Musson K. Cushingoid status: induced by topicalsteroid medication. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1968;5:33.

Flach AJ. Cyclo-oxygenase inhibitors in ophthalmology. Surv Ophthalmol. 1992;36:259.

Goa KL, Chrisp P. Ocular diclofenac: a review of its pharmacology and clinical use in cataract surgery, and

potential in other inflammatory ocular conditions. Drugs Aging. 1992;2:473.

Ocufen [prescribing information]. Hormigueros, PR: Allergan America; 1992.

Voltaren Ophthalmic [prescribing information]. Atlanta, GA: CIBA Vision Ophthalmics; 1991.

Flach AJ et al. The effect of ketorolac tromethamine solution in reducing postoperative inflammation after

cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology. 1988;95:1279.

Flach AJ et al. Prophylaxis of aphakic cystoid macular edema without corticosteroids. Ophthalmology.

1990;97:1253.

Flach AJ et al. Improvement in visual acuity in chronic aphakic and pseudophakic cystoid macular edema after

161.

162.

163.

164.

165.

166.

167.

168.

169.

170.

171.

172.

173.

174.

175.

treatment with topical 0.5% ketorolac tromethamine. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991;112:514.

Tinkelman DG et al. Double-masked, paired-comparison clinical study of ketorolac tromethamine 0.5%

ophthalmic solution compared with placebo eyedrops in the treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. Surv

Ophthalmol. 1993;38(Suppl):133.

Ballas Z et al. Clinical evaluation of ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% ophthalmic solution for the treatment of

seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. Surv Ophthalmol. 1993;38(Suppl):141.

Pavan-Langston DR, Foster CS. Trifluorothymidine and idoxuridine therapy of ocular herpes. Am J Ophthalmol.

1977;84:818.

McGillJ et al. Some aspects of the clinical use of trifluorothymidine in the treatment of herpetic ulceration of the

cornea. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK. 1974;94:342.

Collins P, Bauer DJ. The activity in vitro against herpes virus of 9-(2-hydroxyethoxymethyl) guanine

(acycloguanosine), a new antiviral agent. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1979;5:431.

Pavan-Langston DR et al. Acyclic antimetabolite therapy of experimental herpes simplex keratitis. Am J

Ophthalmol. 1978;86:618.

Coster DJ et al. A comparison of acyclovir and idoxuridine as treatment for ulcerative herpetic keratitis. Br J

Ophthalmol. 1980;64:763.

Colin J et al. Ganciclovir ophthalmic gel in the treatment of herpes simplex keratitis. Cornea. 1997;16:393.

Kaufman HE et al. Trifluridine, cidofovir, and penciclovir in the treatment of experimental herpetic keratitis.

Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:777.

Congdon N et al. Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States. Arch

Ophthalmol. 2004;122:477.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Eye Institute. Agerelated macular degeneration: what you should know. Washington, DC: National Eye Institute, National

Institutes of Health, US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2003. Publication no. 03–2294.

Lynch SS, Cheng CM. Bevacizumab for neovascular ocular diseases. Ann Pharmacother. 2007;41:614.

Chapman JA, Beckey C. Pegaptanib: a novel approach to ocular neovascularization. Ann Pharmacother.

2006;40:1322.

Lucentis [prescribing information]. San Francisco, CA: Genentech; 2007.

Jager RD et al. Age-related macular degeneration [published correction appears in N Engl J Med.

2008;359:1736]. N EnglJ Med. 2008;358:2606.

p. 1169

Perioperative analgesia utilizes nerve blocks via peripheral or spinal local

anesthetic delivery. A preoperative pain assessment may identify a

history of uncontrolled postsurgical pain, analgesic intolerance or

contraindication, risks and benefits of regional anesthesia, and presence

of preoperative pain or anxiety.

Case 55-1 (Questions 1–3)

Multimodal analgesia is a strategy that utilizes a combination of different

analgesic modalities to achieve better postoperative pain management

and a subsequent reduction in adverse effects. The additive and

synergistic effects between different classes of analgesics allow for a

reduction in the doses of individual medications while achieving similar

or better pain control.

Case 55-2 (Questions 1–3)

Low back pain is a very common chronic pain condition. It is complex,

often involving physical and emotional factors. Patients may have

musculoskeletal, neuropathic, and/or central pain that needs to be

assessed, as well as comorbidities.

Case 55-3 (Questions 1, 2)

Chronic pain management requires multimodal therapies, both

pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic. Many factors affect analgesic

selection, including comorbidities, available routes of administration, and

cost.

Case 55-3 (Questions 3–7)

Neuropathic pain may be caused by injury to peripheral nerves or to the

central nervous system. Neuropathic pain is treated with analgesic

antidepressants and anticonvulsants. Peripheral or localized nerve pain

may be treated with topical agents.

