in a randomized, controlled trial, found that the use of variceal ligation instead
of sclerotherapy had a lower failure rate (4% vs. 15%; p = 0.02) and a lower
transfusion requirement (p = 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found
in mortality. Adverse effects (e.g., aspiration pneumonia, esophageal bleeding,
ulceration, and chest pain) occurred in 28% of patients receiving sclerotherapy and
14% with ligation (RR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1–3.5; p = 0.03).
found that the rate of re-bleeding was lower in the EVL
group than in the sclerotherapy group (6.4% vs. 20.8%; p <0.05). EVL is the
recommended form of therapy for acute esophageal variceal bleeding, although
sclerotherapy may be used in the acute setting if ligation is technically difficult.
Endoscopic treatments are best used in combination with pharmacologic therapy,
which preferably should be started before endoscopy.
Guidelines Committee and the Practice Parameters Committee of the American
College of Gastroenterology (ACG) on the Prevention and Management of
and Variceal Hemorrhage in Cirrhosis recommend that for the control and
management of acute hemorrhage, the combination of vasoconstrictive pharmacologic
therapy and variceal ligation is the preferred approach.
immediately be treated with octreotide for 3 to 5 days, and EVL to control the
Balloon tamponade is used to control bleeding by direct compression to the site of
origin in massive hemorrhage cases (Table 25-2). It is important to remember that
balloon tamponade is only a temporary measure and can cause pressure necrosis
after 48 to 72 hours. Thus, the balloon should be deflated after 12 to 24 hours.
Deflation and removal of the tube can result in removal of the fibrin scab at the
bleeding site, resulting in re-bleeding. Balloon tamponade will achieve temporary
control of the bleeding and allow time for other measures (e.g., EVL or
sclerotherapy) to be undertaken.
ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT MODALITIES
Transjugular Intrahepatic Portal Systemic Shunt
Although the combination of pharmacotherapy (octreotide, terlipressin, or
somatostatin) and endoscopic procedures (EVL or sclerotherapy) has been shown to
be beneficial in controlling acute bleeding, re-bleeding episodes can occur.
responders to initial therapy may require further intervention to lower portal pressure
122 conducted a prospective, multicenter trial comparing distal
splenorenal shunt (DSRS) to TIPS for variceal bleeding refractory to medical
treatment with β-blockers and endoscopic therapy. Patients with Child–Turcotte–
Pugh class A and class B cirrhosis and refractory variceal bleeding were randomly
assigned to DSRS or TIPS. No significant differences were found in survival at 2 and
5 years (DSRS, 81% and 62%; TIPS, 88% and 61%, respectively). Thrombosis,
stenosis, and re-intervention rates were significantly higher in the TIPS group
(DSRS, 11%; TIPS, 82%; p < 0.001). Re-bleeding, encephalopathy, ascites, need for
transplantation, quality of life, and costs did not significantly differ between
122 TIPS has the advantage of being less invasive and faster than surgical
portal systemic shunts. Long-term patency of the TIPS remains problematic (Table
25-2). TIPS can be used as a bridge to liver transplantation, and might be an effective
option for nonsurgical patients or those with advanced cirrhosis (Child–Turcotte–
Pugh class C) with recurrent bleeding, uncontrolled by pharmacologic and
86,92,110,123,124 TIPS would be an option for C.V. if EVL and
Surgical creation of a portacaval shunt has been effective in reducing portal pressure
and in preventing recurrent bleeding. These shunts, however, are associated with a
high incidence of hepatic encephalopathy and may exacerbate hepatic parenchymal
dysfunction by shunting blood away from the liver. Mesocaval shunts and distal
splenorenal shunts are also effective in preventing variceal re-bleeding and may be
associated with a lower incidence of hepatic encephalopathy.
INFECTION PROPHYLAXIS: SHORT-TERM ANTIBIOTICS
CASE 25-2, QUESTION 4: Should C.V. receive prophylaxis for bacterial infections?
Variceal hemorrhage is a risk factor for the development of severe bacterial
infections, which increase mortality.
92 Short-term administration of antibiotics for the
prevention of bacterial infections in patients with variceal hemorrhage has
demonstrated favorable results.
