Stenman S et al. What is the benefit of increasing the sulfonylurea dose? Ann Intern Med. 1993;118:169.

Jaber LA et al. Comparison of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of short- and long-term glyburide

therapy in NIDDM. Diabetes Care. 1994;17:1300.

Amaryl [package insert]. Bridgewater, NJ: Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC; July 2009.

Klepzig H et al. Sulfonylureas and ischaemic preconditioning; a double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of

glimepiride and glibenclamide. Eur Heart J. 1999;20:439.

Donath MY et al. Mechanisms of beta-cell death in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2005;54(Suppl 2):S108.

Yki-Järvinen H. Thiazolidinediones. N EnglJ Med. 2004;351:1106.

Actos [package insert]. Deerfield, IL: Takeda Pharmaceuticals America; September 2009.

Hanefeld M. Pharmacokinetics and clinical efficacy of pioglitazone. Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2001;(121):19.

Avandia [package insert]. Brentford, UK: Glaxo Smith Kline; October 2008.

Al-Salman J et al. Hepatocellular injury in a patient receiving rosiglitazone. A case report [published correction

appears in Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:237]. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:121.

Su DH et al. Liver failure in a patient receiving rosiglitazone therapy. Diabet Med. 2006;23:105.

Farley-Hills E et al. Fatal liver failure associated with pioglitazone. BMJ. 2004;329:429.

Singh S et al. Long-term risk of cardiovascular events with rosiglitazone. A meta-analysis. N Engl J Med.

2007;298:1189.

Nissen SE, Wolski K. Effect of rosiglitazone on the risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular

causes [published correction appears in N EnglJ Med. 2007;357:100]. N EnglJ Med. 2007;356:2457.

Nissen SE, Wolski K. Rosiglitazone revisited: an updated meta-analysis of risk for myocardial infarction and

cardiovascular mortality. Arch Intern Med. 2010:170(14);1191–1201.

Dormandy JA et al. Secondary prevention of macrovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes in the

PROactive Study (PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events): a randomised controlled

trial. Lancet. 2005;366:1279.

Lincoff AM et al. Pioglitazone and risk of cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A

meta-analysis of randomized trials. JAMA. 2007;298:1180.

Gerrits CM et al. A comparison of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone for hospitalization for acute myocardial

infarction in type 2 diabetes. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2007;16:1065.

197.

198.

199.

200.

201.

202.

203.

204.

205.

206.

207.

208.

209.

210.

211.

212.

213.

214.

215.

216.

217.

218.

219.

220.

221.

222.

223.

224.

225.

226.

227.

228.

229.

Graham DJ et al. Risk of acute myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, and death in elderly Medicare

patients treated with rosiglitazone or pioglitazone. JAMA. 2010;304:411.

Ryan EH Jr et al. Diabetic macular edema associated with glitazone use. Retina. 2006;26:562.

Food and Drug Administration. FDA drug safety communication: ongoing safety review of actos (pioglitazone)

and potential increased risk of bladder cancer after two years exposure. September 17, 2010. Available at

http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm226214.htm. Accessed December 9, 2010.

Schwartz AV, Sellmeyer DE. Thiazolidinedione therapy gets complicated. Is bone loss the price of improved

insulin resistance? Diabetes Care. 2007;30:1670.

Loke YK et al. Long-term use of thiazolidinediones and fractures in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Can Med

Assoc J. 2009;180:32.

Dormuth CR et al. Thiazolidinediones and fractures in men and women. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:1395.

Aubert RE et al. Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone increase fracture risk in women and men with type 2 diabetes.

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2010;12:716.

Ali AA et al. Rosiglitazone causes bone loss in mice by suppressing osteoblast differentiation and bone

formation. Endocrinology. 2005;146:1226.

Scheen AJ. Pharmacokinetic interactions with thiazolidinediones. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2007;46:1.

Clar C et al. Adding pioglitazone to insulin containing regimens in type 2 diabetes: systematic review and metaanalysis. PLoS One. 2009;4:e6112.

Precose [package insert]. Pittsburgh, PA: Bayer Corporation; 2011.

Glyset [package insert]. NY, NY: Pfizer/Pharmacia and Upjohn Company; 2012.

