It is estimated that 35% to 80% of people addicted to prescription

opioids report that they were first exposed to opioids for the legitimate treatment of

pain, including postsurgical pain.

6 The use of nonopioid medication can help reduce

the need for opioid therapy.

CASE 55-2, QUESTION 3: What other nonopioid medications would be helpful in the management of

D.K.’s postoperative pain?

Recent guidelines on postoperative pain management reviewed studies on

acetaminophen and NSAIDs in conjunction with opioids and found that the

combination of both medications is more effective than either drug alone in reducing

pain and opioid consumption.

30 Perioperative oral acetaminophen at a dose of 1,000

mg 3 or 4 times/day for 48 hours after surgery in adults with normal liver function is

supported in the literature.

51 After the initial postoperative period, the dose should be

reduced to 650 mg and administered on an “as-needed” frequency. To reduce the risk

of liver toxicity associated with acetaminophen daily totals exceeding 3,000 mg,

patients who will need opioid therapy should not be prescribed combination

products containing acetaminophen such as oxycodone/acetaminophen or

hydrocodone/acetaminophen. Use of intravenous acetaminophen has generally been

reserved for patients who cannot take oral medications after surgery and cannot use

NSAIDs due to increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding or renal insufficiency.

Most research indicates that there is no clear difference between intravenous and

oral acetaminophen in reducing postoperative pain.

30,52

Compared with acetaminophen, NSAIDs are more efficacious for reducing

postoperative pain due to their anti-inflammatory effects. Most of the oral

nonselective NSAIDs are comparable in efficacy so selection may be influenced by

other factors such as cost, availability for use over the counter, and lower

cardiovascular adverse effects. All NSAIDs are contraindicated for management of

perioperative pain in patients who undergo coronary artery bypass graft surgery

because of an increased risk of cardiovascular events.

30 Refer to Chapter 43

Osteoarthritis for more detailed information on NSAIDs.

Intravenous ketorolac is a nonselective NSAID and very effective in reducing

postoperative pain. The recommended ketorolac dose for adult patients <65 years

with normal renal function is 30 mg every 6 hours as needed. For patients over 65

years of age or with mild-to-moderate renal failure, the dose of ketorolac must be

reduced to 15 mg every 6 hours as needed. The maximum duration for ketorolac

administration is limited to 5 days to prevent adverse events related to

gastrointestinal bleeding with prolonged use. It is not recommended to administer

ketorolac to patients who are hypovolemic postoperatively due to excessive blood

loss or dehydration due to the risk for renal injury.

30

Gabapentin or pregabalin are neuromodulators that are helpful in reducing

postoperative neuropathic pain. The initial dose should be based on the patient’s use

prior to admission. For patients who were not taking gabapentin or pregabalin for

chronic pain prior to surgery, the dose should be titrated up from the lowest dose and

adjusted for renal function (Table 55-8). Patients who were taking gabapentin or

pregabalin for preexisting neuropathic pain prior to surgery should have their dose

and frequency resumed as soon as possible postoperatively to prevent uncontrolled

chronic pain.

