R.W. has some degree of renal impairment (SCr, 1.4 mg/dL) and is receiving
spironolactone and furosemide. Therefore, his electrolytes and renal function tests
should be monitored daily while hospitalized. After hospital discharge, monitoring
will be dictated by the stability of the patient and need for diuretic dosage
adjustments. For example, outpatients may need electrolytes and renal function
monitoring once or twice weekly early after hospital discharge to as infrequently as
every 3 months for very stable patients.
Pre-renal azotemia usually results from over diuresis with subsequent compromise of
intravascular volume and decreased renal perfusion. In addition to looking for
clinical signs of hypovolemia, such as dizziness, orthostatic hypotension, and
increased heart rate, frequent measurements of BUN and serum creatinine
concentrations provide a relatively simple means of assessing the intravascular
volume. A gradual rise in serum creatinine, BUN, as well as the BUN:serum
creatinine ratio can serve as a warning to slow the rate of diuresis.
64 serial measurements of plasma volume and ascites volume were made during
treatment with diuretics in patients with cirrhosis. Patients with ascites and no edema
were able to mobilize more than 1 L/day during rapid diuresis, but at the expense of
plasma volume contraction and renal insufficiency. Patients with peripheral edema
appear to be somewhat protected from these effects and may safely undergo diuresis
at a more rapid rate (>2 kg/day) until edema resolves.
64 Others suggest, however, that
the maximal daily fluid loss should not exceed more than 0.5 L/day (>0.5 kg/day) for
patients with ascites alone or 1 L/day (>1 kg/day) for those with both ascites and
edema to prevent plasma volume depletion and decreased renal perfusion. If faster
removal of ascites is required because of respiratory distress, large-volume
paracentesis may be more effective than rapid diuresis (see Case 25-1, Question
In cirrhotic patients, azotemia may also occur because of nonsteroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). All NSAIDs should be discontinued, except low
dose aspirin in patients at high risk for a cardiac or neurological event.
Because R.W. presented with both edema and ascites, an initial weight loss of up
to 1 kg/day would be reasonable with slowing to 0.5 kg/day when the edema
resolves. Gradual diuresis avoids diuretic-induced depletion of intravascular fluid
volume by permitting ascitic fluid to equilibrate with intravascular fluid. Long-term
management of ascites is done in the outpatient setting. Severe cases with respiratory
distress or impaired ambulation as well as patients with spontaneous bacterial
peritonitis (see Chapter 70, Intra-Abdominal Infections) require hospitalization. If
outpatient therapy is an option, a weekly evaluation initially would be prudent to
prevent over diuresis and electrolyte disturbances.
CASE 25-1, QUESTION 9: Over the next several days, R.W.’s spironolactone dosage was increased to 400
mg/day. Furosemide was simultaneously increased to 80 mg BID without major improvement in diuresis.
mL/minute) and his BUN had increased to 45 mg/dL. Serum electrolytes were as follows:
The AASLD guidelines mention a few treatment options for refractory ascites.
Midodrine 7.5 mg given 3 times daily to increase blood pressure in hypotensive
patients could possibly convert diuretic-resistant patients to diuretic-sensitive. In
addition, discontinuation of β-blockers is recommended since these drugs are
associated with increased mortality in patients with refractory ascites. The guidelines
also mention avoiding angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and
angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) because of the risk of hypotension.
Because of the increase in SCr and respiratory distress, R.W.’s ascites treatment
needs modification. Patients with cirrhosis experiencing respiratory distress despite
diuretic therapy, sodium restriction, and appropriate management of hypotension
(discontinuation of β-blockers and adding midodrine) may warrant more aggressive
second-line treatment, including large-volume paracentesis, shunting procedures, or
38 Paracentesis involves the removal of ascitic fluid from the abdominal cavity
with a needle or a catheter. Although paracentesis can remove large amounts of
ascitic fluid (e.g., 10 L), removal of as little as 1 L of fluid may provide considerable
relief from the painful stretching of skin and the respiratory distress that occurs with
massive ascites. The ascitic fluid often re-accumulates rapidly after paracentesis.
The major complications of overly aggressive, large-volume paracentesis include
hypotension, shock, oliguria, encephalopathy, and renal insufficiency. Other potential
complications of paracentesis are hemorrhage, perforation of the abdominal viscera,
infection, and protein depletion.
used in conjunction with paracentesis?
Large-volume (>4 L) paracentesis should be performed for patients with tense
(PICD), which manifests clinically as worsening renal function 24 to 48 hours postprocedure.
Intravenous (IV) albumin infusions are commonly administered to
prevent PICD after large-volume paracentesis.
38 Use of albumin in combination with
large-volume paracentesis produces an expansion of circulating blood volume,
increases cardiac output, and suppresses release of renin and norepinephrine.
Although albumin is costly and sometimes in short supply, for some patients it is
appropriate with paracentesis.
In one study, patients requiring large-volume
paracentesis (≥6 L/day) received either concomitant IV albumin (40 g) or saline. The
incidence of PICD was significantly higher in the saline than the albumin group
(33.3% vs. 11.4%, respectively). The prevalence of PICD after paracentesis depends
on the volume of ascites removed such that albumin infusion may not be necessary for
a single paracentesis <4 to 5 L.
38,74 For large-volume paracentesis greater than or
equal to 6 L, 6 to 8 g of albumin is typically administered for each liter of ascites
75 conducted a meta-analysis of 55 randomized, controlled trials
evaluating the effects of albumin administration for a variety of indications on patient
mortality. They found no improvement in mortality with albumin administration.
However, albumin administered to patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
lowered the incidence of renal impairment (10% vs. 33%; p = 0.002), overall
mortality at 3 months (22% vs. 41%; p = 0.03), and hospital mortality (10% vs. 29%;
No comments:
Post a Comment
اكتب تعليق حول الموضوع