Search This Blog

468x60.

728x90

 


89

In patients with normal renal function, piperacillin is primarily excreted

unchanged by the kidney with a clearance of 2.6 mL/minute/kg, and a half-life of

approximately 1 hour.

90,91 Doses of piperacillin/tazobactam can be as high as 4.5 g

every 6 hours for the treatment of serious Pseudomonas species infections. In patients

with ESRD, mean piperacillin clearance and half-life values are 0.7 mL/minute/kg

and 3.3 hours, respectively.

90–92 Although these parameters are significantly different,

they are less than those expected for a drug primarily cleared by the kidneys,

suggesting that some other compensatory mechanism for elimination must be present.

Piperacillin is partially cleared by biliary excretion, a route of elimination that is

increased in patients with renal failure.

92,93 Therefore, aggressive dosage reductions

in M.H. are unnecessary. An appropriate dose of piperacillin/tazobactam for M.H.

would be 3.375 g every 8 hours. Widely used drug references such as Facts and

Comparisons can be used for dosing guidelines for drugs commonly used in patients

with renal failure.

45

Vancomycin

PHARMACOKINETIC DOSAGE CALCULATIONS

CASE 31-5, QUESTION 2: In addition to the aforementioned regimen for M.H., vancomycin therapy is

initiated at 500 mg every 24 hours to cover the possibility of an infection resistant to antistaphylococcal

penicillins, such as nafcillin. Is this an appropriate dosing regimen for M.H.?

Vancomycin is a bactericidal antibiotic with excellent activity against most grampositive organisms such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and

Streptococcus species, including some isolates of Enterococcus species. It is used

empirically in febrile neutropenic patients because the incidence of infection

secondary to resistant organisms is much greater in this patient population. However,

cases of vancomycin-resistant enterococci have emerged at rates as high as 50%,

raising concern and reducing its empiric use.

94

Vancomycin is poorly absorbed by the oral route and must be administered IV

when used to treat systemic infections. As with many other antibiotics, vancomycin

primarily is cleared by the kidneys.

95 Significant toxicities have been associated with

elevated serum concentrations, making careful dosing modification in renal failure

necessary.

96

As with the aminoglycosides, pharmacokinetic calculations can be used to

individualize a dosing regimen to produce the desired peak and trough plasma levels.

Unlike the aminoglycosides, the therapeutic range for vancomycin is less clear.

Normally, doses are designed to achieve peak levels of 25 to 40 mg/L and trough

levels of 10 to 15 mg/L.

97,98 The correlation between vancomycin toxicity (e.g.,

ototoxicity) and plasma levels is not well defined. Some clinicians have suggested,

however, that plasma levels of 80 mg/L or more may correlate with auditory

dysfunction.

Vancomycin has an elimination half-life of 3 to 9 hours in patients with normal

renal function.

99 This increases to 129 to 189 hours in patients with ESRD.

100–102

Using pharmacokinetic principles and considering that the plasma clearance of

vancomycin is approximately 60% to 70% of CrCl

97 and the Vd averages 0.7

L/kg,

97,99,103

the estimated Vdvanco and Clvanco can be calculated using the following

equation:

Based on estimated values for Clvanco and Vdvanco

, the elimination rate constant

can be calculated using the following equation:

p. 674

p. 675

Because M.H.’s estimated peak concentration is less than 40 mg/L and her trough

falls within the range of 10 to 15 mg/L, the starting dose of 500 mg every 24 hours is

appropriate for M.H.

Routine monitoring of plasma vancomycin concentrations in patients with normal

renal function is controversial because the likelihood that toxicity will develop in

this group is relatively low. However, in patients with renal failure, such as M.H., it

is advisable to measure vancomycin levels several days after initiation of therapy to

ensure that they are within an acceptable range.

99,101,102,104 This is prudent if an

extended course of therapy is anticipated. Vancomycin is usually infused over the

course of 60 minutes.

HEMODIALYSIS OF VANCOMYCIN

CASE 31-5, QUESTION 3: M.H.’s renal function begins to deteriorate to the point where she requires

hemodialysis. How should her regimen now be altered?

Patients with ESRD may have measurable vancomycin levels for up to 3 weeks

after a single dose despite conventional hemodialysis.