Table 55-8

Pharmacologic Options for Treatment of Neuropathic Pain

Drug Dose

a Adverse Effects Monitoring/Comments

Carbamazepine

b 200 mg TID, titrate to max

400 mg TID

Diplopia, rash, hepatitis,

neutropenia, aplastic

anemia, dizziness,

cognitive effects,

hyponatremia

Check LFTs, CBC,

sodium at baseline and

every 3 months during

therapy, periodic serum

levels

Oxcarbazepine 75 mg BID, titrate to max

1,200 mg BID

Rash, cognitive effects,

hyponatremia, sedation,

blurred vision, nausea

Check sodium every 2

weeks for 3 months, then

with dose increases

Lamotrigine 25 mg daily, titrate to max

200 mg BID

Desquamating rash,

cognitive effects

Requires very slow

titration to avoid rash

Topiramate

b 25 mg BID, titrate to max

200 mg BID

Nausea, anorexia,

paresthesias, metabolic

acidosis, cognitive

effects, nephrolithiasis

Check serum bicarbonate

at baseline and every 3

months or with each dose

increase

Lacosamide 50 mg BID, titrate to max

200 mg BID

Nausea, vomiting,

dizziness, diplopia, ataxia,

fatigue, rash, atrial

fibrillation/flutter

ECG at baseline and with

dose adjustments,

especially in patients at

risk for cardiac conduction

abnormality

Reduce dose for renal and

liver impairment

Gabapentin

b 300 mg daily, titrate to

max 1,200 mg TID

Somnolence, dizziness,

edema, cognitive effects

Reduce dose for renal

impairment or elderly

patients

Pregabalin

b 75 mg BID, titrate to max

300 mg BID

Same as gabapentin Same as gabapentin

Amitriptyline, Nortriptyline 10 mg QHS, titrate to 100

mg QHS

Dry mouth, constipation,

urinary retention,

orthostatic hypotension,

somnolence

Caution in elderly patients

Duloxetine

b 30 mg daily, titrate to max

60 mg daily

Nausea, dry mouth,

headache, diarrhea,

fatigue, sweating, anorexia

Contraindicated with liver

disease or concurrent

alcohol consumption

p. 1180

p. 1181

Venlafaxine 37.5 mg daily, titrate to

max 225 mg daily

Headache, nausea,

sweating, sedation,

hypertension, seizures,

tachycardia

Serotonergic effects <150

mg and noradrenergic

effects >150 mg

Monitor blood pressure

and heart rate

Opioids

b 10–15 mg morphine every

4 hours or equianalgesic

dose of other opioid

Somnolence, respiratory

depression, dry mouth,

constipation, urinary

retention

May cause confusion in

elderly patients

Use with a bowel regimen

Monitor for misuse and

abuse

Tramadol

b 25 mg QID to max 100

mg QID

Somnolence, dry mouth,

constipation, Seizures,

Serotonin syndrome

Caution with

antidepressants

Capsaicin cream

b Apply QID Rash, burning feeling on

skin

Avoid contact with

mucous membranes, eyes

Capsaicin patch

b Apply 1 patch for 1 hour,

every 3 months

Skin irritation at

application site, burning

feeling on skin

Must be applied in medical

office

Lidocaine patch

b Apply 1–3 patches daily

for 12 hours

Skin reaction at site of

application

aAll oral agents are titrated up to reduce adverse effects and titrated down when discontinuing therapy.

bFood and Drug Administration–approved for treating pain conditions.

BID, 2 times a day; CBC, complete blood cell count; ECG, electrocardiogram; LFTs, liver function tests; QHS,

every night at bedtime; QID, 4 times a day; TID, 3 times a day.

The use of ketamine is becoming increasingly popular postoperatively in patients

with a history of chronic pain that is poorly responsive to traditional analgesic

medications including opioids. Ketamine is a NMDA receptor antagonist that is

effective in decreasing central sensitization after surgery. There is insufficient

evidence in the literature on the optimal ketamine dose and duration of use

postoperatively. Doses for postoperative intravenous ketamine bolus dosing or

continuous infusion range from 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg.

30 The main side effect of

postoperative ketamine is hallucinations which can be mitigated by keeping the dose

low. Ketamine is contraindicated in patients with uncontrolled hypertension.

Intravenous lidocaine has been evaluated as part of multimodal analgesia in

patients who underwent open or laparoscopic abdominal procedures. Studies

showed that perioperative or intraoperative intravenous lidocaine infusions were

associated with shorter duration of ileus and better quality of analgesia compared to

placebo.

30

In trials, lidocaine was typically administered as an intravenous bolus

(100–150 mg or 1.5–2.0 mg/kg) followed by an infusion of 2 to 3 mg/kg/hour through

the end of surgery.

53,54 Topical local anesthetics such as the lidocaine 5% patch may

be helpful for incisional pain, but its efficacy is limited due to lack of penetration

into deeper tissues.