Case 55-4 (Questions 1, 2)

Elderly patients and patients with multiple comorbidities are at high risk

for adverse effects. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug

interactions must be considered with the use of anticonvulsants and

antidepressants.

Case 55-4 (Questions 3, 4)

Central neuropathic pain may present with peripheralsymptoms that are

localized or generalized. Pharmacotherapy provides only modest relief.

Central poststroke pain is commonly multifactorial, including neuropathic

pain and nociceptive pain. Central pain may respond to traditional

neuropathic pain therapies. NSAIDs are ineffective. Comorbidities and

Case 55-5 (Questions 1, 2)

drug interactions must be considered.

Functional pain does not have a clear pathophysiology. Comorbid mental

health issues and psychosocialstressors complicate chronic pain

management. Analgesic antidepressants and anticonvulsants, in

conjunction with cognitive behavioral therapies, are recommended for

management of functional pain syndromes (FPSs).

Case 55-6 (Questions 1, 2)

Opioid therapy requires effective risk assessment to avoid medication

abuse, misuse, and diversion. Monitoring recommendations should

include use of written opioid agreements, urine drug testing, opioid risk

screening tools, and electronic prescription monitoring program records.

Case 55-7 (Questions 1–6)

Cancer pain may result from one or more causes related to direct tumor

involvement, cancer therapy, and psychological factors. Pain

management involves assessment of the patient to determine the

etiology of pain and development of a care plan to address pain and

other symptom management.

Case 55-8 (Question 1)

p. 1170

p. 1171

Transdermal fentanyl and methadone are potent opioids commonly used

in cancer pain management. Opioid conversion tables for fentanyl and

methadone are different due to differences in pharmacokinetics.

Supplemental doses of short-acting opioids are recommended for

breakthrough pain management.

Case 55-8 (Questions 2–5)

Opioid adverse effects including sedation, constipation, nausea, vomiting,

itching, and respiratory depression should be addressed in the pain

management plan. Complementary and alternative medicine therapies

are widely used by patients in the management of cancer pain, dyspnea,

and nausea and vomiting. Neuraxial opioid administration may be

appropriate for patients with intolerable pain who cannot tolerate

systemic opioid therapy.

Case 55-8 (Questions 6–9)

INCIDENCE, PREVALENCE, AND

EPIDEMIOLOGY

Pain is defined as “an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with

actual or potential tissue damage or described in terms of such damage.”

1 The ability

to experience pain is critical for survival because it informs the body of real or

potential injury (e.g., touching a hot stove). The body is then able to respond to the

threat and protect itself from further injury (e.g., refraining from touching or removing

the hand from the hot stove). Pain is a hallmark of many acute and chronic conditions.

More than 80% of patients who undergo surgical procedures experience acute pain,

75% of which report the severity as moderate, severe, or extreme.

2,3 Chronic pain

affects more than 25% of Americans over the age of 20 years.

4 Many people think

that pain is a natural part of growing older, and up to 60% of people believe that pain

is just something you have to live with.

5 However, nearly all cases of chronic pain

begin as acute pain stemming from surgery, trauma, or illness.

6 The Institute of

Medicine in 2011 estimated that $635 billion is spent annually on treatment of

chronic pain conditions alone.

7 Back pain and osteoarthritis (OA) are among the top

5 chronic pain conditions associated with high healthcare costs and the prevalence

continues to rise with the aging U.S. population. A study of Humana insurance

utilization data for Medicare members from 2007 to 2011 found that annual costs

were $327 million for OA and $218 million for back pain.

8 There are also gender,

racial, and socioeconomic disparities that exist with chronic pain. Chronic pain is

reported more often in women than in men, and in non-Hispanic white patients

compared with other races and ethnicities.

4 Chronic pain is also more common in

those whose income is 2 times less than the level of poverty. Pain is more complex

than just physiology. It is a subjective experience, and sometimes the severity of pain

does not appear to equal the extent of tissue damage. A person’s perception of pain is

affected by environmental, emotional, cultural, spiritual, and cognitive factors.

Unrelieved chronic pain affects not only physical well-being but also a person’s

psychological and social well-being and relationships with loved ones. Recent

estimates showed that musculoskeletal-related conditions with low back pain, neck

pain, and knee OA ranked within the top 10 noncommunicable diseases for global

disability-adjusted life years (i.e., years of life lost and years lived in disability).

9,10

Factors that increase pain and suffering include sensory factors, cognitive factors,

and emotional factors (Fig. 55-1). All are interrelated and illustrate the complex

nature of chronic pain.

