibodies.

25 Typically, the course of HAV includes

an incubation phase, an acute hepatitis phase, and a convalescent phase. Complete

clinical recovery is usually seen in all patients within 6 months after HAV infection.

Clinical Manifestations

CASE 80-1

QUESTION 1: E.T., a 34-year-old medical sales representative, presents to the emergency department (ED)

with acute onset of jaundice and “dark urine.” He was in good health until 2 weeks ago, when he noted feeling

fatigued and weak, which he attributed to his demanding work schedule. He also recalled having a mild

headache, loss of appetite, muscle pain, diarrhea, and low-grade fevers from 99°F to 101°F. He attributed these

symptoms to the flu and took acetaminophen with plenty of fluids. His symptoms persisted until yesterday, when

they seemed to resolve unexplainably. He then noted his urine was cola-colored. This morning, he noted

jaundice of his eyes and skin and sought medical attention.

E.T.’s medical history includes a recent respiratory tract infection, treated successfully with levofloxacin. His

social history is significant for frequenting the local oyster bar, where he regularly ingests raw oysters. He

denies smoking and recent travel outside the United States, but admits to occasional alcohol consumption. E.T.

has no history of sexual exposure, needle use, or transfusions. His current medications include oral (PO)

diazepam 5 mg at bedtime (HS) as needed (PRN) for “muscle spasms,” but he has not taken diazepam for

“several months.” He also has a seizure disorder sustained after a motorcycle accident 2 years before

admission, for which he takes phenytoin 400 mg PO every HS.

Physical examination is significant for a well-developed, well-nourished man in no acute distress. He is alert

and oriented, with a temperature of 99°F. His sclerae and skin are icteric, and his abdomen is positive for a

tender, enlarged liver and right upper quadrant pain. Laboratory tests reveal the following values:

Hemoglobin (Hgb): 16 g/dL

Hematocrit (Hct): 44%

White blood cell (WBC) count: 5,500 cells/μL

Aspartate transaminase (AST): 120 units/L

Alanine aminotransferase (ALT): 240 units/L

Alkaline phosphatase: 86 units/L

Total bilirubin: 3.2 mg/dL

Direct bilirubin: 1.5 mg/dL

Phenytoin concentration: 12 mg/L (normal: 10–20 mg/L)

The albumin, prothrombin time (PT), blood glucose, and electrolytes all are within normal limits. E.T. is

negative for anti-HCV, HBeAg, HBsAg, and hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc), but is positive for IgM antiHAV. What clinical features and serologic markers are consistent with viral hepatitis in E.T.?

The incubation period for HAV is 15 to 50 days (average 28 days) after

inoculation. The host is usually asymptomatic during this stage of the infection; thus,

E.T. is beyond the inoculation phase of the disease. Because HAV titers are highest

in the acute-phase fecal samples, the period of infectivity is 14 and 21 days, before

the onset of jaundice, to 7 or 8 days after jaundice. Therefore, E.T. should be

considered infectious at this time. In HAV infections, acute-phase serum and saliva

are less infectious than fecal samples, whereas urine and semen samples are not

infectious. Family members and persons recently in immediate contact with E.T.

should be notified.

26

The symptoms of acute viral hepatitis caused by HAV, HBV, HCV, HDV, and

HEV are similar. The onset of symptoms in HAV infection, however, is less

insidious than those seen with HBV and HCV infection.

5 Generally, symptoms of

HAV infection present a week or more before the onset of jaundice. The likelihood

of having symptoms is related to age. In children younger than 6 years of age, 70% of

infections are asymptomatic, whereas older children and adults have symptomatic

disease with jaundice occurring in more than 70% of cases.