D.K. should have acetaminophen started at 1,000 mg orally scheduled every 8

hours as soon as he is alert enough to swallow medication without risk of aspiration.

NSAIDs should be avoided in the immediate postoperative period until his renal

function can be evaluated. If D.K.’s creatinine clearance is >50 mL/minute, ibuprofen

600 mg orally every 6 hours as needed can be used for pain because this was the

patient’s NSAID choice. Prior to admission, D.K. was reporting pain shooting down

the right leg but was not taking medication for neuropathic pain. If the shooting pain

persists postoperatively, gabapentin started at a low dose of 100 mg orally scheduled

3 times a day may be helpful. Caution should be used with gabapentin in patients with

renal insufficiency which may require a dose adjustment. Intravenous lidocaine is

generally not a first-line option for postoperative pain management and should be

used only if pain control is suboptimal after maximizing other multimodal

medications. Before D.K. is discharged, plans should be made for prescribing the

oral multimodal medications for a short duration of time because acute postoperative

pain generally abates after one to 2 weeks.

LOW BACK PAIN

Low back pain occurs at a rate of 1.39/1,000 person-years in the United States,

including 3.15% of all emergency visits. These are typically injuries occurring in the

home.

55

It has been reported that low back pain affects 70% to 85% of adults at some

point in their lives, and 12 months after the onset of low back pain, 45% to 75% of

people still have pain.

56,57 There is a bimodal distribution with peaks between 25 and

29 years of age (2.58/1,000 person-years) and 95 to 99 years of age (1.47/1,000)

without differentiation by underlying etiology.

56 There is an association between

psychological factors and the occurrence of low back pain, including anxiety,

depression, somatization symptoms, stress, and negative body image. Chronic low

back pain patients have higher rates of emotional distress and depression (25%)

relative to acute low back pain subjects (2.9%).

58 Socioeconomic risk factors

include job dissatisfaction, physical work, psychologically stressful work, low

educational achievement, and workers’ compensation insurance.

59 Biomechanical

and physical work factors such as heavy lifting, repetitive motion, non-neutral body

postures, and vibration are established risks for back disorders.

60 Chronic low back

pain also creates a large financial burden on the workplace. Low back pain accounts

for almost $20 million in lost productivity annually, and patients who have been on

disability for more than 1 year rarely return to work.

61

Low back pain, by definition, affects the lumbosacral spine and associated

muscles and nerves. It is multifactorial in nature, either nociceptive (musculoskeletal,

myofascial), neuropathic (radicular pain), or has a central sensitization component.

62

In about 85% of cases, no pathophysiologic cause can be found.

63 The functional

spinal unit is made up of two vertebral bodies, two zygapophyseal (facet) joints, the

intervertebral disc, and the supporting ligamentous structures (Fig. 55-5). The facet

joints of the spine form the junction where vertebral bodies meet. The joint space is

maintained by cartilage and fluid in the joint. Like all weight-bearing joints of the

body, the spine also develops joint space narrowing, bony hypertrophy, and

deterioration of cartilage with normal use, resulting in the musculoskeletal pain of

OA. If the spine is used more, as with jobs involving heavy lifting and manual labor,

the joints deteriorate faster. In addition to deterioration of the facet joint spaces, the

intervertebral discs lose water content with time and may become desiccated,

reducing the cushion between the vertebral bodies. These discs are fragile and can be

torn or damaged and may herniate into the spinal canal foramen (Fig. 55-5). If

vertebral bodies shift because of deterioration, spondylolisthesis may occur. This

shift, or a herniated disc, may impinge on the spinal nerve root, or cause nerve root

irritation, which can produce radicular neuropathic pain. This is sometimes referred

to as sciatica. Shifting of the vertebral bodies may also reduce the size of the foramen

where the nerves exit the spinal cord (spinal stenosis). If the vertebral bodies shift

too far into the central spinal canal, pressure can be exerted on the spinal cord, which

may lead to spinal cord injury and subsequent loss of sensory and motor nerve

function (paralysis). If the motor nerves are affected (as with lower extremity muscle

weakness, bowel or bladder incontinence), a “red flag” is present and surgery may

be necessary to preserve function. Table 55-9 lists other serious conditions that call

for immediate medical or surgical attention.