Pathophysiology

ASCENDING PATHWAY

Nociception, or the sensation of pain, is composed of four basic processes:

transduction, transmission, modulation, and perception (Fig. 55-2) . Transduction is

the process by which noxious stimuli are translated into electrical signals at

peripheral receptor sites (i.e., free nerve endings located throughout the skin, muscle,

joints, fascia, and viscera). Normal sensory stimuli do not activate the pain signal,

but if the stimulus is powerful enough to surpass the threshold for innocuous

activation, the receptors become nociceptors (i.e., pain receptors). These sensory

receptors target mechanical (crushing or pressure), chemical (endogenous or

exogenous), or thermal (hot or cold) stimuli. Some nociceptors are polymodal,

transducing more than one type of stimuli. One of these types of nociceptors is called

the transient receptor potential (TRP). This family has a large number of members

that are activated by the whole spectrum of thermal stimuli (very hot to very cold), as

well as some mechanical and various chemical stimuli. Other receptors are “silent,”

but are recruited if the stimulus is more intense or prolonged.

Figure 55-1 Factors affecting chronic pain.

p. 1171

p. 1172

Figure 55-2 Pain pathways. 5-HT, serotonin; NE, norepinephrine.

After stimulation of nociceptors, several processes occur. Proinflammatory

mediators, including histamine, substance P, prostaglandins, bradykinins, and

serotonin are released at the site of injury. Immune mediators are also released,

including tumor necrosis factor, nerve growth factors, interleukins, and interferons.

These mediators sensitize the nociceptors, lowering the pain threshold in and around

the injury (peripheral sensitization). The sensitized nociceptors may fire more

frequently and erratically and are stimulated by much weaker stimuli (hyperalgesia).

More frequent firing is correlated with an increase in pain intensity.

Transmission is the propagation of the electrical signal along primary afferent

nerves, through the dorsal horn of the spinal cord to the central nervous system

(CNS). Painful impulses are generated at the nociceptor, with voltage-gated sodium

channels initiating the action potentials. Voltage-gated calcium channels are

responsible for allowing calcium influx to the presynaptic terminal, causing

neurotransmitter release. The message is then transmitted to the spinal cord via two

primary afferent nerve types: myelinated A fibers and unmyelinated C fibers. The Aδ

fibers are responsible for rapidly conducting impulses associated with thermal and

mechanical stimuli. Transmission of signals along Aδ fibers results in sharp or

stabbing sensations that alert the patient to an injury (also called “first pain”). This

produces reflex signals, such as musculoskeletal withdrawal, to prevent further

injury.

The smaller, unmyelinated C fibers respond to mechanical, thermal, and chemical

stimuli but conduct impulses at a much slower rate compared with Aδ fibers.

Transmission of electrical impulses via C fibers results in pain that is dull, aching,

burning, and diffuse (called “second pain”). Prolonged stimulation of C fibers causes

an additive effect on the perceived intensity of second pain, called windup.

At the level of the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, the primary afferents cause

calcium release into the presynaptic terminal. This leads to release of excitatory

amino acids (EAAs) like glutamate into the synapse (Fig. 55-3). C fibers also release

peptides such as substance P, neurokinins, and calcitonin gene-related peptide

(CGRP). The EAAs then stimulate the postsynaptic receptors and the electrical

signals stimulate second-order neurons in the CNS. The postsynaptic α-amino-3-

hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazoleproprionate (AMPA) receptors are sodium channelmediated and are responsible for the first pain mentioned previously. N-methyl-Daspartate (NMDA) receptor channels allow both sodium and calcium passage.

Usually a magnesium ion holds the channels closed; however, when there is sustained

firing from the primary afferents, the magnesium ion is displaced and the NMDA

receptor is activated. This sensitizes the second-order neurons that will then

discharge at a higher frequency. When sensitization occurs, the firing threshold is

reduced, so even slightly painful stimuli (hyperalgesia) and nonpainful stimuli

(allodynia) cause sustained activation of second-order neurons. NMDA receptor

activation is linked to windup and central sensitization (i.e., decreased thresholds for

response or increased vigor of responses after a sensitizing event) and may

contribute to the maintenance of chronic pain conditions with processes occurring

both at the dorsal horn level and in the supraspinal areas. Central sensitization may

occur with all types of pain when prolonged primary afferent activation causes

plasticity (adaptation) of the pain sensory thresholds in the CNS.

11

One of the predominant contributors to pain propagation at the synapse and within

the CNS is the glial cell. In the periphery, these are Schwann cells and satellite cells.

In the CNS, these include oligodendrocytes, astrocytes, ependymal cells, and

microglia. Glial cells account for 70% of the CNS and under normal conditions

microglia account for 5% to 20% of glia.

