Tolwani A. Continuous renal-replacement therapy for acute kidney injury. N EnglJ Med. 2012;367:2505.

Thomas ME et al. The definition of acute kidney injury and its use in practice. Kidney Int. 2015;87:62.

Lakhmir S et al. Acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease as interconnected syndromes. N Engl J Med.

2014;371:58.

Murugan R et al. Acute kidney injury: what’s the prognosis? Nat Rev Nephrol. 2011;7:209.

Coca SG et al. Chronic kidney disease after acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Kidney

Int. 2012;81:442.

Bellomo R et al. Acute renal failure—definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information

technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative

(ADQI) Group. Crit Care. 2004;8:R204.

Mehta RL et al. Acute Kidney Injury Network: report of an initiative to improve outcomes in acute kidney injury.

Crit Care. 2007;11:R31.

Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Acute Kidney Injury Work Group. KDIGO Clinical

Practice Guideline for Acute Kidney Injury. Kidney Int Suppl. 2012;2:1.

Colpaert K et al. Impact of real-time electronic alerting of acute kidney injury on therapeutic intervention and

progression of RIFLE class. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:1164.

Waikar SS et al. The incidence and prognostic significance of acute kidney injury. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens.

2007;16:227.

Kaufman J et al. Community-acquired acute renal failure. Am J Kidney Dis. 1991;17:191.

Nash K et al. Hospital-acquired renal insufficiency. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;39:930.

Lameire N et al. The changing epidemiology of acute renal failure. Nat Clin Pract Nephrol. 2006;2:364.

Chertow GM et al. Acute kidney injury, mortality, length of stay, and costs in hospitalized patients. J Am Soc

Nephrol. 2005;16:3365.

Chawla LS et al. The severity of acute kidney injury predict progression to chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int.

2011;79:1361.

Zarjou A et al. Sepsis and acute kidney injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22:999.

Brochard L et al. An official ATS/ERS/ESICM/SCCM/SRLF Statement: prevention and management of acute

renal failure in the ICU patient: an International Consensus Conference in Intensive Care Medicine. Am J

Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;181:1128.

Cerda J et al. Epidemiology of acute kidney injury. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3:881.

Thakar CV et al. Incidence and outcomes of acute kidney injury in intensive care units: a Veterans Administration

study. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:2552.

Selby NM et al. Defining the cause of death in hospitalized patients with acute kidney injury. PLoS One.

2012;7(11):e48580.

Rahman M. Acute kidney injury: a guide to diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician. 2012;86:631.

Hilton R. Acute renal failure. BMJ. 2006;333:786.

Brouchard J. Comparison of methods for estimating glomerular filtration rate in critically ill patients with acute

kidney injury. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25:102.

Caregaro L et al. Limitations of serum creatinine level and creatinine clearance as filtration markers in cirrhosis.

Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:201.

KDIGO 2012 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney

Int Suppl. 2013;3:136.

Hewitt SM et al. Discovery of protein biomarkers for renal diseases. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:1677.

Vaidya VS et al. Urinary kidney injury molecule-1: a sensitive quantitative biomarker for early detection of kidney

tubular injury. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2006;290:F517.

Parikh CR et al. Urinary IL-18 is an early predictive biomarker of acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery.

Kidney Int. 2006;70:199.

Mishra J et al. Identification of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as a novel early urinary biomarker for

ischemic renal injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003;14:2534.

Herget-Rosenthal S et al. Early detection of acute renal failure by serum cystatin C. Kidney Int. 2004;66:1115.

Matzke GR et al. Drug dosing consideration in patients with acute and chronic kidney disease—a clinical update

from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). Kidney Int. 2011;80:1122.

Roberts JA et al. Pharmacokinetic issues for antibiotics in the critically ill patient. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:840.

Perazella MA. Drug use and nephrotoxicity in the intensive care unit. Kidney Int. 2012;81:1172.

Diskin CJ et al. The comparative benefits of the fractional excretion of urea and sodium in various azotemic

oliguric states. Nephron Clin Pract. 2010;114:c145.