64 Sometimes low back pain is more

intense than would be expected, or is much more widespread than imaging would

predict. These are hallmarks of central sensitization.

62

p. 1181

p. 1182

Figure 55-5 Spine anatomy and disc herniation.

Myofascial pain is very common in patients with chronic low back pain.

Myofascial pain is localized to specific regions or muscle groups. It affects all age

groups and is associated with numerous other pain conditions. It is classically

associated with muscle knots called “trigger points.” A trigger point is described as

a hyperirritable spot in skeletal muscle that is associated with a palpable “taut band”

of muscle. Trigger points are hypothesized to evolve from excessive acetylcholine

release from the motor endplate, leading to sustained muscle fiber contracture.

Development of trigger points is usually associated with mechanical overuse or

overload of a muscle group (as with repetitive work). It is also associated with

postural problems, prolonged static positions, emotional stress (causing muscles to

tense), and nutritional deficiencies (such as vitamins B1

, B6

, B12

, and D, iron,

magnesium, and zinc) or metabolic problems such as thyroid disease. It is thought that

low-intensity exertions related to static posture cause small muscle fibers to be

continuously activated, leading to the development of trigger points.

65 Nociceptors

are abundant in muscle nerves, and there are a variety of nociceptors that can be

stimulated by substances such as prostaglandins, bradykinin, protons, ATP, 5-HT,

and glutamate, which are released from damaged tissue. The neuropeptides,

substance P and CGRP, are also found in the nociceptor terminals, which stimulate

the inflammatory cascade, leading to peripheral sensitization and the clinical

manifestation of muscle pain. Continuous activation of muscle nociceptors leads to

release of substance P and glutamate from the presynaptic terminal at the dorsal root

ganglion. These substances activate postsynaptic AMPA and NMDA receptors,

respectively, and subsequently may lead to neuroplasticity (Fig. 55-3).

p. 1182

p. 1183

Table 55-9

Red Flags for Potentially Serious Conditions that Cause Back Pain

64

Possible Fracture Possible Tumor or Infection

Possible Cauda Equina

Syndrome

Major trauma, such as vehicle

accident or fall from height

Age <20 or >50 years Saddle anesthesia

Minor trauma or strenuous lifting in

older or potentially osteoporotic

patients

History of cancer Recent onset of bladder dysfunction

(e.g., urinary retention, increased

frequency, overflow incontinence)

Constitutionalsymptoms (recent

fever, chills, unexplained weight

loss)

Severe or progressive neurologic

deficit in the lower extremities

Risk factors for spinal infections:

Recent bacterial infection

IV drug abuse

Immune suppression

Unexpected laxity of the anal

sphincter

Pain that worsens when supine Perianal/perinealsensory loss

Severe nighttime pain Major motor weakness:

Quadriceps (knee extension

weakness)

Ankle plantar flexors, evertors, and

dorsiflexors (foot drop)

IV, intravenous.

Acetaminophen is considered the safest choice for the management of

musculoskeletal pain. Its mechanism of action is not well defined, but it has analgesic

activity in the CNS. It has no peripheral clinical effect on prostaglandins, so it lacks

typical anti-inflammatory activity. Use of acetaminophen therefore avoids the GI,

renal, and cardiovascular toxicities associated with NSAIDs. NSAIDs reduce pain

and inflammation by inhibiting cyclooxygenases (COX-1 and COX-2) at the site of

injury and along the ascending pain pathway. The NSAIDs are equally effective

across the drug class, although some patients may respond to one agent better than

another. They are more effective as monotherapy for acute low back pain than in

combination with a muscle relaxant or an opioid. A meta-analysis showed that

NSAIDs are better than placebo for back pain without neuropathic symptoms, but not

for back pain with neuropathic symptoms.