102 This suggests that the ability

of these patients to eliminate vancomycin is minimal and that little of the drug is

removed by conventional hemodialysis. The elimination half-life for vancomycin in

these individuals averages 5 to 7 days, which is consistent with a residual

vancomycin clearance of 3 to 4 mL/minute.

100–102 Only about 5% of vancomycin is

metabolized hepatically in patients with normal renal function.

Conventional hemodialysis removes about 7% of vancomycin during a typical 4-

hour dialysis run.

105 The elimination half-life on and off dialysis and plasma levels of

the drug before and after hemodialysis do not differ significantly. The poor removal

of vancomycin by conventional hemodialysis is attributable to its large MW of 1,400.

Patients receiving conventional hemodialysis are typically given a single, 1-g dose

every 7 to 10 days.

99,102,104 Based on M.H.’s estimated Vd of 49 L, this dose will

produce an initial peak plasma level of approximately 20 mg/L. If vancomycin is

administered weekly, steady-state peak and trough levels of 40 and 16 mg/L,

respectively, would be predicted.

Vancomycin is removed to a greater extent by high-flux hemodialysis than by

conventional hemodialysis. As a result, more frequent dosing is necessary to maintain

therapeutic vancomycin concentrations. High-flux dialysis clearance of vancomycin

using the Fresenius polysulfone dialyzer is 45 to 160 mL/minute and varies with

membrane surface area.

60,106 Up to 50% of a dose of vancomycin is removed in 4

hours by high-flux hemodialysis compared with 6.9% using conventional dialysis. A

rebound phenomenon after dialysis suggests that the total amount of drug removed

may be less than initially reported.

107,108

In any case, the efficiency of high-flux

procedures in removing vancomycin is greater than that of conventional dialysis.

Therefore, plasma levels should be monitored carefully in these patients, and the

necessity for postdialysis replacement doses of around 500 mg (~10–15 mg/kg)

should be anticipated.

Caspofungin

DOSING

CASE 31-5, QUESTION 4: M.H. continues to be febrile despite her triple antimicrobial regimen.

Caspofungin is started empirically for potential fungal infections. In addition, pentamidine is begun to cover

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia. How should caspofungin be administered in patients such as M.H. with renal

dysfunction?

HEMODIALYSIS OF CASPOFUNGIN

Caspofungin is an echinocandin antifungal agent that is slowly metabolized by

hydrolysis and N-acetylation, with little being excreted unchanged in the urine.

109

Caspofungin is not removed significantly by hemodialysis or continuous

hemofiltration. No dosage adjustment is necessary in patients with renal failure or on

renal replacement therapy.

110 The maintenance dose needs to be reduced in the setting

of moderate liver failure however.

CASE 31-5, QUESTION 5: What factors need to be considered when other antifungal agents are used in

patients with kidney disease?

Amphotericin B is a polyene antifungal agent that has activity against a wide

variety of fungi. Amphotericin B is extensively distributed into the peripheral tissue,

and has a long elimination half-life of approximately 15 days.

111,112 There is no

significant change in the disposition of amphotericin B in patients with liver or

kidney disease. The utility of amphotericin B has been limited due to its

nephrotoxicity.

113 Lipid-based formulations are associated with a lower incidence of

nephrotoxicity and other systemic side effects.

114 Triazole antifungal agents (e.g.,

fluconazole, posaconazole, voriconazole) or an echinocandin class (e.g.,

anidulafungin, caspofungin, micafungin) are alternative choices that are not

potentially nephrotoxic, nor do they need to be dose adjusted in the setting of renal

dysfunction (with the exception of fluconazole). The oral as opposed to the IV

formulation of voriconazole and posaconazole should be used in the setting of renal

dysfunction or for patients with a CrCl of less than 50 mL/minute to prevent

accumulation of sulfobutyl ether β-cyclodextrin, the solvent vehicle found in the IV

formulation.

115

Cefazolin

PERITONEAL DIALYSIS

CASE 31-6

QUESTION 1: M.J. is a 65-year-old woman with chronic kidney disease awaiting a kidney transplant. She

has been managed with PD for the past 8 years. She presents with a cloudy effluent and abdominal pain.

Analysis of the effluent reveals a WBC count of 323/μL and gram-positive cocci and clusters on Gram stain.