Carvounis CP et al. Significance of the fractional excretion of urea in the differential diagnosis of acute renal

failure. Kidney Int. 2002;62:2223.

Chittineni H et al. Risk for acute renal failure in patients hospitalized for decompensated heart failure. Am J

Nephrol. 2007;27:55.

Loboz KK et al. Drug combinations and impaired renal function—the “triple whammy.” Br J Clin Pharmacol.

2005;59:239.

Lapi F et al. Concurrent use of diuretics, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor

blockers with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of acute kidney injury: nested case control study.

BMJ. 2013;346:e8525.

Schneider V et al. Association of selective and conventional nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs with acute renal

failure: a population based, nested case-control analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;164:881.

Lafrance JP et al. Selective and non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the risk of acute kidney

injury. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009;18:923.

Winkelmayer WC et al. Nonselective and cyclooxygenase-2-selective NSAIDs and acute kidney injury. Am J

Med. 2008;121:1092.

Gradman AH. Evolving understanding of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system: pathophysiology and targets

for therapeutic intervention. Am Heart J. 2009;157(6 Suppl):S1.

Schoolwerth AC et al. Renal considerations in angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapy: AHA Scientific

Statement. Circulation. 2001;104:1985.

Mangrum AJ et al. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in chronic renal

disease:safety issues. Semin Nephrol. 2004;24:168.

Rodríguez-Iturbe B et al. Pathogenesis of poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis a century after Clemens von

Pirquet. Kidney Int. 2007;71:1094.

Rodriguez-Iturbe B et al. The current state of poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol.

2008;19:1855.

Levy JB et al. Clinical features and outcome of patients with both ANCA and anti-GBM antibodies. Kidney Int.

2004;66:1535.

Papiris SA. Bench-to-bedside reviews: pulmonary-renal syndromes—an update for the intensivist. Crit Care.

2007;11:213.

Couser WG. Glomerulonephritis. Lancet. 1999;353:1509.

Berden AE et al. Tubular lesions predict renal outcome in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated

glomerulonephritis after rituximab therapy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23:313.

Ravnskov U. Glomerular, tubular and interstitial nephritis associated with non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs.

Evidence of a common mechanism. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1999;47:203.

Taber S et al. Drug-associated renal dysfunction. Crit Care Clin. 2006;22:357.

Davis A et al. Best evidence topic report. The use of loop diuretics in acute renal failure in critically ill patients to

reduce mortality, maintain renal function, or avoid the requirements for renal support. Emerg Med J.

2006;23:569.

Bagshaw SM et al. Loop diuretics in the management of acute renal failure: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Crit Care Resusc. 2007;9:60.

Friedrich JO et al. Meta-analysis: low-dose dopamine increases urine output but does not prevent renal

dysfunction or death. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:510.

Lakhal S et al. Acute kidney injury network definition of contrast-induced nephropathy in the critically ill:

incidence and outcome. J Crit Care. 2011;26:593.

McCullough A. Contrast-induced acute kidney injury. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:1419.

Davenport MS et al. Contrast material-induced nephrotoxicity and intravenous low-osmolality iodinated contrast

material: risk stratification by using estimated glomerular filtration rate. Radiology. 2013;268:719.

Lameire NH. Contrast-induced nephropathy—prevention and risk reduction. Nephrol Dial Transplant.

2006;21(Suppl 1):i11.

Heyman SN et al. Reactive oxygen species and the pathogenesis of radiocontrast-induced nephropathy. Invest

Radiol. 2010;45:188.

Marenzi G et al. Contrast volume during primary percutaneous coronary intervention and subsequent contrastinduced nephropathy and mortality. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:170.

Aqeel I et al. Relative nephrotoxicity of different contrast media. Interv Cardiol Clin. 2014;3:349.

Idée JM et al. The role of gadolinium chelates in the mechanism of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: a critical

update. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2014;44:895.