12 The glial cells have historically been seen

as support cells for synaptic homeostasis. This is true; however, they also have an

important role in the synthesis, release, and uptake of neurotransmitters and serve as

a link between the nervous system and the immune system. Nerve damage due to

trauma, infection, drugs, or toxins exposes peripheral nerve proteins, and they are

seen by the immune system as “nonself,” initiating an immune reaction. Glial cells

are activated, causing release of cytokines and inflammatory mediators which

contribute to peripheral sensitization, increasing nociceptor sensitivity, and lowering

of the firing threshold. Continuous nociceptive input results in high levels of

glutamate within synapses. In the setting of chronic pain, glial cells swell (called

gliosis) and an increase in cell surface markers is seen. The more persistent the

stimulus, the more they swell and release inflammatory mediators. This contributes to

the development and maintenance of central sensitization.

13 Glial cells and NMDA

receptors may also be activated by medications such as opioids. This is thought to

contribute to opioid tolerance, dependence, addiction, and a phenomenon called

opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH).

14

Figure 55-3 Synaptic activity at the dorsal horn. AMPA, α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazoleproprionate;

NK1, neurokinin 1; NMDA, N-methyl-D-aspartate.

p. 1172

p. 1173

Visceral pain is very complex. It follows somatosensory pathways and also its

own systems. Aδ and C fibers have been found in the heart, pleura, abdominal cavity,

gallbladder, and testicles. Additionally, the intestinal tract has its own neuronal

system called the “brain–gut axis” that operates independently and in conjunction

with the rest of the CNS.

15 Like the somatosensory pathways, peripheral and central

sensitization occurs with chronic visceral pain. Activation of the autonomic nervous

system may also affect visceral sensitivity and the role of emotions in modulating

visceral pain. Visceral pain may be referred to areas of the somatosensory system

(e.g., myocardial ischemia causes left arm pain), leading to a complex presentation of

an individual’s pain.

15,16

SUPRASPINAL MODULATION AND THE DESCENDING PATHWAY

Once nociceptive signals reach the CNS (typically at the spinal cord level), they

ascend to the thalamus, primarily via the spinothalamic tract. From the thalamus,

tertiary neurons project to many structures in the brain, including the brainstem,

diencephalon (includes the thalamus), primary and secondary somatosensory

cortices, and frontolimbic area. The somatosensory cortex is where the brain

interprets the qualities of pain such as location, duration, and intensity. Tertiary

neurons also project to the limbic system, which is involved in the affective or

emotional component of pain. Perception is when the sensory (physical) and affective

(psychological) components of the nociceptive message are integrated into the

patient’s overall experience. An individual does not experience pain until the brain

has processed and interpreted the electrical nociceptive signal.

A second tract, called the spinoreticular tract, ascends to the thalamus, but also

branches off at the brainstem to stimulate descending modulation. Modulation

happens throughout the CNS and results in either an increase or a decrease in

transmission. Neurons from the thalamus and brainstem release inhibitory

neurotransmitters, such as norepinephrine (NE), serotonin (5-HT), γ-aminobutyric

acid (GABA), glycine, endorphins, and enkephalins, which inhibit EAA activity in

the ascending pathway. GABA is more active at supraspinal sites, and glycine is

more active at spinal sites. The GABA-A receptor is a binding site for

benzodiazepines and barbiturates, and the GABA-B receptor is a binding site for

baclofen, causing muscle relaxation. Glycine has both pronociceptive and

antinociceptive effects, depending on the receptor. Endogenous opioids (endorphins,

enkephalins) are the most common group of inhibitory peptides, inhibiting EAA

release from the presynaptic terminals and activation of second-order neurons in the

postsynaptic terminals. Opioids also enhance the descending pathway via release of

NE and 5-HT. In fact, activation of most of the supraspinal structures results in

enhancement of NE and 5-HT effects.

Diagnosis and Clinical Presentation

Pain is a symptom and a reactionary response to real or potential bodily harm, but it

is not currently defined as a specific disease state. It also cannot be measured

objectively. It is a symptom that relies on a patient’s subjective report and any

physical findings indicative of underlying pathology. Healthcare teams take on the

task of identifying the cause of the pain using everything from noninvasive imaging

such as magnetic resonance imaging to invasive testing such as electromyelograms

and spinal discography.