Van de Laar FA et al. Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.

2005;(2): CD003639.

Drucker DJ, Nauck MA. The incretin system: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl

peptidase-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes. Lancet. 2006;368:1696.

Victoza [package insert]. Bagsvsrd. Denmark: Novo Nordisk A/S; 2016.

Tanzeum [package insert]. Wilminton, DE: GlaxoSmithKline LLC; 2015.

Trulicity [package insert]. Indianapolis, IN: Eli Lilly and Co; 2015.

Byetta [package insert]. Wilmington, DE: AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals P; 2015

Bydureon [package insert]. Wilmington, DE: AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals P; 2015.

Vilsbøll T. Liraglutide: a once-daily GLP-1 analogue for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Expert Opin

Investig Drugs. 2007;16:231.

Drab SR. Incretin-based therapies for type 2 diabetes mellitus: current status and future prospects.

Pharmacotherapy. 2010;30:609.

Nauck M et al. Efficacy and safety comparison of liraglutide, glimepiride, and placebo, all in combination with

metformin, in type 2 diabetes: the LEAD (liraglutide effect and action in diabetes)-2 study. Diabetes Care.

2009;32:84.

Zinman B et al. Efficacy and safety of the human glucagon-like peptide-1 analog liraglutide in combination with

metformin and thiazolidinedione in patients with type 2 diabetes (LEAD-4 Met+TZD) [published correction

appears in Diabetes Care. 2010;33:692]. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:1224.

Marre M et al. Liraglutide, a once-daily human GLP-1 analogue, added to a sulphonylurea over 26 weeks

produces greater improvements in glycaemic and weight control compared with adding rosiglitazone or placebo

in subjects with Type 2 diabetes (LEAD-1 SU). Diabet Med. 2009;26:268.

Januvia [package insert]. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck and Co; 2010.

Onglyza [package insert]. New York, NY: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; 2009.

Tradjenta [package insert]. Ridgefield, CT: Boehringer ingelheim Pharmaceuticals; 2015.

Nesina [package insert]. Deerfield, IL: Takeda Pharmaceuticals America; 2013.

Drucker DJ, Nauck MA. The incretin system: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl

peptidase-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes. Lancet. 2006;368:1696.

Langley AK et al. Dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors and the incretin system in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Pharmacotherapy. 2007;27:1163.

Golightly LK et al. Comparative clinical pharmacokinetics of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. Clin

Pharmacokinet. 2012;51(8):501–514.

Lajara R. The potential role of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors in combination therapy for type 2

diabetes mellitus. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2014;15(17):2565–2585.

Li L, Shen J, Bala MM, et al. Incretin treatment and risk of pancreatitis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus:

230.

231.

232.

233.

234.

235.

236.

237.

238.

239.

240.

241.

242.

243.

244.

245.

246.

247.

248.

249.

250.

251.

252.

253.

254.

255.

256.

257.

258.

systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised studies. BMJ. 2014;348:2366.

Singh-Franco D et al. Pramlintide acetate injection for the treatment of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin

Ther. 2007;29:535.

Symlin [package insert]. Wilmington, DE: AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP; 2015.

Invokana [package insert]. Titusville, NJ:Jannsen Pharmaceuticals; September 2015.

Farxiga [package insert]. Wilmington, DE: AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP; March 2015.

Jardiance [package insert]. Ridgefield, CT: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals; June 2015.

Monami M, Nardini C, Mannucci E. Efficacy and safety of sodium glucose co-transport-2 inhibitors in type 2

diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014;16(5):457–466.

FDA Drug Safety Communication: FDA warns that SGLT2 inhibitors for diabetes may result in a serious

condition of too much acid in the blood. Available at

http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm446845.htm2015.

Gaziano JM et al. Randomized clinical trial of quick-release bromocriptine among patients with type 2 diabetes

on overallsafety and cardiovascular outcomes. Diabetes Care. 2010; 33:1503.

UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on

complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34) [published correction appears in Lancet.

1998;352:1558]. Lancet. 1998;352:854.

Welchol [package insert]. Parsippany, NJ: Daiichi Sankyo Inc; October 2014.