Deo A et al. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: a population study examining the relationship of disease development

to gadolinium exposure. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;2:264.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration website. FDA drug safety communication: new warnings for using

gadolinium-based contrast agents in patients with kidney dysfunction.

www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm223966.htm. Published December 2010. Accessed June 13, 2015.

Solomon R et al. Contrast-induced acute kidney injury. Circulation. 2010;122:2451.

Massicotte A. Contrast medium-induced nephropathy:strategies for prevention. Pharmacotherapy. 2008;28:1140.

Pannu NM et al. Systematic review of the impact of N-acetylcysteine on contrast nephropathy. Kidney Int.

2004;65:1374.

Romano G et al. Contrast agents and renal cell apoptosis. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:2569.

Kshirsagar AV et al. N-acetylcysteine for the prevention of radiocontrast induced nephropathy: a meta-analysis

of prospective controlled trials. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:761.

Briguori C et al. Standard vs double dose of N-acetylcysteine to prevent contrast agent associated nephrotoxicity.

Eur Heart J. 2004;25:206.

Weisbord SD et al. Prevention of contrast-induced AKI: a review of published trials and the design of the

prevention of serious adverse events following angiography (PRESERVE) trial. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol.

2013;8:1618.

Majumdar SR et al. Forced euvolemic diuresis with mannitol and furosemide for prevention of contrast-induced

nephropathy in patients with CKD undergoing coronary angiography: a randomized controlled trial. Am J

Kidney Dis. 2009;54:602.

Bagshaw SM. Theophylline for prevention of contrast induced nephropathy: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1087.

Toso A et al. Usefulness of atorvastatin (80 mg) in prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with

chronic renal disease. Am J Cardiol. 2010;105:288.

Bouzas-Mosquera A et al. Statin therapy and contrast-induced nephropathy after primary angioplasty. Int J

Cardiol. 2009;134:430.

Spargias K. Ascorbic acid prevents contrast-mediated nephropathy in patients with renal dysfunction undergoing

coronary angiography or intervention. Circulation. 2004;110:2837.

Jo SH et al. N-acetylcysteine versus ascorbic acid for preventing contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with

renal insufficiency undergoing coronary angiography NASPI study—a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Am Heart J. 2009;157:576.

Baddour LM et al. Diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy, and management of complications: a statement for healthcare

.

.

professionals from the Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease, Council on

Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology, Stroke, and Cardiovascular

Surgery and Anesthesia, American Heart Association. Circulation. 2005;111:e394.

Mingeot-Leclercq M et al. Aminoglycosides: nephrotoxicity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43:1003.

Barclay ML et al. Once daily aminoglycoside therapy: is it less toxic than multiple daily doses and how should it

be monitored? Clin Pharmacokinet. 1999;36:89.

Swan SK. Aminoglycoside nephrotoxicity. Semin Nephrol. 1997;17:27.

Rybak MJ et al. Prospective evaluation of the effect of an aminoglycoside dosing regimen on rates of observed

nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43:1549.

González PM. Acute interstitial nephritis. Kidney Int. 2010;77:956.

Ray S. Proton pump inhibitors and acute interstitial nephritis. BMJ. 2010;341:c4412.

Blank ML et al. A nationwide nested case–controlstudy indicates an increased risk of acute interstitial nephritis

with proton pump inhibitor use. Kidney Int. 2014;86:837.

Naughton CA. Drug-induced nephrotoxicity. Am Fam Physician. 2008;78:743.

Rossert J. Drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis. Kidney Int. 2001;60:804.

Sierra F et al. Systematic review: proton pump inhibitor-associated acute interstitial nephritis. Aliment Pharmacol

Ther. 2007;26:545.

Goldfarb DS. In the clinic. Nephrolithiasis. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:ITC2.

Manthey DE et al. Nephrolithiasis. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2001;39:383.

Brent J. Current management of ethylene glycol poisoning. Drugs. 2001;61:979.

Frassetto L et al. Treatment and prevention of kidney stones: an update. Am Fam Physician. 2011;84:1234.