66,67 COX-2 selective inhibitors are as

effective as traditional NSAIDs for analgesia but are better tolerated.

67 Celecoxib is

the only COX-2 selective inhibitor available in the United States. Acetaminophen

may be used in combination with NSAIDs for additive analgesia.

There are several guidelines published for the management of low back pain. Koes

et al. reviewed evidence-based management guidelines from 13 different countries

and 2 international committees that were published between 2000 and 2008.

65 Table

55-10 presents a summary of common recommendations. All guidelines were in

agreement with the use of simple analgesics such as over-the-counter acetaminophen

and NSAIDs for first-line therapy for both acute and chronic low back pain. Both of

these medication classes are considered effective for short-term use, although their

effects are modest. Because the guidelines have been published, a meta-analysis of

acetaminophen versus placebo for spinal pain and osteoarthritis found acetaminophen

to be ineffective for long-term use in chronic pain.

68 This would make NSAIDs the

ideal first-line analgesic, if there are no contraindications.

Most guidelines recommend either muscle relaxants or weak opioids as third-line

choices for short-term use in either acute or chronic low back pain. Despite the fact

that muscle relaxants are used commonly, there is no evidence that they are effective

for chronic low back pain. Agents such as cyclobenzaprine and tizanidine, as well as

benzodiazepines such as diazepam, show moderate efficacy in the short-term (<2

weeks) but are associated with a higher incidence of adverse effects than placebo.

69

Weak opioids such as tramadol have also shown modest relief with short-term use

(<4 weeks).

70,71 There are several studies showing some efficacy for most long- and

short-acting opioids, but they do not show any long-term functional improvement or

return to work.

72–74

A few guidelines, including those from the American Pain Society (APS),

recommend use of antidepressants or anticonvulsants for neuropathic pain

symptoms.

70 Antidepressants, specifically the TCAs, have shown modest analgesia

compared with placebo, but they have not been shown to be effective for acute low

back pain, nor have they shown demonstrable improvement in function.

67,68,75,76

Duloxetine, an SNRI, has shown efficacy and safety for the treatment of low back

pain.

77 There have been a very small number of trials using the anticonvulsants

topiramate and gabapentin for back pain. Anticonvulsants traditionally have been

helpful for treating neuropathic pain (e.g., peripheral neuropathies) but produce only

small improvements for back pain with radiculopathy.

78–80

Table 55-10

Summary of Common Recommendations for Treatment of Low Back Pain

65

Acute or Subacute Pain

Reassure patients that diagnosis is not serious

Advise to stay active

Prescribe medication if necessary

First line: acetaminophen

Second line: NSAIDs

Third line: muscle relaxants, opioids, antidepressants, or anticonvulsants as coanalgesics

Discourage bed rest

Do not recommend supervised exercise program

Chronic Pain

Discourage use of alternative therapies (ultrasound, electrotherapy)

Short-term use of medication/manipulation

Supervised exercise therapy

Cognitive behavioral therapy

Multidisciplinary treatment

NSAIDs, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

p. 1183

p. 1184

Myofascial pain treatment is aimed at correcting precipitating behaviors including

ergonomic factors. Physical rehabilitation is essential for teaching patients

appropriate stretching and strengthening exercises, as well as postural support and

stabilization. Some clinicians inject the trigger point(s). There are several techniques

that are all equally effective, including dry needling, saline injection, local anesthetic

injection or botulinum toxin. Several other pharmacologic therapies may be used, but

none have more than anecdotal support. General approaches to pain management,

including NSAIDs, muscle relaxants, antidepressants, anticonvulsants, and opioids,

may be helpful for individual patients. Vitamin D deficiency has been linked to

chronic musculoskeletal pain, although this is somewhat controversial.