Pain can be classified in many ways. Some conditions are classified as syndromes

because the patient presents with a constellation of symptoms that cannot be

attributed to any definitive diagnosis or disease process (e.g., complex regional pain

syndrome). Often clinicians simply state the location and type of pain (e.g.,

neuropathic pain in bilateral lower extremities). Cancer-related pain, whether from

the disease process itself or the treatment of the disease (e.g., surgery, chemotherapy,

or radiation), presents very much like noncancer pain. One of the most common ways

to classify pain is to describe the time course. Acute pain is caused by an injury or

illness. It alerts an individual to the injury and initiates withdrawal from the noxious

stimulus. It typically has an easily identified cause and location. The course is

predictable, and the pain is expected to diminish in hours, days, or weeks as the

injury heals. It may be associated with an inflammatory response, producing redness

and swelling. Inadequately treated acute pain can evoke physiologic hormonal

responses that alter circulation and tissue metabolism; these can also produce

tachypnea, tachycardia, widening of the pulse pressure, and increased sympathetic

nervous system activity. It can also cause emotional distress.

Chronic pain serves no biologic purpose. It is characterized by persistent pain that

lasts beyond the length of an illness or the healing of an injury. Sometimes there is no

apparent cause. It may be either continuous or recurrent and of sufficient duration and

intensity to adversely affect a patient’s well-being, level of function, and quality of

life. Risk factors for developing chronic pain include individual predisposition (e.g.,

female sex, increasing age, or a genetic predisposition), environmental factors (e.g.,

previous painful experiences or abuse), and psychological factors (e.g., anxiety,

depression, or catastrophizing).

16

Chronic pain can be further classified based on mechanism, symptoms, or location

of injury. Musculoskeletal or inflammatory pain is described as constant, aching pain,

often mediated by prostaglandins. It is usually caused by injury to the skeletal

muscles or joints. Pain may be localized to the joints (as in rheumatoid arthritis and

osteoarthritis) or more regional (as with myofascial pain or muscle strain).

Neuropathic pain is described as tingling, sharp, shooting, stabbing, burning, or other

uncomfortable feelings (dysesthesias) such as the sensation that there are bugs

crawling on the skin. Neuropathic pain may be constant (as in diabetic peripheral

neuropathy) or intermittent (as in trigeminal neuralgia). It is typically caused by

injury within the nervous system or a nervous system response to persistent pain

stimulus from outside the nervous system. Visceral pain can have a vague

presentation, because the enteric and autonomic nervous systems are involved.

Patients may report nausea or generalized abdominal discomfort (as in

endometriosis, hepatitis, or pancreatitis). Some people report pain in the absence of

physiologic tissue damage; however, their perception of the pain is very real. This is

c a l l e d dysfunctional pain. Conditions such as irritable bowel syndrome,

fibromyalgia, interstitial cystitis, and some abdominal or pelvic pain fall into this

category. In these conditions, pain appears to be generated by an imbalance in

pronociceptive signals and antinociceptive signals in the CNS. Patients with

dysfunctional pain syndromes are heavily influenced by factors that augment or

diminish the CNS pathways (including stress, anxiety, depression, or illness).

p. 1173

p. 1174

Assessment

Pain is very subjective and difficult to measure in quantitative terms. It is essential to

obtain a thorough history and examination, both physical and psychological. When

obtaining a pain history, clinicians should gather details about the pattern, duration,

location, and character of the pain and should additionally determine what makes the

pain worse and what makes it better, what medications and nonpharmacologic

therapies have been tried in the past, and the result of those therapies (positive or

negative outcome) (Table 55-1).

Pain intensity should be measured using an appropriate pain scale according to the

patient’s ability to communicate (Table 55-2, Fig. 55-4).

17 Single-dimensional pain

scales tend to be more accurate in the acute pain setting and not as helpful for chronic

pain because they only capture a “snapshot” of what the patient is feeling. Chronic

pain symptoms wax and wane over time, so more useful tools are multidimensional

pain scales that evaluate function, including sleep, appetite, performance of activities

of daily living, work, and social interactions. Examples of multidimensional tools

include the McGill Pain Questionnaire and the Brief Pain Inventory.

18,19 Ultimately,

the most useful aspect of patient assessment is the information provided by the patient

on how pain impacts day-to-day life, such as the number of hours they spend on their

hobbies, or how well they can perform activities of daily living. Some of the most

difficult patients to assess are young children and patients with cognitive, visual, or

hearing impairment. These patients may have difficulty describing and

communicating their pain and discomfort. There are multiple assessment tools that

are designed and tested in these special populations to increase the accuracy of pain

assessment. In addition to physical and functional assessments, psychological

evaluations help to identify those patients who may need more psychiatric or

psychological therapy to help them cope with their chronic pain. Because controlled

substances are used to treat chronic pain, some clinicians advocate for substance

abuse screening (see Case 55-7, Question 4).