Hedges SJ et al. Evidence based treatment recommendations for uremic bleeding. Nat Clin Pract Nephrol.

2007;3:138.

Karellas C et al. A comparison of early versus late initiation of renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients

with acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2011;15:R72.

Cerda J et al. Modalities of continuous renal replacement therapy: technical and clinical considerations. Semin

Dial. 2009;22:114.

Churchwell MD et al. Drug dosing during continuous renal replacement therapy. Semin Dial. 2009;22:185.

Heintz BH et al. Antimicrobial dosing concepts and recommendations for critically ill adult patients receiving

continuous renal replacement therapy or intermittent hemodialysis. Pharmacotherapy. 2009;29:562.

Schetz M. Drug dosing in continuous renal replacement therapy: general rules. Curr Opin Crit Care.

2007;13:645.

Aronoff GR et al. Drug Prescribing in Renal Failure: Dosing Guidelines for Adults. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA:

American College of Physicians—American Society of Internal Medicine; 2007.

p. 650

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) occurs when there is progressive loss

of kidney function over a period of months to years to the point where

the kidneys can no longer remove wastes; concentrate urine; maintain

acid–base homeostasis; and regulate fluid, electrolytes, and other

important body functions.

Case 30-1 (Question 1)

Dialysis is a process that facilitates the removal of excess water and

solutes from the body, both of which accumulate as a result of

inadequate kidney function. Solutes from the blood are removed through

diffusion and convection. Accumulated water is removed by

ultrafiltration.

Case 30-1 (Question 1),

Figure 30-1

The ability of a dialyzer to remove solutes and water is determined by its

composition, pore size, surface area, and configuration.

Case 30-1 (Question 1),

Figure 30-1

Dialysate is an electrolyte solution that simulates plasma. The

concentration of electrolytes in dialysate can be manipulated to control

the diffusion of electrolytes from the blood into dialysate to maintain

homeostasis. Metabolic acidosis is controlled with the addition of

bicarbonate to dialysate.

Case 30-1 (Question 1),

Figure 30-1

Different types of vascular access are available: arteriovenous (AV)

fistula, AV graft, and double-lumen or tunneled catheters. An AV

fistula is preferred because of its longer survival rates and low rates of

complications.

Case 30-1 (Question 2)

Anticoagulation is necessary during hemodialysis (HD) to prevent blood

from clotting in the extracorporeal circuit. Several methods have been

used to provide adequate anticoagulation without increasing the risk of

bleeding.

Case 30-1 (Questions 3–5)

Complications can arise during HD. The most common complications

are hypotension and muscle cramps. Graft thrombosis and graft

infection are common chronic complications.

Case 30-1 (Questions 6–9),

Case 30-2 (Questions 1–2)

Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis is performed by instilling sterile

dialysate into the peritoneal cavity through a surgically placed resident

catheter. The solution dwells within the cavity for 4 to 8 hours, and then

it is drained and replaced with a fresh solution. This process of fill,

Case 30-3 (Question 1),

Figure 30-2

dwell, and drain is performed 3 to 4 times during the day, with a longer

dwell overnight.

The process of peritoneal dialysis (PD) is similar to HD; in this process,

however, the peritoneal membrane covering the abdominal contents

serves as an endogenous dialysis membrane, and the vasculature

embedded in the peritoneum serves as the blood supply. Fluid is

removed by manipulating the dextrose concentration in dialysate to

control the osmotic pressure gradient for fluid removal.

Case 30-3 (Question 1),

Figure 30-2

The most significant complication among patients having PD is

peritonitis. Empiric antibiotics can be administered by the intraperitoneal

(IP) route and must cover both gram-positive and gram-negative

organisms.

Case 30-3 (Questions 2, 4)

p. 651

p. 652

Other medications can be administered IP. Heparin can be added to

dialysate to prevent fibrin clots from forming and obstructing outflow

from the peritoneal cavity. Regular insulin can be administered IP to

patients with diabetes.