Bays HE et al. Colesevelam hydrochloride therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with

metformin: glucose and lipid effects. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:1975.

Goldberg RB et al. Efficacy and safety of colesevelam in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and inadequate

glycemic control receiving insulin-based therapy. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:1531.

Fonseca VA et al. Colesevelam HCl improves glycemic control and reduces LDL cholesterol in patients with

inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes on sulfonylurea-based therapy. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:1479.

Roussel R et al. Metformin use and mortality among patients with diabetes and atherothrombosis. Arch Intern

Med. 2010;170:1892.

Cycloset [package insert]. Tiverton, RI: VeroScience LLC; September 2010.

UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Efficacy of atenolol and captopril in reducing risk of macrovascular and

microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 39. BMJ. 1998;317:713.

UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and

microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38 [published correction appears in BMJ.

1999;318:29]. BMJ. 1998;317:703.

Holman RR et al. Long-term follow-up after tight control of blood pressure in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med.

2008;359:1565.

Libby G et al. New users of metformin are at low risk of incident cancer: a cohort study among people with type

2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:1620.

Feher MD et al. Tolerability of prolonged-release metformin (Glucophage) in individuals intolerant to standard

metformin—results from four UK centres. Br J Diabetes Vasc Dis. 2007;7:225.

Pelletier AL et al. Metformin stinks, literally. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:267.

de Jager J et al. Long term treatment with metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes and risk of vitamin B12

deficiency: randomised placebo controlled trial. BMJ. 2010;340:c2181.

Welschen LM et al. Self-monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes who are not using insulin: a

systematic review. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:1510.

Clar C et al. Self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes: systematic review. Health Technol Assess.

2010;14:1.

Bloomgarden ZT et al. Lower baseline glycemia reduces apparent oral agent glucose-lowering efficacy: a metaregression analysis. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:2137.

Sherifali D et al. The effect of oral antidiabetic agents on A1C levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Diabetes Care. 2010;33:1859.

Bolen S et al. Systematic review: comparative effectiveness and safety of oral medications for type 2 diabetes

mellitus [published correction appears in Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:887]. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:386.

Kahn SE et al. Glycemic durability of rosiglitazone, metformin, or glyburide monotherapy [published correction

appears in N EnglJ Med. 2007;356:1387]. N EnglJ Med. 2006; 355:2427.

DeFronzo RA et al. Effects of exenatide (exendin-4) on glycemic control and weight over 30 weeks in

metformintreated patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:1092.

259.

260.

261.

262.

263.

264.

265.

266.

267.

268.

269.

270.

271.

272.

273.

274.

275.

276.

277.

278.

279.

280.

281.

282.

283.

284.

285.

286.

287.

288.

Willi C et al. Active smoking and the risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA.

2007;298:2654.

Rafalson L et al. Cigarette smoking is associated with conversion from normoglycemia to impaired fasting

glucose: the Western New York Health Study. Ann Epidemiol. 2009;19:365.

Stang M et al. Incidence of lactic acidosis in metformin users. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:925.

Turner R et al. United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study 17: a 9-year update of a randomized, controlled trial

on the effect of improved metabolic control on complications in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Ann

Intern Med. 1996;124(1, pt 2):136.

Pan A et al. Bidirectional association between depression and type 2 diabetes mellitus in women. Arch Intern

Med. 2010;170:1884.

DeFronzo RA, Goodman AM. Efficacy of metformin in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

The Multicenter Metformin Study Group. N EnglJ Med. 1995;333:541.

Phung OJ et al. Effect of noninsulin antidiabetic drugs added to metformin therapy on glycemic control, weight

gain, and hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes. JAMA. 2010;303:1410.

Langtry HD, Balfour JA. Glimepiride. A review of its use in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Drugs.

1998; 55:563.

Klonoff DC et al. Exenatide effects on diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular risk factors and hepatic biomarkers in

patients with type 2 diabetes treated for at least 3 years. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008;24:275.

ACCORD Study Group et al. Effects of medical therapies on retinopathy progression in type 2 diabetes

[published correction appears in N EnglJ Med. 2011;364:190]. N EnglJ Med. 2010;363:233.