Table 55-1

Patient Evaluation

General History

Chief complaint

History of present illness (HPI)

Past medical history (PMH)

Family history

Social history

Current medications, including allergies

Pain History

Onset

Duration

Quality

Intensity

Ameliorating factors

Exacerbating factors

Pain rating, if possible

Analgesic History

Current and past analgesics

Dose/route

Duration of use

Effectiveness

Adverse effects

Clinical Examination

Clinician observations of patient behavior (grimacing, withdrawing, guarding)

Physical examination

Functional assessment

Overview of Treatment

Treatment of pain is based on guidelines whenever possible. However, the number of

treatment guidelines for pain management is limited. More commonly, clinicians

choose a therapy based on the type of pain (e.g., neuropathic, musculoskeletal,

visceral, and central). For all types of pain, multimodal therapy including

pharmacologic, physical rehabilitation, and cognitive behavioral therapy should be

combined. Interventional therapies should be considered if possible.

A treatment plan must always include evaluation of the following factors: age,

comorbidities (such as renal and liver disease), route of administration (the oral

route may not be suitable), concurrent medications (for duplication or drug–drug

interactions), laboratory abnormalities, and financial resources.

Acute pain is usually managed very effectively with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, and/or opioids, but may include

adjunctive therapies as well. Pharmacotherapy for chronic pain is more complex.

First-line agents for the treatment of neuropathic pain consist of antidepressants,

preferably serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), including

tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs). These agents enhance the descending inhibitory

pain pathway. Anticonvulsants (e.g., sodium-channel blockers, calcium-channel

blockers, or GABA agonists) are also considered first-line therapy for many common

types of neuropathic pain. They inhibit activation of sodium and calcium channels,

block release of EAAs such as glutamate, or block the postsynaptic receptors. Some

anticonvulsants also enhance the inhibitory effects of GABA. If the pain is localized,

topical agents may be useful (e.g., capsaicin or local anesthetics). Addition of an

opioid may be considered if the former agents fail to provide adequate analgesia.

Combination therapy has been shown to be more effective in some cases (TCA–

anticonvulsant or opioid–anticonvulsant combinations).

20 Nerve blocks and other

interventional therapies may be helpful for short-term relief.

21

Chronic musculoskeletal pain usually responds to acetaminophen, salicylates, or

NSAIDs, in addition to nonpharmacologic therapies such as heat and ice or physical

rehabilitation modalities. Localized pain may be amenable to topical therapies

(NSAIDs, capsaicin), and trigger points (i.e., taut muscle bands) may be amenable to

injections. SNRIs may also be considered for this indication.

22,23

Visceral pain is complex, and there are no clear treatment guidelines. Because it

travels the somatosensory pathways, antidepressants that enhance inhibitory

modulation are most commonly used. Additionally, anticonvulsants that reduce

central sensitization and hyperalgesia may be helpful.

24

Trials of any pharmacologic therapy must be monitored for both efficacy and

toxicity. Patients must have realistic expectations for any medication trial. Even the

most effective analgesics are expected to achieve only about 30% to 50%

improvement in chronic pain. This is why multimodal therapy is essential. NSAID

therapy should be accompanied by monitoring for dyspepsia, peptic ulcers, and

gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, elevated blood pressure, and declining renal function,

at a minimum. Antidepressants do not usually require laboratory monitoring but are

known to cause dry mouth, constipation, urinary retention, and drowsiness. Some of

the anticonvulsants require laboratory monitoring for liver toxicity, electrolyte

imbalance, or bone marrow abnormalities. All anticonvulsants may cause

drowsiness, dizziness, and cognitive dysfunction, with short-term memory loss and

word-finding difficulty. Opioids require laboratory monitoring for long-term adverse

effects such as osteoporosis, hypogonadism, and end-organ impairment, and patients

must be routinely screened for sleep apnea, constipation, drowsiness, nausea, and

vomiting. Drug interactions, both pharmacokinetic (e.g., hepatic enzyme interactions)

and pharmacodynamic (e.g., additive sedation), are common with many of these

agents, particularly when used in combination.

p. 1174

p. 1175

Table 55-2

Pain Assessment Tools for Adults

17

Tool

Method of

Administration Advantages Disadvantages

Visual analog scale (VAS) Verbal, visual Reliable; sensitive to acute

changes in pain

Requires paper/pencil,

mechanicalskills;

decreased reliability with

cognitive, visual or

auditory impairment; not

sensitive to long-term

changes in pain

Numerical rating scales

(NRS)

Verbal, visual Reliable; good validity;

detects treatment effects

acutely

Decreased reliability with

extremes of age; requires

abstract thought, difficult

to use with cognitive,

visual, or auditory

impairment; not sensitive

to long-term changes in

pain

Verbal description scales

(VDS)

Verbal, visual (4- or 5-

point scales)