81,82

CASE 55-3

QUESTION 1: J.P. is a 48-year-old man who presents with low back and leg pain. He has had chronic back

pain for several years, which has progressively worsened during the last several months. He reports an aching

pain that is localized to his lumbosacral spine with some radiation into his buttocks and hips. He also describes

burning pain into his right leg all the way down to his toes. He rates his pain as 7 out of 10 on the numeric pain

scale. On good days, his pain is 5 of 10. He recently did some yard work and had an acute exacerbation of his

pain. He reports that this felt like 10 out of 10 on the numeric pain scale, and he was in bed for the following 2

days because of pain. He is usually able to do some chores around the house, but activity makes his pain worse.

He sleeps poorly (only about 4–5 hours/night), and he does not go out or socialize very often because he is

afraid this will exacerbate his pain. He used to golf and play softball but is not able to participate in these

hobbies any more as a result of pain. He smokes two packs of cigarettes daily and drinks about a six-pack of

beer each week. He was previously a plumber but had to quit his job earlier this year because of health

problems. He denies any lower extremity weakness and also denies loss of bowel or bladder control. He has

not found anything that really helps his pain except rest and acetaminophen/codeine that his sister gave him. His

past medical history includes hypertension, hyperlipidemia, depression, and morbid obesity. His current

medications are lisinopril for hypertension, simvastatin for hyperlipidemia, carisoprodol, cyclobenzaprine as

needed, a baby aspirin, and acetaminophen/codeine. He also takes three tablets of over-the-counter strength

(200 mg/tablet) ibuprofen and three tablets of extra strength (500 mg/tablet) acetaminophen about four times

daily with minimal relief of his pain. Upon physical examination, J.P. has pain with palpation along his lumbar

paraspinal muscles with several trigger points noted and marked tenderness at the level of L4–L5. His reflexes

are intact, and he has full strength in his lower extremities. The remainder of his physical examination is

unremarkable except that general deconditioning is noted. There are no laboratory tests or imaging studies

available. He reports that his blood pressure is usually around 150/80 mm Hg with a pulse around 75

beats/minute.

What are the clinically relevant findings (or absence of findings) for J.P.’s pain assessment, and how would

you characterize his pain?

The presentation and assessment of back pain can be very complex given its

multifactorial nature. Acute low back problems are defined by the Agency for Health

Care Policy and Research as “activity intolerance attributable to lower back or backrelated leg symptoms of less than 3 months’ duration.”

64 J.P.’s acute exacerbation

would fit this definition. When J.P. has acute exacerbations of his back pain, the

numeric pain scale is an accurate assessment tool (Table 55-2, Fig. 55-4). His rating

of 10 out of 10 indicates severe acute pain. Clinicians should also consider a

patient’s vital signs, which may be elevated with acute pain. If a patient is unable to

communicate (e.g., on a respirator), changes in vital signs may be the only indicator

of discomfort.

J.P.’s chronic back pain assessment must rely heavily on the history he provides,

because there is minimal objective evidence to base the assessment on, other than his

findings on physical examination or imaging studies. He indicated that his chronic

pain is about 7 out of 10 on the numeric pain scale. Even though the numeric pain

scale has been validated for chronic pain, it is less useful in this setting because it

only gives a snapshot of the whole pain picture. A multidimensional tool, such as the

Brief Pain Inventory or the McGill Pain Questionnaire, is more useful to assess

chronic pain (Table 55-2).

18,19 Physical activities, sleep, diet, and social interactions

may be affected by chronic pain. J.P. notes that his pain is worse with physical

activity. He reports sleeping poorly and has limited physical activity and minimal

social interaction. All of these factors contribute to a patient’s pain experience and

must be considered (Fig. 55-1). Assessment of chronic pain is not only more

complex, but is more extensive, because the perception and response to chronic pain

is widely variable. Each patient experiences pain in his/her own way. A

psychological assessment is essential to identify comorbidities such as depression or

anxiety and any history of abuse (e.g., physical, verbal, sexual) or previous trauma,

as well as to assess a patient’s coping ability. It may be helpful to ask J.P. about his

spirituality and cultural values, because these may offer unique opportunities (or

barriers) to any proposed treatment plan.