DeWitt DE, Dugdale DC. Using new insulin strategies in the outpatient treatment of diabetes: clinical

applications. JAMA. 2003;289:2265.

Riddle MC et al. The treat-to-target trial: randomized addition of glargine or human NPH insulin to oral therapy

of type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:3080.

Anderson JH Jr et al. Mealtime treatment with insulin analog improves postprandial hyperglycemia and

hypoglycemia in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Multicenter Insulin Lispro Study Group.

Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:1249.

Holman RR et al. Addition of biphasic, prandial, or basal insulin to oral therapy in type 2 diabetes. N EnglJ Med.

2007 Oct 25; 357:1716

Jain R et al. Efficacy of biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 in patients with T2DM not achieving glycemic targets on

OADS with/without basal insulin therapy [abstract]. Diabetes. 2005;54:A69.

Unnikrishnan AG et al. Practical guidance on intensification of insulin therapy with BIAsp 30: a consensus

statement. Int J Clin Pract. 2009;63:1571.

Cryer PE, Davis SN, Shamoon H. Hypoglycemia in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(6):1902–1912.

Sarkar A et al. Pharmacological and pharmaceutical profile of gliclazide: a review. J Appl Pharm Sci.

2011;1(9):11–19.

Phenformin: removal from the general market. FDA Drug Bull. 1977;7:19.

Gambert SR. Atypical presentation of diabetes mellitus in the elderly. Clin Geriatr Med. 1990;6:721.

Morley JE, Perry HM 3rd. The management of diabetes mellitus in older individuals. Drugs. 1991;41:548.

Silver AJ, Morley JE. Role of the opioid system in the hypodipsia associated with aging. J Am Geriatr Soc.

1992;40:556.

Brown AF et al. Guidelines for improving the care of the older person with diabetes mellitus. J Am Geriatr Soc.

2003;51(5, Suppl Guidelines):S265.

Shorr RI et al. Individual sulfonylureas and serious hypoglycemia in older people. J Am Geriatr Soc.

1996;44:751.

Molitch ME et al. Nephropathy in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(Suppl 1):S79.

DeFronzo RA. Diabetic nephropathy. In: Porte D Jr et al, eds. Ellenberg & Rifkin’s Diabetes Mellitus. 6th ed.

New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2003:723.

Lteif AA, et al. Diabetes and heart disease an evidence-driven guide to risk factors management in diabetes.

Cardiol Rev. 2003;11:262.

Young L, Chyun D. Heart disease in patients with diabetes. In: Porte D Jr et al, eds. Ellenberg & Rifkin’s

Diabetes Mellitus. 6th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2003:823.

Fong DS et al. Diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:2540.

Pignone M et al. Aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular events in people with diabetes: a position

statement of the American Diabetes Association, a scientific statement of the American Heart Association, and

289.

290.

291.

292.

293.

294.

295.

296.

297.

298.

299.

300.

301.

302.

an expert consensus document of the American College of Cardiology Foundation [published corrections appear

in Diabetes Care. 2011;34:247; Diabetes Care. 2010;33:2129]. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:1395.

Vinik A et al. Diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:1553.

Kashyap P, Farrugia G. Diabetic gastroparesis: what we have learned and had to unlearn in the past 5 years.

Gut. 2010;59:1716.

Food and Drug Administration. Reglan (metoclopramide) tablets, ODT (Orally Disintegrating Tablets), and

injection. 2010. http://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/ucm170934.htm. Accessed

December 19, 2010.

Tesfaye S et al. Diabetic neuropathies: update on definitions, diagnostic criteria, estimation of severity, and

treatments. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:2285.

Boulton AJ et al. Diabetic neuropathies: a statement by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care.

2005;28:956.

Finnerup NB et al. Pharmacotehrapy for neuropathic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur

J Neurol. 2010;17(9):1113–e88. doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.02999.x. Epub 2010 Apr 9.

Attal N et al. EFNS guidelines on the pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain:2010 revision. Cochrane

Database Syst Rev. 2009;(3):CD007076. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007076.pub2.