Case 30-3 (Questions 3, 7)

Prevention of catheter exit-site infections (and thus peritonitis) is the

primary goal of exit-site care. Routine care consists of hand cleansing

with antiseptics or antibacterialsoap before touching the exit site,

washing the exit site daily with antibacterialsoap, and use of

antimicrobial creams around the exit site.

Case 30-3 (Questions 5, 6)

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) occurs when there is progressive loss of kidney

function over a period of months to years to the point where the kidneys can no longer

remove wastes, concentrate urine, maintain acid–base homeostasis, and regulate fluid

and electrolytes and other important body functions. ESRD is classified under stage 5

chronic kidney disease (CKD), which refers to patients with an estimated glomerular

filtration rate (eGFR) less than 15 mL/minute/1.73 m2

, or those requiring dialysis or

transplantation.

1,2 Demographic characteristics of ESRD population are based

primarily on data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, because

patients with ESRD are eligible for Medicare benefits. Coverage for ESRD began in

1972, when Congress enacted the End-Stage Renal Disease Program as an

amendment to Medicare. Data from the ESRD program are reported annually by the

United States Renal Data System. According to the 2014 Annual Report, diabetes and

hypertension continue to be leading causes of ESRD.

3 Patients aged 45 years and

older account for the largest segment of the ESRD population. Racial differences in

the prevalence of ESRD persist. While prevalence of ESRD in Native Americans has

declined since 2000, prevalence rates remain much higher in Blacks/African

Americans than in other racial groups, at nearly twofold higher than Native

Americans, 2.5-fold higher than Asians, and fourfold higher than Whites.

3

In 2012 there were 636,905 prevalent cases of ESRD in the United States, an

increase of 3.7% from the previous year. Of these, 402,514 patients were treated by

hemodialysis (HD), 40,605 were on peritoneal dialysis (PD), and 17,305 kidney

transplantations were performed.

3 The number of kidney transplants has remained

stable since 2005. Recipients living with a functioning graft continue to grow,

reaching 186,303 in 2012 reflecting a 3.6% increase from 2011. However, the

shortage of donor kidneys and the existence of patients with ESRD, who are

unacceptable transplant recipients, sustain the demand for dialysis. Kidney

transplantation is further discussed in Chapter 34, Kidney and Liver Transplantation.

The two primary modes of dialysis therapy are HD and PD. Both HD and PD were

developed as methods for the removal of metabolic waste products across a

semipermeable membrane.

HD is an extracorporeal (dialysis membrane is outside of the body) process,

whereas PD uses the patient’s peritoneal membrane for the clearance of water and

solutes. Variations of PD include continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD)

and automated peritoneal dialysis (APD), an increasingly common modality that

permits greater patient flexibility with dialysis at home. Among the 443,119 dialysis

patients in the United States, 91% undergo HD.

3 Most of these patients receive

dialysis 3 times a week in a center designed primarily for stable, ambulatory patients

at either a hospital-based or a free-standing dialysis facility. Home HD accounts for

less than 1% of dialysis patients. Patients having PD are also managed through

dialysis centers for routine care, although less often than patients on HD. The most

frequent form of dialysis in children is APD. Several factors are considered in the

selection of the type of dialysis for each patient. Often, the overriding consideration

is the suitability of the procedure for the patient’s lifestyle. A patient who needs

flexibility and freedom from a rigid schedule may prefer PD versus HD to avoid the

necessity of being at a dialysis center 3 times weekly for a 3- to 4-hour dialysis

treatment. Other considerations include the availability of a vascular access site for

HD, a patient’s ability to perform self-care for dialysate exchanges with PD, or the

capability of the patient, parent, or caregiver to carry out APD at home.

Without dialysis or transplantation, patients with ESRD will die from the

metabolic complications of their renal failure. Survival on dialysis has improved

over the years. Since 1993, mortality rates have fallen across all renal replacement

modalities with a 28% reduction for HD patients, 47% reduction for PD patients, and

51% reduction for transplant patients.

3 While these rates are encouraging, only 54%

of HD patients and 65% of PD patients survive beyond 3 years after ESRD onset.