If opioids are being considered, many clinicians endorse the use of a substance

abuse screening tool such as the Screener and Opioid Assessment of Patients with

Pain-Revised (SOAPP-R), Opioid Risk Tool (ORT), or Diagnosis, Intractability,

Risk, Efficacy (DIRE) score.

83 J.P. drinks alcohol, smokes tobacco, and has used his

sister’s acetaminophen/codeine. These factors may warrant use of a screening tool to

assess his risk for opioid abuse.

J.P.’s chronic pain has been present for several years and has gradually worsened.

Based on his history and current physical examination, he appears to have

mechanical musculoskeletal pain. He is a former plumber, which involves bending

and lifting, which puts him at risk for facet joint arthritis. He describes the aching,

localized pain that is typical of arthritis, either in his spine–hip junction (sacroiliac

joint) or his zygapophyseal (facet) joints, which are the most common locations for

lumbosacral pain. He demonstrated localized tenderness at the L4–L5 level. This is

most consistent with facet joint disease. He also has tenderness along muscles in his

low back, reaching into his buttocks, which is very common, because the body

attempts to accommodate structural spine abnormalities. Muscular pain may radiate

into the mid-back or into the buttocks, but does not travel below the knees. J.P. did

not have pain that radiated below the knees. J.P. does not have any motor weakness,

past experiences, or comorbidities that would indicate a red ag (Table 55-9). J.P.’s

physical examination reveals radicular pain in the L5 dermatome (i.e., an area of the

skin supplied by nerves from a single spinal root). Unlike muscular pain, radicular

pain travels from the spine past the knee into the distal extremities. J.P. describes

burning and shooting pain that radiates from his spine down his right leg to his toes.

These are hallmarks of neuropathic pain. J.P. appears to have both

musculoskeletal/myofascial and neuropathic pain. This mixed picture is very

common with back pain and adds complexity to both diagnosis and treatment plans.

p. 1184

p. 1185

CASE 55-3, QUESTION 2: What comorbidities will affect J.P.’s presentation and pain assessment?

J.P. has a concurrent diagnosis of depression, which is quite common in patients

with chronic pain. The incidence of depression in chronic pain patients is 2 or 3

times higher than the general population.

84 Depression is often under-recognized in

the face of pain as a presenting symptom. Many times healthcare providers

investigate for a functional cause of the pain, but overlook the psychosocial aspects

of pain. Variables associated with depression in chronic pain are female sex,

younger age, lower socioeconomic status, unmarried, Caucasian, and higher pain

severity.

85

In fact, because pain severity worsens, depressive symptoms worsen,

medical visits become more frequent, and healthcare costs increase.

86 The relative

deficiency of NE and 5-HT that occur with depression makes the pain-blocking

function of the descending pain pathway less effective. As a result, J.P. may feel

more pain physiologically and may also have a greater emotional response to his

pain and other stressors. His depression may be contributing to his sleep disturbance

and his diminished social interactions. Untreated depression may be detected with a

multidimensional pain assessment tool. If identified and treated, his pain may

improve concurrently with his depression. Other psychiatric comorbidities that

commonly occur with chronic pain include anxiety, personality disorders, and

substance abuse.

J.P. also has a diagnosis of hypertension. Although this will not directly contribute

to his pain, any acute exacerbations may cause an increase in his pulse and blood

pressure. Increases in blood pressure are associated with an increased incidence of

stroke. The presence of hypertension is also a factor when developing a treatment

plan. He is currently taking ibuprofen for pain, and NSAIDs are known to cause fluid

retention, compromise renal function, and diminish the benefits of antihypertensives

(such as J.P.’s lisinopril). Corticosteroids, which may be used during an

interventional pain procedure, may also increase blood pressure.

CASE 55-3, QUESTION 3: How can current low back pain treatment guidelines be applied to J.P.’s

pharmacologic regimen?