Snedecor SJ, et al. Systematic review and meat-analysis of pharmacological therapies for painful diabetic

peripheral neuropathy. Pan Pract. 2014;14:167–184.

Lüscher TF et al. Diabetes and vascular disease: pathophysiology, clinical consequences, and medical therapy:

part II. Circulation. 2003;108:1655.

Mayfield JA et al. Preventive foot care in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(Suppl 1):S63.

Vue M et al. Drug-induced glucose alterations. Part 1: drug-induced hypoglycemia. Diabetes Spectr.

2011;24(4):234–238.

Rehman A et al. Drug-induced glucose alterations part 2: Drug-induced hyperglycemia. Diabetes Spectr. 2011

Nov; 24(4):234–238.

Pietraszek A et al. Alcohol and type 2 diabetes. A review. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2010;20:366.

Van de Wiel A. Diabetes mellitus and alcohol. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2004;20:263.

p. 1147

GLAUCOMA

There are different types of glaucoma, including open-angle and angleclosure glaucoma. Angle-closure glaucoma is a medical emergency

requiring immediate intervention. Open-angle glaucoma is a chronic

condition, which can result in progressive loss of vision leading to

blindness if left untreated.

Case 54-1 (Question 1)

Treatment for open-angle glaucoma is targeted toward reducing

intraocular pressure (IOP), a clinical measure of drug efficacy. βAdrenergic blockers, prostaglandin analogs (PGAs), and α-adrenergic

agonists are the mainstay of treatment. Treatment is not curative.

Case 54-1 (Question 2),

Figure 54-1, Table 54-1

OCULAR AND SYSTEMIC SIDE EFFECTS OF DRUGS

Many widely used medications for various conditions cause ocular side

effects. The true incidence is frequently not known, making the

reporting of ocular side effects of drugs an important function for any

healthcare practitioner.

Case 54-3 (Question 1),

Table 54-3

Conversely, many topically administered ocular medications may cause

systemic symptoms.

Case 54-10 (Question 1)

COMMON OCULAR DISORDERS

Stye(hordeolum) is a common ocular disorder for which no viable overthe-counter treatment exists.

Conjunctivitis (pinkeye) is frequently related to bacterial or viral

infection, or allergy. Viral conjunctivitis is generally self-limiting.

Bacterial conjunctivitis should be treated with an appropriate

antimicrobial, recognizing that Gram-positive organisms are frequently

the cause. A number of agents are available for the treatment of

allergic conjunctivitis. Among those, decongestants (e.g.,

tetrahydrozoline) should be used for no more than 72 hours, because

they may mask a more serious condition or result in rebound redness.

Case 54-5 (Question 1)

CORTICOSTEROIDS

Topicalcorticosteroids are used for a variety of ocular inflammatory

conditions. The most potent topical corticosteroid is prednisolone acetate

1%.

Case 54-8 (Question 1),

Table 54-4

Topical and oral corticosteroids may be associated with serious side

effects such as increases in IOP and cataracts (with long-term use).

Case 54-8 (Question 1),

Table 54-5

AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION

There are two forms, dry (affecting 85% of patients) and the more

serious form, wet (affecting 15% of patients).

Case 54-13 (Question 1)

Wetmacular degeneration is associated with abnormal growth of blood

vessels behind the retina (choroidal neovascularization) and may be

treated by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors.

Case 54-13 (Question 1)

p. 1148

p. 1149

The eye is a highly complex organ composed of various parts, all of which must

function in integration to permit vision. A brief overview of the anatomy and

physiology of the eye prefaces the presentation of specific eye disorders. Readers

should consult an ophthalmology textbook for an understanding of ocular anatomy,

physiology, and general ophthalmology (e.g., Vaughan and Asbury’s General

Ophthalmology).

1

OCULAR ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY

The eyeball is approximately 1 inch wide and is housed in a cavity (i.e., eye socket)

formed by two bony orbits that are lined with fat, which serves to protect the eyeball.

Six ocular muscles facilitate movement of the eyeball (Fig. 54-1).

