respectively. V2 receptors are located in the renal collecting
tubules and mediate the antidiuretic effects of AVP. Antagonism of the V2 receptors
results in aquaresis, which is a unique solute-free and electrolyte-sparing (sodium
and potassium) water excretion process in the kidneys. Because circulating levels of
AVP are elevated in SIADH, cirrhosis, and HF, VRA can be beneficial in the
management of hyponatremia associated with these conditions.
Conivaptan, a mixed V1A and V2 receptor antagonist, was the first VRA approved
by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of euvolemic and
hypervolemic hyponatremia in hospitalized patients.
placebo-controlled trials demonstrated its efficacy in increasing serum sodium
concentrations in patients with euvolemic and hypervolemic hyponatremia associated
with SIADH and HF, respectively.
It is administered as an IV infusion and its use
is restricted to a short-term (4 days) inpatient use only. Close monitoring of serum
sodium concentration is necessary to prevent overly rapid correction of hyponatremia
and central pontine myelinolysis that may ensue. Because conivaptan is a potent
inhibitor of the cytochrome P-450 3A4 (CYP3A4) enzyme, drug interactions with
medications that undergo CYP3A4-mediated metabolism are possible.
patients may experience infusion-site reactions with conivaptan caused by the
organic solvent, polypropylene glycol.
Tolvaptan, a selective oral VRA, was approved by the FDA in 2009 for the
treatment of hypervolemic and euvolemic hyponatremia in patients with HF,
cirrhosis, and SIADH. Because of its selectivity for the V2 receptor, tolvaptan
increases urinary excretion of free water (aquaresis) and has less of a blood
pressure–lowering effect. As such, it may be more suitable for use in patients with
low to normal blood pressure, such as those with HF or cirrhosis. Tolvaptan has
been shown to increase serum sodium concentration significantly and correct
hyponatremia in patients with SIADH, chronic HF, or cirrhosis.
studied extensively in chronic HF where improvement in signs and symptoms such as
reduction of edema and weight, as well as normalization of serum sodium
91,92 However, the use of tolvaptan in HF had no effect on
long-term cardiovascular mortality or hospitalization for HF.
have shown the potential benefits of tolvaptan in patients with autosomal dominant
94,95 However, hepatic injury was noted in some patients,
thus resulting in the release of a safety announcement by FDA to limit tolvaptan’s use
to no more than 30 days and the removal of the indication for use in patients with
It should not be used also in patients with underlying hepatic disease.
Lixivaptan is another VRAs that is selective for the V2 receptor. Like tolvaptan,
they are orally active and thus useful in patients who require chronic therapy or when
oral therapy is preferred. Lixivaptan has been studied in patients with hyponatremia
from HF, cirrhosis, and SIADH; the results showed significant increases
in aquaresis and serum sodium concentrations in both in- and outpatients.
However, it has yet to receive FDA approval.
Common adverse effects of VRAs include thirst, dry mouth, polyuria, and blood
pressure reduction. Aquaretics increase thirst by increasing blood tonicity and urine
volume; orthostatic hypotension has been reported.
contraindicated in hypovolemic hyponatremia. The risk of excessive correction of
hyponatremia and the resultant neurologic complications from osmotic demyelination
exists with VRA, especially when used in combination with fluid restriction. These
agents should therefore be initiated in the inpatient setting at the lowest possible dose
and titrated slowly, with close monitoring of serum sodium concentrations and
volume status. Additionally, the VRAs are substrates and inhibitors of the CYP3A4
enzyme. As a result, there is a potential for clinically significant drug interactions,
particularly with concomitant administration of moderate or strong CYP3A4 inducers
The VRAs should be used in hyponatremic patients with mild-to-moderate severe
neurologic symptoms. Not only have they been shown to maintain normal serum
sodium concentrations both short- and long-term but their aquaretic effect could also
reduce or eliminate the need for fluid restriction normally required of patients.
The effectiveness of VRA to correct serum sodium concentration in euvolemic and
hypervolemic hyponatremia has been shown. However, their long-term safety with
chronic use and their potential benefits on morbidity and mortality still need to be
assessed. The high cost of using these agents is also a major barrier to routine
Hypernatremia can occur under the following conditions: (a) normal total body
sodium with pure water loss, (b) low total body sodium with hypotonic fluid loss,
and (c) high total body sodium as a result of pure salt gain.
hyponatremia, it is important to assess the volume status of the ECF when evaluating
Pure water loss can result from the inability of the kidney to conserve water
(diabetes insipidus) or from extrarenal water loss through the respiratory tract or the
105 Usually, pure water loss does not cause hypernatremia unless the thirst center
is damaged or access to free water is limited.
Hypotonic fluid loss can occur renally as a result of osmotic diuresis, use of loop
diuretics, postobstruction diuresis, or intrinsic renal disease. Extrarenally, hypotonic
fluid loss can result from diarrhea, vomiting, burns, and excessive sweating.
Pure salt gain can result from the use of hypertonic saline during abortion, sodium
bicarbonate administration during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, hypertonic feedings
in infants, and, rarely, mineralocorticoid excess.