18 E.T. has signs and

symptoms of acute HAV infection, including the nonspecific prodromal symptoms of

fatigue, weakness, anorexia, nausea, and vomiting. Abdominal pain and

hepatomegaly are common. Less common symptoms include fever, headache,

arthralgias, myalgias, and diarrhea. Within 1 to 2 weeks of the onset of prodromal

symptoms, patients may enter an icteric phase with symptoms, including clay-colored

stools, dark urine, scleral icterus, and jaundice. The dark urine is caused by

bilirubin, generally occurring shortly before the onset of jaundice. E.T. should be

questioned about the presence of pale stools (light gray or yellow), which usually is

observed during the icteric phase. His scleral icterus is strongly suggestive of viral

hepatitis. Icteric infections usually occur in adults and are 3.5 times more common

than the nonicteric presentation that is seen in children.

16,26

The results of E.T.’s liver function tests (e.g., elevations in AST, ALT, and total

bilirubin) also are consistent with viral hepatitis. Serum transaminase concentrations

increase during the prodromal phase (usually ALT > AST) of HAV infection, peaking

before the onset of jaundice. These concentrations are often greater than 500 units/L

and decline at an initial rate of 75%/week, followed by a slower rate of decline

thereafter. Serum bilirubin peaks after aminotransferase activity and rarely exceeds

10 mg/dL. Total bilirubin levels decline more slowly than aminotransferases and

generally normalize within 3 months. Right upper quadrant tenderness, mild liver

enlargement, and splenomegaly may also be present in patients with acute HAV

infection.

5,26

p. 1664

p. 1665

Extrahepatic Manifestations

CASE 80-1, QUESTION 2: Are there any additional complications that E.T. could experience from his acute

HAV infection?

With the appearance of jaundice, prodromal pruritus and extrahepatic

manifestations can occur, usually in patients with a more protracted illness. E.T.

should be monitored for additional manifestations of HAV infection, including

immune complex-associated rash, leukocytoclastic vasculitis, glomerulonephritis,

cryoglobulinemia (less likely than with HCV), and arthritis.

26

Diagnosis and Serology

Diagnostic methods for detecting HAV antigen and anti-HAV are listed in Figure 80-

1. Detection of IgM antibodies to HAV in a patient who presents with clinical

characteristics of hepatitis, or in an asymptomatic patient with elevated

transaminases, is consistent with acute HAV infection. HAV IgG appears after IgM

and is indicative of previous exposure and immunity to HAV, whereas a rising IgG is

consistent with recent exposure.

5,26 Anti-HAV IgM is commonly present throughout

the disease course (16–40 weeks), usually peaking early and declining to

undetectable levels 3 to 4 months after the initial infection.

26 One-quarter of patients

infected with HAV have IgM present for up to 6 months and occasionally longer.

HAV IgG appears early in the convalescent phase and is detectable for decades after

the acute infection resolves, with a slowly declining titer.

16,26 Both enzyme-linked

immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and radioimmunoassay methods of antibody detection

are sensitive, specific, and reliable to diagnose acute HAV infection. E.T. has a

positive IgM anti-HAV, consistent with acute HAV infection. He has a negative IgM

anti-HBc test, ruling out acute HBV infection.

16,26

Treatment

GENERAL MEASURES

HAV infection is usually a self-limiting disease and rarely leads to serious

complications including fulminant liver failure and death.

27 Management involves

supportive care and medical treatment of serious complications. Intravenous (IV)

fluid and electrolyte replacement, nutritional support, and the use of antiemetics may

be necessary for some patients. Antipyretics (acetaminophen) should not be used

because the risk of fulminant hepatic failure (FHF) could increase. Considering that

hemolysis or acute kidney injury is possible, a regular assessment of renal function

with a complete blood count (CBC) should be performed. Patients should abstain

from alcohol during the acute phase of the disease. After resolution of symptoms and

serum biochemical abnormalities, moderate alcohol intake is no longer

contraindicated. In general, prognosis after HAV infection is very good. Long-term

immunity accompanies HAV infection, and recurrence or chronic hepatitis usually

does not occur.

Adjustment of Medication Doses

CASE 80-1, QUESTION 3: Should E.T.’s medications be adjusted during the acute phase of HAV infection?