The outer coat of the eye is made up of the sclera, conjunctiva, and cornea. The

sclera is the white, dense, fibrous protective coating. The episclera, a thin layer of

loose connective tissue, contains blood vessels that cover and nourish the sclera. The

conjunctiva is a mucous membrane that covers the anterior portion of the eye and

lines the eyelids. The cornea is the transparent, avascular tissue that functions as a

refractive and protective window membrane through which light rays pass en route to

the retina.

The corneal epithelium and endothelium are lipophilic, and the centrally located

stroma is hydrophilic. These three corneal layers are particularly important because

they affect drug penetration through the cornea. Ophthalmic medications, which are

both fat- and water-soluble, are best able to penetrate through the intact cornea.

The iris, choroid, and ciliary body are known collectively as the uveal tract. The

iris is a colored, circular membrane suspended between the cornea and the

crystalline lens. It controls the amount of light that enters the eye. The choroid,

located between the sclera and retina, is largely made up of blood vessels, which

nourish the retina. The ciliary body is adherent to the sclera and contains the ciliary

muscle and ciliary processes. The ciliary muscle contracts and relaxes the zonular

fibers, which hold the crystalline lens in place. The ciliary processes are responsible

for the secretion of aqueous humor, a clear liquid that occupies the anterior chamber.

The anterior chamber is bounded anteriorly by the cornea and posteriorly by the iris.

The posterior chamber lies between the iris and the crystalline lens.

Figure 54-1 Anatomy of the human eye. (Adapted from

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Eyesection.svg)

The inner segment of the eye contains the retina with the optic nerve. The retina,

the light-sensitive tissue at the back of the eye, contains all of the sensory receptors

for light transmission. The optic nerve, a bundle of more than a million nerve fibers,

transmits visual impulses from the retina to the brain.

The crystalline lens, aqueous humor, and vitreous humor assist the cornea with the

refraction of light. The lens, located behind the iris, functions to focus light onto the

retina by changing its shape to accommodate near or distant vision. The innermost

part of the lens (i.e., the nucleus) is surrounded by the softer material of the cortex.

The aqueous humor, the thin watery fluid that fills the anterior chamber (i.e., the

space between the cornea and the iris) and posterior chamber of the eye, functions to

provide nourishment to the cornea and lens. Disorders involving the aqueous humor

are presented in the section on glaucoma. The primary function of the vitreous humor

(i.e., the jellylike substance between the lens and the retina) is to maintain the shape

of the eye and allow the transmission of light to the retina.

The eyelids and eyelashes are the outermost means of protection for the eye. The

eyelids contain various sebaceous and sweat glands, which may become infected or

inflamed, contributing to many ocular disorders.

The eye is innervated by both the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous

systems. Parasympathetic fibers, originating from the oculomotor nerve in the brain,

innervate the ciliary muscle and sphincter pupillae muscle that constrict the pupil. As

a result, parasympathomimetic (cholinergic) medications generally are associated

with miosis (pupillary contraction), and parasympatholytic (anticholinergic) agents

with mydriasis (pupillary dilation) and cycloplegia. The term cycloplegia refers to a

paralysis of the ciliary muscle and zonules (fibrous strands connecting the ciliary

body to the lens) that results in decreased accommodation (adjustment of the lens

curvature for various distances) and blurred vision. Tear secretion by the lacrimal

glands also is a parasympathetic function.

Sympathetic fibers from the superior cervical ganglion in the spinal cord innervate

the dilator pupillae muscle, the blood vessels of the ciliary body, the episclera, and

the extraocular muscles. Sympathomimetics cause mydriasis without affecting

accommodation.

In this chapter, we will discuss glaucoma, ocular and systemic side effects of

drugs, common ocular disorders, ocular inflammatory conditions, and age-related

macular degeneration. These are all common conditions that the pharmacist may

encounter in all practices of pharmacy. It is important for the pharmacist to be

educated on these disorders and their associated treatment so that the pharmacist can

evaluate the appropriateness of pharmacotherapy, screen for adverse effects and drug

interactions, and counsel patients on their ocular medications.