The management of hypernatremia includes correcting the underlying cause of the
hypertonic state, replacing the water deficits, and administering adequate water to
104 The pure water deficit can be estimated as follows:
where desired serum sodium is usually 140 mEq/L.
The rate at which hypernatremia should be corrected depends on the severity of
symptoms and degree of hypertonicity. Too-rapid correction can precipitate cerebral
edema, seizures, and irreversible neurologic damage, and can be fatal. For
asymptomatic patients, the rate of correction probably should not exceed changes of
0.5 mEq/L/hour in plasma sodium. A rule of thumb is to replace half the calculated
deficit with hypotonic solutions over the course of 12 to 24 hours. Any ongoing water
loss, including insensible loss, should also be replenished while carefully monitoring
the patient’s neurologic status. The remaining deficit can then be replaced during the
ensuing 24 to 48 hours. Concomitant solute deficits and ongoing solute losses should
also be replaced as appropriate. If hypernatremia is caused only by pure water loss,
free water can be administered as 5% dextrose in water. Half-normal saline or
quarter-normal saline is used if a sodium deficit is also present. In patients with
hypotension or shock, the effective arterial blood volume should be restored with
normal saline or colloids before the plasma tonicity is corrected.
Diuretics reduce sodium and chloride reabsorption in the renal tubules, thereby
increasing urine volume. Enhanced solute and fluid excretion can be initiated through
osmotic diuresis or inhibition of transport in the kidney tubules. Diuretics are
categorized according to the sites within the kidney tubules where they inhibit sodium
reabsorption (see Chapter 9, Essential Hypertension, and Chapter 28, Chronic
The loop diuretics—furosemide, bumetanide, torsemide, and ethacrynic acid—are
the most potent diuretics available. They are also known as high-ceiling diuretics
because they can inhibit the reabsorption of up to 20% to 25% of the filtered sodium
load. The loop diuretics act in the medullary and cortical portion of the thick
ascending limb of Henle’s loop. Sodium and chloride transport through the
− carrier in the luminal membrane is inhibited. Reabsorption of calcium
and magnesium is reduced secondary to the reduction in sodium chloride transport.
The loop diuretics also possess a vasodilatory effect that can contribute to their
The thiazide diuretics are a group of structurally similar compounds that share a
common mechanism of action. Several other sulfonamide diuretics that differ
chemically, such as chlorthalidone, indapamide, and metolazone, also have diuretic
effects similar to the thiazides. The primary site of action of these diuretics is at the
proximal portion of the distal tubule. Sodium reabsorption via the Na
cotransporter is blocked through competition with the chloride site of the transporter.
Some of these agents, such as chlorothiazide, may also reduce sodium transport in the
proximal tubule. The contribution of this effect toward net diuresis is negligible,
however, because the sodium ions that are not reabsorbed in the proximal tubule will
subsequently be reabsorbed in Henle’s loop. Thiazide diuretics can enhance the
reabsorption of calcium ion through a direct action on the early distal tubule.
Therefore, these agents are useful to reduce calciuria in patients with kidney stones.
In contrast, magnesium excretion is increased by the thiazides, which may result in
SPIRONOLACTONE, TRIAMTERENE, AND AMILORIDE
Spironolactone, triamterene, and amiloride are potassium-sparing diuretics that
inhibit sodium reabsorption in the cortical collecting tubules through different
mechanisms. Spironolactone is a competitive receptor-site antagonist of aldosterone
segment of the renal tubule and is indicated especially for patients with
hyperaldosteronism secondary to decreased renal perfusion. Patients with
hyperaldosteronism can be identified by urinary electrolyte screening, which shows
high urine potassium excretion with concomitant diminished or absent urine sodium
excretion. By serving as an aldosterone antagonist, spironolactone inhibits sodium
reabsorption and decreases the excretion of potassium and hydrogen ions. Dosages as
high as 200 to 400 mg/day may be needed to induce natriuresis in patients with
In contrast to spironolactone, triamterene and amiloride reduce the passage of
sodium ions through the luminal membrane, independent of aldosterone activity, by
directly acting on sodium and potassium transport processes in the distal renal
tubular cells. Triamterene and amiloride offer the advantage of a more rapid onset of
The initial effects of spironolactone are usually delayed for 2 or 3 days, and
several additional days are needed to attain maximal diuretic effect. This delay is
caused partly by the formation of an active metabolite, canrenone, which accounts for
approximately 70% of the antimineralocorticoid activity of spironolactone. The
elimination half-life of canrenone is 13.5 to 24 hours in normal subjects and is
prolonged in patients with chronic liver disease (59 hours [range, 32–105 hours]) or
HF (37 hours [range, 19–48 hours]).
106 Although the elimination half-life of
canrenone is prolonged in these patients, plasma canrenone concentrations do not
differ significantly from those in normal subjects because assay methods for
canrenone are nonspecific and include measurement of both active and inactive
No comments:
Post a Comment
اكتب تعليق حول الموضوع