Dosage adjustments for hepatically eliminated drugs in the setting of liver disease

are difficult to predict. This is because hepatic metabolism is complex, involving

numerous oxidative and conjugative pathways that are variably affected in hepatic

disease. In renal disease, creatinine serves as an endogenous marker to predict the

clearance of renally eliminated drugs. In hepatic disease, however, no reliable

endogenous markers exist to predict drug hepatic clearance. Laboratory tests that

approximate the synthetic function of the liver (e.g., albumin, PT) and biliary

clearance (bilirubin) are used to estimate the degree of hepatic impairment, but these

tests are not dependable in predicting alterations in pharmacokinetic parameters for

hepatically metabolized drugs. Unnecessary and potentially hepatotoxic medications

should be avoided during the acute phase of the illness. When drug therapy is

indicated with agents that undergo hepatic elimination, it is prudent to use the lowest

doses possible to achieve the desired therapeutic effect.

Figure 80-1 Typical course of hepatitis A. anti-HAV, antibody to HAV; HAV, hepatitis A virus. A: Presence of

hepatitis A virus in liver, feces, and blood. B: Markers of hepatitis A virus in blood. (Adapted from McConnell TH,

The Nature of Disease Pathology for the Health Professions. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,

2007, with permission.)

p. 1665

p. 1666

E.T. should be advised to discontinue diazepam because this medication

undergoes extensive hepatic biotransformation and limited data suggest this agent

accumulates in the setting of acute viral hepatitis.

28

If E.T. should require drug

therapy for muscle spasms, he should either decrease the diazepam dose or consider

using an alternative agent (e.g., lorazepam) that does not accumulate in acute viral

hepatitis.

29 Patients with acute viral hepatitis do not require phenytoin dosage

adjustments.

30 Because E.T.’s plasma phenytoin concentration is within the desired

therapeutic range, no dosage adjustment is needed.

Prevention of Hepatitis A

Prevention of hepatitis A infection can be achieved through immunoprophylactic

measures. Immunoprophylaxis may be passive, active, or a combination of both. I





passive immunization, temporary protective antibody in the form of immunoglobulin

is administered. In active immunization, a vaccine is administered to induce the

formation of protective antibody.

20,31 Prophylaxis can be administered before (preexposure prophylaxis) or after exposure (post-exposure prophylaxis).

Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis

CASE 80-2

QUESTION 1: M.D., a 22-year-old student, is preparing for a 2-week vacation to Thailand. He plans to travel

3 months from now and wonders whether he should receive prophylaxis for HAV.

Immunoglobulin

Before hepatitis A vaccine was available, the only therapy for pre-exposure

prophylaxis of hepatitis A infection was immunoglobulin. Although passive

immunization with immunoglobulin alone is highly effective in preventing HAV

infection,

20

the duration of protection is short. When used for pre-exposure

prophylaxis (e.g., in travelers who are allergic to a vaccine component or decide

against vaccination), a dose of 0.02 mL/kg of immunoglobulin administered

intramuscularly (IM) confers protection for less than 3 months, and an IM dose of

0.06 mL/kg confers protection for 5 months or longer.

19,20,26

Table 80-2

Recommended Doses of Hepatitis A Vaccines

27,31,32

Age at Vaccination Dose (Volume)

a

Schedule

(Months)

b

Havrix

Children 12 months–18 years 720 ELISA units (0.5 mL) 0, 6–12

Adults >19 years 1,440 ELISA units (1.0 mL) 0, 6–12

Vaqta

Children 12 months–18 years 25 units (0.5 mL) 0, 6–18

Adults >19 years 50 units (1.0 mL) 0, 6

aEnzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) units.

bZero months represent timing of the initial dose; subsequent numbers represent months after the initial dose.