GLAUCOMA

Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. The estimated

number of suspected cases worldwide is 60 million, increasing to 76 million in 2020

and 111 million in 2040. In the United States, an estimated 3 million Americans are

living with glaucoma but only half know they have it. Glaucoma is a nonspecific term

used for a group of diseases that can irreversibly damage the optic nerve, resulting in

visual field loss. Increased intraocular pressure (IOP) is the most common risk factor

for the development of glaucoma; however, even people with “normal”

p. 1149

p. 1150

IOPs can experience vision loss from glaucoma. Generally, the higher the IOP is, the

greater the risk for developing glaucoma. Increasing age, African-American race,

family history, thinner central corneas, and larger vertical cup–disc ratios are other

risk factors for glaucoma.

1–3

Intraocular Pressure

The inner pressure of the eye (i.e., IOP) is influenced by the production of aqueous

humor by the ciliary processes and the outflow of aqueous humor through the

trabecular meshwork. The tonometry test to measure the IOP is based on the pressure

required to flatten a small area of the central cornea. Generally, an IOP of 10 to 20

mm Hg is considered normal. An IOP of 22 mm Hg or greater should arouse

suspicion of glaucoma, although a more rare form of glaucoma is associated with a

low IOP.

Ocular Hypertension

Ocular hypertension has been defined as an IOP exceeding 21 mm Hg, normal visual

fields, normal optic discs, open angles, and the absence of any ocular disease

contributing to the elevation of IOP. Only a small percentage of patients with ocular

hypertension have open-angle glaucoma. An ophthalmoscope can examine the inside

of the eye, especially the optic nerve, and a diagnosis of glaucoma can be applied

when pathologic cupping of the optic nerve is observed.

Open-Angle Glaucoma

Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) occurs in about 1.8% of people older than 40

years of age in the United States; however, glaucoma can affect other age groups,

including children.

1–3

In patients with POAG, aqueous humor outflow from the

anterior chamber is continuously subnormal primarily because of a degenerative

process in the trabecular meshwork. The IOP can vary in the course of a day from

normal to significantly high pressures.

1 The decreased outflow appears to be caused

by degenerative changes in outflow channels (i.e., the trabecular meshwork and

Schlemm canal) and tends to worsen with the passage of time.

1

In rare cases, the

outflow is normal even during a phase of elevated IOP, and the elevation appears to

be to the result of hypersecretion of aqueous humor.

1

The onset of POAG usually is gradual and asymptomatic. A defect in the visual

field examination may be present in early glaucoma, but loss of peripheral vision

usually is not seen until late in the course of the disease. Visual field defects

correlate well with changes in the optic disc and help differentiate glaucoma from

ocular hypertension in patients with increased IOP. Patients with normal visual fields

and an IOP of 24 mm Hg or greater have a 10% likelihood of developing glaucoma in

5 years.

5

Angle-Closure Glaucoma

Examination of the anterior chamber angle by gonioscopy, using a corneal contact

lens, a magnifying device (e.g., a slit-lamp microscope), and a light source, assists in

differentiating between open-angle glaucoma and angle-closure glaucoma. Angleclosure glaucoma accounts for approximately 5% to 10% of all primary glaucoma

cases. The sole cause of the elevated IOP in angle-closure glaucoma is closure of the

anterior chamber angle.

1,5

Angle-closure glaucoma, which is a medical emergency, usually presents as an

acute attack with a rapid increase in IOP, blurring or sudden loss of vision,

appearance of haloes around lights, and pain that is often severe. When patients are

predisposed to angle-closure glaucoma, their pupils should not be dilated (e.g.,

during an ophthalmic examination) and they should be taught the signs and symptoms

of angle closure. Acute attacks can terminate without treatment, but if the IOP remains

high, the optic nerve can be irreparably damaged.

1 Patients with chronic angleclosure generally experience a gradual closure of aqueous humor outflow channels,

and patients can be asymptomatic until the glaucoma is in an advanced stage.

1

Permanent medical management of acute or chronic angle-closure glaucoma is

difficult: Surgical procedures (e.g., peripheral iridectomies) often are needed.

PRIMARY OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA

Therapeutic Agents for Treatment of Primary OpenAngle Glaucoma

INITIAL THERAPY

Historically, β-adrenergic blockers have been the most commonly prescribed firstline agents for the treatment of POAG. In recent years, prostaglandin analog (PGA)

use has reached, if not exceeded, β-adrenergic blocker use. All of the ophthalmic βblockers currently on the market are available in generic formulation, allowing for

cost-effective treatment. Some of the PGAs are available as generic formulations

making their cost comparable to β-blockers.