All-cause mortality rates are 6.1 to 7.8 times higher for dialysis patients compared to

the general population, and highest in the second and third months of dialysis.

Dialysis patients are expected to live one-third as long as people of the same age in

the general population. Transplant patients live longer with an estimated lifetime that

is 83% to 87% of the general population.

The rapid growth of the number of patients having dialysis calls attention to the

need for practitioners who understand the processes and therapies for these patients.

This chapter addresses the fundamental clinical aspects of both HD and PD,

including principles, complications, and management. Throughout the chapter,

reference will be made, when appropriate, to the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality

Initiative (K/DOQI) clinical practice guidelines developed by the National Kidney

Foundation.

4–6

HEMODIALYSIS

Principles and Transport Processes

Dialysis is a process that facilitates the removal of excess water and toxins from the

body, both of which accumulate as a result of inadequate kidney function. During HD,

a patient’s anticoagulated blood (circulated to the dialyzer from a vein in the arm)

and an electrolyte solution that simulates plasma (dialysate) are simultaneously

perfused through a dialyzer (artificial kidney) on opposite sides of a semipermeable

membrane. Solutes (e.g., metabolic waste products, toxins, potassium, and other

electrolytes) are removed from the patient’s blood by diffusing across concentration

gradients into the dialysate. The rate of removal of various solutes from the blood is

a function of blood and dialysate flow rates through the dialyzer, relative

concentration of each solute in the blood and dialysis solution (thus determining their

concentration gradients across the membrane), physical characteristics of the dialysis

membrane (e.g., total available surface area, thickness, and pore size), and properties

of the solute being removed (e.g., molecular size in daltons, molecular weight,

volume of distribution, and protein binding). Because blood and dialysate flow in

opposite directions through the dialyzer, the concentration gradient for each solute

across the membrane is amplified (Fig. 30-1). This principle is defined in greater

detail in the Dialyzer Characteristics section.

p. 652

p. 653

Comments

Search This Blog

Archive

Show more

Popular posts from this blog

TRIPASS XR تري باس

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

ZENOXIA 15 MG, Comprimé

VOXCIB 200 MG, Gélule

Kana Brax Laberax

فومي كايند

بعض الادويه نجد رموز عليها مثل IR ، MR, XR, CR, SR , DS ماذا تعني هذه الرموز

NIFLURIL 700 MG, Suppositoire adulte

Antifongiques مضادات الفطريات

Popular posts from this blog

علاقة البيبي بالفراولة بالالفا فيتو بروتين

التغيرات الخمس التي تحدث للجسم عند المشي

إحصائيات سنة 2020 | تعداد سكَان دول إفريقيا تنازليا :

ما هو الليمونير للأسنان ؟

ACUPAN 20 MG, Solution injectable

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

الام الظهر

VOXCIB 200 MG, Gélule

ميبستان

Popular posts from this blog

TRIPASS XR تري باس

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

Popular posts from this blog

TRIPASS XR تري باس

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

ZENOXIA 15 MG, Comprimé

VOXCIB 200 MG, Gélule

Kana Brax Laberax

فومي كايند

بعض الادويه نجد رموز عليها مثل IR ، MR, XR, CR, SR , DS ماذا تعني هذه الرموز

NIFLURIL 700 MG, Suppositoire adulte

Antifongiques مضادات الفطريات

Popular posts from this blog

Kana Brax Laberax

TRIPASS XR تري باس

PARANTAL 100 MG, Suppositoire بارانتال 100 مجم تحاميل

الكبد الدهني Fatty Liver

الم اسفل الظهر (الحاد) الذي يظهر بشكل مفاجئ bal-agrisi

SEDALGIC 37.5 MG / 325 MG, Comprimé pelliculé [P] سيدالجيك 37.5 مجم / 325 مجم ، قرص مغلف [P]

نمـو الدمـاغ والتطـور العقـلي لـدى الطفـل

CELEPHI 200 MG, Gélule

أخطر أنواع المخدرات فى العالم و الشرق الاوسط

Archive

Show more