Acetaminophen is considered first-line therapy for low back pain. J.P. has been

using acetaminophen up to 6,000 mg daily, which exceeds the recommended

maximum daily dose. He has also been using some acetaminophen/codeine that he

obtained from his sister. J.P. is at risk for liver toxicity from high doses of

acetaminophen. Additionally, he has not found the acetaminophen to be helpful, so it

should be stopped. J.P. is also taking ibuprofen, which is recommended as secondline therapy. He is taking 2,400 mg daily without benefit. His pain relief is unlikely

to improve with a dose increase, but he may benefit from rotation to another NSAID

with a different chemical structure. Naproxen is an inexpensive agent that is also

available over the counter. He does not demonstrate any muscle spasm, so a muscle

relaxant is not indicated, nor is it recommended for chronic back pain. He has

radicular pain, so a trial of gabapentin may be helpful. He has been using the

codeine-containing product and notes that this has been helpful; however, opioids are

not recommended for long-term management and have not shown substantial benefit

with long-term use. He should be encouraged to reduce or discontinue use of the

opioid. Chang et al. recommend a trial of TCAs if NSAIDs and acetaminophen have

failed.

87 This may also help his chronic insomnia, but the doses used for analgesia

(typically less than 100 mg/day) may not be high enough to have true antidepressant

effects. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) may be used to treat

depression, but have very little independent analgesic effects. However, if his

depression improves, we would expect to see a proportional improvement in his

pain. Because SSRIs are better tolerated than TCAs, and TCAs have not

demonstrated improvement in function in the long term, J.P. should have a trial of a

generic SSRI such as citalopram. SNRI’s may also be an effective and well-tolerated

option that would treat both his depression and pain.

CASE 55-3, QUESTION 4: J.P. has been taking two different muscle relaxants for his back pain. He reports

that neither of these is very helpful, and he usually does not have muscle spasms but does have trigger points on

physical examination. What would you recommend with regard to continuing these drugs? Would a trial of a

different muscle relaxant be appropriate?

Muscle relaxants are commonly used to treat chronic musculoskeletal pain. They

are recommended for short-term use for acute low back pain (all are fairly equal).

69

Comments

Search This Blog

Archive

Show more

Popular posts from this blog

TRIPASS XR تري باس

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

ZENOXIA 15 MG, Comprimé

VOXCIB 200 MG, Gélule

Kana Brax Laberax

فومي كايند

بعض الادويه نجد رموز عليها مثل IR ، MR, XR, CR, SR , DS ماذا تعني هذه الرموز

NIFLURIL 700 MG, Suppositoire adulte

Antifongiques مضادات الفطريات

Popular posts from this blog

علاقة البيبي بالفراولة بالالفا فيتو بروتين

التغيرات الخمس التي تحدث للجسم عند المشي

إحصائيات سنة 2020 | تعداد سكَان دول إفريقيا تنازليا :

ما هو الليمونير للأسنان ؟

ACUPAN 20 MG, Solution injectable

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

الام الظهر

VOXCIB 200 MG, Gélule

ميبستان

Popular posts from this blog

TRIPASS XR تري باس

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

Popular posts from this blog

TRIPASS XR تري باس

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

ZENOXIA 15 MG, Comprimé

VOXCIB 200 MG, Gélule

Kana Brax Laberax

فومي كايند

بعض الادويه نجد رموز عليها مثل IR ، MR, XR, CR, SR , DS ماذا تعني هذه الرموز

NIFLURIL 700 MG, Suppositoire adulte

Antifongiques مضادات الفطريات

Popular posts from this blog

Kana Brax Laberax

TRIPASS XR تري باس

PARANTAL 100 MG, Suppositoire بارانتال 100 مجم تحاميل

الكبد الدهني Fatty Liver

الم اسفل الظهر (الحاد) الذي يظهر بشكل مفاجئ bal-agrisi

SEDALGIC 37.5 MG / 325 MG, Comprimé pelliculé [P] سيدالجيك 37.5 مجم / 325 مجم ، قرص مغلف [P]

نمـو الدمـاغ والتطـور العقـلي لـدى الطفـل

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

أخطر أنواع المخدرات فى العالم و الشرق الاوسط

Archive

Show more