In a prospective, randomized trial comparing
norfloxacin 400 mg BID for 7 days (n = 60) with no treatment controls (n = 59), the
norfloxacin group had a significantly lower incidence of spontaneous bacterial
peritonitis (SBP, 3.3% vs. 16.9%; p < 0.05); although the decrease in mortality
(6.6% vs. 11.8%) did not reach statistical significance.
of infections caused by quinolone-resistant bacteria, Fernandez et al.
oral norfloxacin versus IV ceftriaxone in the prophylaxis against bacterial infection
in cirrhotic patients with GI hemorrhage. Patients were randomly assigned to oral
norfloxacin 400 mg BID or IV ceftriaxone 1 g/day for 7 days. Antibiotics were
initiated after emergency endoscopy and within 12 hours of hospital admission. The
probability of developing proven infections (26% vs. 11%; p < 0.03), and
bacteremia or spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (12% vs. 2%, p < 0.03) was
significantly higher in patients receiving norfloxacin as compared with ceftriaxone.
No significant difference was seen between groups in mortality at 10 days.
Cochrane review of 12 trials evaluating the role of antibiotic prophylaxis with
placebo or no antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent bacterial infections in cirrhotic
patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding reported that antibiotic prophylaxis was
associated with a significant decrease in mortality from bacterial infections (RR,
The AASLD guidelines recommend 7 days of antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention
of SBP in patients with variceal hemorrhage with oral norfloxacin (400 mg BID) or
ceftriaxone IV (1 g/day; when oral administration is not possible).
treated with norfloxacin 400 mg orally once daily (dose adjusted for creatinine
clearance of 30 mL/minute), or ceftriaxone 1 g/day for 7 days to prevent SBP.
Preventing the initial occurrence of variceal bleeding is referred to as primary
prevention or primary prophylaxis. Pharmacologic prophylaxis is aimed at reducing
the HVPG to ≤12 mm Hg, or a decrease from baseline of ≥20%.
129 none of the patients with HVPG ≤12 mm Hg bled from portal
hypertensive-related causes as compared to 42% in the HVPG >12 mm Hg group. In
addition, only one of the six patients with a HVPG less <12 mm Hg as compared with
16 (of 24) in the HVPG >12 mm Hg group died during the study period (p < 0.06).
130 confirmed that a fall of HVPG by 20% or more from
baseline was associated with a decreased risk of variceal bleeding (6% vs. 45%; p =
Nonselective β-adrenergic blockers decrease portal pressure through a reduction in
portal venous inflow as a result of a decrease in cardiac output (β1
blockade) and splanchnic blood flow (β2
resulting in a decrease in portal pressure. Usual starting dosages of propranolol are
10 mg 3 times a day, or nadolol 20 mg daily. Selective β-blockers (e.g., atenolol and
metoprolol) have little effect on mesenteric arterioles and have not been shown to be
effective in primary prophylaxis.
Propranolol or nadolol, given in dosages to reduce the resting heart rate to 55 to
60 beats/minute or by 25%, have been shown to prevent or delay the first episode of
β-blockers are considered first-line drug therapy in the prevention of variceal
hemorrhage based on numerous randomized, placebo-controlled trials and metaanalyses.
110,132 For example, Pascal et al.
133 conducted a prospective, randomized,
multicenter, single-blinded trial of propranolol compared with placebo in the
prevention of bleeding in patients with large esophageal varices without previous
bleeding. Patients received either propranolol or placebo, with the endpoints of the
study being bleeding and death. The dosage of propranolol was progressively
increased to decrease the heart rate by 20% to 25%. The cumulative percentages of
patients free of bleeding 2 years after inclusion in the study (74% vs. 39%; p < 0.05)
and cumulative 2-year survival (72% vs. 51%; p < 0.05) were higher in the
propranolol compared to the placebo group.
134 conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing
EVL plus propranolol with EVL alone as primary prophylaxis for prevention of first
variceal bleeding among patients with high-risk varices. The mean duration of
follow-up for both groups was about 12.2 months (±10.7 months). EVL was
performed at 2-week intervals until obliteration of varices. Propranolol was
administered at a dosage sufficient to reduce heart rate to 55 beats/minute or 25%
reduction from baseline, and continued after obliteration of varices. No significant
differences were seen in the rates of bleeding and survival between groups, although
more patients in the EVL alone group had recurrence of varices (p = 0.03).
In a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of
propranolol for the primary prevention of variceal hemorrhage, Abraczinskas et al.
No comments:
Post a Comment
اكتب تعليق حول الموضوع