The patient has a history of S. aureus peritonitis that was readily treated with cefazolin previously. The patient

has no allergies, and weighs 52 kg. How should M.J.’s PD-related infection be managed?

p. 675

p. 676

Gram-positive cocci such as S. aureus are common causes of PD-related

infections. The selection of empiric antibiotics should be made based on the patient’s

and program’s history of microorganisms and sensitivities. A first-generation

cephalosporin such as cefazolin would be a reasonable choice for M.J. Programs

with a high rate of methicillin-resistant organisms should use vancomycin.

IP antibiotics can be given with each exchange (continuous dosing). In this

situation, a single 500-mg/L loading dose of cefazolin is given followed by a

maintenance dose of 125 mg/L with subsequent exchanges. Antibiotics can also be

given intermittently (once daily per exchange). With intermittent dosing, the

antibiotic-containing dialysis solution should dwell for at least 6 hours to allow for

adequate absorption. Cefazolin 15 mg/kg (rounded off to 750 mg) is typically given

in one exchange. For patients on automated PD, the dose of cefazolin is 20 mg/kg

every day in a long-day dwell. For patients with residual renal function (e.g., >100

mL/day of urine output), empirically, the dose is increased by 25%. The management

of PD-related infections and dosing of various antibiotics is discussed in the

International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis guidelines.

116

Phenytoin

PROTEIN BINDING

CASE 31-7

QUESTION 1: R.S., a 24-year-old man with ESRD from rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis, is treated by

hemodialysis 3 times weekly. He has a 7-year history of generalized tonic–clonic seizures and has been treated

with phenytoin. He presents to the ED after having had a seizure lasting about 5 minutes. His mother states that

he ran out of phenytoin 4 weeks ago. Because his plasma phenytoin concentration on admission was less than

2.5 mg/L, R.S. is given an IV loading dose of fosphenytoin: 15 mg/kg in 30 minutes. Additional admission

laboratory work includes the following:

SCr, 8.6 mg/dL

BUN, 110 mg/dL

Potassium, 5.4 mEq/L

Calcium, 9 mg/dL

Albumin, 2.9 g/dL

Eight hours after administration, his phenytoin level is 5 mg/L. Is this levelsubtherapeutic?

R.S. has severe renal disease, which will affect the total (bound plus free)

phenytoin concentration achieved and how this concentration is interpreted.

Decreased plasma protein binding will result in lower measured total phenytoin

concentrations, and the calculated apparent Vd may increase. In patients with normal

renal function, approximately 90% of the measured phenytoin is bound to albumin,

and 10% is free. The free fraction of phenytoin is increased to about 20% to 25% in

patients with uremia.

11,117–121 Because the free fraction for phenytoin is increased in

patients with uremia, lower plasma concentrations will produce therapeutic effects

that will be equivalent to those produced by higher phenytoin concentrations in

patients with normal renal function.

8,122 Phenytoin is an acidic drug that is bound

primarily to albumin. A number of mechanisms have been proposed that account for

the decreased binding, including (a) decreased albumin concentration, (b)

accumulation of uremic by-products that displace acidic drugs from their binding

sites, and (c) alteration in the conformation or structure of albumin in uremic patients,

resulting in a reduced number of binding sites or decreased affinity for drugs (see

Chapter 60, Seizure Disorders). Other acidic drugs with altered protein binding in

renal disease are listed in Table 31-1.

Figure 31-2 Plasma phenytoin concentrations in uremic (°) and nonuremic (•) patients after 250 mg of intravenous

(IV) phenytoin. (Reprinted with permission from LetteriJM et al. Diphenylhydantoin metabolism in uremia. N Engl

J Med. 1971;285:648. Copyright © 2001 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.)

Figure 31-2 illustrates changes in phenytoin levels when uremic and nonuremic

patients are given equivalent doses.

123

The following equation should be used to correct for R.S.’s altered binding owing

to his renal dysfunction and hypoalbuminemia

120

:

where Cp′ is the measured plasma concentration reported by the laboratory, and

CpNormal Binding

is the corrected plasma concentration that would be seen if the patient

had normal renal function and normal albumin. Alpha (α) is the normal free fraction

(0.1), P′ is the patient’s serum albumin, and PNL

is normal albumin (4.4 g/dL). The

factor 0.48 was derived from patients on hemodialysis and represents the decreased

affinity of phenytoin for albumin.