β-Adrenergic Blockers

Ophthalmic β-adrenergic antagonists block the β-adrenergic receptors in the ciliary

epithelium of the eye and lower IOP primarily by decreasing aqueous humor

production. On average, β-blockers decrease IOP by 20% to 35% depending on the

strength used and the frequency of administration.

6–14

Timolol (Timoptic)

Timolol, a nonselective β1

- and β2

-adrenergic antagonist, is one of the most

commonly prescribed glaucoma medications. Because timolol was the first ocular βadrenergic blocker marketed, subsequently marketed ophthalmic β-blockers usually

are compared with timolol for safety and effectiveness. Concentrations or dosages

exceeding one drop of timolol 0.5% twice daily (BID) do not produce further

significant decreases in IOP.

15 Therapy usually is initiated with a 0.25% solution

administered as one drop BID. Monocular administration of timolol has resulted in

equal bilateral IOP reduction and can reduce the cost of therapy and side effects for

some patients.

16 An escape phenomenon, or tachyphylaxis, can occur with timolol.

Timolol has been associated with a modest reduction of resting pulse rate (5–8

beats/minute),

17,18 worsening of heart failure, and adverse pulmonary effects (e.g.,

dyspnea, airway obstruction, pulmonary failure).

19,20 After chronic administration in

susceptible individuals, timolol can cause corneal anesthesia.

21,22 Although uveitis

has been reported in patients receiving ophthalmic timolol, a cause-and-effect

relationship has not been established.

23,24

Systemic absorption after topical administration does occur, but it may not be

significant in the majority of patients. Care should be taken when timolol is used in

patients with sinus bradycardia, heart failure (see Chapter 14, Heart Failure), or

pulmonary disease. Systemic side effects could be exaggerated in elderly patients

secondary to inadvertent overdosing associated with poor administration technique

(see Case 54-1, Question 3).

p. 1150

p. 1151

Comments

Search This Blog

Archive

Show more

Popular posts from this blog

TRIPASS XR تري باس

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

ZENOXIA 15 MG, Comprimé

VOXCIB 200 MG, Gélule

Kana Brax Laberax

فومي كايند

بعض الادويه نجد رموز عليها مثل IR ، MR, XR, CR, SR , DS ماذا تعني هذه الرموز

NIFLURIL 700 MG, Suppositoire adulte

Antifongiques مضادات الفطريات

Popular posts from this blog

علاقة البيبي بالفراولة بالالفا فيتو بروتين

التغيرات الخمس التي تحدث للجسم عند المشي

إحصائيات سنة 2020 | تعداد سكَان دول إفريقيا تنازليا :

ما هو الليمونير للأسنان ؟

ACUPAN 20 MG, Solution injectable

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

الام الظهر

VOXCIB 200 MG, Gélule

ميبستان

Popular posts from this blog

TRIPASS XR تري باس

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

Popular posts from this blog

TRIPASS XR تري باس

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

ZENOXIA 15 MG, Comprimé

VOXCIB 200 MG, Gélule

Kana Brax Laberax

فومي كايند

بعض الادويه نجد رموز عليها مثل IR ، MR, XR, CR, SR , DS ماذا تعني هذه الرموز

NIFLURIL 700 MG, Suppositoire adulte

Antifongiques مضادات الفطريات

Popular posts from this blog

Kana Brax Laberax

TRIPASS XR تري باس

PARANTAL 100 MG, Suppositoire بارانتال 100 مجم تحاميل

الكبد الدهني Fatty Liver

الم اسفل الظهر (الحاد) الذي يظهر بشكل مفاجئ bal-agrisi

SEDALGIC 37.5 MG / 325 MG, Comprimé pelliculé [P] سيدالجيك 37.5 مجم / 325 مجم ، قرص مغلف [P]

نمـو الدمـاغ والتطـور العقـلي لـدى الطفـل

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

أخطر أنواع المخدرات فى العالم و الشرق الاوسط

Archive

Show more