Reliable; good validity;

preferred by older adults;

preferred by some over

NRS or VAS

Dependent on literacy and

language; limited number

of response categories,

unequal intervals between

anchors; not very sensitive

to changes in pain

Faces pain scale (FPS) Visual Reliable; good validity;

good with poor literacy or

language barrier; possibly

easier than NRS or VDS

Requires abstract thinking;

not specific for pain

Brief pain inventory (BPI) Verbal, written Reliable; intensity and

interference components;

sensitive to change in

condition over time

Does not assess quality of

pain or affective

component

McGill Pain Questionnaire

(MPQ)

Verbal, written (long form

—30 minutes; short form

—2–3 minutes)

Reliable; measures

sensory and affective

components; valid in older

patients

Not recommended for

illiterate or cognitively

impaired patients


Figure 55-4 Pain assessment scale. (Adapted from Northeast Health Care Quality Foundation [NHCQF], the

Medicare Quality Improvement Organization [QIO] for Maine, New Hampshire and Vermont, under contract with

the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services [CMS], an Agency of the U.S. Department of Health and Human

Services.)

Perioperative Pain Management

It is estimated that 25 million inpatient surgeries and 35 million ambulatory surgeries

are performed annually in the United States.

25 Greater than 80% of surgical patients

experience postoperative pain and of those patients, up to 40% experience “severe”

pain.

2 The mismanagement of postoperative pain, whether undertreatment or

overtreatment, is associated with negative physiologic consequences such as

persistent postoperative pain, impaired rehabilitation, increased hospital length of

stay, and adverse events related to excessive analgesic use, including hospital readmission. Multimodal treatment must be utilized throughout the perioperative

continuum to effectively manage pain.

Pain management during the perioperative period can be divided into three phases:

pre-, intra-, and postoperative analgesia. Preoperative analgesia is treatment started

1 to 2 hours before surgery, with medications used to decrease peripheral

sensitization. Intraoperative analgesia prevents the establishment of central

sensitization caused by incisional injury and includes only the intraoperative time

period. Postoperative analgesia is aimed at proactively reducing acute pain and

preventing central sensitization, thereby avoiding subsequent development of chronic

pain.

26

p. 1175

p. 1176

Table 55-3

Prevalence of Chronic Postsurgical Pain

28

Type of Surgery Incidence of Chronic Pain (%) Clinical Presentation

Limb amputation 30–85 Phantom limb pain

Mastectomy >50 Scar pain, phantom breast pain,

shoulder or arm pain, chest wall

pain

Thoracotomy 30–50 Scar pain, chest wall pain

Coronary artery bypass surgery 30–55 Sternal pain, postsaphenectomy

pain

Inguinal hernia repair 20–60 Scar pain, ilioinguinal nerve pain,

inflammatory pain

Source: Cregg R et al. Persistent postsurgical pain. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2013;7:144–152.

Normally, the acute pain trajectory has a rapid decline during the first week after

surgery, and most patients fully recover within a few weeks with no residual pain.

Although there is no single definition of a time frame for chronic pain, chronic

persistent surgical pain (CPSP) is usually regarded as pain of at least 2 months

duration and which all other causes have been excluded.

27 The prevalence of CPSP is

highest with limb amputation, thoracotomy, mastectomy, hernia repair, and cardiac

surgery (Table 55-3).

28 Risk factors for CPSP include history of chronic pain prior to

surgery, gender, age, surgical site, invasiveness of surgery, unrelieved postoperative

pain, and comorbid anxiety or depression.

29 Genetic factors also account for a

significant degree of inter-individual variation in pain sensitivity and treatment

response.

CASE 55-1

QUESTION 1: B.B. is a 46-year-old female who sustained a shoulder injury while pulling a cart at work. She

will be undergoing shoulder arthroplasty in 2 weeks. She also has fibromyalgia and takes

hydrocodone/acetaminophen 5/325 mg 1 to 2 tablets by mouth every 6 hours (usually takes eight tablets daily)

as well as duloxetine 30 mg by mouth daily and pregabalin 75 mg by mouth twice daily. She smokes one pack of

cigarettes daily and has "a few" glasses of wine nightly to help her pain because she does not think her current

analgesic regimen is effective.

What assessment should be done with B.B. prior to surgery? What risk factors does she have for increased

pain after surgery?

It is paramount that all patients have a thorough preoperative assessment including

review of medical comorbidities, medications, history of chronic pain, and substance

abuse, as well as prior postoperative analgesic regimens and responses.

30 This might

include evaluating kidney or liver function, pulmonary function, or coagulation status.

Pharmacists should also ask about sleep apnea. The presence of central or

obstructive sleep apnea is associated with a higher risk for perioperative

complications including opioid-induced respiratory depression.