For R.S., a total plasma phenytoin concentration of 5 mg/L is comparable to 13

mg/L in a patient without renal failure. Because this falls within the phenytoin’s

therapeutic range of 10 to 20 mg/L, his measured level is not subtherapeutic.

The factor 0.48 should be used only to estimate changes in protein binding for

patients with ESRD receiving hemodialysis. Data for patients with moderate renal

disease are limited, and it is unclear what changes exist in the binding of phenytoin to

albumin.

118 For patients with normal or moderate renal impairment, the following

equation should be used only if the serum albumin is low; the factor 0.48 should be

omitted:

Fosphenytoin, a prodrug of phenytoin, does not need to be dissolved in propylene

glycol, and therefore can be administered more quickly. This offers an important

advantage for seizures that must be controlled quickly. In patients with renal failure,

the conversion of fosphenytoin to phenytoin was equally efficient in patients with

renal disease and healthy subjects.

124 Once fosphenytoin is converted to phenytoin,

the impact of renal disease on protein binding is expected to be similar to that seen

with phenytoin and thus the same considerations should be made for patients with

renal failure.

p. 676

p. 677

EFFECT OF RENAL FAILURE ON METABOLIZED

DRUGS

Meperidine

CASE 31-8

QUESTION 1: F.G., a 56-year-old woman, is admitted for a cervical laminectomy. She has a history of

chronic kidney disease (CrCl 20 mL/minute) and arrhythmias that are treated with amiodarone. Her admission

laboratory values are as follows:

SCr, 4.4 mg/dL

BUN, 66 mg/dL

Hematocrit, 34%

Hemoglobin, 12.6 g/dL

After surgery, she complains of severe pain and is treated with meperidine 50 to 100 mg intramuscularly

every 3 to 4 hours. Three days postoperatively, F.G. experiences a generalized tonic–clonic seizure. She has no

history of seizures. What might be responsible for this sudden event?

Meperidine is a narcotic analgesic commonly used to control acute pain. It is

metabolized hepatically via N-demethylation to normeperidine, a metabolite known

to accumulate in renal insufficiency.

15,125 Although meperidine has both CNS

excitatory and depressant properties, normeperidine is a very potent CNS stimulant

that can cause seizures in patients with renal failure who are receiving multiple doses

of the parent drug.

126 Patients with renal dysfunction given merperidine experience

more neurologic effects.

126 Because the renal clearance of normeperidine correlates

significantly with CrCl, renal dysfunction can lead to its accumulation, resulting in

neurologic toxicity. The normeperidine to meperidine plasma concentration ratio was

consistently higher in patients with renal failure, averaging 2.0 compared with a

mean of 0.6 for patients with good renal function.

126 Table 31-3 lists examples of

additional drugs that have active or toxic metabolites that may accumulate in renal

disease.

Narcotic Analgesics

CASE 31-8, QUESTION 2: Are the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of other narcotic analgesics

altered in patients with renal insufficiency?

MORPHINE

The pharmacokinetic disposition of morphine does not appear to be altered in

patients with renal failure

127

; however, its active metabolite, morphine-6-

glucuronide, as well as its principal metabolite, morphine-3-glucuronide, do

accumulate in renal disease. The elimination half-life of morphine-6-glucuronide

increases from 3 to 4 hours in normal subjects to 89 to 136 hours in subjects with

renal failure.

128 This metabolite penetrates the blood–brain barrier more readily, has

a greater affinity for CNS receptors, and has analgesic activity that is 3.7 times

greater than morphine.

129 Therefore, accumulation of morphine-6-glucuronide may be

responsible for the morphine-induced narcosis reported in patients with severe renal

disease.

32,33

CODEINE

Other analgesics that have been associated with CNS toxicity in patients with renal

failure include codeine, propoxyphene, and dihydrocodeine.

125 The disposition of

orally administered codeine does not appear to be altered in renal failure; however,

there have been case reports of codeine-induced narcosis.

130 Although the dose of

codeine did not exceed 120 mg/day, CNS and respiratory depression persisted for up

to 4 days after discontinuing codeine and initiating naloxone administration. The

elimination half-life of codeine is prolonged in patients on chronic hemodialysis.