Vaccine

Active immunization with hepatitis A vaccine has largely supplanted the use of

immunoglobulin for pre-exposure prophylaxis of infection caused by HAV. Two

types of the inactivated, monovalent hepatitis A vaccines are available in the United

States and globally: Havrix and Vaqta. Both vaccines are formalin-inactivated

preparations of attenuated HAV strains.

32 The manufacturers use differing units to

express antigen content of their respective vaccines. Havrix dosages are expressed in

ELISA units, and Vaqta dosages are expressed as units of hepatitis A antigen. These

vaccines are developed to provide long-term immunity. They are free of thimerosal

and mercury as preservatives and are safe and effective for children and adults.

33

Dosing Regimen

Havrix is available in two formulations that differ according to age: for persons 12

months to 18 years of age, 720 ELISA units (0.5 mL)/dose in a two-dose schedule;

and for persons 19 years and older, 1,440 ELISA units (1.0 mL)/dose in a two-dose

schedule (Table 80-2).

27,31,32 Havrix is injected IM into the deltoid muscle with a

booster dose administered 6 to 12 months later. The pediatric Havrix formulation

(three-dose schedule) is no longer available. Vaqta is available in two formulations

that differ according to the person’s age: for persons 12 months to 18 years of age, 25

units (0.5 mL) in a two-dose schedule; and for persons 19 years and older, 50 units

(1.0 mL) per dose in a two-dose schedule (Table 80-2).

27,31,32 Likewise, this vaccine

is injected IM into the deltoid muscle with a booster dose administered 6 to 18

months later.

20,31,32

Combination Vaccine

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has also licensed a combined HAV

and HBV vaccine (Twinrix) for use in persons aged 18 years and older. Twinrix is

composed of the same antigenic components used in Havrix and Engerix-B. Each

dose of Twinrix contains at least 720 ELISA units of inactivated HAV and 20 mcg of

recombinant HBsAg.

34,35 Twinrix does not contain thimerosal and mercury as

preservatives and is safe and effective for children and adults.

33

Comments

Search This Blog

Archive

Show more

Popular posts from this blog

TRIPASS XR تري باس

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

ZENOXIA 15 MG, Comprimé

VOXCIB 200 MG, Gélule

Kana Brax Laberax

فومي كايند

بعض الادويه نجد رموز عليها مثل IR ، MR, XR, CR, SR , DS ماذا تعني هذه الرموز

NIFLURIL 700 MG, Suppositoire adulte

Antifongiques مضادات الفطريات

Popular posts from this blog

علاقة البيبي بالفراولة بالالفا فيتو بروتين

التغيرات الخمس التي تحدث للجسم عند المشي

إحصائيات سنة 2020 | تعداد سكَان دول إفريقيا تنازليا :

ما هو الليمونير للأسنان ؟

ACUPAN 20 MG, Solution injectable

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

الام الظهر

VOXCIB 200 MG, Gélule

ميبستان

Popular posts from this blog

TRIPASS XR تري باس

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

Popular posts from this blog

TRIPASS XR تري باس

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

ZENOXIA 15 MG, Comprimé

VOXCIB 200 MG, Gélule

Kana Brax Laberax

فومي كايند

بعض الادويه نجد رموز عليها مثل IR ، MR, XR, CR, SR , DS ماذا تعني هذه الرموز

NIFLURIL 700 MG, Suppositoire adulte

Antifongiques مضادات الفطريات

Popular posts from this blog

Kana Brax Laberax

TRIPASS XR تري باس

PARANTAL 100 MG, Suppositoire بارانتال 100 مجم تحاميل

الكبد الدهني Fatty Liver

الم اسفل الظهر (الحاد) الذي يظهر بشكل مفاجئ bal-agrisi

SEDALGIC 37.5 MG / 325 MG, Comprimé pelliculé [P] سيدالجيك 37.5 مجم / 325 مجم ، قرص مغلف [P]

نمـو الدمـاغ والتطـور العقـلي لـدى الطفـل

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

أخطر أنواع المخدرات فى العالم و الشرق الاوسط

Archive

Show more