31

If the patient does

not have a sleep apnea diagnosis, a screening tool called the STOP-BANG

questionnaire can be utilized to assess the risk (Table 55-4).

32 The results of this

screening are associated with postoperative critical care admission.

33 As part of a

medication review, the pharmacist should consult with the respective state

prescription drug monitoring program to determine what controlled substances the

patient has been filling. It is expected that patients have only one prescriber of

controlled substances so it is helpful to determine whether stated use matches the

prescription history. Keeping with The Joint Commission standards, the pharmacist

should reconcile outpatient medication profiles, contacting dispensing pharmacies if

necessary.

34 Current and past substance use should be addressed in an open and

nonjudgmental manner. Some hospitals perform urine drug testing to confirm

prescription and/or illicit drug use.

Table 55-4

STOP-BANG Questionnaire

32

Do you snore loudly?

Do you feel tired, fatigued, sleepy during the day?

Has anyone observed you stop breathing during sleep?

Are you being treated for high blood pressure?

BMI >35 kg/m

2

Age >50 years

Neck circumference >40 cm

Male gender

Yes to 3 or more item = high risk for OSA

Yes to <3 items = low risk of OSA

Patients always bring their past experiences and current fears to surgery. These

factors affect how they perceive and cope with acute pain after surgery (Table 55-5).

Risk factors for increased pain after surgery in B.B. include female gender, work

injury, and chronic opioid therapy. Functional pain syndromes such as fibromyalgia

are associated with inefficient diffuse noxious inhibitory control (DNIC). This means

that the inhibitory pathway is not effectively blocking pain transmission into the CNS,

and she will likely have an exaggerated pain response to surgery. Her chronic opioid

use could also complicate pain management because she will likely require higher

opioid doses after surgery.

CASE 55-1, QUESTION 2: What should be done to help B.B. prepare for surgery?

Clinicians should provide the patient and family with individually tailored

education, including information on treatment options for management of

postoperative pain, making sure to document the plan and goals in the medical record

and on paper for the patient to take home.

30 Patient-tailored education has been

shown to reduce postoperative opioid consumption, reduce preoperative anxiety,

reduce requests for sedatives, and reduce length of stay.

30,35 Education should include

changes in analgesics prior to surgery, reporting and assessment of pain and when to

report, multimodal pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic options, as well as

realistic goals for pain control.

7

Table 55-5

Risk Factors for Increased Postoperative Pain

29

Adverse experience with previous surgery

Preexisting pain (moderate–severe >1 month)

Psychological vulnerability

Younger age

Female

Workman’s compensation

Inefficient diffuse noxious inhibitory control (DNIC)

Genetic predisposition

Use of chronic opioid therapy

p. 1176

p. 1177

Comments

Search This Blog

Archive

Show more

Popular posts from this blog

TRIPASS XR تري باس

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

ZENOXIA 15 MG, Comprimé

VOXCIB 200 MG, Gélule

Kana Brax Laberax

فومي كايند

بعض الادويه نجد رموز عليها مثل IR ، MR, XR, CR, SR , DS ماذا تعني هذه الرموز

NIFLURIL 700 MG, Suppositoire adulte

Antifongiques مضادات الفطريات

Popular posts from this blog

علاقة البيبي بالفراولة بالالفا فيتو بروتين

التغيرات الخمس التي تحدث للجسم عند المشي

إحصائيات سنة 2020 | تعداد سكَان دول إفريقيا تنازليا :

ما هو الليمونير للأسنان ؟

ACUPAN 20 MG, Solution injectable

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

الام الظهر

VOXCIB 200 MG, Gélule

ميبستان

Popular posts from this blog

TRIPASS XR تري باس

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

Popular posts from this blog

TRIPASS XR تري باس

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

ZENOXIA 15 MG, Comprimé

VOXCIB 200 MG, Gélule

Kana Brax Laberax

فومي كايند

بعض الادويه نجد رموز عليها مثل IR ، MR, XR, CR, SR , DS ماذا تعني هذه الرموز

NIFLURIL 700 MG, Suppositoire adulte

Antifongiques مضادات الفطريات

Popular posts from this blog

Kana Brax Laberax

TRIPASS XR تري باس

PARANTAL 100 MG, Suppositoire بارانتال 100 مجم تحاميل

الكبد الدهني Fatty Liver

الم اسفل الظهر (الحاد) الذي يظهر بشكل مفاجئ bal-agrisi

SEDALGIC 37.5 MG / 325 MG, Comprimé pelliculé [P] سيدالجيك 37.5 مجم / 325 مجم ، قرص مغلف [P]

نمـو الدمـاغ والتطـور العقـلي لـدى الطفـل

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

أخطر أنواع المخدرات فى العالم و الشرق الاوسط

Archive

Show more