Although the Vd of codeine was twice as large, the total clearance was not

significantly decreased.

131 A lower initial dose should be used because codeine is

metabolized to morphine.

Table 31-3

Drugs with Active or Toxic Metabolites Excreted by the Kidney

Drug Metabolite

Acetohexamide Hydroxyhexamide

Allopurinol Oxypurinol

Bupropion Threo/erythro-hydrobupropion

Cefotaxime Desacetylcefotaxime

Chlorpropamide Hydroxy metabolites

Clofibrate Chlorphenoxyisobutyrate

Cyclophosphamide 4-Ketocyclophosphamide

Daunorubicin Daunorubicinol

Meperidine Normeperidine

Methyldopa Methyl-O-sulfate-α-methyldopamine

Midazolam α-Hydroxymidazolam

Morphine Morphine-3-glucuronide

Morphine-6-glucuronide

Phenylbutazone Oxyphenbutazone

Primidone Phenobarbital

Procainamide N-acetylprocainamide (NAPA)

Propoxyphene Norpropoxyphene

Rifampicin Deacetylated metabolites

Sodium nitroprusside Thiocyanate

Sulfonamides Acetylated metabolites

Tramadol O-Demethyl-N-demethyltramadol

HYDROMORPHONE

Hydromorphone is metabolized in the liver to hydromorphone-3-glucuronide,

dihydroisomorphone, dihydromorphine, and small amounts of hydromorphone-3-

sulfate, norhydromorphone, and nordihydroisomorphone.

132 All metabolites that are

eliminated are excreted by the kidneys. Hydromorphone can be used in patients with

renal failure; however, smaller initial doses may be warranted.

131

Enoxaparin

CASE 31-8, QUESTION 3: Because F.G. is not ambulating well after her surgery, her physician would like

to initiate deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis with enoxaparin. Are there any dosing considerations for enoxaparin

in this patient?

Enoxaparin is a low MW heparin that is used to prevent and treat various

thromboembolic disorders, such as deep venous thrombosis, unstable angina, and

non–Q wave myocardial infarction. The kidneys play a major role in the clearance of

enoxaparin,

133 and a higher incidence of bleeding complications is associated

p. 677

p. 678

with the use of enoxaparin in patients with renal dysfunction.

134 The elimination

half-life of enoxaparin is prolonged in patients with ESRD, although the other

pharmacokinetic parameters are similar to those in healthy subjects.

135,136 The

increased incidence of bleeding complications cannot be completely attributed to

pharmacokinetic changes, but may also be related to the effects of enoxaparin on

antifactor IIa and antithrombin III, as well as the effects of uremia on hemostasis.

137

Enoxaparin should be used cautiously in patients with a CrCl less than 30

mL/minute, with a recommended lower dosage of 30 mg subcutaneously daily.

Although monitoring of the anticoagulant effect by anti-Xa activity is not necessary in

clinically stable patients, it may be warranted in patients with renal dysfunction as

well as in those who have other factors that may increase the risk of bleeding

complications.

ASSESSING RENAL FUNCTION IN THE ELDERLY

Renal function declines physiologically with advancing age and as the result of

comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes.

138 This decrease in renal function

can have significant consequences on drug excretion, metabolism, and the potential

for adverse drug reactions, particularly in the elderly population that is often

prescribed multiple medications.

139 Antithrombotic and antidiabetic drugs are highrisk medications that are often implicated as a cause for hospitalizations due to

adverse drug events in elderly patients.

140 Sulfonylurea antidiabetic agents such as

glyburide that are eliminated primarily by the kidneys can lead to prolonged

hypoglycemia in patients with decreased renal function.

141

In addition, metformin

should be used with caution in patients with kidney dysfunction due to the increased

risk for lactic acidosis.

Formulas that estimate renal function use the serum creatinine. In elderly adults, a

low serum creatinine may not always be indicative of normal renal function. Older

adults tend to have lower muscle mass than younger people, and a low serum

creatinine may not be indicative of normal renal function, but rather reduced muscle

mass. Differences in the estimated GFR between the MDRD and Cockcroft–Gault

formulas may result in discordant dosing recommendations in an elderly

population.

No comments:

Post a Comment

اكتب تعليق حول الموضوع

mcq general

 

Search This Blog